Assessment Using Web 2.0 Technologies

Post on 30-Dec-2015

29 views 0 download

Tags:

description

A presentation by Peter Bishop, in partial fulfillment for course Education 6610: Research in Computers in the Curriculum. Assessment Using Web 2.0 Technologies. Methods. Findings. Web 2.0 As Formative Assessment. Self-Assessment Using Web 2.0. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of Assessment Using Web 2.0 Technologies

A presentation by Peter Bishop, A presentation by Peter Bishop,

in partial fulfillment for course Education 6610: in partial fulfillment for course Education 6610:

Research in Computers in the CurriculumResearch in Computers in the Curriculum

Assessment Using Web Assessment Using Web 2.0 Technologies2.0 Technologies

Methods Methods

Findings Findings

Web 2.0 As Formative AssessmentWeb 2.0 As Formative Assessment

Self-Assessment Using Web 2.0Self-Assessment Using Web 2.0

Use of rubrics to assess student learning when using web 2.0 Use of rubrics to assess student learning when using web 2.0

Discussion Discussion

Conclusion Conclusion

Implications Implications

Limitations Limitations

References References

1.Abendroth, M., Golzy, J, B., O’Connor, E., A.(2011). Self-1.Abendroth, M., Golzy, J, B., O’Connor, E., A.(2011). Self-Cceated youtube recordings of microteachings: Their Cceated youtube recordings of microteachings: Their effects upon candidates' readiness for teaching and effects upon candidates' readiness for teaching and instructors' assessment. instructors' assessment. Journal of Educational Journal of Educational Technological Systems.Technological Systems. 4040(2). 141-159.  (2). 141-159.  

2.Barry, S. (2012). A video recording and viewing protocol 2.Barry, S. (2012). A video recording and viewing protocol for student group presentations: Assisting self-assessment for student group presentations: Assisting self-assessment through a Wiki environment. through a Wiki environment. Computers and EducationComputers and Education, , 5959(3), 855-860. doi:10.1016/j.compedu2012.04.008(3), 855-860. doi:10.1016/j.compedu2012.04.008  

3.Barwell, G. Moore, C. Walker, R., (2011). 3.Barwell, G. Moore, C. Walker, R., (2011). Marking machinima: A case study in assessing Marking machinima: A case study in assessing student use of a web 2.0 technology. student use of a web 2.0 technology. Australasian Journal of Education Technology. Australasian Journal of Education Technology. 2727(5), 765-780. Retrieved from: (5), 765-780. Retrieved from: http://www.ascilite.org.au.http://www.ascilite.org.au.  

4.Chang, C., & Tseng K. (2009). Use and 4.Chang, C., & Tseng K. (2009). Use and performances fo Web-based portfolio performances fo Web-based portfolio assessment. assessment. British journal of Educational British journal of Educational Technology. 40Technology. 40(2). 358-370. doi: (2). 358-370. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00885.x10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00885.x

5.Chang, C. C., & Wu, B.H. (2012). Is teacher 5.Chang, C. C., & Wu, B.H. (2012). Is teacher assessment reliable or valid for high school assessment reliable or valid for high school students under a web-based portfolio students under a web-based portfolio environment? environment? Educational Technology & Educational Technology & Society, 15Society, 15(4), 265–278. Retrieved from: (4), 265–278. Retrieved from: http://www.ifets.info

6.Churchill, D. (2009). Educational applications 6.Churchill, D. (2009). Educational applications of web 2.0: using blogs to support teaching and of web 2.0: using blogs to support teaching and learning. learning. British Journal of Educational British Journal of Educational TechnologyTechnology, , 4040(1),179-183. doi:10.1111/j.1467-(1),179-183. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2008.00865.x8535.2008.00865.x

7.Griffith, S. (2009). Assessing student 7.Griffith, S. (2009). Assessing student participation in an online graduate course. participation in an online graduate course. International Journal of Instructional International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning. 6Technology and Distance Learning. 6(4), (4), 35-44. Retrieved from: 35-44. Retrieved from: http://www.itdl.org/

8.Lai, Yiu Chi and Ng, Eugenia M.W. 8.Lai, Yiu Chi and Ng, Eugenia M.W. (2011). Using Wikis to develop student (2011). Using Wikis to develop student teachers’ learning, teaching, and teachers’ learning, teaching, and assessment capabilities. assessment capabilities. Internet and Internet and Higher EducationHigher Education. . 1414(1),15-26. (1),15-26. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.06.001doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2010.06.001

9.Terrel, J., Richardson, J., Hamilton M. (2011). 9.Terrel, J., Richardson, J., Hamilton M. (2011). Using web 2.0 to teach web 2.0: A case study in Using web 2.0 to teach web 2.0: A case study in aligning teaching, learning and assessment aligning teaching, learning and assessment with professional practice. with professional practice. Australasian Journal Australasian Journal of Education Technology, 27of Education Technology, 27(5), 846-862. (5), 846-862. Retrieved from: Retrieved from: http://www.ascilite.org.au..

10.Wang, K. H., Wang, T. H., Wang, W. L.., 10.Wang, K. H., Wang, T. H., Wang, W. L.., Huang, S. C. (2006). Learning styles and Huang, S. C. (2006). Learning styles and formative assessment strategy: enhancing formative assessment strategy: enhancing student achievement in web-bases learning. student achievement in web-bases learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning.Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. 2222(3), (3), 207-217. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00166.x207-217. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00166.x