Applied systemic approach in the banking sector: financial contagion in the...

Post on 14-Dec-2015

216 views 0 download

Tags:

Transcript of Applied systemic approach in the banking sector: financial contagion in the...

Applied systemic approach in the banking sector:

financial contagion in the “cheques-as-collateral” network

Michalis Vafopoulosjoint work with D. Soumpekas

6/5/2011

Aristotle University, Mathematics Department Master in Web Science

supported by Municipality of Veria

outline

① Financial crisis: a network explanation

② Why networks? ③ Systemic risk and financial

contagion④ The “cheques-as-collateral”

network⑤ Data and model⑥ Results ⑦ Further extensions 2

Financial crisis: a network explanation

• 2007: Started from US sub-prime and disseminated rapidly to the global real economy

• Regulation based on binary relations – Government & bank– Bank & customer

• and in “too big to fail”

• Research on correlation and market risk (VaR-like metrics)

3

Financial crisis: a network explanation

Current risk systems cannot:• Predict failure cascades. • Account for linkages. • Determine counterparty losses.

4

Financial crisis: a network explanation

But the financial system is:

A global networked system

So,

+ “too interconnected to fail”

How to model it?Networks!

5

Why networks? • Easy to model and visualize relations• Easy to calculate major statistics • The study of the Web network help us to

conclude that most of real networks are:– Self-similar (Scale-free)– Small worlds

6

NETWORK THEORY

Financial Network Analysis

Biological Network Analysis

Graph & Matrix Theory

Web Science

Social Network Analysis

Computer Science

Network theory and related fields

how? • Define:

1. Node (e.g. person, business)

2. Link [directed or not] (e.g. friendship, commerce)

And if necessary:

3. Evaluation of node (e.g. score, potential)

4. Evaluation of link (weight) (e.g. trust)

8

4 50.54

Federal fundsBech, M.L. and Atalay, E. (2008), “The Topology of the Federal Funds Market”. ECB Working Paper No. 986. Iori G, G de Masi, O Precup, G Gabbi and G Caldarelli (2008): “A

network analysis of the Italian overnight money market”, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, vol. 32(1), pages 259-278

Italian money market

Financial networksFocused on banks, financial institutions etc.

Financial Systemic risk from grass-roots

What about trying model systemic risk directly from bank customers?

Financial systemic risk• The risk of disruption to a financial

entity with spillovers to the real economy.

• The risk that critical nodes of a financial network fail disrupting linkages.

• Financial contracts with externalities.

10

The “cheques-as-collateral” network

• Nodes: cheque issuers and recipients • Link ij : customer i issues cheque to customer

j• Weight of link: the fraction of the value of

cheques that customer i have issued to customer j, to the total value of cheques in euros received by the bank

Cheque recipients use their incoming cheques as collateral to working capital credit.

11

Data

The model-1

Step 01. Assume a set of criteria for the

failure of every customer (c). Here it is assumed that c=50% of the total amount of the unpaid cheques that drives every customer to failure.

2. For a given “cheques-as-collateral” network, calculate the weighted adjacency matrix (W).

The model-2

Step 03. Calculate the failure threshold for every customer j:

It is assumed that this threshold remains constant in every stage k.

4. Assume a set of customers that initially fail to pay their cheques (Dk=0).

This set can be chosen by some relevant criterion. In our case, five customers with the highest weighted out-degree have been selected to collapse at stage k=0.

The model-3

Step 11. Calculate the sum of the defaulted

exposures of failed customer i to j:

The model-4

Step 12. Compare the calculated defaulted exposure failure threshold of customer j.

3. Update Dk with the failed customers.

The model-5

Step 2• Repeat Step 1 until Dk=Dk+1.

Results-1

18

Stage 0 Number of failed nodes: 5Decrease in total value:

17%

Results-2

19

Stage 1Number of failed nodes: 4Decrease in total value:

27%

Results-3

20

Stage 2Number of failed nodes: 3Decrease in total value:

38%

Results-4

21

Stage 3Number of failed nodes: 2Decrease in total value:

41%

Results-5

22

After the shock

Number of failed nodes:

14Decrease in total value:

41%

Evaluating the systemic risk of a bank customer

• Assume that only a customer fails• Ceteris paribus• Calculate financial contagion• Compare to others• Weight factors like stage, sector etc

23

Further extensions• More data and metrics• Model the initial shock• Reverse logic: development

multiplier

Thank you.Questions?

24