Design Steam Path Bucket Tip Leakage Steam Deflectors (Spill Strips) Packing Leakage Packing Ring...

Post on 16-Dec-2015

231 views 1 download

Transcript of Design Steam Path Bucket Tip Leakage Steam Deflectors (Spill Strips) Packing Leakage Packing Ring...

Design Steam Path

Bucket Tip LeakageSteam Deflectors

(Spill Strips)

Packing Leakage

Packing Ring

Rotating Blade

Turbine Rotor

Rotor Wheel

Stationary Diaphragm

Stationary Blade

Typical Impulse Steam Path (i.e. GE, Hitachi, Toshiba, etc.)

Design Steam Path

Reduced Bucket Tip Leakage form the Vortex Shedder

Vortex Shedder Shape Applied to the Spill Strip only on the 1st up stream tooth

Reduced Packing Leakage

Guardian Packing Ring

Rotating Blade

Turbine Rotor

Rotor Wheel

Stationary Diaphragm

Stationary Blade

Typical Impulse Steam Path With TPL’s Advanced Seals

Conventional Spill Strip

SteamFlow

Rotor

Stationary Cylinder

Typical Reaction Steam Path (i.e. Westinghouse, ABB, Mitsubishi, Kraftwork Union) uses inserted Seal Strips

Typical Efficiency Losses per Stage for General Electric Turbines

Nozzle Secondary Loss15%

Root Leakage4%

Blade Secondary Loss15%

Rotation3%

Blade Profile15%

Carryover4%

Tip Leakage22%

Shaft Packing Leakage7%

Nozzle Profile15%

What Can Cause Rub’s• Misalignment, Alignment is Critical for all

current seal Designs• Balancing• Thermal Distortion• Harmonics• Bearing Oil Whip• Steam Whirl• Generator Transients• Incorrect Operation of the Boiler, Condenser,

Generator, or Extractions• Improper Starting and Loading Procedures for

the Turbine Generator

Rotating Shaft

Conventional SealIn a Rubbing Condition

Steam Flow

Spring Tension

Practical Application Concerns

•If a rub does occur there is a permanent loss of seal efficiency

•Springs do afford very little give or release if a rub conditions does happen

•Conventional tooth material has a relative high coefficient of friction.

•A rub can result in a hot spot which could lead to rotor bluing, scoring, or cutting. Worst case a bowed rotor.

•Hard and prolonged contact of the seal in a rub can result in a heat effected zone on the rotor increasing the possibility of a hydrogen embrittled area.

•Conventional tooth material mushrooms increasing the discharge area of the seal. This adds to a greater efficiency loss

Turbine Rotor

What Occurs During RubsFor Other then Guardian Designed Seals

Guardian Seal

Rotating Shaft

Steam Flow

Spring Tension

TURBINE ROTOR

Guardian Seals

Theory Behind Design

•Prevents damage to conventional seal in any rub situation

•No stationary fit modifications required

•Works in any OEM designed turbine

•Will not cause bowed rotors

•Works in any Labyrinth Seal RingLocation or Application

•Works in any steam condition

•Works in any Pressure condition

•Extends Seal Efficiency Life

•Extends unit Heat Rate between Overhauls

•Improves unit reliability

•Limits seal degradation

TURBINE ROTOR

Rotating Shaft

In a Rub ConditionGuardian Seal

Steam Flow

Spring Tension

Guardian SealsPractical Application

•Lighter coil springs lessen radial forces only during startup

•The Guardian Post contacts the rotor first and prevents damage to the conventional teeth

•When rubs do occur with the Guardian they do not grow in intensity as with conventional materials or Brush Seals

•Conventional teeth still maintain factory radial Clearance during and after the rub occurs

•Guardian Post Material with its low coefficient of friction and long wearing characteristics prevents damage to the rotor body even during extreme rub conditions.

•Rubs during startup are proven not to cause rotor instability and/or higher bearing vibration

•Long term rubs due to misalignment have been proven not to cause any adverse effects in turbine operations.

•The Guardian Seal Can Not remain in a Retracted position. Thus eliminates this potential for major efficiency losses due to this situation

Laboratory Hard Rub Test

• Standard Tooth • Guardian with Standard Teeth

Test Procedure : Rotor Spinning at 3600 RPM, Seal pushed downward against the rotor with

5,000 lbs. of force for 40 minutes

• Note the discoloration cased by hard rubbing which generated intense heat at the tooth tips

• Note only light contact because of the Guardian Seal Protection

Test Rotor

Before Cleaning

• Guardian transferred a protective layer of Proprietary Material to the rotor.

• Proprietary Material rubbing on Proprietary Material has an extremely low coefficient of friction.

• Low coefficient of friction means very little heat generated by contact

After Partial Cleaning

• No Scoring or Grooving on rotor where the Guardian seal contacted the rotor.

• No heat effected zone where the Guardian Seal contacted the rotor.

• No change in rotor hardness where the Guardian seal contacted the rotor

BRG # 2 HP-IP

Turbine ran without oil, there was ≈ 1/8” of babbit prior to accident. The rotor dropped straight down and ran on the seals

N3 Grv 5

HP-IP

• This gland is adjacent to the #2 Bearing in the previous slide

N3 Grv6

N3 Grv5

HP-IP

Note Oil Deflector damage to rotor, No damage where the Guardian Posts made contact to rotor, it only polished the rotor. Even the conventional teeth did not cause any damage because of the protection provided by the Guardian Posts

N3 Grv 6 HP-IP

This is the bottom center segment from N3 Grv 6, Note the minor damage to the Guardian Post and conventional teeth. The packing ended up supporting the weight of the rotor during the accident.

Guardian Post

Conventional Teeth

Bottom Segment

Bottom center segment view, Note minimal damage to Guardian Post and conventional teeth

N3 Grv 6 HP-IP

Opposite end view of the bottom center segment

NOTE: Where all conventional packing rings were installed in the unit, the rotor required machining to remove heat effected zones created from the sever rubs at these locations. No rotor machining required where Guardian Rings were installed.

Design Applications

•Seals by providing pressure drops using relative tight radial clearances (same principle as a nozzle)

•Stationary

•Typically Material selection based on Stage operating temperatures

•Spring backed NOT Spring loaded. This design allows for ease of installation only.

Design Applications

•Reduces axial flow or leakage in a CFD modeling by 5.7% when compared to a conventional straight shape.

•This savings translates into 1.5-2.2% turbine steam path efficiency improvement above design

•The reduction in flow is accomplished by creating vortices at the tip of the seal. These vortices act as a pressure barrier thus reducing the pressure drop across the seal.

•Lower flow means higher efficiency.

•Lower flow also means less wear.

•All tip seals are manufactured from a non-sulferized 12Cr material

•Uses OEM design Radial Clearances

SteamFlow

Rotor

Stationary Cylinder

Typical Reaction Steam Path using inserted Seal Strips Radial Seal Height

must be at least 0.200 inches in order to effectively install the Vortex Shedder

Only one tooth on the steam admission side gets the Vortex Shedder