Transcript of CEC-CAN Summer Policy Series ▪ July 2013 ELEMENTARY & SECONDARY EDUCATION ACT UPDATE.
- Slide 1
- CEC-CAN Summer Policy Series July 2013 ELEMENTARY &
SECONDARY EDUCATION ACT UPDATE
- Slide 2
- WELCOME TO CECS 1 ST SUMMER POLICY SESSION! Deb Ziegler,
Associate Executive Director, Policy & Advocacy Kim Hymes,
Senior Director, Policy & Advocacy
- Slide 3
- TODAYS AGENDA ESEA Reauthorization & Waivers Update on
Legislative & Policy Proposals Next Generation of Assessments
Teacher Evaluation 3
- Slide 4
- 4 4
- Slide 5
- 5 44 Representatives are past educators 7 Senators are past
educators
- Slide 6
- 2007200820092010201120122013? What a difference 7 years
makes!!
- Slide 7
- CECS ESEA GUIDING PRINCIPLES 7 Supporting a Well Prepared
Successful Educational Workforce Improving Outcomes for All
Children Through the Collaboration of All Educators Strengthening
Assessment and Accountability for ALL Meaningful Systems that
Encourage Collaborative and Supportive Measurement, Evaluation, and
Reward of Professional Performance Developing Improved Strategies
that Create Positive School Reform Meeting the Unique Needs of
Gifted Learners Providing Full Funding to Execute the Goals and
Provisions of ESEA
- Slide 8
- Senator Lamar Alexander (R-TN) Senator Tom Harkin (D-IA) LOTS
OF TALKING 8
- Slide 9
- American Association of Administrators, Policy Insider Oct 2011
9
- Slide 10
- 10 White House Announces Waivers September, 2011
- Slide 11
- ESEA WAIVERS 11 Remove 2014 AYP deadline Funding Flexibility
Changes to Accountability Flexibility for HQT Plans
- Slide 12
- 12 4 Conditions: Adopt College & Career Ready Standards
Develop Assessments that Measure Student Growth Develop
Differentiated Accountability System Develop Guidelines for Local
Teacher and Principal Evaluations Based on Effectiveness ESEA
WAIVERS
- Slide 13
- 39 States + Washington, DC have waivers 13 ESEA WAIVERS
- Slide 14
- 14
- Slide 15
- 2013 HOUSE VS. SENATE ESEA BILLS 15 Total Opposites!!
- Slide 16
- WHERE ARE WE IN THE LEGISLATIVE PROCESS?? Passage by House
Education Committee Passage by Senate Education Committee President
Signs! Conference Committee Works Out Differences! Passage by Full
House of Representatives Passage by Full Senate
- Slide 17
- July 19, 2013: Passed House by 221-207 vote; all Democrats and
12 Republicans voted against Two days of debate 18 amendments
passed 4 amendments defeated 4 withdrawn Student Success Act (HR 5)
House Version of ESEA CEC Opposed, as did most of the education
& disability communities
- Slide 18
- 18 Student Success Act (HR 5) House Version of ESEA Provisions
in Student Success Act (HR 5) CEC Supports Eliminates AYP &
2014 Deadline Maintains Disaggregation of Subgroup Data
- Slide 19
- 19 CEC Expressed Serious Concerns with Student Success Act (HR
5) Reduces Accountability for Students with Disabilities Eliminates
Highly Qualified Teacher Provisions Lacks focus on Professional
Development Reduces, Caps and Eliminates Funding; Locks into place
sequestration Increases Privatization Ignores High-Ability Students
Student Success Act (HR 5) House Version of ESEA
- Slide 20
- Passed Senate Health, Education, Labor, Pensions (HELP)
Committee June 12, 2013 Passed with only Democrat support Two days
of debate and amendments Strengthening Americas Schools Act Senate
Version of ESEA CEC supported with some reservations, as did most
of disability community; education community split
- Slide 21
- 21 Provisions in Strengthening Americas Schools Act CEC
Supports Focus on early learning for entry ready to learn Encourage
equity through greater transparency and fair distribution of
resources Limits Use of Alternate Assessment Changes to
Accountability System, Focus on Bottom 15%, Low Performing
Subgroups, Maintains Subgroup Disaggregation, Student Growth &
Performance Targets; Eliminates AYP & 2014 Deadline Early
Intervening Services in General Ed, UDL, PBIS Mental Health
Supports Includes Key Provisions of CEC-Endorsed, TALENT Act for
High-Ability Students Strengthening Americas Schools Act Senate
Version of ESEA
- Slide 22
- 22 Provisions in Strengthening Americas Schools Act That
Concern CEC New Requirements without Adequate Resources
Accountability System Focus on Bottom 15% of Schools and Only
Reporting for Remaining 85% Includes Turnaround Models that Promote
Firing of Staff and Other Interventions Overemphasis of Teacher
Evaluation from Federal Level Defining Highly Qualified to Include
Individuals Still Enrolled in Alternate Route to Certification
Programs Strengthening Americas Schools Act Senate Version of
ESEA
- Slide 23
- WHATS NEXT FOR ESEA? 23
- Slide 24
- COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS & THE FUTURE OF TESTING New
Assessments, Adaptive Assessments, & Racing to the Top 24
- Slide 25
- RACE TO THE TOP ASSESSMENT CONTEST 25 Next Generation of
Assessments 1% Dynamic Learning Maps 1% National Center & State
Collaborative 99% Smarter Balanced Consortia 99% PARCC Consortia
Aligns to the Common Core State Standards
- Slide 26
- TWO CONSORTIA: 1% Dynamic Learning Maps Alternate Assessment
Program (DLM) Kansas University $22 million 13 States - Iowa,
Kansas, Michigan, Mississippi, Missouri, New Jersey, North
Carolina, Oklahoma, Utah, Virginia, West Virginia, Washington and
Wisconsin. Accessibility - keyboard, drag-and-drop, touch- screen,
and compatible with a variety of assistive technologies commonly
used by students. 26
- Slide 27
- NATIONAL CENTER & STATE COLLABORATIVE 19 States: Alaska,
Arizona Connecticut, District of Columbia, Florida, Georgia,
Indiana, Louisiana, Massachusetts, Nevada, New York, North Dakota,
Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota,
Tennessee, Wyoming 27
- Slide 28
- ASSESSMENT CONSORTIA: PARCC Computer Based 28
- Slide 29
- ASSESSMENT CONSORTIA: SMARTER BALANCED 29 Computer
Adaptive
- Slide 30
- TIMELINE 2012-13 School Year: First year pilot/field testing
and related research and data collection Fall 2012 Small Scale
Trials 500 schools in 23 states February April 2013-14 School Year:
Second year pilot/field testing and related research and data
collection 2014-15 School Year: Full operational administration of
PARCC assessments Summer 2015: Set achievement levels, including
college- ready performance levels 30
- Slide 31
- TEACHER EVALUATION Waiver concerns and beyond 31
- Slide 32
- POLICYMAKERS: A SHIFT IN FOCUS Highly Qualified Highly
Effective Inputs Outputs 32
- Slide 33
- System Components Complex Role Measure Evidence- Based Practice
Recognize Professionalism Incorporate Research CECs Position:
Components of Special Education Teacher Evaluations 33
- Slide 34
- All educators must be included in one evaluation system.
Evaluation systems must identify appropriate professional
development opportunities for teachers based on the results of
their evaluations. Evaluations must support continuous improvement.
Evaluation processes and all measures of teacher effectiveness must
be open and transparent to the teacher being evaluated. Include
Fundamental System-Wide Components 37 TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEMS
SHALL :
- Slide 35
- Evaluations must clearly identify and be based on a special
education teachers specific role and responsibilities during a
given school year. Evaluations must take into account the
population of children and youth and their range of
exceptionalities that special education teachers instruct.
Evaluations must be conducted by evaluators with expertise related
to evidence-based service delivery models and individualized
teaching practices and interventions in special education. TEACHER
EVALUATION SYSTEMS SHALL : Identify the Complex Role of the Special
Education Teacher 38
- Slide 36
- Evaluations must be based on multiple reliable measures and
indicators that support valid measurement of special education
teacher effectiveness. Evaluations should never be based solely on
student growth. Statistical models that estimate a teachers
contribution to student growth, such as value-added models, should
not be applied to any teacher until there is a general consensus
among researchers that the model provides a valid estimate of a
teachers contribution to student growth. Measure the Use of
Evidence-Based Practices 39 TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEMS SHALL :
- Slide 37
- CEC RESOURCES http://www.cec.sped.org/Policy-and-Advocacy
- Slide 38
- CEC RESOURCES www.policyinsider.org @CECAdvocacy
- Slide 39
- TAKE ACTION: CECS LEGISLATIVE ACTION CENTER www.cec.sped.org
Choose: Policy & Advocacy Choose: Legislative Action Center
www.cec.sped.org Choose: Policy & Advocacy Choose: Legislative
Action Center 39
- Slide 40
- MARK YOUR CALENDARS! CEC CAN Summer Policy Series Continues
July 24, 2013, 10-11am (est): Advocacy strategies for new CAN
Coordinators August: 1, 2013, 10-11am (est): Federal funding for
special/gifted education programs
- Slide 41
- THANK YOU!! 41 Deb ZieglerKim Hymes Associate Executive
DirectorSenior DirectorPolicy & Advocacy debz@cec.sped.org
kimh@cec.sped.org