Call for efficient collection & sorting for beverage ......Not-for-profit association representing...

Post on 05-Oct-2020

0 views 0 download

Transcript of Call for efficient collection & sorting for beverage ......Not-for-profit association representing...

“Call for efficient collection & sorting for beverage containers”

10 October 2019Istanbul, Turkey

Ermis PanagiotopoulosSustainability Director

Contents

Introduction to EFBW and the sector

EU bottled water actions & EU legislation

The way forward for collection & sorting

Who we are

Not-for-profit association representing the European Bottled Water industry

Founded in 2003 (successor to UNESEM/GISENEC, Paris, 1953)

Membership base of national associations and companies representing almost 550 producers of packaged water

Members

DanoneGerolsteinerKarlovarske Mineralni VodyNestle WatersRomaquaSan BenedettoSpadelUludağ

OthersLaboratorio Dr. Oliver RodesNSFSGS FreseniusWatercoolers Europe

AustriaBelgiumBulgariaCroatiaCzech RepublicDenmarkFranceGeorgiaGermanyGreeceHungaryIrelandItaly

LuxembourgNetherlandsPolandPortugal RomaniaSerbiaSloveniaSouth AfricaSpainTurkey (Suder & Masuder) UK (BSDA)Ukraine

National Federations Companies

4

Key statistics

EU non-alcoholic beverages 2017

Source: GlobalData

Regional Growth of Bottled Water

7.3%

4.2%

3.0%

1.8%

2.8%

1.7%3.8%

2.5%

10.7%

9.6%

8.0%

4.8%

8.0%

5.9%

9.8%

4.6%CAGR 13-18

CAGR 18-23

Regional Bottled Water* Volume Growth 13-18 and Forecast 18-23

Bubble size representative of 2018 Volume

* Packaged Water, Flavoured Water and Enhanced Water. Excludes Bulk/HOD Water.

Country 2013 2018 CAGR

Russia 4,423 4,363 -0.3%

Turkey 4,000 5,747 7.5%

What do European consumers drink?

EU bottled water packaging materials

Source: GlobalData

Sustainable packaging

➢Glass & PET bottles, aluminium cans = 100% recyclable

➢ Producers = pioneers in setting up nat. recovery schemes, design guidelines for recycling and light-weighting

➢ Beverage packaging recycling rates = top of the class!

Sector’s challenges

We use fully recyclable and light-

weight materials

We protect the environment

around the source

We market a healthy and

natural product

And yet ….

…. we have an issue

From urban litter to marine pollution

Packaging should not end up as litter

EU moves forward

EFBW Pledges 15 May 2018

EFBW submitted pledges to DG Grow

➢The sector pledged for 135 thousand tonnes of additional rPET use by 2025

➢Uptake of recycled content is a continuous process

➢Important preconditions: availability, high quality recyclates and affordability

Single Use Plastics Directive

77% collectiontarget of plastic

beverage bottles by 2025 and 90% collection target

by 2029

25% rPET by 2025 and 30%

recycled content requirement on

all beverage bottles by 2030

Mandatorytethered caps in

2024

EPR of SUP products:

producers to contribute to

litter clean up = costs will be

higher

Companies very active on r-PET

Nestle Waters: 100% rPET for Valvert (2019)

Danone: 100% rPET for Volvic(2019) and Evian (2019 Wimbledon trial)

Vöslauer: 100% rPET(2019 in Germany)

Mattoni: 50 % rPET(2018)

UN Declares War on Ocean Plastic

Material substitution?

Collection

Coming up

➢A separate waste collection plan will be presented in the first 100 days of the new European Commission

➢The proposal includes setting common colours for garbage bags and bins

➢The new Commission also wants to make it mandatoryfor companies to support any environmental claims they make

Overview of Europe‘s Extended Producer Responsibility (Status 2018)

11 countries with National EPR

scheme

17 countries with competition

between EPRs or waste

management operators

2 countries with state-owned

recovery organization

1 country with deposit system

only

RUSSIA

UKRAINE2 countries with packaging tax

threat to push for EPR

Deposit Refund Systems in Europe

Deposit system implemented / Political decision taken

DRS return rates

Source: Tomra

➢DRS in EU countries yield high collection of beverage bottles and thus decrease beverage littering

➢DRS is a clean waste stream = quality input material for bottle-to-bottle recycling

➢Deposit fee could (?), at first instance, discouragebeverage sales

➢DRS is only part of the solution of the broader post-consumer packaging issue (i.e. non-beverage litter)

DRS provides reliable beverage collection

data per country

EFBW first to endorse DRS (2/7/2019)

Design elements of a successful DRSGovernance

❖Set up & run by obliged industry ❖Centrally operated (Central Deposit

Management Organization)❖Not-for-profit

Scope ❖Operated at national level❖Include all relevant

beverage categories & packaging types

Consumer❖The level of deposit

fee to incentivize a “bring back” culture

❖Convenient return points

❖Communications▪ Deposit fee as a

separate from the sales price for clarity

▪ Materials covered

Finances❖Unredeemed deposits & sales

of collected materials to stay in CDMO

Reflections

➢Is there a litter problem in your country?

➢What kind of litter?

➢Plastics is more than PET – DRS is part of the solution

➢If applied then DRS should be well designed

If a bird can do it…

THANK YOU!

Ermis PanagiotopoulosSustainability DirectorErmis.Panagiotopoulos@efbw.org

@efbw_eu