Post on 19-Jul-2020
Correlation between high energy objects and molecular clouds in the Galaxy; lessons in the SNR RXJ1713.7-3946and Westerlund 2
Astrophysics group meeting, November 19-20, 2009
Yasuo Fukui
Astrophysics lab. Radio astronomy
The Galaxy
Galactic center - magnetic flotation loops
Massive star formation – Wd2, Carina etc.
Molecular jets – Wd2, etc.
Gamma ray sources – RXJ1713, W28, Wd2, Wd1, etc.
SNR, PWN, molecular clouds
Galaxies
Magellanic clouds – GMC evolution (Kawamura)
Galactic nuclei
Aims; Star formation, gas dynamics (magnetic force, gravity), high energy phenomena (gamma, relativistic jets)
International collaborations; NANTEN2/Spitzer/Fermi/HESS/Herschel/Planck/….
Publications; PASJ two special issues / ApJ / AA /AJ / Science etc. reviews in ARAA2010, PPV etc.
3
4
NANTEN & NANTEN2
@Atacama, alt.4860m@Las Campanas,
alt.2400m
NANTEN2 at Atacama 4860m
NANTEN CO Galactic Plane Survey•12CO(J=1-0), Grid size ~ 4 (|b|<5), 8 (5<|b|<10)
•Integ. time (typ) ~5sec/point, 1,100,000 observed points
Molecular loops as evidence for magnetic flotation driven by the Parker Instability
300 pc
600 pc
30
0 p
c2
20
pc
Loop 1
Loop 2
Magnetic loop in solar corona
(TRACE:191Å)
MHD activities of galactic disks
Fukui et al. (2006)7
RXJ1713 TeV g SNR (1)
Pfeffermann and Aschenbach 1996 ROSAT
Koyama et al. 1997 ASCA
X ray absorption 6x10^21 cm-2
GC absorption 6x10^22 cm-2 1kpc
Slane et al. 1999 molecular cloud at -94 km s-1
X ray absorption 8x10^21 cm-2
N(HI) 1.2x10^22 cm-2 6.3kpc
Fukui et al. 2003
different molecular clouds at -10 km s-1 1kpc
widely accepted
identify associated gas–candidate for target proton8
RXJ1713 TeV g SNR (2)
Emission mechanism of g ray; cosmic ray protons?
leptonic (electron IC) or
hadronic (proton, neutral pion)
Aharonian et al. 2007 HESS etc.
Tanaka et al. 2008 Suzaku and HESS
strong magnetic field 100mG
IC is not effective to produce g ray
target protons are uniform
because X/ g ray is uniform
Fukui 2008 correlation btw. molecular clouds and X/ g ray suggests target protons are non uniform
9
Comparison of 12CO(J=1-0) with X-ray RXJ1713
(Fukui et al. 2003)
molecular holesurrounding boundary of the SNR
CO peaks⇔X-ray peaks show good spatial correlation(northwestern bright rim)
↓
indicates interaction of the gray peak of the SNR with molecular clouds.
D
A
B
C
RXJ1713 CO Velocity distribution by NANTEN
Moriguchi et al. 2005
VLSR and kinematic distance
NANTEN2 CO(2-1) vs X ray (XMM)
ASTE CO J=3-2
RXJ1713 Peak C : X ray vs. 12CO(J=1-0)
image:0.2-12KeV Xrayby Suzaku XIS
Takahashi et al 2008
Contour:12CO(J=1-0)by NANTEN
velocity range-12 km/s – 3km/s
min. = 3K km/sinterval = 7K km/s
Peak C : 12CO(J=3-2) vs 12CO(J=4-3)
←12CO(3-2) observed by ASTE
velocity lange : -12 - -3 km/s
min. : 3.0K km/s interval : 1.5 K km/s
Moriguchi et al 2005
↑12CO(3-2) observed by ASTE
velocity lange : -12 - -3 km/s
min. : 3.0K km/s interval : 1.5 K km/s
Red crosses show the position of the IRAS point sources in each map
12CO(3-2)
12CO(4-3)
1pc
1pc
RXJ1713/ G347.3 : TeV Gamma vs 12CO(J=1-0)
Image:
TeV gamma ray
by H.E.S.S
Contour:
12CO(J=1-0)
by nanten
velocity range
-18 km/s – 0km/s
min. = 3K km/s
interval = 7K km/s
Map of J1713.7-3946
5pc
SNR G347.3-0.5 (RXJ1713.7-3946)
-Shell-like structure: similar with X-rays- No significant variation of spectrum index across the regions-spatial correlation with surrounding molecular gas
Aharonian et al. 2005
RXJ1713 Peak C : X ray vs. 12CO(J=1-0)
image:0.2-12KeV Xrayby Suzaku XIS
Takahashi et al 2008
Contour:12CO(J=1-0)by NANTEN
velocity range-12 km/s – 3km/s
min. = 3K km/sinterval = 7K km/s
White contour:
12CO(J=1-0)
by nanten
velocity range
-18 km/s – 0km/s
min. = 3K km/s
interval = 7K km/s
White contour:
12CO(J=4-3)
by nanten
velocity range
-18 km/s – 0km/s
min. = 3K km/s
interval = 3K km/s
12CO(J=4-3)
Black contour:
0.2-12KeV Xray
by Suzaku XIS
Takahashi et al 2008
Image:
TeV gamma ray
by H.E.S.S
Aharonian et al 2007
1pc
IRAS Source
PeakC detailed analyses
Red line: Gamma-rayBlue line: HI gasBlack lime: 12CO(J=2-1)
Fig.3. Image: (a)gamma-ray (b) X-rayContour: NANTEN2 12CO(J=2-1)
-11 km/s
-4 km/s
-3 km/s
-2 km/s
Tanaka et al. 2008
B=100mG IC failshadronic supported
X/g ratio uniform
Some recent “e” injection in the west
0.1deg resolutionMuch more scattering
Targtets are non uniform
Fig.2. Image: X-ray taken by Suzaku. (Tanaka et al. 2008)Contour: 12CO(J=2-1) taken by NANTEN2.
CO vs X-ray Distributions
Fig.1. Image: Gamma-ray taken by HESS. (Aharonian et al. 2006)Contour: 12CO(J=2-1) taken by NANTEN2.
CO vs Gamma-ray Distributions
TeV g ray vs HI
Image:
HI 21cm line
by A.T.C.A.
Contour:
TeV gamma ray
by H.E.S.S.
min. = 20 count
interval = 10 count
Map of J1713.7-3946
-16 km/s - -3 km/s
Fig.4. Image: Gamma-ray taken by HESS.Contour: HI gas taken by ATCA.
SE-rim detailed analyses
Red line: Gamma-rayBlue line: HI gasBlack lime: 12CO(J=2-1)
Another one
Numerical simulations
Density log (n) |B|
(Inoue, Inutsuka 2009)
SNR RXJ1713 summary
• g ray correlates well with CO/HI, allows new detailed identification of target protons in a density range from 10 to 10^3 cm-3
(southeastern rim 10^21cm-2/3pc = 100cm-3)
• Hadronic origin is supported
• Cosmic ray proton will be estimated by careful analysis of HI and CO
• Theories seem to be consistent
Molecular Jets discovered by NANTEN
High J=2-1/1-0 ratio
Westerlund 2 (Wd2)
(l, b) = (284.27, -0 .33)
O Star 12WR Star 2
WR20a, WR20bTotal mass of stars 4500Mo
Age 2-3 Myr
(Rauw et al. 2007)
(Piatti et al. 1998)
Spitzer IRAC ; 3.5 (blue), 4.5 (green), 5.8 (orange), 8.0 (red) mm
RCW 49
Distribution of dust influencedby starsStar formation in progress
YSO 300
(Churchwell et al. 1998)
(Whitney et al. 2004)
Super star cluster
Distance vs. Temperature
Image: Tkin, Contour: 12CO(2-1),
red cross:Wd2
+16 km/s Cloud
+4 km/s Cloud
Temperature of the +4 km s-1 cloud is higher than the 16
km s-1
The molecular cloud near Wd2 is warmer than the outside.
Inside: ~70 K @ 5 pc
Outside: ~10 K @ 20 pc
G.L. 284.2-284.4Contour: 12CO(J=2-1)Blue: +4 km/s Cloud Red: +16 km/s Cloud
Cloud-Cloud Collision
16 km s-1
Distance
velocity of 16 km s-1, 4 km s-1, and -4 km s-1 components
assume the rotation curve of Brand & Blitz 1993
5.5 1.5 kpc
Mass
9.1 4.1 104 Mo
8.1 3.7 104 Mo~16 km s-1 cloud
~ 4 km s-1 cloud
Kinetic Energy
1.2 0.5 1050 ergs 3.6 1051 ergs
Energy of stellar wind
(Rauw et al. 2007)
X factor:2.0 1020 cm-2 (K km s-1)-1
12CO(J=1-0)
a) Integrated intensity of 12CO(J=1-0)
b) Position-Velocity diagramof 12CO(J=1-0)
Arc (Vlsr = 24 – 28 km/s)
min.= 2.6 K km/s (3 sigma)
interval = 1.8 K km/s
Jet (Vlsr = 28-30 km/s)
min = 2.1 K km/s (3 sigma)
interval = 0.7 K km/s
Jet 2 (Vlsr = 25 – 28 Km/s)
min = 2.4 K km/s (3 sigma)
interval = 1.6 K km/s
Cross : the center of HESS J1023-575
Yellow box & dashed lines in a)show the integrated regions ofP-V diagram of Arc & Jet.
Gray scale: HI(1 channel @26 km/s)
Red: Integrated intensity of arc
(23~28km/s)White: Integrated intensity of jet
(28~30km/s)Orange:HESS J1023-575
Results
Westerlund 2
Discussion: LVG analysis
Jet and Arc Formation Scenario
• Relativistic jet passes through atomic gas with non-uniform density.
• Shock wave propagates cylindrically, compressing the atomic gas and forming jet-like molecular gas. (Yamamoto et al. 2008)
• Spherical explosion compresses the atomic gas to form shell-like structure in HI and arc-like molecular cloud.
• Gamma-rays emitted from remnant neutron star?
Suggestion : Cloud and Gamma-ray Source Formation Scenario
• Progenitor has strong magnetic field of ~1013-15 G.
• Candidate objects for gamma ray bursts.
• Results of simulations show relativistic jet-like explosions.
• Remnant becomes special class of neutron star called magnetor.
About
Anisotropic supernova explosions
Takiwaki et al. 2009
Results : Ratio
At jet tip, 12CO(2-1) to 12CO(1-0) ratio is higher.
Parent cloud
candidates
Dame 2007
Discovery of jet- and arc-like molecular clouds
Parent cloud candidates Furukawa et al. 2009, Ohama et al. submitted
White:stellar cluster, Wd2
Red:TeV gamma-ray source
MOPRA 12CO J=1-0 Result s: S3
LVG analysis
S1 northern part
S1 southern part
S3 northern part
S3 southern part
S1 northern partN(H2) ~ 800 cm-3
T(kin) ~ 18 K
S1 southern partN(H2) ~ 300 cm-3
T(kin) ~ 15 K
S3 northern partN(H2) ~ 200 cm-3
T(kin) ~ 22 K
S3 southern partN(H2) ~ 300 cm-3
T(kin) ~ 65 K
G327.5
Molecular Jet Survey by NANTEN2 -12CO(J=2-1)-
SS433
MJG23.8 MJG359.5
MJG347.5
MJG343.1
MJG327.5
MJG348.5
+
GRS1915+105
Wd2
MJG343.1 MJG327.5
MJG359.5SS433 southMJG348.5 S3
Wd2
Astrophysical jets
Microquasar jets/
Anisotropic SNe
(Mirabel & Rodríguez 1994)
GRS1915+105
(3.5cm conti.)
3C296
Molecular Jets discovered by NANTEN
High J=2-1/1-0 ratio
Left: NANTEN 12CO(1-0) image (beam size : 2.7’) of the W 28 region for VLSR=0 to 10 km/s with
VHE γ ray significance contours overlaid (green) -levels 4,5,6σ. The radio boundary of
W 28, the 68% and 95% location contours of GRO J1801-2320 and the location of the HII
region W 28A2 (white stars) are indicated.
Right: NANTEN 12CO(1-0) image for VLSR=10 to 20 km/s.
(Aharonian et al. 2007)
TeV γ vs. CO(J=1-0) W28
NANTEN2 12CO(2-1) image of the
W 28 region for VLSR=-10 to 25
km/s with VHE γ ray significance
contours overlaid (yellow) levels
4,5,6σ.
The location of the HII region
W 28A2 (white stars) are indicated.
(Aharonian et al.2008)
TeV γ vs. CO(J=2-1)
NANTEN CO Galactic Plane Survey•12CO(J=1-0), Grid size ~ 4 (|b|<5), 8 (5<|b|<10)
•Integ. time (typ) ~5sec/point, 1,100,000 observed points
3-D M-JET PROJECT 2010-2014
Future plan with NANTEN2;
3-dim molecular temperature survey
By CO J=1-0, 2-1, 3-2 at 1 arcmin
Coverage;
l = 200 deg. – 60 deg.
b= -30 deg. to 30 deg.
number of spectra 10^7
Systematic jet search;
expect new ~100 molecular jets (9 at present)
correlation with CTA gamma ray sources, ~1000 galactic sources (~50 sources by HESS)
Fermi, IR, X ray surveys, and ALMA67
ALMA (2012-)
Atacama Large Millimeter/submillimeter Array0.1”-1”(~ 0.1 pc@50kpc)