Post on 02-Oct-2020
PRESENTATION
May 2009
CAMPUS DEVELOPMENT PLAN
March 2007
Introduction
Development Plan Scope and Criteria
• ECS was commissioned in June 2008 to prepare a Campus Development Plan to guide campus development to 2013 and beyond.
• The Campus Development Plan models future academic activities, explores how these requirements could be implemented on campus and calculates order-of-magnitude space requirements to describe a general direction for Humber to further develop and improve campus facilities.
March 2007
Purpose of the Development Plan
A roadmap to guide directions for the development and/ or improvement of the campus by identifying a number of principles on “how to get there”
A reference to validate that capital projects and campus development initiatives contribute to the realization of the College’s strategic goals, academic plans and operational objectives
A resource to describe space needs both internally and externally & is flexible enough to permit changes while specific enough to maintain established priorities
March 2007
Process
• Interviews and meetings with senior academic and administrative staff, student leadership members, faculty representatives, and support staff.
• Assessment of existing campus inventory and calculated instructional space needs based on:
– Future requirements for non-instructional office & support spaces
– Standardized room & seat utilization & hourly targets
– Future requirements for student learner and support spaces
• Regular presentations of Findings and Observations to the Steering Committee for validation and feedback
• Presentation of draft Planning Options via Town Hall forums
March 2007
Context
Humber 2008-2013 Strategic Plan establishes the following priorities for the College:
Manage Enrolment Growth
Commitment to Teaching and Learning Excellence
Commitment to High Quality Services to Support Student Success and Improved Business Practices
Commitment to Human Resource Planning and Professional Development
ECS believes that the priorities shown in bold green have particular implications for the Development Plan
These three priorities are partly contingent on physical changes at the North and Lakeshore campuses
March 2007
Context Enrolment Projections
Fall Target FTE Winter Target FTE Net Difference (+/- %) School / Academic Unit 2008 2012 2008 2012 Fall 2012 Winter 2012 North Campus Business 3,232 3,487 3,300 3,501 +7.9% +6.1% Applied Technology 2,330 2,604 2,291 2,531 +11.8% +10.5% CCE 36 36 70 70 0.0% 0.0% Health Sciences 2,168 2,202 1,968 2,011 +1.6% +2.2% Hospitality/Recreation/Tourism 1,151 1,503 1,112 1,422 +30.6% +27.9% Liberal Arts & Science 408 408 494 494 0.0% 0.0% Media Studies & IT 1,487 1,734 1,357 1,550 +16.6% +14.2% Sub totals 10,812 11,974 10,592 11,579 +10.7% +9.3% Lakeshore Campus Business 1,572 2,343 1,503 2,175 +49.0% +44.7% Creative & Performing Arts 741 741 845 845 0.0% 0.0% Liberal Arts & Science 126 166 191 227 +31.7% +18.8% Media Studies & IT 893 1,330 919 1,298 +48.9% +41.2% Social & Community Services 1,280 1,885 1,286 1,833 +47.3% +42.5% Sub totals 4,612 6,465 4,744 6,378 +40.2% +34.4% Orangeville Campus Business 86 121 74 108 +40.7% +45.9% Social & Community Services 73 73 68 68 0.0% 0.0% Sub totals 159 194 142 176 +22.0% +23.9% Grand Totals 15,583 18,633 15,478 18,133 +19.6% +17.2%
The presented table shows enrolment growth targets distributed by campus and school to a 2012 planning horizon
Significant growth (40%) is planned at the Lakeshore Campus while more measured growth (10%) is planned at the North Campus
These figures have since been revised higher
March 2007
Context Space IndicatorsEnrolment growth has outpaced physical growth at Humber in the past 10 years
Current additions and renovations at the North and Lakeshore campuses will not be enough to reverse the decrease in area to student ratio
Indicators point to a space deficit in the next five years
16,288 16,321 16,321
17,007
18,40018,629
18,96919,460
20,09820,627
1,100,000
1,150,000
1,200,000
1,250,000
1,300,000
1,350,000
1,400,000
1,450,000
1,500,000
1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08
Academic Year
Tota
l Gro
ss S
quar
e Fe
et -
All
Cam
puse
s Ex
clud
ing
Gue
lp-H
umbe
ran
d R
esid
ence
s
15,000
16,000
17,000
18,000
19,000
20,000
21,000
22,000
Stud
ent F
TE P
opul
atio
n
72.5 72.3
70.5
68.1 67.766.9 67.0 67.0
64.9
67.9
1,100,000
1,150,000
1,200,000
1,250,000
1,300,000
1,350,000
1,400,000
1,450,000
1,500,000
1998-99 1999-00 2000-01 2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08
Academic Year
Tota
l Gro
ss S
quar
e Fe
et -
All
Cam
puse
s Ex
clud
ing
Gue
lp-H
umbe
ran
d R
esid
ence
s
60.0
65.0
70.0
75.0
Gro
ss S
quar
e Fe
et p
er F
TE S
tude
nt
1998-99 to 2007-08 Changes in Inventory and Student Population
1998-99 to 2007-08 Changes in Inventory and GSF per Student
March 2007
Planning Principles
• Student Space: Highly visible, easily accessible, and comfortably furnished space should be provided in each academic building for students to study independently, study in groups, and/or gather socially.
• Faculty Space: Appropriate office space should be provided for all faculty, both full time and part time, clustered by academic department and proximate to the labs, workshops and classrooms where the faculty teach most often.
• Future Growth: Humber is evolving from a suburban institution to an urban one. New buildings need to be taller and use of public transit must be encouraged.
March 2007
Key Site Challenges - Cohesiveness
NORTH CAMPUS
How to add new buildings while reinforcing internal cohesiveness and circulation along the internal north to south and east to west axis?
North Campus
B
A
March 2007
Key Site Challenges - Connectivity
LAKESHORECAMPUS
How to best improve the connections among the various distinct precincts?
B
AD
C
March 2007
Key Site Challenges – Surface Parking
DIRECTION
Create a more compact campus.
Encourage building development which provides closer connections with existing infrastructure.
Promote a sense of place.
Bring transit closer to core of campus.
Student Housing
Main formalentranceset backfromstreet
Mainstudentserviceentrance set backfrom street
Internalsecondarystreet
Parking
Parking
Parking
Parking
Parking
Parking
MainBuilding
Mainvehicular road
March 2007
Key Site Challenges – Campus Densities
DIRECTION
Encourage higher density additions -3 to 4 storeysminimum.
Facilitate a sense of community by integrating a range of functions that tie in with neighbouringfunctions
Promote a livelier campus
5 storeys & greater
4 storeys
3 storeys2 storeys
1 storey
5
7
9
5
4
No. of Storeys Above Ground
North Campus
Lakeshore East
Lakeshore West
60m4
3
2
22
2
2
2
1
1
1
2
2
2
3
1
60m
2
2
2
6
3
11
22
3 3 3
3
3 3 33
3
60m
March 2007
Key Site Challenges – Transportation
DIRECTION
Integrate transportationnetworks to reduce conflicts.
Minimize transportation and pedestrian conflicts
Promote easier campus access through proper location of lay-bys, bus stops, etc.
Proposed options for LRT stopsPresent bus stop locationsLandscaped courtyardsLoading & unloading service bays
Legend
A
B
C
Bus Stops
Pedestrianroute frombus stop
Bus Stops
Outdoorcourtyards
Serviceroute
Proposedtransit location“C”
Proposedtransit location“A”
Proposedtransitlocation“B”
Servicebays
March 2007
Key Site Challenges – Main Entrance
DIRECTION
Create a central entry point to the campus.
Provide easier access to front line services
Promote a sense of arrival that is exciting and welcoming
Ground Floor Plan
No directground level access
Awkward junction
Circuitouscongestedsecondarycirculation
Student Serviceslocated away frommain entrance
Outdoor amphitheatrehas poor connectivityto campus
Primary axiscorridor
Challenges exist dueto location of spaceat back of maincampus
Main formalentrance
Student services entrance
March 2007
Key Site Challenges – LandscapingDIRECTION
Enhance the quality of constructed landscapes
Develop creative landscape and streetscape solutions
Unify the North Campus through physical landscape interventions at the North end
Arboretum
Playing Fields
Ravine
NNorth OrientedCampus
March 2007
North Campus
LRT
A
B
Preferred locationfor new light railtransit station
Site for futuredevelopmentbridge linked tobuilding A
Gateway Contextual Building
Infill Building
C
Bus
CAMPUS DEVELOPMENT
Develop a strategy and sequencing framework for future capital projects for the North Campus
March 2007
Option N-A
OPTION N-A
Construct a new 4-storey 75,000 NASF Library and Student Services building at the main north entrance
Ground Floor PlanOPTION N-A
Arboretumgardens
Enclosed glazed passage overlooking gardens
University of Ontario Institute of Technology, Library*
Academic Learning Centre - U of T, Mississauga
Possiblebridge links
New informationcommons atground floor
Library onthird and fourthfloors with largereading room
New student servicesfacilities on ground floor and part second
43
2
1
Arboretumgardens
March 2007
Lakeshore Campus
CAMPUS DEVELOMENT
Develop a strategy and sequencing framework for future capital projects for the Lakeshore Campus
A
C
Lake Shore Blvd. W.
COLO
NEL S
AMUE
L SMI
TH PA
RK DR
IVE
Kipling Ave .
B23rd. St.
Mid-rise Infill Building
Gateway Entrance Building
Contextually Anchored Building
March 2007
Option L-AOPTION L-A
Construction of a 60,000 NASF- 4 to 8 storey- New Centre to accommodate existing program growth and new program initiatives at 3166 Lake Shore Blvd. W.
3170 Lake ShoreBlvd. W.
3166 Lake ShoreBlvd. W.
TTC StreetcarLoop
Site PlanOPTION L-A
Contextual Addition - Heaslip House, Ryerson University
Subject to zoning complianceof site for construction of a new, 4 to 8 storey Centre, 60,000 NASF, (96,000 GASF).
Consolidation of 3166 & 3170 Lake Shore Blvd. W. properties into a single site is an optionto be considered subject tocity application and approval
Existing 3 storey office building to remain and re-purposed for academic use
LAKE SHORE BLVD. W.
KIPLIN
G AVE
.
19TH S
T.
Possible expansion area if allowable under variance and re-zoning applications
Proposed 2 storey building extension over streetcar loop subject to TTC agreements
March 2007
Option L-BOPTION L-B
Construction of a 64,000 NASF New Centre to accommodate existing program growth and new program initiatives at Lakeshore Campus West
Ground Floor PlanOPTION L-B
UOIT, Durham
Claude Watson School for the Arts, Toronto, ON*
LAK ESHORE
LODGE
LAKE SHORE BOULEVARD WEST
New landscapedforecourt / studentsocial space
Existing pathto LakeshoreEast
New east entranceand entrance gallery linked to corridorto center of Lakeshore West
New 3-storeyHumberCentre
New shiftedkitchenlocation
Existingserviceyard
New studentcafeteria seating
Exiting kitchenspace to be renovated fornew academicor student support use
Expand libraryto accommodateadditional studentstudy space & aLearning Commons
23
1
12
March 2007
Option L-COPTION L-C
Construction of a 64,000 NASF New Centre to accommodate existing program growth and new program initiativesat Lakeshore Campus East
Site PlanOPTION L-C
Theatre podium and tower
University of Ontario Institute of Technology*
Open Green Space
64,000 NASFHumberCentre over 4floors
Area reservedfor future low rise developmentdependant onfuture landvariance
Possiblebelow gradeparking underpodium dependanton geo-technical conditions one story structure
with accessiblepodium roof
12
34
March 2007
Planning Principles
Student Space
• Space should be provided in each academic building for students to study independently, study in groups, and/or gather socially.
• Not all student space needs to be formal or enclosed.
• Space for students should be highly visible, easily accessible, comfortably furnished, and have wireless capabilities.
March 2007
Planning Principles
Faculty Space• Appropriate office space should be provided for all
faculty, both full time and contract, in accordance with Humber’s space management policy.
• Whenever practical, faculty offices should be clustered by department.
• Faculty office space needs to include small meeting rooms to enable faculty to meet privately with students.
• Departmental clusters should be located proximate to the labs, workshops, and classrooms where the faculty teach most often. This is particularly important for departments that rely extensively on specialized labs and workshops.
March 2007
Planning Principles
Future Growth
• Humber is evolving from a suburban institution to an urban one.
• New buildings need to be taller, to make better use of the limited land that is available.
• Site and building design must encourage use of public transit to reduce the amount of land required for parking and roadways for private transportation.
• For buildings which will house specialized functions, the design should incorporate expansion either internally, horizontally or vertically.
March 2007
Planning Principles
North Campus• The construction of a new 75,000 net assignable square
feet building (Option N-A) will provide space for an expanded library and consolidated and enhanced student services.
• Existing space that will be vacated by library and student services functions will enable Humber to alleviate shortages of space for students and faculty and to provide additional teaching spaces to accommodate enrolment growth.
• The existing library is best suited for conversion to administrative and faculty offices.
• Medium and longer term growth can be accommodated in future buildings at the two sites proposed in the campus development plan (Options N-B and N-C).
March 2007
Planning Principles
Lakeshore Campus• The space challenges at the Lakeshore campus will not be
solved by one new building; a three pronged approach is required.
• Option L-A, in conjunction with 3170 Lakeshore Drive, will provide additional space for classrooms, light labs, and offices.
• Option L-B will provide space for an expanded library, consolidated and enhanced student services, and additional academic delivery space.
• Option L-C will provide space for heavily serviced labs and workshops and other academic space.
• All buildings are required urgently. The exact sequencing will be determined based on funding availability and other factors.
March 2007May 2009
Thank you for your attention.We welcome your questions and comments.
North Campus - Options Lakeshore Campus - Options
DA
C
Lake Shore Blvd. W.
COLO
NEL S
AMUE
L SMI
TH PA
RK D
RIVE
Kipling Ave .
B23rd. St.
Mid-rise Infill Building
Gateway Entrance Building
Contextually Anchored Building
LRT
A
B
Preferred locationfor new light railtransit station
Site for futuredevelopmentbridge linked tobuilding A
Gateway Contextual Building
Infill Building
C
Bus