Post on 12-Sep-2016
Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences (2011) 18, 287–292
King Saud University
Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences
www.ksu.edu.sawww.sciencedirect.com
Authentication of the medicinal plant Senna angustifoliaby RAPD profiling
Salim Khana,*, Khanda Jabeen Mirza
b, Fahad Al-Qurainy
a, Malik Zainul Abdin
b
a Department of Botany and Microbiology, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Kingdom of Saudi Arabiab Centre for Transgenic Plant Development, Department of Biotechnology, Faculty of Science, Jamia Hamdard,Hamdard Nagar, New Delhi 110062, India
Received 28 December 2010; revised 27 February 2011; accepted 21 March 2011Available online 25 March 2011
*
E
13
El
Pe
do
KEYWORDS
Adulteration;
Senna;
Herbal medicine;
PCR
Corresponding author. Tel.
-mail address: salimkhan17@
19-562X ª 2011 King Saud
sevier B.V. All rights reserve
er review under responsibilit
i:10.1016/j.sjbs.2011.03.001
Production and h
: +966 0
yahoo.c
Universit
d.
y of King
osting by E
Abstract In this study ‘‘RAPD’’ molecular marker was employed for the identification of Senna
angustifolia, Senna acutifolia, Senna tora and Senna sophera. Total 32 decamer primers were
screened in amplification with genomic DNA extracted from all species, of which 6 primers yielded
species-specific reproducible bands. Out of 42 loci detected, the polymorphic, monomorphic and
unique loci were 24, 2 and 16, respectively. Based on dendrogram and similarity matrix, 4 species
were differentiated from each other and showed more divergence. Thus, this technique may prove
and to contribute the identification of these species of Senna having similar morphology sold in the
local markets.ª 2011 King Saud University. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Herbal medicine has been enjoying renaissance among custom-ers throughout the world. The World Health Organization
estimates that 80% of the world’s population utilizestraditional medicines for healing and curing diseases (http://www.worldwildlife.org/what/globalmarkets/wildlifetrade/
14675876; fax: +966 4678301.
o.in (S. Khan).
y. Production and hosting by
Saud University.
lsevier
faqs-medicinalplant.html). Medicinal plants cover a wide
range of plant taxa and closely related species. There is anincreasing international market for medicinal plants, whichare used both for herbal medicine and for pharmaceuticalproducts. Accurate and rapid authentication of plants and
their respective adulterants is difficult to achieve at the scaleof international trade in medicinal plants. The naturalmedicines are much safer than synthetic drugs, have gained
popularity in recent years, leading to a tremendous growthof phyto-pharmaceutical usage. However, herbal medicinescan be potentially toxic to human health and sometimes may
cause unknown effects. The recent investigations have revealedthat many plants used in traditional and folk medicine arepotentially toxic and mutagenic (Matthews et al., 2003; Ferre-ira-Machado et al., 2004). Due to the complex nature and
inherent variability of the chemical constituents of plant-baseddrugs, it is difficult to establish quality control parameters.Due to the popularity of herbal drugs globally, their adultera-
tion/substantiation aspects are gaining importance at the
288 S. Khan et al.
commercial level. Pharmaceutical companies are procuring
materials from traders, who are getting these materials fromuntrained persons from rural and/or forest areas. This has gi-ven rise to wide-spread adulteration/substitution, leading topoor quality of herbal formulations.
Misidentification of herbs can be non-intentional (pro-cessed plant parts are inherently difficult to distinguish) orintentional (profit-driven merchants sometimes substitute
expensive herbs with less-expensive look-alike ones (Kiranet al., 2010). Adulteration can occur due to ignorance or inten-tional substitution with cheaper plant material and may cause
damage to human body (Jordan et al., 2010). Therefore,authentication at various stages, from the harvesting of theplant material to the final product, is a need of the hour.
The general approaches to herb identification are dependenton morphological (Carlsward et al., 1997), anatomical (Sternet al., 1994), chemical (Kite et al., 2009; Li et al., 2010) andmolecular (Li et al., 2005) techniques. However, traditional
taxonomic studies require expertise of experienced professionaltaxonomists. In the case where diagnostic morphological traitsof the given specimen are lacking, it becomes difficult even for
specialists to recognize a species correctly. Genetic analysis hasa promising role in resolving disputes of taxonomic identities,relations and authentication of the species in question, as the
genetic composition is unique for each species and is not af-fected by age, physiological conditions and environmental fac-tors. It also helps in the identification of useful genotypeswhich are likely to improve efficacy of standard drug formula-
tions; even the plant extract used in the herbal-drug formula-tions can be authenticated by DNA-based methods (Novaket al., 2007). Therefore, DNA-based methods have gained wide
acceptance in quality control to authenticate crude materials.Formerly included in Cassia L., Senna (Senna angustifolia)
(family: Caesalpiniaceae) is widely used in Unani medicine and
also has been adopted by the pharmacopoeias of the world(Trease and Evans, 1983). It is found in abundance throughoutsouth India and other parts of the country. It is a branching
shrub with a height up to 1.8 m. The seeds are creamish tobrown in color, obovate–oblong, dicotyledonous and mediumsize (3–4 · 1.5–2.0 · 4–5 mm) with weight 2.65 g per 100 seedsapproximately. It has complex mixture of several active con-
stituents such as dianthrone glycosides, free anthraquinones(aloe-emodin, chrysophanol and rhein) and anthraquinoneglycosides. S. angustifolia contributes significantly to commer-
cial drugs and has been investigated for various therapeuticpreparations in several parts of the world in various ways suchas anti-mutagenic, anti-genotoxic and anti-fungal (Silva et al.,
2008). The other species of Senna of same family such as Sennasophera, Senna acutifolia and Senna tora have medicinal valueand are found in Indian sub continent, and widely used as folk
medicine for the treatment of numerous diseases. The phyto-chemicals of various species of Senna are different and someare common to each other which depend on its genotype andenvironmental conditions. However, their identification based
on these markers is difficult as they are influenced by environ-mental conditions. The search for and development of herbalmedicines is rapidly increasing worldwide, therefore, practical
and accurate authentication methods are needed (Sucher andCarles, 2008; Yao et al., 2009; Song et al., 2009) to maintainquality and efficacy of herbal formulations.
Random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) is a simpleand cost ineffective PCR based method as compared to other
DNA based markers. Due to such property of this technique, it
has been widely used for the differentiation of a large numberof medicinal species from their close relatives or adulterants,including Echinacea species (Nieri et al., 2003), turmeric (Sas-ikumar et al., 2004), Astragali radix (Na et al., 2004), Dendro-
bium officinale (Ding et al., 2005), Typhonium species (Acharyaet al., 2005), Dendrobium species and its products (Zhang et al.,2005), Tinospora cordifolia (Rout, 2006), Mimosae tenuiflorae
cortex (Rivera-Arce et al., 2007), Rahmannia glutinosa culti-vars and varieties (Qi et al., 2008), Desmodium species (Irshadet al., 2009), Glycyrrhiza glabra and its adulterant (Khan et al.,
2009), Piper nigrum (Khan et al., 2010b), Cuscuta reflexa andCuscuta chinensis (Khan et al., 2010a), and Ruta graveolensand its adulterant (Khan et al., 2011). The Senna species viz.,
S. angustifolia, S. acutifolia, S. tora and S. sophera are immen-sely used in Ayurvedic prescription and their accurate identifi-cation is urgent need in herbal industry to maintain the efficacyand quality of herbal formulations. Our major objective there-
fore, was to develop DNA based marker ‘‘RAPD’’ for accu-rate identification of Senna species in the local markets.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. Plant materials
The genuine sample of S. angustifolia was provided by Central
Council for Research in Unani Medicine (CCRUM) Hydera-bad. The samples for authentication were purchased fromthe local markets of Khari Baoli, Delhi, India. The material
was identified at National Institute of Science Communicationand Information (NISCAIR), New Delhi.
2.2. Reagents and chemicals
The stock solution concentration were CTAB 3% (w/v), 1 MTris–HCl (pH 8), 0.5 M EDTA (pH 8), 5 M NaCl, absolute
ethanol, chloroform-IAA (24:1 [v/v]), polyvinylpyrrolidone(PVP) (40,000 mol. wt.) (Sigma) and b-mercaptoethanol. Theextraction buffer consisted of CTAB 3% (w/v), 100 mM
Tris–HCl (pH 8), 25 mM EDTA (pH 8), and 2 M NaCl,respectively. PVP and b-mercaptoethanol were added freshlyprepared in the extraction buffer at the time of genomicDNA extraction. All PCR chemicals were supplied by Benga-
lore Genei Pvt. Ltd. (Bangalore, India) except for primers,which were supplied by Genetix Biotech Asia Ltd. (Bangalore,India).
2.3. DNA extraction
DNA was isolated from dried leaves using a modified CTABmethod (Khan et al., 2007). The dried leaves were ground into800 ll extraction buffer in pestle-mortar and taken into micro-
tube. The suspension was gently mixed and incubated at 65 �Cfor 20 min with occasional mixing. The suspension was thencooled to room temperature and an equal volume of chloro-form: isoamyl alcohol (24:1) was added. The mixture was
centrifuged at 12,000 rpm for 5 min. The clear upper aqueousphase was then transferred to a new tube and added 2/3volume of ice-cooled isopropanol and incubated at �20 �Cfor 30 min. The nucleic acid was collected by centrifugationat 10,000 rpm for 10 min. The resulting pellet was washed
Figure 1 Morphological slides of four Senna species: (a) S. angustifolia, (b) S. acutifolia, (c) S. tora, (d) S. sophera.
Figure 2 RAPD analysis carried out with primers: OPC-3 (lanes:
1–8), OPC-4 (lanes: 9–16). S. angustifolia (lanes: 1, 2, 9, 10), S.
acutifolia (lanes: 3, 4, 11, 12), S. sophera (lanes: 5, 6, 13, 14), S. tora
(lanes: 7, 8, 15, 16). 1 kb and 100 bp are DNA ladder.
Authentication of the medicinal plant Senna angustifolia by RAPD profiling 289
twice with 80% ethanol. The pellet was air-dried under a sterile
laminar hood and the nucleic acid was dissolved in TE buffer(10 mM Tris buffer pH 8 and 1 mM EDTA) at room temper-ature and stored at 4 �C until used. The RNA from crude
DNA was eliminated by treating the sample with RNase A(10 mg/ml) for 30 min at 37 �C. DNA concentration and pur-ity were determined by measuring the absorbance of diluted
DNA solution at 260 nm and 280 nm. The quality of theDNA was determined using agarose gel electrophoresis stainedwith ethidium bromide.
2.4. RAPD analysis
RAPD reaction was performed according to the method devel-
oped by McClelland et al. (1995). The total volume of reactionwas performed in 25 ll. PCR reaction for RAPD analysis con-sisted of 15 mM MgCl2, 2.5 ll 10· buffer, 2 ll 2 mM dNTPs
(mix), 0.5 U Taq polymerase in buffer, 25 ng/ll of each primer,30 ng/ll plant DNA and sterile water up to 18 ll. For DNAamplification a Techne thermal cycler was programmed for 1
cycle of 3 min at 94 �C, 30 s at 36 �C, and 1 min at 72 �C fol-lowed by 45 cycles of 1 min at 94 �C, 30 s at 36 �C, and 1 minat 72 �C, then terminating with 5 min at 72 �C. The RAPDfragments were separated on 1.2% agarose gel by electropho-
resis in 1· TAE buffer for 2 h 30 min at 60 V. The gel wasstained with ethidium bromide (0.5 lg/ml) and photographedunder ultraviolet light using a chemiluminescence Imaging Sys-
tem (UVP Bioimaging systems, CA, USA). To overcome thereproducibility problems, the experiments were repeatedthrice.
2.5. Data analysis
The RAPD bands were scored as present (1) or absent (0), eachof which was treated as an independent character regardless ofits intensity. Only prominent and reproducible bands obtainedfor each RAPD primer were considered. By comparing the
banding patterns of species for a primer, species-specific bands
were identified. Faint or unclear bands were not considered. Adendrogram was constructed using the unweighted pair groupmethod with arithmetic average (UPGMA) with the SAHN
module of NTSYS-pc to show a phenetic representation of ge-netic relationships as revealed by the similarity coefficient(Sneath and Sokal, 1973).
3. Results
Four species of Senna were chosen to test the reliability ofquality control using RAPD technique. In the local marketsamples, the adulteration was found among these species.
The dried leaves of these species are more or less similar in
Table 1 The unique bands and common for S. angustifolia, S.
acutifolia, S. sophera and S. tora obtained with 6 decamer
290 S. Khan et al.
morphology to each other and easily adulterated (Fig. 1).
RAPD technique was carried out in replicates (three) usinggenomic DNA with 32 decamer primers for reproducibilityof the results. The selected primers amplified DNA fragmentsacross the 4 species studied, with the number of amplified frag-
ments varied from 3 (OPC-3) to 10 (OPC-4, OPC-17, OPC-19,OPC-19 and OPC-20), and the amplicon size varied from 500to 2500 bp. Out of 42 loci detected, the polymorphic, mono-
morphic and unique loci were 24, 2 and 16, respectively. AllSenna species were discriminated by the presence or absenceof unique fragment in RAPD profile. The total number of un-
ique fragments specific to each species with different primers issummarized in Figs. 2–4 and Table 1.
Figure 3 RAPD analysis carried out with primers: OPC-17
(lanes: 1–8), OPC-18 (lanes: 9–16). S. angustifolia (lanes: 1, 2, 9,
10), S. acutifolia (lanes: 3, 4, 11, 12), S. sophera (lanes: 5, 6, 13, 14),
S. tora (lanes: 7, 8, 15, 16). 1 kb and 100 bp are DNA ladder.
Figure 4 RAPD analysis carried out with primers: OPC-19
(lanes: 1–8), OPC-20 (lanes: 9–16). S. angustifolia (lanes: 1, 2, 9,
10), S. acutifolia (lane; 3, 4, 11, 12), S. sophera (lanes: 5, 6, 13, 14),
S. tora (lanes: 7, 8, 15, 16). 1 kb and 100 bp are DNA ladder.
3.1. Cluster analysis
A dendrogram based on UPGMA analysis, the 4 Senna speciesclustered into two groups (group I and II), with Jaccard’s sim-
ilarity coefficient ranging from 0.1034 to 0.7273 (Fig. 5, Table2). First group comprised S. anustifolia and S. acutifolia whichhad 72.73% similarity whereas second group comprised S. sop-
hera and S. tora which had 23.68% similarity to each other.
primers in PCR amplification.
Primers Species (specific unique bands (bp)
S. angustifolia S. acutifolia S. sophera S. tora
OPC-3 (Fig. 2) 2600 – – –
– – 2000 –
– – 1400 –
– – 1200 1200
1100 – 1100 –
– – 1000 1000
900 900 – –
800 800 800 800
– – – 700
600 600 – –
– – 500 –
OPC-4 (Fig. 2) – – – 2400
– – – 2300
– – 2000 2000
– – 1500 1500
– – 1400 1400
1200 1200 – –
1000 1000 1000 1000
– – 800 800
700 700 – –
650 – – –
600 600 – –
OPC-17 (Fig. 3) – – 2400 –
– – – 2300
1800 1800 – –
– – 1400 –
OPC-18 (Fig. 3) – – 2800 –
2500 – – 2500
– – 2400 2400
1800 – 1800 –
1700 – 1700 1700
– 1600 – 1600
– – – 1500
1000 1000 1000 –
900 900 900 900
800 800 – –
OPC-19 (Fig. 4) 2500 2500 2500 2500
– – – 1800
1000 1000 – –
– – 900 –
800 800 – –
OPC-20 (Fig. 4) – – 2500 –
– – 2300 –
– – – 2000
1400 – – –
– – 1100 –
800 800 800 –
700 700 – –
– – 650 –
Figure 5 UPGMA dendrogram showing clustering of 4 Senna species based on RAPD data.
Table 2 Genetic similarity matrix based on RAPD data
among 4 Senna species estimated according to Jaccard’s
method.
S. angustifolia S. acutifolia S. sophera S. tora
S. angustifolia 1.0000
S. acutifolia 0.7273 1.0000
S. sophera 0.2368 0.1714 1.0000
S. tora 0.1875 0.1034 0.3226 1.0000
Authentication of the medicinal plant Senna angustifolia by RAPD profiling 291
4. Discussion
According to WHO general guidelines for methodologies onresearch and evaluation of traditional medicines, first step isassuring quality, safety and efficacy of traditional medicines
for correct identification. In the present article S. angustifoliawas chosen for the identification through RAPD technique.In the local market samples, S. tora, S. sophera andS. acutifolia were found as adulterant when identified at NISC-
AIR, New Delhi. For accuracy of the results, the high qualityand purity of genomic DNA free from secondary metaboliteswas isolated from these species by modified CTAB method
(Khan et al., 2007). For RAPD reaction, it was necessary tostandardize the following variables for successful amplificationwith PCR: RAPD amplification is not reproducible below a
certain concentration of genomic DNA and produces ‘smears’or results in poor resolution, if DNA concentration is high,series of dilutions were made to check good amplification.PCR trials were undertaken with different concentrations of
MgCl2 (0.5 mM, 1 mM and 1.5 mM) keeping all other param-eters constant. MgCl2 of 1.5 mM concentration was provedbest in 25 ll reaction volume. For most amplification reactions
0.5–1.5 units of the enzyme were used. Initially amplificationreactions were carried out with 0.9 units of Taq polymerase,however, this was not found to work to generate better results.
Therefore the quantity was reduced to 0.5 units of Taq poly-merase per 25 ll reaction volume, which gave better amplifica-tion. In all PCR trials the annealing temperature 36 �C has
been used which was determined with gradient PCR. DNAdenaturation is a critical step in DNA amplification reactions.For most DNA amplification reactions incubation time forDNA denaturation is 1 min at 94 �C.
In the present investigation, 6 RAPD primers produced 24polymorphic bands that unambiguously discriminated Senna
species including S. angustifolia, S. acutifolia, S. sophera andS. tora, respectively. This RAPD marker exhibited 57.14%polymorphism among these species with 6 decamer primers.
Our results indicated the presence of wide genetic variabilityamong different Senna species. Variations in the DNAsequences lead to the polymorphism and greater polymor-phism is indicative of greater genetic diversity. All four species
of Senna were differentiated from each other based on uniqueband obtained in PCR amplification. S. angustifolia had un-ique bands; 1, 1, 0, 0, 0 and 1 with primers OPC-3, 4, 17, 18,
19 and 20, respectively (Table 1). Similarly, other speciesviz., S. acutifolia, S. sophera and S. tora had unique bands;(0), (3,0,2,2,1,4) and (1,2,1,2,1,1), respectively with primers
(OPC-3, 4, 17, 18, 19 and 20) (Table 1). These bands werereproducible when PCR reaction was repeated thrice. Amongthe different primers utilized, OPC-3 and OPC-4 produced
maximum number of polymorphic bands and may be used infuture for the identification of these Senna species. The clusteranalysis clearly showed the genetic divergence among thesespecies. These four species are clustered into two groups: First
group had S. angustifolia and S. acutifolia which had high sim-ilarity (72.73%) to each other as compared to the second groupwhich had S. sophera and S. tora (Table 2 and Fig. 5). How-
ever, the S. angustifolia and S. acutifolia have morphologicalsimilarities in leaves to a great extent and in dried state it isvery difficult to differentiate to each other, but in RAPD anal-
ysis both species showed more genetic divergence.The advantages of this technique are its rapidity, simplicity
and avoidance of any need such as genetic information aboutthe plant prior to the commencement of the experiment. These
characters are especially advantageous for the identification ofany herbal drugs because of little DNA existing in the driedmaterial. The significance of the present work is that a single
primer can differentiate genuine as well as adulterant samplesas reported in our study. More reproducible DNA markerssuch as sequence characterized amplified regions (SCAR) can
be developed in further studies, which would provide an alter-native tool to monitor the quality of these herbal drugs. Thus,our study revealed that RAPD markers can be used for the
identification of commercial Senna species and could be a use-ful tool to supplement the distinctness, uniformity and stabilityanalysis for plant samples to maintain their identity for theprotection in the future. Our study clearly indicated that
292 S. Khan et al.
RAPD markers could be used effectively to authenticate gen-
uine as well as their respective adulterant samples sold in thelocal herbal markets.
Acknowledgement
This work was supported by Central Council Research for
Unani Medicine (CCRUM) New Delhi, Govt. of India.
References
Acharya, L., Mukherjee, A.K., Panda, P.C., Das, P., 2005. Molecular
characterization of five medicinally important species of Typhonium
(Araceae) through random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD).
Z. Naturforsch. C 60 (7–8), 600–604.
Carlsward, B.S., Stern, W.L., Judd, W.S., Lucansky, T.W., 1997.
Comparative leaf anatomy and systematics in Dendrobium, sections
Aporum and Rhizobium (Orchidaceae). Int J Plant Sci. 158, 332–
342.
Ding, G., Ding, X.Y., Shen, J., Tang, F., Liu, D.Y., He, J., Li, X.X.,
Chu, B.H., 2005. Genetic diversity and molecular authentication of
wild populations of Dendrobium officinale by RAPD. eCAM 40,
1028–1032.
Ferreira-Machado, S.C., Rodrigues, M.P., Nunes, A.P.M., Dantas,
F.J.S., De Mattos, J.C.P., Silva, C.R., Moura, E.G., Bezerra,
R.J.A.C., Caldeira-de-Araujo, A., 2004. Genotoxic potentiality of
aqueous extract prepared from Chrysobalanus icaco L. leaves.
Toxicol. Lett. 151, 481–487.
Irshad, S., Singh, J., Kakkar, P., Mehrotra, S., 2009. Molecular
characterization of Desmodium species – an important ingredient of
‘Dashmoola’ by RAPD analysis. Fitoterapia 80, 115–118.
Jordan, S.A., Cunningham, David G., Marles, Robin J., 2010.
Assessment of herbal medicinal products: challenges, and oppor-
tunities to increase the knowledge base for safety assessment.
Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 243 (12), 198–216.
Khan, S., Qureshi, M.I., Kamaluddin, Tanweer, A., Abdin, M.Z.,
2007. Protocol for isolation of genomic DNA from dry and fresh
roots of medicinal plants suitable for RAPD and restriction
digestion. Afr. J. Biotech. 6, 175–178.
Khan, S., Mirza, K.J., Tayaab, M., Abdin, M.Z., 2009. RAPD profile
for authentication of medicinal plant Glycyrrhiza glabra Linn.
MAPSB 3 (1), 48–51.
Khan, S., Mirza, K.J., Abdin, M.Z., 2010a. Development of RAPD
markers for authentication of medicinal plant Cuscuta Reflexa.
EurAsian J. BioSci. 4 (1), 1–7.
Khan, S., Mirza, K.J., Anwar, F., Abdin, M.Z., 2010b. Development
of RAPD markers for authentication of Piper nigrum (L.). Environ.
Int. J. Sci. Tech. 5, 47–56.
Khan, S., Mirza, K.J., Tyagi, M.R., Abdin, M.Z., 2011. Development
of RAPDMarkers for authentication of Ruta graveolens (L) and its
adulterant. MAPSB 5 (1), 58–61.
Kiran, U., Khan, S., Mirza, K.J., Ram, M., Abdin, M.Z., 2010. SCAR
Markers: a potential tool for authentication of herbal drugs.
Fitoterapia (81), 969–976.
Kite, G.C., Veitch, N.C., Boalch, Martha, E., Lewis, GP., Leon, C.J.,
Simmonds, M.S.J., 2009. Flavonol tetraglycosides from fruits of
Styphnolobium japonicum (Leguminosae) and the authentication of
Fructus Sophorae and Flos Sophorae. Phytochemistry 70, 785–794.
Li, T., Wang, J., Lu, Z., 2005. Accurate identification of closely related
Dendrobium species with multiple species-specific gDNA probes. J.
Biochem. Biophys. Methods 62, 111–123.
Li, M., Jiang, R.W., Hon, P.M., Cheng, L., Li, L.L., Zhou, J.R., Shaw,
P.C., But, P.P.H., 2010. Authentication of the anti-tumor herb
Baihuasheshecao with bioactive marker compounds and molecular
sequences. Food Chem. 119, 1239–1245.
Matthews, S.C., Camacho, A., Lawson, K., Dimsdale, J.E., 2003. Use
of herbal medications among 200 psychiatric outpatients: preva-
lence, patterns of use, and potential dangers. Gen. Hosp. Psychiat.
25, 24–26.
McClelland, M., Mathieu-Daude, F., Welsh, J., 1995. RNA finger-
printing and differential display using arbitrarily primed PCR.
Trends Genet. 11, 242–246.
Na, H., Um, J., Kim, S., Koh, K., Hwang, W., Lee, K., Kim, C., Kim,
H., 2004. Molecular discrimination of medicinal Astragali radix by
RAPD analysis. Immunopharmacol. Immunotoxicol. 26, 265–272.
Nieri, P., Adinolfi, B., Morelli, I., Breschi, M.C., Simoni, G.,
Martinotti, E., 2003. Genetic characterization of the three medic-
inal Echinacea species using RAPD analysis. Planta Med. 69, 685–
686.
Novak, J., Grausgruber-Groger, S., Lukas, B., 2007. DNA-based
authentication of plant extracts. Food Res. Int. 40, 388–392.
Qi, J., Li, X., Song, J., Eneji, A.E., Ma, X., 2008. Genetic relationships
among Rehmannia glutinosa cultivars and varieties. Planta Med. 74,
1846–1852.
Rivera-Arce, E., Gattuso, M., Alvarado, R., Zarate, E., Aguero, J.,
Feria, I., Lozoya, X., 2007. Pharmacognostical studies of the plant
drugMimosae tenuiflorae cortex. J. Ethnopharmacol. 113, 400–408.
Rout, G.R., 2006. Identification of Tinospora cordifolia (Willd.) Miers
ex Hook F & Thomas using RAPD markers. Z. Naturforsch. C 6,
118–122.
Sasikumar, B., Syamkumar, S., Remya, R., Zachariah, T.J., 2004.
PCR based detection of adulteration in the market samples of
turmeric powder. Food Biotech. 18, 299–306.
Silva, C.R., Monteiro, M.R., Rocha, H.M., Ribeiro, A.F., Caldeira-
de-Araujo, A., Leitao, A.C., Bezerra, R.J.A.C., Padula, M., 2008.
Assessment of anti-mutagenic and genotoxic potential of senna
(Cassia angustifolia Vahl.) aqueous extract using in vitro assays.
Toxicol. Vitro 22 (1), 212–218.
Sneath, P.H.A., Sokal, R.R., 1973. Numerical Taxonomy. Freeman
Press, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Song, J.Y., Yao, H., Li, Y., Li, X.W., Lin, Y.L., 2009. Authentication
of the family Polygonaceae in Chinese pharmacopoeia by DNA
barcoding technique. J. Ethnopharmacol. 124, 434–439.
Stern, W.L., Morris, M.W., Judd, W.S., 1994. Anatomy of the thick
leaves in Dendrobium section Rhizobium (Orchidaceae). Int. J. Plant
Sci. 155, 716–729.
Sucher, N.J., Carles, M.C., 2008. Genome-based approaches to the
authentication of medicinal plants. Planta Med. 74, 603–623.
Trease, G.E., Evans, W.C., 1983. In: Pharmacognosy. Balliere Tindall,
Eastbourne, London, UK, p. 812.
Yao, H., Song, J.Y., Ma, X.Y., Liu, C., Li, Y., 2009. Identification of
Dendrobium species by a candidate DNA barcode sequence: the
chloroplast psbA-trnH intergenic region. Planta Med. 75, 667–669.
Zhang, Y., But, P.P., Wang, Z., Shaw, P., 2005. Current approaches
for the authentication of medicinal Dendrobium species and its
products. Plant Genet. Resour. 3, 144–148.