Are your students developing 21 st century skills? Assessments You Can Implement Now to Find Out...

Post on 22-Dec-2015

215 views 0 download

Tags:

Transcript of Are your students developing 21 st century skills? Assessments You Can Implement Now to Find Out...

Are your students developing 21st century skills?

Assessments You Can Implement Now to Find Out

Patte Barth ♦ Director ♦ Center for Public EducationNSBA Annual Conference ♦ San Francisco ♦ April 9, 2011

Agenda

• what’s different?• a 5-minute primer on testing• don’t wait for the state – tests worth teaching to• common core state standards & assessments• q & a

What still works in the 21st century

• Post secondary education and training is more important than ever

• The traditional college prep curriculum has benefits for work as well as for college

• The traditional curriculum is not enough3

Core curriculum, version 2.0

• Prepares all students for postsecondary education and/or advanced training.

• Attends to the application of knowledge and skills

• Develops students’ broader competencies related to critical thinking, collaboration, and creativity.  

4

Core curriculum, 2.0:Knowledge & skills work together

SOURCE: Jerald, Defining a 21 st Century Education, Center for Public Education, 20095

Which are most critical skills? The 3 C’s!

• Critical thinking and problem solving– Labor economists Levy & Murnane call it “expert thinking”

• Communication/Collaboration– Levy and Murnane call it “complex communications”

• Creativity-- Knowledge, ability to make connections & creative skills

6SOURCE: Jerald, Defining a 21 st Century Education, Center for Public Education, 2009

Two approaches to assessing high school biology

7

High school biology questions from a state assessment

8

High School Biology Exam

When scientists design drugs against infectious agents, the term “designed drug” is often used.

A. Explain what is meant by this term. __________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

SOURCE: Darling-Hammond, Lessons from Abroad, Edutopia, 2009, exam from Victoria, Australia9

Biology exam, Parts B & C

Scientists aim to develop a drug against a particular virus that infects humans. The virus has a protein coat, and different parts of the coat play different roles in the infective cycle. Some sites assist in the attachment of the virus to a host cell; others are important in the release from a host cell. The structure is represented in the following diagram:

SOURCE: Darling-Hammond, Lessons from Abroad, Edutopia, 2009, exam from Victoria, Australia

The virus reproduces by attaching itself to thesurface of a host cell and injecting its DNA into the host cell. The viral DNA then uses the components of host cell to reproduce its parts, and hundreds of new viruses bud off from the host cell. Ultimately, the host cell dies.

10

B. Design a drug that will be effective against this virus. In your answer, outline the important aspects you would need to consider. Outline how your drug would prevent continuation of the cycle of reproduction of the virus particle. Use diagrams in your answer.

SOURCE: Darling-Hammond, Lessons from Abroad, Edutopia, 200911

Before a drug is used on humans, it is usually tested on animals. In this case, the virus under investigation also infects mice.

C. Design an experiment, using mice, to test the effectiveness of the drug you have designed.

SOURCE: Darling-Hammond, Lessons from Abroad, Edutopia, 200912

Think about …

Which test gets at the 3C’s?

How do we know if our students are developing the 3C’s?

13

A 5-minute primer on testing

A testing glossary

• Standardized test: taken under the same conditions; sometimes at the same time– can be multiple-choice or open-ended (constructed response)

• High-stakes tests: consequences attached to the results– eg., state tests for ESEA, student advancement, teacher evaluation

• Low-stakes tests: no consequences outside the classroom– eg., interim assessments, teacher tests, course finals

SOURCE: A guide to standardized testing, Center for Public Education, 200615

A testing glossary

• Norm-referenced tests: compare individual students’ achievement to a representative “norm group”– someone will always be above average, and someone will

be below average

• Criterion-referenced tests: compare individual students’ achievement to an agreed upon criterion, or standard– it’s possible for every student to meet standards, or be

“proficient”

SOURCE: A guide to standardized testing, Center for Public Education, 200616

A testing glossary

• Formative assessment: diagnostic, gauges where students are so corrections or interventions can be made– eg., benchmark assessments, classroom quizzes or tests– low stakes attached to performance

• Summative assessment: summarizes learning at a point in time– eg., end of course, graduation, state tests– typically higher stakes attached

SOURCE: A guide to standardized testing, Center for Public Education, 200617

A testing glossary

• Validity: the test accurately measures what it intends to measure

• Reliability: students taking the test multiple times will receive approximately the same score each time

• High stakes tests must meet high psychometric standards for both validity and reliability

SOURCE: A guide to standardized testing, Center for Public Education, 200618

Test format

Multiple-choice Performance

• can be standardized & used for high stakes• test taker recognizes answer• machine scorable & cheaper• objectivity less likely to be challenged

• can be standardized & used for high stakes• test taker must construct answer• usually scored by hand; more costly• without rigorous scoring processes, can be viewed as subjective

19

The fact that assessments are lower stakes allows them to be of higher quality, both in terms of the range of ways in which learning is to be measured and the performance standards that are set.

-- Darling-Hammond & Pecheone

SOURCE: Developing an Internally Comparable Balanced Assessment System That Supports High-Quality Learning, Stanford University, 2010

20

LOW GUARDED ELEVATED HIGH SEVERE

Continuous improvement

Accountability

formative:teacher quizzes & tests

benchmark assessments

How good does your data need to be? Data alert meter

summative:state tests

graduation tests

middlin’ stakes:district performance assessments & projects

Don’t wait for the state -Tests worth teaching to

Good assessment should be indistinguishable from learning.

23

PISA - problem solving in math

SOURCE: PISA Released Items – Mathematics, OECD, 200624

question

Looking at the diagram, the teacher claims that Group B did better than Group A in this test.

The students in Group A don’t agree with their teacher. They try to convince the teacher that Group B may not necessarily have done better.

Give one mathematical argument, using the graph, that the students in Group A could use.

25SOURCE: PISA Released Items – Mathematics, OECD, 2006

Ohio performance assessment project

• pilot project with 15 participating districts• tasks will require students to demonstrate

mastery of 21st century skills • assessment will be curriculum-embedded,

teacher-managed, rich performance tasks that are both content-focused and skills-driven

26SOURCE: Beyond Basic Skills, Stanford Center for Opportunity Policy in Education, 2010

Think about …

Look at the “Heating Degrees” task

What content knowledge is required to perform this task?

Are 21st c. skills called for (the 3Cs)? How?

27

Project-based assessment

• Project-based learning (PBL) is learning through exploration of real-world problems– Typically cross-curricular & collaborative; ends with a culminating project

• Culminating projects are sometimes used as end of course assessment or required for graduation– Requires some standardization to assure that common expectations for

all students

28

29

Guiding elements of a culminating project

• clear & aligned purpose• explicit, rigorous standards• student-directed learning & youth engagement• clear scaffolding & support of skills• authentic project• community & parent involvement• coordination & comprehensive communication• ongoing professional development & program improvement• celebration & recognition• risk management & liability

SOURCE: Project Service Leadership, Developing Civically Rich Culminating Projects, WA, 2005

30

Examples

• A senior seminar course culminating in a small group project. Groups design organize, implement, and evaluate a sustainable service project to address a problem or issue.

• Practicum in Community Involvement. Students intern with a local nonprofit and produce a project that meets a need with the organization/agency.

• Youth Service Center. Students staff a service project resource center that features past projects and helps students design new projects.

SOURCE: Project Service Leadership, Developing Civically Rich Culminating Projects, WA, 2005

31

Graduation project –Charlotte-Mecklenburg

• 3Ps: Product, portfolio, presentation

• Counts as part of the English IV grade at 40% of 4th quarter grade

• Intended to reflect work through grades 9 – 12

• Evaluated according to detailed, common scoring guides, or rubrics

SOURCE: CMS Graduation Project, www,cms.k12.nc.us retrieved April 4, 2011

Project-based assessment pros and cons

Pros Cons

• model real world activity• integrate knowledge & skills• learning is more relevant• students are more engaged• mentorships strengthen student & school relationships with community

• requires considerable staff & student time• finding mentors is challenging• student supervision can be problematic• large-scale attempts have produced mixed student results

32

Coming soon –The common core state standards

The Common Core Standards are intended to be:

• Aligned with college and work expectations• Focused and coherent• Include rigorous content and application of knowledge

through high-order skills• Build upon strengths and lessons of current state standards• Internationally benchmarked so that all students are

prepared to succeed in our global economy and society• Based on evidence and research• State led – coordinated by NGA Center and CCSSO

34SOURCE: Common Core State Standards, www.corestandards.org

35

40 states & DC have adopted the CCSS

adoptednot adopted

36

PARCC

Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College & Careers

• 26-state coalition to develop 21st century assessments aligned to common core standards

• headed by Achieve, Inc.• supported with $170 million federal grant• tests will be ready 2014-15• emphasis on formative, or benchmark assessments to monitor

students’ progress toward college/career readiness• assessments will be computer-based

37

26 states & DC are in the PARCC consortium

participantnon participant

38

SMARTER

SMARTER Balanced Assessment Consortium

• 30-state coalition to develop computer adaptive tests aligned to common core standards

• centered at University of Washington• supported with $176 million federal grant• tests will be ready 2014-15• emphasis on twice-yearly summative exams• optional formative, or benchmark exams, tools for teachers’ ongoing

classroom assessment

39

30 states are in the SMARTER consortium

participantnon participant

40

45 states & DC are involved

involvednot involved

Points of collaborationSMARTER & PARCC

41

• working to ensure comparability of scores

• developing protocols for Artificial Intelligent scoring

• working toward same deadlines

SOURCE: Center for K-12 Assessment & Performance Management at ETS, webinar April 4, 2011

42

What local districts can do

• ask – what do we know about our students’ readiness for 21st century life and work? how do we know it?

• engage teachers and your communities in developing 21st century assessment strategies and policies, including what stakes should be attached to results

• districts in CCSS states … form study groups to examine the common core standards against current practices

43

What local districts can do

• form partnerships with local colleges to develop better assessments, provide professional development and align expectations

• start small with project-based assessments; evaluate closely

• engage your stakeholders!• get involved with state efforts!

Questions?

Center for Public Education Objective, easy to understand

research Up to date analysis School success stories

Data First Data Center with national & state data Learning Center with downloadable

videos Ask the expert

Resources & tools

learn more

check out our websites at

www.centerforpubliceducation.org and

www.data-first.org

contact me

pbarth@nsba.org