Combining Light & Sound Can ultrasound become the preferred modality for functional and molecular...

Post on 30-Dec-2015

215 views 0 download

Tags:

Transcript of Combining Light & Sound Can ultrasound become the preferred modality for functional and molecular...

Position (mm)

Po

sit

ion

(m

m)

5 10 15 20 25 30 35

10

15

20

25

30

35

Combining Light & SoundCan ultrasound become the preferred modality for functional and molecular

imaging?

Shai AshkenaziBiomedical Ultrasound Lab

Dept. Biomedical EngineeringUniversity of Michigan

Outline

Imaging methods

Ultrasound Photoacoustic

Imaging devices

Imaging agents

Ultrasound Imaging

• Array of Tx/Rx elements

• Beam steering and focusing – time delayed channel excitation

• Receive – delay & sum

• Reflections – different density, speed of sound

Ultrasound Imaging

> 20 MHz (UBM)

10 – 20 MHz

Low MHz

Resolution (mm)

Pen

etra

tion

dep

th

(mm

)

0.01 0.1 1

10

100

1

Abnormal Thyroid Gland

Opto-Acoustic Ultrasound Transducers

Optoacoustic US Transducers

Receive Transmit

Hi Q

/

Bell’s Photophone

February 1880

Etalon detector – principle of operation

Etalon

PD Array (camera)

CW laser

Etalon detector – principle of operation

Etalon

PD Array (camera)

CW laser

Ultrasound – Space/time load

Piezo vs. EtalonComparison of

sensitivity

ETALON

2.7 2.9

0

Time (s)

Am

plit

ud

e

Etalon

5.3 5.5 5.7

0

Time (s)

Pulse-EchoPIEZO

TRANS

Optical Generation of Ultrasound

High thermal expansion

Optically absorbing

Water

Black PDMS

Clear PDMS

Laser pulse

2D Gold Nanostructure

220 nm

128 nm

20 nm

Glass

Substrate

4.5 um PDMS layer

Acoustic Signal

Spectrum

Acoustic Pressure

• Acoustic pressure increases linearly with optical input energy

• Thermal damage threshold: 25 uJ delivered to a spot size of 25 um

• Acoustic pressure at thermal damage threshold: 500 kPa at 10 mm

Integrated Device

Ultrasound Generation

Beam

Ultrasound Detection

Beam

Etalon

6 um

PDMS layer

SU-8 protection layer

200 nm

Pulse-echo Results

Optical Microring detectors

Resonance optics

Output = T + S

T = - S (critical coupling)

S = 0 (off-resonance phase cancelation)

TS

Experimental verification

Tunable LaserPhotodetector

Ultrasound Transducer

USPulser0

0.01

0.02

0.03

0.04

1550 1560 1570

Wavelength (nm)

Tra

ns

mis

sio

n

a

b

c

1558 1563 (nm)T

ran

smis

sio

n

0

16.5 18Time (s)

a

b

c

1558 1563 (nm)

Tra

nsm

issi

on

Wavelength dependence

0

0

16.5 18Time (s)

0

Tra

ns.

Mod

ula

tion

10 MHz Transducer

Array configurations

In

Out

λ1 λm

λm+1 … λ2

m

λ3 …λ2Fiber coupled optical circulator

Demux and Photodetector array

Tunable laser

Demultiplexer and Photodetector array

Miniaturization of high-Freq arrays for intravascular and “in-vivo” microscope application

80 elements sharing 1 waveguide 2D Arrays

Why Micro-Optics for Ultrasound Devices?

• Micron size elements– High frequency arrays > 30 MHz

• High SNR (size independent noise)

• Wide Bandwidth > 50 MHz

• Selectable sensitivity– “Shiftable” dynamic range

• High BW signal comm. (80 Ch. on SMF using 100 GHz standard grid)

Applications – Smart Needle

• High resolution ultrasound microscopy at the tip of a needle

• Guiding biopsy

• Reducing bleeding complications (e.g. in kidney biopsy)

G23

0.64 mm

Side viewing

Transmitter

Receiver array

200 µ

m

2 mm

Photoacoustic Imaging

Position (mm)

Po

sit

ion

(m

m)

5 10 15 20 25 30 35

10

15

20

25

30

35

500 m

PA imaging

▼ Laser pulse (~5 ns)

▼ Heat absorption

▼ Temp. rise (~ 0.01 °C)

▼ Thermal expansion (strain ~

10-5)

▼ Acoustic propogation

▼ Detection and Source

reconstruction

Receiver

PD Array (camera)

CW laser

Etalon

Etalon for Photoacoustic imaging

2D phantom imaging

0.11mm

100 m

Photoacoustic image

Optical image

Nerve cord imaging

Probe laser scan lines

(4mm x 0.36mm aperture)

532 nm pulsed illumination

500 m

Nerve Cord In Lobster Tail

3D phantom imaging

50 µm

Array size: 128x128 Element spacing: 30 um

Pig Coronary Artery

Lateral Position (mm)A

xial

pos

ition

(m

m)

0 2

4

6

8

Lateral position (mm)

Axi

al p

ositi

on (

mm

)

-2 0 2

4

6

8

Lateral Position (mm)

Axia

l Posi

tion

(m

m)

700 nm

Photoacoustics agents for functional and molecular imaging

Gold Nanorods – Molecular probe for PAI

Au Nanorod – Spectrum

400 500 600 700 800 900 10000

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

Wavelength (nm)

Ab

sorp

tio

n e

ffic

ien

cy

Bioconjugation

PAA

Surfactant (CTAB)

Antibody

Gold Nanorod

OS AM

Laser

OPO

UTSC

BXCC

Cell Culture Setup

Photoacoustic Image – LNCaP Cells

ConjugatedNanorods

UnconjugatedNanorods

-40

-30

-20

-10

0

-40

-30

-20

-10

0

1 mm

Laser OPO

US

UA

PH

SYNC

BX

UltraSound-PhotoAcoustic (USPA) Imaging

Combined Modality

Position (mm)

Po

siti

on

(m

m)

5 10 15 20 25 30 35

10

15

20

25

30

35

Animal Imaging

-20 -15 -10 -5 0 5 10 15

0

5

10

15

20

Prostate Imaging

PEBBLES – Molecular Contrast

Conclusions

• Photoacoustics provides an exciting vehicle for molecular imaging

• PEBBLES can be detected at only 10 particles per cell with 100 nm particle diameter

• Nanorods can be detected at only 50 particles per cell with volume 50 times less than PEBBLE

• Both agents can be made much more efficient

Future research projects

• Optical resonators for ultrasound sensing

• PA contrast for cancer detection

• Sensor dyes for functional PAI

• PA sensor for protease activity

Optical resonators for ultrasound sensing

• Ultimate sensitivity for PAI applications – Acoustic noise limited

• Explore structures for optimal acousto-optic interaction

– Membrane interface

– Air-water interface

-5 -4 -3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3 4 5

x 1011

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

Frequency (Hz)

Tra

nsm

issi

on

Waveguide Bragg Grating

PA contrast for cancer detection

• Real-time PA imager

– Small animals

– Clinical trials

• Stability-dynamics of nanoparticles in-vivo

• Cell targeting

- Prostate Cancer

- Thyroid cancer

Sensor dyes for functional PAI

• Develop PA imaging of pH, Ca, O2, and other

• Study PA sensing mechanisms– Absorption (change, spectral shift)– Fluorescence quenching PA increase– Life time of non-radiative decay change in PA shape

• Delivery agents - Dye embedded nanoparticles

Combine versatility of molecular probes with PAI

Example - pH dye

5 6 7 8 9 100.35

0.4

0.45

0.5

0.55

0.6

0.65

0.7

pH

Phot

oaco

ustic

am

plitu

de (a

.u)

Absorption of Snarf-5F as a function of pH

0

0.05

0.1

0.15

0.2

0.25

0.3

0.35

0.4

0.45

0.5

400 500 600 700 800 900

Wavelength (nm)

Ab

sorp

tio

n

pH 5.0pH 6.0pH 7.0pH 8.0pH 9.0pH 10.0

SNAFR-5F

PA sensor for protease activity

400 450 500 550 600 650 7000

2

4

6

8

10

Wavelength (nm)A

bso

rpti

on

eff

icie

ncy

30 nm gold spheres pair (in water)

d

12 nm

6 nm

2 nm

Abs

T H AN K S

Chemistry

Raoul Kopelman

Gwangseong Kim

Tom Horvath

Rodney Agayan

Chemical Eng.

Nick Kotov

Ashish Agarwal

Cancer Center

Mark Day

Kathleen Day

EECS

Jay Guo

ChungYen Chao

Tao ling

JingSung

More slides

Fabrication Process I

Laser Interference Lithography

Si

SiO2

glass

polymer

Nanoimprint

Lithography

Fabrication Process II

Transducer

Lens

ND filters

CollimatorPulsed Laser Input

Data

Collection

Experimental Setup

Amplifier

Ultrasound Detection

Beam

Integrated Device

PBSPhotodiode

Reflector

Ultrasound Generation

Beam

Amplifier

Data Capture

Pulse-echo Experiment

Optical Absorption

50 MHz Test Signals

5.6 5.7 5.8 5.9 6 6.1-0.8

-0.6

-0.4

-0.2

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

Time (s)

Pul

se-e

cho

Sig

nal (

V)

(a)

2.7 2.8 2.9 3 3.1 3.2

-0.2

-0.1

0

0.1

0.2

Time (s)

Det

ecte

d O

ptic

al S

igna

l (V

)

(b)

0 20 40 60 80-50

-40

-30

-20

-10

0

Frequency (MHz)

Nor

mal

ized

Mag

nitu

de (

dB)

(c)

Pulse-echo Optic modulation

Spectra

Acoustic modulation

2xk

2xk

2xk

2zk 2

yk22 / corec

x

y z

Ref

lect

ion

Wavelength

Stained live lobster nerve cord

PE

PA

Dep

th

2 mm LateralDR = 32 dB

-35

-25

-15

-5

5 mm

dB

Phantom Image

Detection sensitivity = 5 x 1010 particles/cc

= 50 particles/cell

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

1.2

1.4

0 5 10 15

ICG concentration (μM)

ab

so

rba

nc

e a

t 7

90

nm

Free ICG

PEBBLE

PEBBLE with ICG

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1

0 1 2 3 4

Time (day)

Re

lati

ve

ab

s.

at

79

0 n

m

ICG free

ICG ormosil PEBBLE

PEBBLE with ICG - Stability

0

0.4

0.8

1.2

1.6

400 600 800 1000

Wavelength (nm)

Ab

so

rba

nc

e10 μM

5 μM

2.5 μM

1 μM

0.5 μM

ICG Ormosil PEBBLE

PEBBLE with ICG - Spectrum

Photoacoustic Image – PEBBLES

Position (mm)

Po

sit

ion

(m

m)

10 20 30

15

20

25

1010 10121011

Detection sensitivity = 1010 particles/cc

= 10 particles/cell

Posi

tion (

mm

)

0 1

1

0 -40

-30

-20

-10

0

Position (mm)

Posi

tion (

mm

)

0 1

1

0 -40

-30

-20

-10

0

Photoacoustic Image – LNCaP Cells

ConjugatedPEBBLES

UnconjugatedPEBBLES