Post on 20-Aug-2015
The 1995 Canadian Firearms Legislation - Ten Years Later
Gary Mauser, Ph D
ANZSOC Conference
Wellington, NZ
February 2005
Gary Mauser Professor
Institute for Canadian Urban Research StudiesSimon Fraser University
Burnaby, BCCanada
February 2005
ANZSOC 2005
Canada has long had strict firearms law
• 1880s - firearm permit required
• 1920s - anti-Bolshevick law
• 1934 - handguns registered
• 1967 - modern framework for law
• 1977 - FAC• 1991 - Kim Campbell• 1995 - Allan Rock
ANZSOC 2005
The 1991 Canadian Firearms Legislation(1991 through 1994)
• Registration/ban of semi-automatic military-style rifles, and high-capacity magazines,
• Increased FAC requirements: • - firearm safety course,• - 35-question application form,• - passport-type photograph• - two references (spouse required)• - mandatory 28-day waiting period
ANZSOC 2005
In 1994 Canada Consulted with New Zealand
• The Canadians were advised that firearms registration – would be exceptionally difficult to achieve
• - with an acceptable error rate• - at an acceptable cost• - The results probably not worth the effort
ANZSOC 2005
The 1995 Canadian Firearms Legislation(1995 through 2003)
• Prohibition of over half of all registered handguns
• Stricter regulations
• Broadened police powers
• July 1998 - Registration of firearms begun
• January 2000 – Licensing of firearm owners begun
• January 1, 2001 – All firearm owners required to be licensed
• July 1, 2003 – All firearms required to be registered
ANZSOC 2005
Criteria for evaluation
• Reasonable cost
• Acceptable error rate
• High level of compliance
• Public support
• Effective in improving public safety
ANZSOC 2005
Cost estimates of owner licencing and universal firearm registration
• Original estimate in 1995 $C 2 million
• AG partial estimate (DOJ) $C 1 billion
• To date for all agencies $C 2 billion
• Original estimate off by a factor of 1,000
ANZSOC 2005
Organizational problems
• Failure to understand project scope• Failure to plan for inter-agency cooperation• Information criteria differ across agencies• Some participants opposed to firearm ownership
in principle• Failure to consult with owners, provinces, or
Natives• Government cover-up of costs
ANZSOC 2005
Data quality of firearm registry
• Over 5 million of the 7 million registered firearms are un-verified
• Error rate between 50% and 90%– Errors in description of firearm or owner
• Few criminal record checks of owners • No information on location of registered rifles or
shotguns• No information on more than 170,000 people with
firearm prohibition orders
ANZSOC 2005
Police do not trust the registry
• RCMP told Auditor General they do not trust the information (2004)
• Toronto Police Chief reports (2003) the system has not helped solve a single homicide
• Police Association of Ontario said they fail to get information requested 95% of the time (2002)
ANZSOC 2005
Public support for the firearm registry
• 77% of Canadian public agree that “the firearm registry should be scrapped.”– (JMCK Polling, N= 1,586, April 2004)
• 8 out of 10 provinces declined to cooperate with federal government in registry (2003)
• 6 out of 10 Provinces challenged the constitutionality of Firearms Act (2000)
ANZSOC 2005
Owner cooperation
CFC actual
CFC estimate
Mauser estimate
DOJ estimate (1995)
Firearm owners 2 M 2.2 M 3.5 - 4.5 M
7 + M
Firearms 7 M 7.7 M 12 - 13 M
25 + M
ANZSOC 2005
Participation rates
• Approximately 50% of firearm owners have complied
• Less than 25% of residents of First Nations communities have complied
• Approximately 50% of firearms stock is registered
Evaluation
Do licencing and registration improve public safety?
ANZSOC 2005
Which measures are the most appropriate?
• Gun deaths
• Gun crime
• Gun violence
• Total violent crime
• Total homicide
ANZSOC 2005
How measure public safety?
• Gun death?
– Gun deaths are falling in Canada– Gun homicides falling– Gun suicides falling
• Is it a success?
ANZSOC 2005
Trends in Canadian Gun Deaths
Gun Homicide Gun Suicide Total
1991 271 1,108 1,379
1995 176 916 1,092
1998 151 818 969
2001 171 651 822
ANZSOC 2005
Canadian Suicide Trends
Firearm Suicides
Hanging Suicides
Total Suicides
1991 1,108 1,034 3,593
1995 916 1,382 3,968
1998 818 1,434 3,698
2001 651 1,509 3,688
ANZSOC 2005
Gun Death is a Red Herring
• Gun deaths are largely suicides• Suicide is not central to public safety
• Strong substitution effect• The removal of firearms or sharps must balance
liberty with personal safety
ANZSOC 2005
Trends in Canadian Suicide Rates
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001
Source: Statistics Canada, Catalogue 84F0209XPB
Rates per 100,000 population
Total Hanging Firearm
ANZSOC 2005
Trends in Suicide Rates in Australia
0.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
10.0
12.0
14.0
16.0
1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001
Source: Australian Bureau of Statistics
Standardized Rates per 100,000
FirearmsHangingTotal
ANZSOC 2005
Social costs of the decline in gun ownership
• Hunters are the driving force behind conservation • Hunters pay $70 million annually in licence fees• Hunters donate $33 million annually for habitat
and conservation projects• Hunters spend almost half ($2.7 billion) on all
expenditures on wildlife related activities• Increased number of wildlife-vehicle collisions
ANZSOC 2005
How measure public safety?
• Gun crime?
• 47% of gun crime is permit violations• Not a measure of violence, but regulatory
enforcement
ANZSOC 2005
Gun Crime in Canada, 2003
Number PercentageIllegal possession 10,037 47%
Other offensive weapon charge
4,510 21%
Robbery with firearm 3,877 18%
Firearm usage 2,256 11%
Homicide with firearm 161 1%
Discharge with intent 223 1%
Trafficking 137 1%
Total crimes with firearms 21,201 100%
ANZSOC 2005
How measure public safety?
• Gun violence?
• Gun violence is small fraction of violent crime
• Not even the worst violence
ANZSOC 2005
Gun violence and violent crime
Violent crime
Homicide Robbery
Australia 1% 14% 6%
England and Wales
1% 9% 4%
Canada 2% 31% 14%
ANZSOC 2005
Injuries caused by weapons during assault, Canada 2003
Firearm Knife Club
Major physical injuries 6% 11% 14%
Minor physical injuries 40% 40% 60%
No injuries 52% 47% 24%
Unknown 2% 2% 2%
Number of incidents 812 5,760 5,432
ANZSOC 2005
How measure public safety?
• Gun homicide?
• Gun homicides are only a fraction of total homicides
• Can reducing gun homicides reduce total homicide?
• Substitution effect is quite powerful
ANZSOC 2005
Homicide trends in Canada
1996 1998 2000 2002 2003
Homicide rate 2.1 2.0 1.8 1.9 1.7
% Firearm 33% 27% 34% 26% 29%
ANZSOC 2005
Homicide trends in Australia
1996 1998 2000 2002 2003
Homicide rate 1.7 1.8 1.6 1.6 1.6
% Firearm 33% 17% 19% 13% 13%
ANZSOC 2005
How should we measure improvements in public safety?
• Violent crime rates should drop
• Not just criminal violence involving guns, but all criminal violence should fall
• Homicide rates should fall
• Not just gun homicide, but total homicide
ANZSOC 2005
More appropriate measures of public safety
• Homicide rate
• Robbery rate
• Armed robbery rate
• Violent crime rate
ANZSOC 2005
Homicide Trends in Canada and USA
-
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
3.00
19901991 19921993 19941995 19961997 19981999 20002001 20022003
Source: Statistics Canada and FBI
Canadian Rate per 100,000 pop
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
USA Rate per 100,000 pop
CDNUS
ANZSOC 2005
Gang Related Homicides in Canada
0.0
2.0
4.0
6.0
8.0
10.0
12.0
14.0
16.0
18.0
1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003
Source: Statistics Canada
Percent Gang Homicides
-
0.50
1.00
1.50
2.00
2.50
Homicides per 100,000 pop
% gang relatedTotal homicide rate
ANZSOC 2005
Violent Crime Trends in Canada and USA
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1982 1984 1986 1988 1990 1992 1994 1996 1998 2000 2002
Source: Statistics Canada and the FBI
Offence rate per 100,000 population
CDNUS
ANZSOC 2005
Trends in Armed Robbery in Australia
1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2002 2003
Armed Robberies6256 9054 10850 9452 9474 7817 7162
% Firearm
25% 24% 18% 15% 14% 15% 16%
ANZSOC 2005
Violent Crime Trends in Australia and USA
0.0
200.0
400.0
600.0
800.0
1000.0
1200.0
1993 1995 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003
Sources: ABS 4510.0, FBI Crime Statistics
Offences per 100,000 population
AustraliaUnited States
ANZSOC 2005
Summary and Conclusion
• The 1995 Firearms Act is not a success– Incomplete coverage– Unacceptably high error rate– No evidence for effectiveness
• Firearms registry cost $2 billion -- other public safety measures under funded
• The registry has reduced firearms access but has not improved public safety
ANZSOC 2005
Suggested alternatives
• Improve monitoring of criminals on probation and parole
• Increase prison time for violent criminals
• Increase port security
• Increase number of police officers
• Tighten controls on deportation orders