Post on 04-Apr-2018
7/29/2019 Boobalan Review i Ppt(08.02.2013)
1/20
ST 9132 PROECT WORK PHASE II
REVIEW I
BY
BOOBALAN A (2011208031)
7/29/2019 Boobalan Review i Ppt(08.02.2013)
2/20
1 ENGINEERING PROPERTIES OF FLY ASH
DATA .
2 RELAVANT FLY ASH LITERATURE
COLLECTION
3 CONFORMING BEHAVIOURAL OF
FLY ASH DETAILS.
7/29/2019 Boobalan Review i Ppt(08.02.2013)
3/20
4 PRELIMINARY TEST
5
CUBE CASTING(M25 GRADE-10%,20%,40%,50%-FLY ASH REPLACEMENT)
6
STRENGTH TEST (COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH,FLEXURAL
STRENGTH TEST,SPILIT TENSILE STRENGTHTEST)
7/29/2019 Boobalan Review i Ppt(08.02.2013)
4/20
7Durability tests
8Comparison of results
9Conclusion
7/29/2019 Boobalan Review i Ppt(08.02.2013)
5/20
REQUIRED DATA:M-25 Grade concrete-10% fly ash
replacement.
Uncrushed aggregates (20mm)
F.A. shows that 40% passes through
600micron sieve.
Slump ranges taken as 30-60mm.Concrete to be prepared at moderate
condition.
Reinforcement cover adopted as 25mm.
7/29/2019 Boobalan Review i Ppt(08.02.2013)
6/20
Quantities IN kg/m3
Cement =267.3
Fly ash =29.7
F.A =750.234
C.A =1224.066
water =148.5
7/29/2019 Boobalan Review i Ppt(08.02.2013)
7/20
S.NO NO OF DAYS NO OF SAMPLES REQUIRED FORTESTING
CUBE CYLINDER BEAM
1 7 15 15 15
2 28 15 15 15
3 56 15 15 15
7/29/2019 Boobalan Review i Ppt(08.02.2013)
8/20
Compressive Strength To determine the compressive
strength of concrete specimens as perIS:516 - 1959. Tests should be done atrecognized ages of the test specimens,
usually being 7 and 28 days. The ages
should be calculated from the time of theaddition of water to the drying of
ingredients
7/29/2019 Boobalan Review i Ppt(08.02.2013)
9/20
7/29/2019 Boobalan Review i Ppt(08.02.2013)
10/20
7/29/2019 Boobalan Review i Ppt(08.02.2013)
11/20
7/29/2019 Boobalan Review i Ppt(08.02.2013)
12/20
7/29/2019 Boobalan Review i Ppt(08.02.2013)
13/20
7/29/2019 Boobalan Review i Ppt(08.02.2013)
14/20
7/29/2019 Boobalan Review i Ppt(08.02.2013)
15/20
7/29/2019 Boobalan Review i Ppt(08.02.2013)
16/20
S.No Wt of cube specimensat 7 days (kg)
Load applied on cubespecimens at 7 days
(KN)
1 8.10 255
2 8.12 296
3 8.20 310
7/29/2019 Boobalan Review i Ppt(08.02.2013)
17/20
S.No No of days Avg compressive strength ( N/mm2)
10% 20% 40% 50%
1 7 13.05 13.57 13.30 13.13
2 28 26.90 26.51 25.20 26.12
7/29/2019 Boobalan Review i Ppt(08.02.2013)
18/20
1.A. Fernandez-Jimenez I. Garca-Lodeiro A. Palomo (2006),
Eduardo Torroja Institute (CSIC), Serrano Galvache St., 28080
Madrid, Spain- Durability of alkali-activated fly ash cementitious
materials, P.No (30553065).
2.C.S. Poon, L. Lam, Y.L. Wong (1999), Department of Civil and
Structural Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University,
Hung Him, Hong Kong, People's Republic of China - A study on
high strength concrete prepared with large volumes of low calciumfly ash, P. No(447-455).
7/29/2019 Boobalan Review i Ppt(08.02.2013)
19/20
C.Y. Lee, H.K. Lee, K.M. Lee (2002), Conclinic Co. Ltd.,
Seoul, South Korea ,Department of Civil and Environmental
Engineering, Sungkyunkwan University- Strength and micro
structural characteristics of chemically activated fly ashcement systems, P.No(425431).
4. Bashar S. Mohammed* and Ong Chuan Fang
(2010),Department of Civil Engineering, College ofEngineering, University Malaysia.-Assessing the properties
of freshly mixed concrete containing paper-mill residuals and
class F fly ash , Vol. 2(2), P.no (17-26).
7/29/2019 Boobalan Review i Ppt(08.02.2013)
20/20
THANK YOU