Breaking the Barrier: Interactive Election Campaign Communication on Twitter

Post on 20-Jun-2015

561 views 3 download

Tags:

description

Presentation from the General Online Research Conference 2010 in Pforzheim, Germany.

Transcript of Breaking the Barrier: Interactive Election Campaign Communication on Twitter

Breaking the Barrier

Interactive Election Campaign Communication on Twitterduring the German General Election 2009

Pascal JürgensU of Mainz, Germanypascal.juergens@gmail.com

Andreas JungherrU of Bamberg, Germanyandreas.jungherr@gmail.com

2

Twitter and Politics

2

Twitter and Politics

The 2009 German General Election started with the impression of Obama’s online campaign fresh in mind

2

Twitter and Politics

The 2009 German General Election started with the impression of Obama’s online campaign fresh in mind

Due to several high-profile incidents, German media and politics focussed on Twitter at least as much as on other social networks

Twitter Overview

3

Twitter Overview»Micro-publishing« — publish short messages

3

Twitter Overview»Micro-publishing« — publish short messages

Re-Tweet — quote message including attribution

3

Twitter Overview»Micro-publishing« — publish short messages

Re-Tweet — quote message including attribution

Directed (@-)message — explicitly sent to a recipient

3

Twitter Overview»Micro-publishing« — publish short messages

Re-Tweet — quote message including attribution

Directed (@-)message — explicitly sent to a recipient

Topic tags (#) — defines the topic of the message

3

Twitter Overview»Micro-publishing« — publish short messages

Re-Tweet — quote message including attribution

Directed (@-)message — explicitly sent to a recipient

Topic tags (#) — defines the topic of the message

High degree of mobile usage (~15% in our dataset)

3

Data Collection

4

Data CollectionBootstrap: List of political twitter users(Assembled from several websites compiling lists of politicians on twitter)

4

Data CollectionBootstrap: List of political twitter users(Assembled from several websites compiling lists of politicians on twitter)

Growth: perpetual search for #tags(Add new users to sample)

4

Data CollectionBootstrap: List of political twitter users(Assembled from several websites compiling lists of politicians on twitter)

Growth: perpetual search for #tags(Add new users to sample)

Capture: Collect all new tweets(Also crawling archives for coverage over entire time range)

4

Data CollectionBootstrap: List of political twitter users(Assembled from several websites compiling lists of politicians on twitter)

Growth: perpetual search for #tags(Add new users to sample)

Capture: Collect all new tweets(Also crawling archives for coverage over entire time range)

Graphs: Nightly snapshot of friend/followers

4

Dataset

5

Dataset

Three months prior to General Election

5

Dataset

Three months prior to General Election

A sample of Germany’s politically active twitter users — 33 048 individuals

5

Dataset

Three months prior to General Election

A sample of Germany’s politically active twitter users — 33 048 individuals

A complete archive of their communication (public tweets) — 10 109 894 messages

5

Dataset

Three months prior to General Election

A sample of Germany’s politically active twitter users — 33 048 individuals

A complete archive of their communication (public tweets) — 10 109 894 messages

A temporal map of their connections

5

Election Day

Twitter Outage

6

Message Volume

Election Day

TV debate

Poster remixes

7

Political Message Volume

8www.flickr.com/photos/41501796@N06/3823362599/

“We know:War means (is) peace”

“We are strong enough for security and

freedom”

Defining Links

9

Defining Links

Followers are a questionable indicator of influence (Cha et al: “The Million Follower Fallacy”)

9

Defining Links

Followers are a questionable indicator of influence (Cha et al: “The Million Follower Fallacy”)

Intentional, meaningful interaction as a link: @-messages and quotes (re-tweets)

9

Network Structure

10

0 2000 4000 6000 8000

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

Degree Distribution

in-degree

cum

ulat

ive

frequ

ency

1 10 100 1000 10000

1e-04

1e-03

1e-02

1e-01

1e+00

Degree Distribution

in-degree

cum

ulat

ive

frequ

ency

highly connectedusers are

infrequent

little connected users make up the majority

(Clustering Coefficient C = .045 Random Erdös-Rényi Graph C = .001)

Distribution of Incoming Links (cumulative)

The Visible Core

110

7500

15000

22500

30000

∑ interactive messages per user / ranked

@-Messages Retweets

12

«The Rich get Richer»

Follower gain over sample timespan correlates with intensity of interaction(Spearman’s Rho rs = .54, two-tailed p ≃ 0)

12

«The Rich get Richer»

Follower gain over sample timespan correlates with intensity of interaction(Spearman’s Rho rs = .54, two-tailed p ≃ 0)

Corresponds to “preferential attachement” theory on network growthNew participants attach (follow) to most visible nodes

12

«The Rich get Richer»

Content Analysis

13

Content Analysis

Hand-coded a sample from each of the 50 most prominent users

13

Content Analysis

Hand-coded a sample from each of the 50 most prominent users

Prominence: Volume of meaningful communication (direct messages + re-tweets)

13

Content Analysis

Hand-coded a sample from each of the 50 most prominent users

Prominence: Volume of meaningful communication (direct messages + re-tweets)

Coding for content topic, references, links

13

Top 50 users

14

35

66

3

Politicians / Parties Media Media-like Blogs Personal Accounts

Top 50 users

14

35

66

3

Politicians / Parties Media Media-like Blogs Personal Accounts

The Pirate PartyThe Green Party

Jörg Tauss

Content Typology

15

personal intellectual work-related automatic

Mindcasting, Lifecasting, Workcasting

Results

16

Results

Reach on twitter is very dependent on a small group of users (new gatekeepers)

16

Results

Reach on twitter is very dependent on a small group of users (new gatekeepers)

Preferential attachement makes entry into twitter ecosystem difficult

16

Results

Reach on twitter is very dependent on a small group of users (new gatekeepers)

Preferential attachement makes entry into twitter ecosystem difficult

Politicians are only successful if they attach to existing topics/trends/conventions? (e.g. Jörg Tauss, Piratenpartei)

16

Results II

17

Results II

Dedicated “political” communities do not play a significant role.

17

Results II

Dedicated “political” communities do not play a significant role.

Dedicated “political” users do (mostly) not play a significant role.

17

Results II

Dedicated “political” communities do not play a significant role.

Dedicated “political” users do (mostly) not play a significant role.

Political communication happens ad-hoc in issue-driven topics among non-political tweets and topics.

17

18

Topical Interaction

18

Topical Interaction

Politics as One Among Many Topics

19

Translated:“I’ll be glad once the election campaigns are over and we can all like each other again. Especially once the dull discussions come to an end.”

20

Thank you

21

List of hashtags identifying political topicscducsu spd fdp gruene grüne piraten npd linke zensursula bundestagswahl petition politik cduremix09 btw09 wahl sst linkspartei union tvduell

22

No Clear-Cut Style

Loadings: Factor1 Factor2 Factor3 Factor4 life -0.902 -0.316 -0.105 -0.267 mind 0.973 -0.199 work 0.996 auto 0.993 polit 0.485 0.188 0.800 0.110 level 0.370 0.167 0.678 ext 0.156 0.152 diag -0.118 -0.154 self -0.131

Explorative factor analysis not fruitful:

22

No Clear-Cut Style

Loadings: Factor1 Factor2 Factor3 Factor4 life -0.902 -0.316 -0.105 -0.267 mind 0.973 -0.199 work 0.996 auto 0.993 polit 0.485 0.188 0.800 0.110 level 0.370 0.167 0.678 ext 0.156 0.152 diag -0.118 -0.154 self -0.131

Explorative factor analysis not fruitful:

22

No Clear-Cut Style

Loadings: Factor1 Factor2 Factor3 Factor4 life -0.902 -0.316 -0.105 -0.267 mind 0.973 -0.199 work 0.996 auto 0.993 polit 0.485 0.188 0.800 0.110 level 0.370 0.167 0.678 ext 0.156 0.152 diag -0.118 -0.154 self -0.131

Explorative factor analysis not fruitful:

22

No Clear-Cut Style

Loadings: Factor1 Factor2 Factor3 Factor4 life -0.902 -0.316 -0.105 -0.267 mind 0.973 -0.199 work 0.996 auto 0.993 polit 0.485 0.188 0.800 0.110 level 0.370 0.167 0.678 ext 0.156 0.152 diag -0.118 -0.154 self -0.131

Explorative factor analysis not fruitful:

22

No Clear-Cut Style

Loadings: Factor1 Factor2 Factor3 Factor4 life -0.902 -0.316 -0.105 -0.267 mind 0.973 -0.199 work 0.996 auto 0.993 polit 0.485 0.188 0.800 0.110 level 0.370 0.167 0.678 ext 0.156 0.152 diag -0.118 -0.154 self -0.131

Explorative factor analysis not fruitful:

22

No Clear-Cut Style

Loadings: Factor1 Factor2 Factor3 Factor4 life -0.902 -0.316 -0.105 -0.267 mind 0.973 -0.199 work 0.996 auto 0.993 polit 0.485 0.188 0.800 0.110 level 0.370 0.167 0.678 ext 0.156 0.152 diag -0.118 -0.154 self -0.131

Explorative factor analysis not fruitful:

(p-value 8.870000×10^-154, Chi square of 727.04 on 6 degrees of freedom)

22

No Clear-Cut Style

Loadings: Factor1 Factor2 Factor3 Factor4 life -0.902 -0.316 -0.105 -0.267 mind 0.973 -0.199 work 0.996 auto 0.993 polit 0.485 0.188 0.800 0.110 level 0.370 0.167 0.678 ext 0.156 0.152 diag -0.118 -0.154 self -0.131

Content Typology

23

0

100

200

300

400

political national politics regional politicslink to party website re-tweet directed message