Post on 06-Jan-2016
description
Best Practices in Transit Rider Survey Data Collection
Chris TathamSr. Vice President, CEO, ETC Institute
725 W. Frontier CircleOlathe, KS 66061
913-254-4512ctatham@etcinstitute.com
January 25, 2012
Challenges with Rider Survey Data Collection
Methods to Address These Challenges
◦ Closely Manage the Design & Distribution of the Sample
◦ Use Tablet PCs & Personal Interviews
◦ Carefully Plan and Conduct Data Expansion
Summary
Questions
2
3
Inadequate Development and Management of the Sample◦ Sampling plans are often developed using very
little information on ridership Usually limited to the total average ridership on a
bus route or rail station, but little else is known◦ Distribution of the sample is often not monitored
while in the field Surveys are collected and the distribution is
reviewed after the survey has been completed◦ IMPACT: Samples are not representative of
the ridership
4
Very little effort is taken to gather data
to support sample-expansion◦ Ride check data is usually available, but seldom
reviewed before surveys are conducted Inattention to automated counts misses a huge (and
largely free!) opportunity Major stops along a route are under-represented End-of-the-Line locations are over-represented
◦ Vehicle counts from P&R lots are available, but often not used – could provide as control totals for data expansion
◦ IMPACT: Aggregate expansion only magnifies sampling errors
5
Severe attrition with self-administered surveys handed out to transit riders
◦ Low participation rates◦ Biases in the types of people who respond◦ High rates of incomplete/illogical records◦ High rates of geo-coding failure◦ IMPACT: introduction of unknown biases
related to ridership characteristics and travel patterns
Response rates are often less than 20% andA Majority of the Completed Surveys
A Often Unusable6
7
Assemble data on existing ridership (first!)◦ Obtain counts from APCs, faregates, etc.◦ Undertake manual boarding/alighting counts if necessary◦ Consider on-to-off “survey”
Set Detailed Sampling Goals:◦ Don’t stop with aggregate goals for each route/station◦ Set goals for:
specific locations along each route specific types of trips (Station A to B/Stop A to B by time of day by direction
Manage the goals while you are in the field
1. Closely Manage the Design & Distribution of the Sample
8
GPS Based ScannersCaptured More than
97% of the
On-to-Off Flows in Honolulu
9
Advantages of Personal Interview◦ More accurate ◦ More complete◦ More representative
key groups are not under-represented
Advantages of Tablet PCs◦ Details about the study area/transit system can be
pre-programmed◦ Can be programmed to interface with Google-Maps for
real-time geocoding in the field ◦ Manage sample distribution in the field◦ Real-time management of data collection in the field
with IPad w/3G◦ Less time to administer (helps capture short trips)
2. Use Tablet PCs & Personal Interviews
10
Combined results of pilot tests in Atlanta (2009), Phoenix (2010), and Nashville (2011)
11
01
12
03
Options Presented at the Beginning of the Survey
13
08aSurvey Interfaces with Google-Earth in Real-Time
14
13aKey Locations, such as Park and Ride Lots Are
Preloaded
15
15Bus Route Shape FilesAre Integrated
16
18
Route Transfers Are Limited
17
25Summary ScreenEnsures All Recorded Information Is Correct
18
Reasons Tablet PCs Enhance Data Quality and Sampling
Video Demonstration
19
Control sample expansion at the least aggregate level possible◦ Ensures the proper distribution of trips along routes◦ Limited by density of samples at stops/stations◦ Often involves some aggregation of stops/stations
Better data supports better expansion: ◦ Atlanta rail faregate data station-to-station controls◦ Atlanta bus APC data stop-on and stop-off controls◦ Phoenix rail counting task (ons, offs, on-to-offs)
station-to-station controls Without good control totals you can’t ensure that
your expanded data are representative
3. Carefully Plan and Conduct Data Expansion
20
RTE 17 DESIRE LINES FROM ON => OFF COUNTS OCT 2011 – ALL FLOWS
Good On-to-Off Flow
Data Helps PlanFor Data Expansion
21
Simple Example of Data Expansion - RAIL
Table 1: NUMBER OF COMPLETE/USEABLE SURVEY (PM PEAK 3-7 PM)WHERE GET OFF
S7 N5 W3 E7 P1WHERE GET ON
Airport Arts Center Ashby Avondale Bankhead TOTALS7=Airport 0 7 3 4 2 16N5=Art Center 9 0 2 4 1 16W3=Ashby 3 2 0 2 14 21E7=Avondale 4 3 2 0 1 10P1=Bankhead 3 3 2 2 0 63
Table 2: FARE GATE COUNTS BY STATION OF ENTRY AND EXIT (PM PEAK 3-7 PM)WHERE GET OFF
S7 N5 W3 E7 P1WHERE GET ON Airport Arts Center Ashby Avondale Bankhead TOTALS7=Airport 0 115 10 49 9 184N5=Art Center 116 0 21 58 11 207W3=Ashby 16 21 0 8 32 77E7=Avondale 42 29 14 0 9 94P1=Bankhead 8 6 28 6 0 562
Table 3: EXPANSION FACTORS/MULTIPLIERS ( PM PEAK 3-7 PM)WHERE GET OFF
S7 N5 W3 E7 P1WHERE GET ON Airport Arts Center Ashby Avondale Bankhead TOTALS7=Airport #DIV/0! 16.480356 3.329365 12.235416 4.619494 11.470702N5=Art Center 12.901289 #DIV/0! 10.737202 14.607588 11.236606 12.953310W3=Ashby 5.493452 10.362648 #DIV/0! 3.995238 2.265157 3.662301E7=Avondale 10.425074 9.738392 6.991666 #DIV/0! 8.989285 9.388809P1=Bankhead 2.746726 1.914385 13.858481 3.121280 #DIV/0! 8.913978
22
If You Don’t Manage Your Sample, Your Data Could Look Like This
Table 1: NUMBER OF COMPLETE/USEABLE SURVEY (PM PEAK 3-7 PM)WHERE GET OFF
S7 N5 W3 E7 P1WHERE GET ON
Airport Arts Center Ashby Avondale Bankhead TOTALS7=Airport 0 1 0 6 9 16N5=Art Center 4 0 0 1 11 16W3=Ashby 14 0 0 0 7 21E7=Avondale 0 9 0 0 1 10P1=Bankhead 0 3 2 2 0 63
Table 2: FARE GATE COUNTS BY STATION OF ENTRY AND EXIT (PM PEAK 3-7 PM)WHERE GET OFF
S7 N5 W3 E7 P1WHERE GET ON Airport Arts Center Ashby Avondale Bankhead TOTALS7=Airport 0 115 10 49 9 184N5=Art Center 116 0 21 58 11 207W3=Ashby 16 21 0 8 32 77E7=Avondale 42 29 14 0 9 94P1=Bankhead 8 6 28 6 0 562
Table 3: EXPANSION FACTORS/MULTIPLIERS ( PM PEAK 3-7 PM)WHERE GET OFF
S7 N5 W3 E7 P1WHERE GET ON Airport Arts Center Ashby Avondale Bankhead TOTALS7=Airport #DIV/0! 115.362492 #DIV/0! 8.156944 1.026554 11.470702N5=Art Center 29.027900 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 58.430353 1.021510 12.953310W3=Ashby 1.177168 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 4.530314 3.662301E7=Avondale #DIV/0! 3.246131 #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 8.989285 9.388809P1=Bankhead #DIV/0! 1.914385 13.858481 3.121280 #DIV/0! 8.913978
23
24
• The Tablet PC/Personal Interview method facilitates data expansion, which can lower the overall unitcost per completed useable survey
Location Year Method
Survey Administration
Cost*
Complete Useable Surveys
Unit Cost Per Useable Survey
Atlanta 2010 Tablet PC/Interview 1,624,300$ 43200 37.60$ Phoenix 2011 Tablet PC/Interview 618,500$ 15450 40.03$ Nashville 2011 Tablet PC/Interview 165,000$ 3956 41.71$ *Survey Administration Costs Do Not Include Survey Design, Sampling Plan, Pilot Test, Analysis, etc
25
The methods discussed today can be used to enhance the overall quality of the data collected
Closely Manage the Design & Distribution of the Sample
Use Tablet PCs & Personal Interviews Carefully Plan and Conduct Data Expansion
Take advantage of new technology Give yourself enough time to do the survey right Good training and oversight of the people
administering the survey is always essential.
Summary
Improvements in the quality of survey datawill place pressure on transit agencies to collect
better ridership data 26
Chris TathamSr. Vice President, CEO
ETC Institute725 W. Frontier Circle
Olathe, KS 66061913-254-4512
ctatham@etcinstitute.com
27