BLADE3DR - turboaerodesign.comBlade three-dimensional profile design and aero/hydrodynamic analysis...

Post on 13-Mar-2021

28 views 0 download

Transcript of BLADE3DR - turboaerodesign.comBlade three-dimensional profile design and aero/hydrodynamic analysis...

BLADE3DRVersion 3.3

2018

Dr. Justin (Jongsik) Oh

www.TurboAeroDesign.com

2018www.TurboAeroDesign.com

2

INTRODUCTIONBLADE3DR ver. 3.3

Blade three-dimensional profile design and aero/hydrodynamic analysis in turbomachinery

A single row blade

Design parameters

Hub and shroud contours

Blade camberline metal angle

Blade normal thickness

Aerodynamic analysis options

Blade loading analysis• SCM (Streamline Curvature Method, or Velocity Gradient Method)

• FEM (Finite Element Method)

Blade 3D simplified CFD• Explicit time-marching method using body forces for turbulent viscous terms

• No rotor tip clearance

• Real gas option included

2018www.TurboAeroDesign.com

3

Development was motivated by personal needs for Better Performance and Reliability at aero design tasks since 2002 while using some commercial software, including

CCAD (by Concepts ETI, but now Concepts NREC)

COMIG (by NREC, but now gone)

BladeGen and BladeGenPlus (by AEA Technology)

AxCENT (by Concepts NREC)

BladeModeller (by Ansys)

Over 12 year-use in personal aero-design tasks at various applications, still evolving.

2018www.TurboAeroDesign.com

4

Program Strucuture Windows-based ( FORTRAN + Visual Basic ) Aiming for use of PC or laptops Programs are installed in “C:\OJS\TurboSW\Blade3DR\Ver3_3\”. All input/output files are located in “C:\OJS\TurboSW\Blade3DR\Ver3_3\Work\”. All input/output file names are pre-determined and fixed. When tasks are done, all necessary files should be copied to the local folder using the data management menu.

Program Limits A single row of blades Max. two-row tangential splitter blades No fillets Currently limited CAD export options (DXF and STL) *

Program Plus Capabilities Two different methods for blade loading analysis (SCM + FEM) 3D compressible or incompressible turbulent CFD Blade rotation by specified angle (useful for IGV model) Large single screen for better work performance (that I love) Supplementary viewer + Text viewer Total 21 spanwise uniformly-spaced layers (fixed) Two curve options

• Spline **

• Bezier polynomial

2018www.TurboAeroDesign.com

5

(*) When professional s/w expertise is added,it will be extended to IGES and STEP, etc.However, a solid can be easily created fromSTL with any CAD programs.

(**) In some situation, using Spline providesbetter work performance than Bezier. You willneed both.

2018www.TurboAeroDesign.com

6

• Large single screen for edit

• Supplementary viewer

• Text viewer

• Easy-access buttons

• File inputs

.rtzt

.ojs

.curve

Meanline output from

all my design programs

The .rtzt file is of a blade meanline format,

shared with all my programs and also with Ansys

BladeModeller (See Appendix).

The .ojs file is of directly-saved data of Blade3D.

The .curve files are Ansys Turbogrid inputs.

Just for illustration (of arbitrary design) to show capabilities of two-row splitters with real gas

Centrifugal compressor impeller using HFC-134a refrigerant

2018www.TurboAeroDesign.com

7

• 2D DXF

• 3D DXF wireframe

• 3D STL

• Direct inputs for

Ansys Turbogrid (.curve)

Numeca FineTurbo (.geomturbo)

2018www.TurboAeroDesign.com

8

Dynamic View

Spanwise Distributions

2018www.TurboAeroDesign.com

9

• Various setting options for

better design performance

2018www.TurboAeroDesign.com

10

• Various edit options for

better design performance

Spline

Bezier Polynomial

• BETA or THETA edit

2018www.TurboAeroDesign.com

11

• Various edit options for better design performance

• Edit while looking at hub and shroud curves together

• By default, all tangential splitter-blades follow full-blade

angles. However, they can be changed via Option menu.

2018www.TurboAeroDesign.com

12

• Edit while looking at hub and shroud curves together

• All tangential splitter-blade thicknesses are independently

changeable.

• Sometimes “spline” curve is better than “Bezier polynomial” at

heavy rate of changes in the distribution. You will need both.

2018www.TurboAeroDesign.com

13

2018www.TurboAeroDesign.com

14

• Total 5 Options

Circle

Ellipse

Bezier *

Pseudo *

Cut-off

(*) In case that the ellipse approach fails

2018www.TurboAeroDesign.com

15

• Unusual case, but available

Through an add-on editor

• Example shows the change of

BETA of 2nd-row splitter.

2018www.TurboAeroDesign.com

16

• Unusual case, but available

Through an add-on editor

• Example shows the change of

THETA of 1st-row splitter.

2018www.TurboAeroDesign.com

17

• Blade trim or extension

Impeller outer diameter

o on hub

o on shroud

Impeller exit height

Impeller inlet height

• While reserving baseline shape of

Blade angle

Blade thickness

• Useful option for industry design needs

2018www.TurboAeroDesign.com

18

• Two Different Analysis Methods

SCM (Streamline Curvature Method)

o Also called Velocity Gradient Method

o Sove the velocity gradient equation (inviscid) along

each quasi-orthogonal to streamlines from inlet to exit

FEM (Finite Element Method)

o Subsonic stream-function Poisson equation (inviscid)

o Adler & Krimerman’s H-S stream surface approach

Ideal gas or incompressible fluid for both methods

Note : Just for illustration to show capabilities of two-row splitters with real gas

2018www.TurboAeroDesign.com

19

Streamlines after

solution converges

Again, just for illustration to show capabilities of two-row splitters with real gas

2018www.TurboAeroDesign.com

20

Streamlines after

solution converges

The FEM program is a part of my

Ph.D. thesis achievements (1992).

Streamlines after

solution converges

Again, just for illustration to show capabilities of two-row splitters with real gas

2018www.TurboAeroDesign.com

21

• A single blade row

• Compressible fluid

Ideal gas

Real gas

• Incompressible fluid

• Turbulent viscous body forces

• No rotor tip clearance

• Multi-grid convergence

• Structured grids

• Effective tool to check aero designs

Again, just for illustration to show capabilities of two-row splitters with real gas

2018www.TurboAeroDesign.com

22

2018www.TurboAeroDesign.com

23

Again, just for illustration to show capabilities of two-row splitters with real gas

2018www.TurboAeroDesign.com

24

Again, just for illustration to show capabilities of two-row splitters with real gas

2018www.TurboAeroDesign.com

25

Again, just for illustration to show capabilities of two-row splitters with real gas

2018www.TurboAeroDesign.com

26

• Example using FreeCAD

Part environment

Open > Blade3D.STL

Part > Creat shape from mesh

Blade3D001 solid

with spanwise extensions

2018www.TurboAeroDesign.com

27

• Tangential Lean

Edit stacking curve

Mostly axial blades

2018www.TurboAeroDesign.com

28

• Meridional Sweep

Edit stacking curve

Mostly axial blades

2018www.TurboAeroDesign.com

29

• Interstage key component

Sample industry design from

a multistage centrifugal chiller

compressor using HFC-134a,

looking a lot problematic in

aerodynamics

2018www.TurboAeroDesign.com

30

On mid-pitchOn 75% span from hub

Near trailing-edge

Blade loadings on shroud

FEMSCM

FEM

Streamlines

SCM

streamlines

Blade Loading Analysis

2018www.TurboAeroDesign.com

31

• CFD inputs

• Real gas

• 0 rpm (stationary)

2018www.TurboAeroDesign.com

32

On mid-pitchOn 75% span from hub

Near trailing-edge

Blade loadings on shroud

Spanwise flow angles

at discharge

2018www.TurboAeroDesign.com

33

• Conventional water

pump impeller

2018www.TurboAeroDesign.com

34

Loading

Analysis

FEMSCM

FEM

StreamlinesSCM

streamlines

2018www.TurboAeroDesign.com

35

• CFD inputs

• Incompressible fluid

2018www.TurboAeroDesign.com

36

• Time-marching

method using

artificial

compressibility for

incompressible

fluid simulation

2018www.TurboAeroDesign.com

37

On Shroud

On mid-pitch On mid-span

2018www.TurboAeroDesign.com

38

• Radial-inflow

turbine rotor with

one-row splitter

2018www.TurboAeroDesign.com

39

FEM

SCM

FEM

Streamlines

SCM

streamlines

Loading Analysis

2018www.TurboAeroDesign.com

40

On lower mid-pitch

On 75% span from hub

Secondary flows

near trailing-edge

On shroud

• CFD

• Transonic rotor

Convergence

2018www.TurboAeroDesign.com

41

• NASA CR 72562

2018www.TurboAeroDesign.com

42

• CFD results

2018www.TurboAeroDesign.com

43

APPENDIX

BLADE3DR ver.3.3

2018www.TurboAeroDesign.com

44

• One of Blade3DR default input formats

Blade meanline geometry

Originally the format was from BladeGen (AEA Technology). (now Ansys BladeModeller)

However, for tangential splitter blades, Blade3DR uses a different definition of pitchwise locations.

Full-blade count Number of tangential splitter blades

Full-blade pitch position Number of spans N (Normal thickness) M

T (Tangential thickness)

Normalized span from hub Total number of data

R (Radius) Theta (rad) Z (Axial) T (Thickness)

along camberline

from bladeless-upstream, blade and bladeless-downstream

Normalized span from hub Total number of data

R (Radius) Theta (rad) Z (Axial) T (Thickness)

along camberline

from bladeless-upstream, blade and bladeless-downstream

>

>

>

○○ Repeated to Shroud

2018www.TurboAeroDesign.com

45

End of bladeless-downstream at shroud of full blade

1st-row splitter pitch position(*) Number of spans N (Normal thickness) M

T (Tangential thickness)

Normalized span from hub Total number of data

R (Radius) Theta (rad) Z (Axial) T (Thickness)

along camberline

from bladeless-upstream, blade and bladeless-downstream

Normalized span from hub Total number of data

R (Radius) Theta (rad) Z (Axial) T (Thickness)

along camberline

from bladeless-upstream, blade and bladeless-downstream

>

>

○○ Repeated to Shroud

>

(*) Relative pitch between two adjacent full blades

2018www.TurboAeroDesign.com

46

End of bladeless-downstream at shroud of 1st-row splitter blade

2nd-row splitter pitch position(**) Number of spans N (Normal thickness) M

T (Tangential thickness)

Normalized span from hub Total number of data

R (Radius) Theta (rad) Z (Axial) T (Thickness)

along camberline

from bladeless-upstream, blade and bladeless-downstream

Normalized span from hub Total number of data

R (Radius) Theta (rad) Z (Axial) T (Thickness)

along camberline

from bladeless-upstream, blade and bladeless-downstream

>

>

○○ Repeated to Shroud

>

(**) Relative pitch between full blade and 1st-row splitter blade

2018www.TurboAeroDesign.com

47

THANKS FOR YOUR INTEREST