Critical Literacy & Interaction

Post on 24-Feb-2016

33 views 0 download

description

UNIT 2: Spinning webs of meaning, language and social reality. Critical Literacy & Interaction. University of Aruba, Faculty of Arts & Science General Education: SW&D / OGM August 26, 2010 Lecturer: Nadia Dresscher. Program:. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Critical Literacy & Interaction

Critical Literacy & Interaction

University of Aruba, Faculty of Arts & ScienceGeneral Education: SW&D / OGM

August 26, 2010Lecturer: Nadia Dresscher

UNIT 2: Spinning webs of meaning, language and social

reality

Program:

• Back to unit 1: Assignment about identity and communication, some notes on the interplay between identity and communication

• We will take a look on the meaning-making process and the role language plays in this process

3

What is the relationship between communication and identity?

• Please reflect on the interplay between the shaping of identities and communication. How does your own identity relate to communication? Can you describe how ‘you are’ in communication? How do you relate to others when communicating and what does this says about your identity?

• ?

4

Negotiation of identities• The ‘self’ (self-identity) is based on innumerable messages

about the ‘self’ that the individual gets from the world.• Relationships and the input (messages) they give us about

ourselves, helps form (shape and re-shape) our identities. • This is a continuous process• Interpersonal communication plays an important role in the

negotiation of identities• But also the groups we want to belong to , we belong to or

don’t belong to shapes our identities (social identity)

5

The ‘self’ In negotiation with others

6

Our identity…• Identity is changeable, constant in a process of shaping and

re-shaping• Identities are observable; we communicate it in differ forms

(our cloths, language we use, our behavior, communication is behavior

• Identities are a product of their time (Jane Austen’s Pride and Prejudice characters vs. Facebook generation)

• We look for acknowledgements (bevestiging) in our communication with others.

• Our ‘self’ is reflected through the mirror that others put in front of us

7

So far:

• Communication is a dynamic process• We make sense of ourselves and the world we

live in by negotiating meaning, interpretation and identities through messages

• Sender and receiver interactions are based on coding and decoding of messages. Messages are composed of codes/signs

• Stepping into ‘the signs’ zone…

signes

Mind, Language, Communication, Meaning

The study of language provides a window into the workings of the mind, and bears on issues of how the mind represents meaning, how we interpret

and understand the world

MindLanguage

CommunicationMeaning

The Meaning of Meaning• Communication is a social process:

• To capture and study the intangible process of communication [negotiation of meaning] we will start by focusing on how meaning is being created at the level of language

• Where Language plays a fundamental role in creating and sustaining realitie

• How?

• We will focus on the meaning making process through the social semiological approach

Spinning, weaving, flow of meaning

• Dialogue• Greek: dia and logos:• The flow of meaning• Communication is a

– process, – dynamic, – symbolic, – contextual, – cultural, – omnipresent, – intentional-unintentional, – interactive-transactive.

11

Functions of Language (Jackobson, 1960):

The constant engagement with meaning relies on the assumption that people do not produce texts at random and without any purpose but have specific intentions to communicate and certain goals to achieve. Language is capable of realizing numerous functions:

1. Referential function: conveying information2. Emotive function: expressing inner states3. Phatic function: establishing or maintaining a channel

of communication (‘Ta hasi calor awe’)

12

Functions of Language (Jackobson, 1960):

4. Poetic function: when the choice of the form is the essence of our message

5. Metalinguistic function: when the language talks about itself (e.g. The word ‘computer’ means…)

6. Directive function: seeking to affect the behavior of the addressee (e.g. ‘Come back’)

7. Contextual function: framing communication as a particular kind (e.g. ‘Let’s start our discussion by…’)

8. In additional to these functions, there are numerous others such as: requesting, offering, apologizing, pleading, complimenting, advising, warning etc.“WE DO THINGS WITH LANGUAGE. LANGUAGE IS (SOCIAL) ACTION”

13

The structure of Human Language (1)

• = a systematic set of sounds, combined with a set of rules, for the sole purpose creating meaning and communicating.

• These sounds are representing symbolically in the language’s alphabet, this is called phonemes. There is no natural relationship between sounds and their accompanying alphabet (e.g. there is no natural relationship between the letter ‘c’ and the sound ‘see’)

• When combined, phonemes become words (=morphemes). (There is also no natural relationship between the word cat and the fuzzy little animal)

14

The structure of Human Language (2)

• All languages have a set of rules for combining the sounds to create meaning. This set of rules is called syntax or grammar

• Through syntax, sentences are generated. Through syntax, sound and meaning are connected.

• Okay, but let’s get to the core of the language business: it is a system of signs

Signs!

Meaning-making process

Negogiation of meaning

Meaning-making is at the core of our humanness

We have to constantly negotiate what it means to be humans, to be women, men, sisters, brothers, professionals, Christians, friends, lovers

A tribute to the legendary linguist: Ferdinand de Saussure

• Founding father of SEMIOLOGY = the science of signs and meanings

• he dedicated most of his life in discovering the underlying system upon which the process of meaning making is based

•Other contributers to semiology are Pierce, Levi-Strauss, Barthes and Kristeva

•Underlying philosophy: there is an essential difference between the psychical world and the social world. The key to approaching this difference is focus upon the human meaning -making process

Human beings communicate

through the use of symbols

Introduction to semiology: the study of signs and meanings (in Saussure’s terms):

• We zoom in the relationship between a sign and its meaning

• We need the following components: Sign, Signifier and signified:

The Sign consists of a signifier and the signified:

The sign consists of :a signifier (refers to the material aspect) & a signified (the mental aspect)

What is a tree? (sign)

signifier

signified

An Aruban Treekwihi

2 different level of meaning combined into 1

• The material level (signifier)level of denotation: literal meaning

• The mental level (signified)connotation: interpretative level• The sign represents the combination of

the two

We can relate this to Ogdon and Richard’s Semantic Triangle: (thought) Warm,

cuddly, loyal friend

(thing) DOG

(symbol) word: “Dog”

5 basic principles of semiology (1)

1. We make meaning through our shared use of symbols –including language as a symbolic sign system (conventionality)

2. What symbols mean is not inevitable. Rather it is based on our socio-political and cultural agreement there is no fixed relationship between the signifier and the

signified. Although they always work together (there cannot be one without the other) the actual bond between them is arbitrary*

(*there is no natural relationship between them like thunder, lighting and rain)

5 basic principles of semiology (2)

3. Meaning is inseparable of context Nueliep’s (2009) contextual model of

communication can help us capture the communication process in the layers of context

:it is in the middle of these waves of contexts that we negotiate meaning

Words pass through context to context, this constantly changes their meaning

Context is key to meaning

A contextual approach to communication (Neuliep,2009)

Layers of different contexts: Definition of each context:

Cultural An accumulated pattern of values, beliefs and behaviors, shared by an identifiable group of people with a common history and verbal and non-verbal systems(the overall rules of communication)

Microcultural Subgroups/minorities group that exist within the main culture.

Environmental The psychical, geographical location of the interaction. The ‘when’ and ‘where’ the rules of communication (culture) apply

Perceptual The individual characteristics of each interactant, including their cognitions (mental models), attitudes, dispositions and motivations. This context focuses on how individuals gathers, stores and retrieves information. Individual perception is affected by culture, moreover how individuals develop attitudes about others (e.g. stereotype) varies from culture to culture

Sociorelational The relationship between the interactants.Whenever people come together they establish a relationship. Each person assumes a role, your interaction varies as a function of what role you are assuming

5 basic principles of semiology (3)

4. Meaning is relationalwe make sense of things (objects, words, actions) in relation to other things – binary opposites (opposition)– Derrida’s concept of différance (if the signifier means

this, it doesn’t mean that)

E.g. beautiful is not ugly, evil is the opposite of goodA dog is not a cat

(categorizing process)

differance

binary opposites

5 basic principles of semiology (3)

5. We engage in these processes largely subconsciously

Social semiotics, more than just language

• Semiotics, however, moves beyond language to study all the meaning systems in a society.

• For instance: fashion, advertising, popular culture genres like TV and movies, music, political discourse, all forms of writing and speech.

• Semiotics contributes to communication studies by providing a method for uncovering and analyzing how a whole system of signification like a movie genre, fashion images, or TV works in a culture.

• Meaning making is not purely individualistic: it is a process and product of collectives. Meanings are generated and agreed within particular social and cultural contexts

Changing meanings of the concept of beauty (1975 vs. 2010):