Post on 27-Jun-2020
Amrita Sai Institute of Science & Technology
Amrita Sai Nagar, Paritala, Krishna Dist, Andhra Pradesh – 521 180
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT (SAR)
UNDERGRADUATE ENGINEERING PROGRAM (TIER II)
FIRST TIME ACCREDITATION
Submitted to
National Board of Accreditation (NBA)
Submitted by
Department of Electronics & Communication Engineering
Amrita Sai Nagar, Paritala, Krishna District, Andhra Pradesh – 521 180
Email: principalasist@gmail.com,
www.amritasai.edu.in, Phone: 0866-2428399
31 October 2017
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Criterion Details Page
No
PART – A INSTITUTIONAL INFORMATION 1
PART – B VISION, MISSION AND PROGRAM EDUCATIONAL
OBJECTIVES 7
1.1 State the Vision and Mission of the Department and Institute 8
1.2 State the Program Educational Objectives (PEOs) 8
1.3 Indicate where the Vision, Mission and PEOs are published and
disseminated among stakeholders 9
1.4 State the process for defining the Vision and Mission of the Department,
and PEOs of the program 10
1.5 Establish consistency of PEOs with Mission of the Department 11
1.5.1 Justify the academic factors involved in achievement of the PEOs 11
2 PROGRAM CURRICULUM AND TEACHING– LEARNING
PROCESSES 13
2.1 Program Curriculum 13
2.1.1
State the process used to identify extent of compliance of the University
curriculum for attaining the Program Outcomes and Program Specific
Outcomes as mentioned in Annexure-I. Also mention the identified
curricular gaps, if any
13
2.1.2 State the delivery details of the content beyond the syllabus for the
attainment of POs and PSOs 15
2.2 Teaching -Learning Processes 17
2.2.1 Describe Processes followed to improve quality of Teaching &Learning 17
2.2.2 Quality of internal semester Question papers, Assignments and
Evaluation 22
2.2.3 Quality of student projects 24
2.2.4 Initiatives Related to Industry Interaction 31
2.2.5 Initiatives Related to Industry Internship/Summer Training 33
3 COURSE OUTCOMES AND PROGRAM OUTCOMES 36
3.1 Establish the correlation between the courses and the Program Outcomes
(POs) and Program Specific Outcomes (PSOs) 37
3.1.1 Course Outcomes(COs) 37
3.1.2 CO-PO matrices of courses selected in 3.1.1 39
3.1.3 Program level Course-PO matrix of all courses INCLUDING first year
courses 41
3.2 Attainment of Course Outcomes 45
3.2.1 Describe the assessment processes used to gather the data upon which
the evaluation of Course Outcome is based 45
3.2.2 Record the attainment of Course Outcomes of all courses with respect to
set attainment levels 47
3.3 Attainment of Program Outcomes and Program Specific Outcomes 50
3.3.1
Describe assessment tools and processes used for measuring the
attainment of each of the Program Outcomes and Program Specific
Outcomes
50
3.3.2 Provide results of evaluation of each PO & PSO 55
4 STUDENTS’ PERFORMANCE 57
4.1 Enrolment Ratio 58
4.2 Success Rate in the stipulated period of the program 58
4.2.1 Success rate without backlogs in any semester/year of study 58
4.2.2 Success rate with backlog in stipulated period of study 58
4.3 Academic Performance in Third Year 59
4.4 Academic Performance in Second Year 59
4.5 Placement, Higher Studies and Entrepreneurship 60
4.6 Professional Activities 60
4.6.1 Professional societies/chapters and organizing engineering events 60
4.6.2 Publication of technical magazines, newsletters, etc. 61
4.6.3 Participation in inter-institute events by students of the program of study 62
5 FACULTY INFORMATION AND CONTRIBUTIONS 63
5.1 Student-Faculty Ratio (SFR) 78
5.2 Faculty Cadre Proportion 79
5.3 Faculty Qualification 79
5.4 Faculty Retention 79
5.5 Innovations by the Faculty in Teaching and Learning 80
5.6 Faculty as participants in Faculty development/ training activities/STTPs 80
5.7 Research and Development 81
5.7.1 Academic Research 81
5.7.2 Sponsored Research 84
5.7.3 Development activities 84
5.7.4 Consultancy (from Industry) 85
5.8 Faculty Performance Appraisal and Development System (FPADS) 86
5.9 Visiting/Adjunct/Emeritus Faculty etc. 88
6 FACILITIES AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT 90
6.1 Adequate and well equipped laboratories, and technical manpower 90
6.2 Additional facilities created for improving the quality of learning
experience in laboratories 91
6.3 Laboratories: Maintenance and overall ambiance 91
6.4 Project laboratory 92
6.5 Safety measures in laboratories 93
7 CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT 96
7.1 Actions taken based on the results of evaluation of each of the POs
&PSOs 96
7.2 Academic Audit and actions taken thereof during the period of
Assessment 103
7.3 Improvement in Placement, Higher Studies and Entrepreneurship 106
7.4 Improvement in the quality of students admitted to the program 108
8 FIRST YEAR ACADEMICS 110
8.1 First Year Student-Faculty Ratio (FYSFR) 110
8.2 Qualification of Faculty Teaching First Year Common Courses 110
8.3 First Year Academic Performance 110
8.4 Attainment of Course Outcomes of first year courses 111
8.4.1 Describe the assessment processes used to gather the data upon which
the evaluation of Course Outcomes of first year is done 111
8.4.2 Record the attainment of Course Outcomes of all first year courses 112
8.5 Attainment of Program Outcomes from first year courses 113
8.5.1 Indicate results of evaluation of each relevant PO and/or PSO, if
applicable 113
8.5.2 Actions taken based on the results of evaluation of relevant Pos 114
9 STUDENT SUPPORT SYSTEMS 122
9.1 Mentoring system to help at individual level 122
9.2 Feedback analysis and reward/corrective measures taken, if any 123
9.3 Feedback on facilities 124
9.4 Self-Learning 125
9.5 Career Guidance, Training, Placement 129
9.6 Entrepreneurship Cell 130
9.7 Co-curricular and Extra-curricular Activities 133
10 GOVERNANCE, INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT AND FINANCIAL
RESOURCES 135
10.1 Organization, Governance and Transparency 135
10.1.1 State the Vision and Mission of the Institute 135
10.1.2 Governing body, administrative setup, functions of various bodies,
service rules, procedures, recruitment and promotional policies 135
10.1.3 Decentralization in working and grievance redressal mechanism 139
10.1.4 Delegation of financial powers 140
10.1.5 Transparency and availability of correct/unambiguous in formation in
public domain 140
10.2 Budget Allocation, Utilization, and Public Accounting at Institute level 141
10.2.1 Adequacy of budget allocation 142
10.2.2 Utilization of allocated funds 143
10.2.3 Availability of the audited statements on the institute‟s website 143
10.3 Program Specific Budget Allocation, Utilization 143
10.3.1 Adequacy of budget allocation 144
10.3.2 Utilization of allocated funds 145
10.4 Library and Internet 145
10.4.1 Quality of learning resources (hard/soft) 145
10.4.2 Internet 146
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – A
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-2
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Electronics & Communication Engineering
PARTA: Institutional Information
1. Name and Address of the Institution:
Amrita Sai Institute of Science & Technology
Amrita Sai Nagar, Paritala, Kanchikacherla Mandal, Krishna Dist, Andhra Pradesh – 521180
2. Name and Address of the Affiliating University:
Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University, Kakinada Andhra Pradesh - 533001
3. Year of establishment of the Institution:2007
4. Type of the Institution:
University
Deemed University
Government Aided
Autonomous
Affiliated
5. Ownership Status:
Central Government
State Government
Government Aided
Self-financing
Trust
Society
Section25 Company
Any Other (Please specify)
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – A
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-3
6. Other Academic Institutions of the Trust/Society/Company etc., if any:
Name of the Institution(s)
Year of
Establishment
Programs of Study
Location
N/A N/A N/A N/A
7. Details of all the programs being offered by the institution under consideration:
S No Program Name Year of
start Intake
Increase
in Intake
Year of
Increase
AICTE
Approval
Accreditation
Status
1 Electrical and Electronics
Engineering 2007 120 60 2009,2010 Yes - 2007
Eligible but not
applied
2 Computer Science and
Engineering 2007 60 60 2010 Yes - 2007
Applying first
time
3
Electronics and
Communication
Engineering
2007 120 60 2010, 2012 Yes - 2007 Applying first
time
4 Mechanical Engineering 2011 60 60 2014 Yes - 2011 Eligible but not
applied
5 Civil Engineering 2012 60 60 2014 Yes - 2012 Not eligible for
accreditation
6 Master of Computer
Applications 2008 60 0 -- Yes - 2008
Eligible but not
applied
7 Master of Business
Administration 2009 60 60 2014 Yes - 2009
Eligible but not
applied
8 M Tech(Power
Electronics) 2012 18 0 -- Yes - 2012
Eligible but not
applied
9 M Tech(Computer
Science and Engineering) 2012 18 0 -- Yes - 2012
Eligible but not
applied
10 M Tech(Structural
Engineering) 2014 24 0 -- Yes - 2014
Not eligible for
accreditation
11
M Tech (Digital
Electronics &
Communication Systems)
2014 24 0 -- Yes - 2014 Not eligible for
accreditation
12 M Tech(VLSI &
Embedded Systems) 2011 18 0 -- Yes - 2011
Eligible but not
applied
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – A
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-4
13 Diploma (Electrical and
Electronics Engineering) 2014 60 0 -- Yes - 2014
Not eligible for
accreditation
14 Diploma(Mechanical
Engineering) 2014 60 0 -- Yes - 2014
Not eligible for
accreditation
8. Programs to be considered for Accreditation vide this application:
S No Level Discipline Program
1 Under Graduate Engineering &Technology B. Tech - Computer Science & Engg.
2 Under Graduate Engineering &Technology B. Tech - Electronics & Communication Engg.
9. Total number of employees in the institution:
A. Regular Employees (Faculty and Staff):
Items 2017-2018 2016 – 2017 2015 -2016
Min Max Min Max Min Max
Faculty in Engineering M 109 123 95 105 95 119
F 37 40 36 39 36 36
Faculty in Maths, Science &
Humanities
M 25 32 52 54 49 53
F 11 14 14 12 6 9
Non-teaching staff M 68 69 68 69 60 69
F 28 27 28 27 23 27 B. Contractual Staff Employees (Faculty and Staff) : (Not covered in Table A):
Items 2017-2018 2016 – 2017 2015 -2016
Min Max Min Max Min Max
Faculty in Engineering M Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil
F Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil
Faculty in Maths, Science &
Humanities
M Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil
F Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil
Non-teaching staff M Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil
F Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil Nil
10. Total number of Engineering Students:
Engineering and Technology- UG Shift1 Shift2
Engineering and Technology- PG Shift1
Shift2
Engineering and Technology-
Polytechnic Shift1
Shift2
MBA Shift1
Shift2
MCA Shift1 Shift2
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – A
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-5
Engineering and Technology- UG Shift -1
Item 2017-2018 2016 – 2017 2015 -2016
Total no. of boys 804 780 792
Total no. of girls 759 728 672
Total no. of students 1563 1508 1464
Engineering and Technology- PG Shift-1
Item 2017-2018 2016 – 2017 2015 -2016
Total no. of boys 51 33 61
Total no. of girls 41 28 43
Total no. of students 92 61 104
Engineering and Technology- Polytechnic Shift-2
Item 2017-2018 2016 – 2017 2015 -2016
Total no. of boys 277 271 186
Total no. of girls 54 45 30
Total no. of students 331 316 216
Engineering and Technology- MBA Shift-1
Item 2017-2018 2016 – 2017 2015 -2016
Total no. of boys 65 55 51
Total no. of girls 57 42 51
Total no. of students 122 97 102
Engineering and Technology- MCA Shift-1
Item 2017-2018 2016 – 2017 2015 -2016
Total no. of boys 29 19 25
Total no. of girls 46 44 48
Total no. of students 75 63 73
11. Vision of the Institution:
"Striving for a symbiosis of Technological excellence and human values."
12. Mission of the Institution:
"To arm young brains with competitive technology and nurture holistic development of the
individuals for a better tomorrow"
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – A
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-6
13. Contact Information of the Head of the Institution and NBA coordinator, if designated:
i. Name : Dr. M Sasidhar
Designation : Principal
Mobile No : 9490797536
Email id : principalasist@gmail.com
ii. NBA coordinator, if designated:
Name : Dr. P Chiranjeevi
Designation : Head CSE
Mobile No : 9490794017
Email id : acadirector.aj@gmail.com
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-7
PART B: Criteria Summary
Name of the program: Electronics & Communication Engineering
Criteria
No. Criteria
Mark/
Weightage
Program Level Criteria
1. Vision, Mission and Program Educational Objectives 60
2. Program Curriculum and Teaching– Learning Processes 120
3. Course Outcomes and Program Outcomes 120
4. Students‟ Performance 150
5. Faculty Information and Contributions 200
6. Facilities and Technical Support 80
7. Continuous Improvement 50
Institute Level Criteria
8. First Year Academics 50
9. Student Support Systems 50
10. Governance, Institutional Support and Financial Resources 120
Total 1000
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-8
CRITERION-1: Vision, Mission and Program Educational Objectives 60
1. VISION, MISSION AND PROGRAM EDUCATIONAL OBJECTIVES (60)
1.1. State the Vision and Mission of the Department and Institute (5)
Vision and Mission of Institute:
Vision:
“Striving for a symbiosis of Technological excellence and human values.”
Mission:
“To arm young brains with competitive technology and nurture holistic development of the
individuals for a better tomorrow.”
Vision and Mission of ECE Department:
Vision:
“To produce high quality skilled and competent Engineers with social and professional ethics
and be known among the top ranking department in the state by 2020”.
Mission:
“To impart contemporary quality technical education that addresses the needs of changing
technology to students with ethical, social and environmental consciousness; and create,
disseminate new knowledge in the field of ECE and allied disciplines.”
The Vision and Mission of the department is fully in consonance with the Vision and Mission of
the Institution.
1.2. State the Program Educational Objectives (PEOs) (5)
(State the PEOs (3 to 5) of program seeking accreditation)
The graduates of Electronics and Communication Engineering will:
i. Possess strong educational foundation in Science, Mathematics and Electronics &
Communication Engineering that is essential to pursue successful careers / higher studies.
ii. Possess knowledge of engineering breadth in core discipline so that they will be successful in
creating new products, processes and solutions for socially relevant problems that are
technically sound and environment friendly.
iii. Have the broad based knowledge and capability suitable for global multi-disciplinary work
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-9
environment.
iv. Be professionals with leadership qualities, effective communication skills, ethical attitude and
competence to excel individually and work efficiently in teams.
v. Be a life-long learner that is essential for a successful professional career.
1.3. Indicate where the Vision, Mission and PEOs are published and disseminated among
stakeholders (10)
Vision Mission and PEOs are published and disseminated through:
Institute's Website: www.amritasai.edu.in
HOD Chambers
Departmental Web site
Course files of each course
Departmental Notice Board Laboratories
Hostel notice board
Lab Manuals
College information Brochure (For this program)
Posters
TPO Office Notice board and information brochure
Apart from this, Vision and Mission is disseminated to all the stakeholders of the programs through
faculty Meetings, student awareness workshops, student induction programs, and parent teacher
meetings etc.
List of stakeholder
Internal:
1. Students
2. Faculty
3. Staff
4. Management
External:
1. Alumni
2. Parents
3. Industry/employer; Perfect Electronics Ltd, Efftronics Pvt. Ltd. etc..
4. Affiliating University
5. Commissioner of Technical Education, Govt. of A.P.
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-10
6. AICTE/NBA
7. Academia
Apart from the published Vision, Mission, PO's of Institute/Departmental recourses mentioned
above, the following activities are organized to ensure awareness and understanding: counseling
sessions, orientations and course descriptions are shared with students.
1.4. State the process for defining the Vision and Mission of the Department, and PEOs of the
program (25)
The process involved in defining the mission and vision of the department from the mission and
vision of the institute is as follows:
1. Brainstorming: Departmental committee has been formed to ensure appropriate formulation,
implementation and review of vision and mission statements and PEOs and their
development/review process. The committee included faculty, staff and some current students
who brainstormed extensively through information collected through environmental scan.
2. The mission of the department was guided by the purpose for which the department exists and its
alignment with the affiliating university, institutional mission.
3. SWOT at the department level was conducted to ascertain departmental strengths, weaknesses,
opportunities and threats. Based on the SWOT priority areas to be addressed through the five
year Department vision.
4. The faculty studied the previous placement and higher education records to determine the initial
PEOs.
5. The departmental committee also considered the industrial scenario in the state, nation and
global level to ascertain the appropriateness of PEOs.
6. The development of drat PEOs included three factors i.e. knowledge, skill and attitude. The
knowledge component included foundational, breadth and depth of knowledge to be possessed
by the graduating engineers from the program; the skills professionalism and learning
environment included the component of ensuring capacity to adopt and adapt to new knowledge
along with creation of new knowledge.
7. The faculty then tried to align the university curriculum with the draft PEOs.
8. Once the faculty was satisfied with the draft PEOs, the meetings with students, alumni and
industry were organized to discuss the PEOs and finalize them. Those who could not be present
were requested to respond to a questionnaire.
9. The vetted and finalized PEOs were presented to the BOG for approval and request for
additional resources that were required to meet the stipulated PEOs.
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-11
I-level: Meeting with Promoters, Administrators, faculty members, staffs is arranged for
defining Vision and Missions according to current needs of stake holders (Direct and
Indirect) and that are aligned with the vision mission of the institute.
II-level: Meeting with current students and Vision mission review committee members
headed by HOD, has been arranged and brainstorming session is carried out to discuss what
points to be emphasized so that Vision & Mission of the department become practical and
achievable.
III-level: Request for suggestions to define vision, mission of the department has been sent
through emails to our current Employers, Alumni. Academic and Industrial experts. Positive
response received from them which were used while defining the Vision and Mission.
10. Benchmarking with similar category institution: Reference for defining Vision and Mission of
the department was taken from renowned institute of central/southern India.
11. Validation by the external experts: Properly framed vision, Mission and PEOs have been sent
through emails to various industries including our regular recruiters, Alumni, renowned
academician for peer review.
12. Suggestions received from external expert are discussed and Vision Mission finalized and
approved by BOG.
1.5. Establish consistency of PEOs with Mission of the Department (15)
PEO Statements
M1
(contemporary quality
technical education)
M2
(ethical, social and
environmental
consciousness)
M3
(create, disseminate new
knowledge)
PEO 1: 3 2 2
PEO 2: 2 2 2
PEO 3: 2 2 2
PEO 4: 3 2 3
PEO 5: 2 3 -
Note: M1, M2, .... Mn is distinct elements of Mission statement. Enter correlation levels 1, 2 or 3as
defined below:
1: Slight (Low), 2: Moderate (Medium), 3: Substantial (High), It there is no correlation, put “-”
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-12
PEO Mapping Justification
PEO1 mapped with M1(3)
PEO is designed to prepare students for successful career/pursue higher
studies and Mission statement requires the students to possess contemporary
and quality education which can only be obtain from strong foundation. The
graduate is also expected to be conscious of social and environmental issues
and lifelong learner.
PEO2 mapped with M2(2) PEO is designed to possess in depth knowledge in students, so that they have
proper ethical values.
PEO3 mapped with M2 The graduate is expected to be conscious of social and environmental issues
and lifelong learner.
PEO4 mapped with M3 PEO is designed to build the students‟ capacity in pursuing skills and
knowledge in the emerging areas
PEO5 mapped with M2 PEO is designed to produce graduates with problem solving culture
Note: In this document wherever the term “Process” has been used its meaning is process
formulation, notification and implementation.
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-13
CRITERION 2
2. PROGRAM CURRICULUM AND TEACHING - LEARNING PROCESSES (120)
2.1. Program Curriculum (20)
2.1.1.State the process used to identify extent of compliance of the University curriculum for
attaining the Program Outcomes and Program Specific Outcomes as mentioned in
Annexure-I. Also mention the identified curricular gaps, if any (10)
A. Process used to identify extent of compliance of the University Curriculum for attaining
the Program Outcomes and Program Specific Outcomes.
Gap Identification Process:
The department faculty had a number of meetings to align the POs/PSOs with university
curricula. Each faculty has also developed the major elements of POs and PSOs to determine
the level their courses will be addressing. The department decided to adopt BLOOM‟s level
of Cognitive domain to decide the level of expected attainment. The introductory level
courses were termed as 1 covering level 1 & 2 of Bloom where students were exposed to the
a topic, 2 was given to courses that provided competence to the topic to the students covering
Blooms level 3 & 4 and the courses where students gained mastery were donated level 3
covering BLOOM‟s level 5 & 6 of cogitative domain.
The table, thus prepared was reviewed by faculty during departmental meetings to determine
which component of PO/PSOs were either not met or met to level 1 only. Discussions
focused on whether level 1 of introductory nature was adequate or does the department need
to develop more beyond syllabus topics, introduce additional electives, laboratory
experiments etc., to improve the level. For example, it was found that PO on Management
and Finance and communication were not adequately addressed in the university syllabus,
hence, additional activities were planned.
Meeting with Syllabus review committee, subject experts and HOD have been arranged to
review the syllabus provided by the university and to detect Gaps if any.
Feedback from alumni and industry are analyzed.
Analyzing the COs and POs mapping, weak areas are pointed out and gaps are identified.
Corrective actions to be taken to bridge the gap are discussed and finalized the content
beyond syllabus to be taught.
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-14
Figure-2.1.1: Processes used to identify the curricular gaps to the attainment of the COs/POs
Process for “Curriculum GAP ANALYSIS”
Implementation process:
Identified content beyond syllabus (Theory/Lab) is included in lesson plan and conducted in
classroom or laboratory by the subject teacher itself or internal / external subject experts.
Effectiveness:
Effectiveness of this process is analyzed through feedback from the students, through their
performance in examinations, from the Alumni, from Industries feedback etc.
It is a continuous improvement process which requires more and more fine tuning through regular
feedbacks from students and other stakeholders.
Figure-2.1.2: Methodology of Gap analysis
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-15
2.1.2. State the delivery details of the content beyond the syllabus for the attainment of POs
and PSOs (10)
This Institute is affiliated to Jawaharlal Nehru Technological University Kakinada since 2008. Our
programme curriculum is as per the scheme and syllabus of affiliated university. Generally
curriculum maintains the balance in the composition of basic science, humanities, professional
courses and their distribution in core and elective and breadth offerings. Although the course
objectives and course outcomes are defined by the university, it is observed that in few subjects the
prescribed syllabus by the university is lagging little to match the PO's. So the departmental
committee along with subject expert and HOD decided to include few topics in the given syllabus
under the head “CONTENTS BEYOND SYLLABUS” in few subjects sample given bellow.
AY 2017-18
S.No. Gap Action
taken
Date-
Month-Year
Resource Person
with designation
% of
students
Relevance
to
POs, PSOs
1
Awareness
Programme on
Computer
Security
Seminar 30-11-2017
Sri K Gopala Reddy
Assoc Prof, ASIST
Sri K Phani Srinivas
Head, R&D Cell, ASIST
Sri Ch Srinivasa Rao
Asst Prof, CSE
90% PO 8,9,10
PSO 1,3
2
Digital System
Design with
PLDs and FPGAs
NPTEL
VIDEO
LECTURE
30-08-2017 Prof Kuruvilla
Varghese 95%
PO 8,9,10
PSO 1,3
AY: 2016-17
S.No. Gap Action
taken
Date-
Month-Year
Resource Person
with designation
% of
students
Relevance
to
POs, PSOs
1
Micro Wave
AMPLIFIER&O
SCILLATORS Seminar 27-02-2017
Dr M. Siva Ganga
Prasad
Professor & HOD,
KITS -Guntur
90% PO 8,9,10
PSO 1,3
2
Numerical
Techniques in
Electro
magnetic
PPT 21-01-2017
Dr. R.S.Rao,
Professor
GEC--
GUDLAVALLERU
85% PO 8,9,10
PSO 1,3
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-16
3
Advanced
digital signal
processing
Seminar 05-11-2016
S. Lenin Babu,
Technical Director,
SANTHA
COMMUNICATION
90% PO 8,9,10
PSO 1,3
4
Industrial
expectation
from young
Engineers
Industrial
expectatio
n from
young
Engineers
06-10-2016
Mr DEVENDAR,
CAP SYSTEMS,
GUNTUR
90%
PO
1,2,3,6,12
PSO 1,3
5 Image
Processing
NPTEL
Videos 06-07-2017
NPTEL videos
provided by the
Institution
90 PO 8,9,10
PSO 1,3
2015-16
S.No. Gap Action
taken
Date-
Month-
Year
Resource Person
with designation
% of
students
Relevance
to
POs, PSOs
1 ARDUINO
Applications Workshop 11/03/2016
Dr.VN.Mani,
Scientist E,DRDO 100 8,9,10
2
Advanced
Research
topics
Conference on
signal
processing,
computing
networking
and power
19/08/2016
Mr. Nandhi
Dharma Kishore,
Senior Manager
(R&D), Samsung
Electronics
90 1,2,3,6,12
2014-15
S.No. Gap Action
taken
Date-
Month-
Year
Resource Person
with designation
% of
students
Relevance
to
POs,
PSOs
1
Advances in
Communication,
Signal
processing &
VLSI
Conference 01/01/2015
Mr. Prathik Pai,
CEO LogicHive
Solutions pvt ltd
100 1,2,3,6,12
2
Advanced
Antenna
applications
using MATLAB
Seminar 05/01/2015
Dr. Md Habibullah
Khan
Professor KLU
90 8,9,10
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-17
3
Satellite
Communication,
Communication
Systems
conference 27-11-2014
Dr. B. S. Rao
Professor,
GVPCOE, VIZAG
98 1,2,3,6
2.2. Teaching - Learning Processes (100)
2.2.1. Describe Processes followed to improve quality of Teaching & Learning (25)
Institutional calendar has been prepared and aligned with University academic calendar. In addition
to events proposed by the university in academic calendar, Institute has introduced many other
events which are useful in overall development of the students. For example training and placement
skill development program is a part of our academic calendar. During this event in addition to soft
skill development, emphasis also given on personality development of the students so that they
become employable. We are following the Institutional academic calendar in total. Our management
and higher officials are keen about follow up of the academic calendar.
1. Calendar of events – which include all other co-circular and extra-curricular activities .
S.No Month Date Event
1.
June
05-06-2017
Subject Allotment for II/I & III/I
Staff meeting and instructions to preparation of lesson plan for
II/I & III/I
2. 10-06-2017 Staff meeting and submission of lesson plan by II/I & III/I to
department
3. 12-06-2017
Commencement of class work for II/I & III/I; Subject
Allotment for IV/I by HOD:ECE; Orientation programme for
II/I & III/I students; Instructions to preparation of lesson plan
for IV/I faculty
4. 13-06-2017 Commencement of unit-1 instruction for II/I & III/I
5. 17-06-2017
Staff meeting and submission of lesson plan by IV/I to
department;
Checking compliance of lesson plan
6. 19-06-2017 Commencement of Class work for IV/I and Orientation
program for IV/I
7. 20-06-2017 Meeting with CRs of various classes in ECE
Commencement of unit-1 instruction for IV/I
8. 27-06-2017 Completion of unit-1 instruction for II/I & III/I
9. 28-06-2017 Commencement of unit-2 instruction for II/I & III/I
10.
July
01-07-2017 Checking compliance of lesson plan
11. 04-07-2017 Completion of unit-1 instruction for IV/I
Meeting with CRs of various classes in ECE
12. 05-07-2017 Commencement of unit-2 instruction for IV/I
Staff meeting
13. 13-07-2017 Completion of unit-2 instruction for II/I & III/I
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-18
14. 14-07-2017 Commencement of unit-2 instruction for IV/I
15. 18-07-2017 Meeting with CRs of various classes in ECE
16. 19-07-2017 Completion of unit-2 instruction for IV/I
Staff meeting
17. 21-07-2017 Commencement of unit-3 instruction for IV/I
18. 29-07-2017 Completion of unit-3 instruction for II/I & III/I
19. 30-07-2017 Workshop for faculty members
20. 31-07-2017 Commencement of Revision Schedule for II/I & II/I
21.
Aug
01-08-2017 Meeting with CRs of various classes in ECE
22. 02-08-2017 Staff Meeting
23. 05-08-2017 Completion of unit-3 instruction for IV/I
Completion of revision schedule for II/I & III/I
24. 07-08-2017 Commencement of Revision Schedule for II/I & II/I
Commencement of MID exams for II/I & III/I
25. 08-08-2017 Department Level NBA File verification
26. 12-08-2017 Completion of MID exams for II/I & III/I
27. 15-10-2017 Celebration of Independence Day
28. 16-08-2017 Commencement of unit-4 for II/I & III/I
29. 23-08-2017 Commencement of unit-4 for IV/I
Meeting with CRs of various classes in ECE
30. 29-08-2017 Department Level NBA File verification
31. 30-08-2017 Completion of unit-4 instruction for II/I & III/I
32. 31-08-2017 Commencement of unit-5 for II/I & III/I
33.
Sept
05-09-2017 Teachers day celebration by the department of ECE
34. 06-09-2017 Staff meeting
35. 07-09-2017 Completion of unit-4 for IV/I
36. 08-09-2017 Commencement of unit-5 for IV/I
37. 12-09-2017 Meeting with CRs of various classes in ECE
38. 13-09-2017 Completion of unit-5 for II/I & III/I
39. 14-09-2017 Commencement of unit-5 for II/I & III/I
40. 19-09-2017 Staff Meeting
41. 20-09-2017 NSS Activity – Awareness on Anti ragging
42. 21-09-2017 Completion of unit-5 for IV/I
43. 22-09-2017 Commencement of unit-6 for IV/I
44. 26-09-2017 Meeting with CRs of various classes in ECE
45. 27-09-2017 Completion of unit-6 for II/I & III/I
46. 28-09-2017 Commencement of Revision Schedule for II/I & III/I
47.
Oct
07-10-2017 Completion of Revision Schedule for II/I & III/I
Completion of unit-6 for IV/I
48. 09-10-2017 Commencement of II Mid examination for II/I & III/I
Commencement of Revision Schedule for IV/I
49. 14-10-2017 Completion of II Mid examination for II/I & III/I
Completion of Revision Schedule for IV/I
50. 16-10-2017 Commencement of II Mid examination for IV/I
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-19
Preparation and Practical‟s for II/I & III/I 51. 21-10-2017 Completion of II Mid examination for IV/I
52. 23-10-2017 Commencement of University examinations for II/I & III/I
Preparation and Practical‟s for IV/I 53. 30-10-2017 Commencement of University examinations for IV/I
54.
Nov
04-11-2017 Completion of University Examination to II/I & III/I
55. 11-112017 Completion of University Examination to IV/I
56. 06-11-2017 Subject Allotment for II/II & III/II by HOD:ECE
Staff meeting and instructions to preparation of lesson plan for
II/II & III/II
57. 11-11-2017 Subject Allotment for IV/II by HOD:ECE
Staff meeting and instructions to preparation of lesson plan for IV/II
Submission of lesson plans by II/II & III/II faculty
58.
13-11-2017
to
18-11-2017
Submission of lesson plans by IV/II faculty
Orientation programme for Staff on II semester subjects
EVEN SEMESTER
59.
NOV
15-11-2017 Display Of Timetables & Submission Lesson Plans
60. 17-11-2017 Meeting With Class Incharges, Subject Coordinators & Lab
Incharges 61. 20-11-2017 Commencement of Class Work For II & III Years
62. 27-11-2017 Commencement of Class Work For IV Year
63. 30-11-2017 Display of Attendance For II,III & IV Years
64.
DEC
1st
Week of
December Students Council By Principal For II,III & IV Years
65. 2
nd Week of
December Workshop For II Year
66. 15-12-2017 Display Of Attendance For II,III & IV Years
67. 30-12-2017 Display Of Attendance For II,III & IV Years
68.
JAN
1st Week of
January Workshop For Iv Year
69. 15-01-2018 to
20-01-2018 I Mid Examinations For II & III Years
70. 15-01-2018 Display of Attendance For II,III & IV Years
71. 22-01-2018 to
27-01-2018 I Mid Examinations For Iv Year
72. 23-01-2018 Display of Mid Marks & Letter To Parents For II & III Years
73. 30-01-2018 Display of Mid Marks & Letter To Parents For IV Year
74. 31-01-2018 Display of Attendance For II,III & IV Years
75.
FEB
12-02-2018 Commencement Of Class Work For I M.Tech
76. 15-02-2018 Display of Attendance For II,III & IV Years
77. 2
nd Week of
February Seminar on Embedded Systems For B.Tech/ M.Tech
78. 2
nd Week of
February Certification Program For III & IV Years
79. 28-02-2018 Display of Attendance For II,III & IV Years
80.
MAR
05-03-2018 to
17-03-2018 Remedial Classes For II & III Years
81. 08-03-2018 Display of Provisional Detention List For II & III Years
82. 12-03-2018 to
24-03-2018 Remedial Classes For IV Year
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-20
83. 15-03-2018 Display of Provisional Detention List For IV Year
84. 19-03-2018 to
24-03-2018 II Mid Examinations For II & III Years
85. 26-03-2018 to
31-03-2018 II Mid Examinations For IV Year
86. 26-03-2018 to
31-03-2018 Preapration & Practicals For II & III Years
87. 28-03-2018 Display of Mid Marks & Letter To Parents For II & III Years
88.
APR
02-04-2018 to
14-04-2018 End Examinations For Ii & Iii Years
89. 02-04-2018 to
07-04-2018 Preapration & Practicals For IV Year
90. 04-04-2018 Display Of Mid Marks & Letter To Parents Iv Year
91. 09-04-2018 to
21-04-2018 End Examinations For IV Year
2. Pedagogical Initiatives:
Student centric – learning not coverage oriented
Emphasis is given aspects of learning and teaching students new modes of thinking – likely to
impact their future – away from rote learning
Focus is given on developing abilities/ skills which are central to the discipline and help prepare
the student on what is important to the discipline and also developing lifelong learning skills.
Following are some pedagogical initiatives taken by the department in addition to Chalk &Talk,
Lectures, Assignments, power point presentation, tutorials;
Role Play
Working model/Visual charts/ videos
Analogy with live examples from industries and surroundings
Lecture interspersed with discussions among students
E-tutorial
Group assignments and projects with defined individual ro
Lab experiments beyond syllabus
Quizzes(conventional/ Technical)
Seminars/ presentations
Group Discussions
Designing and Problem solving through simulation, etc
Apart from the methods listed above, while developing and delivering the Course/Lectures
Objectives, the faculty considered cognitive aspects of Bloom‟s Taxonomy i.e. the faculty listed
what they wanted the students to know-knowledge and development of intellectual skills.
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-21
Beyond curriculum the mechanism to support student of POs achievement and include:
Industry trainings and visits
Industry Expert lectures
Guest lectures
Membership to professional societies
Industry projects
Value added programs, topics, projects, assignments (both internal and external sources)
Conferences and seminars organized and participated by students
Communication skills courses and programmes through language laboratory, corporate
communication, professional ethics etc.
NPTEL (video lecture of renowned IIT professors)
QEEE lectures arranged for the students as well as faculty members.
Additional beyond syllabus topics are also picked up from MIT open courseware (EDX).
As evident from above both Traditional and Innovative Techniques are used to ensure attainment of
course objectives and outcomes. To reinforce the material taught formative assessment is done
regularly through Assignments, Surprise Tests and technical Quizzes etc., and practical training in
industry/project work in industry, Industrial training/summer internships are organized for students.
For innovative approaches for delivery following strategies are used:
Laboratory Experience: In addition to syllabus proposed by the university, additional experiments
are also performed aligned with the curriculum to satisfy the PO's. Results are observed keenly and
noted down and keeps in laboratory records (file) which are monitored and signed regularly by the
concerned teachers.
3. Weak and bright students Identification through result analysis of Unit Tests/Class Tests
(Mid semester test)
Weak student support strategy: Mentors are appointed to enhance the performance of weak student
as follows:
Regular counselling and providing moral support to them.
Encouraging them towards study.
Encouraging them for regular attendance.
Proper guidance given to weak students to clear their backlogs and constant monitoring their
performance in internal tests.
Extra classes arranged for backlog subjects if needed.
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-22
Bright student support strategy: HOD along with senior faculty members and mentors collective
make efforts to boost up the performance of bright students by:
Encouraging them to score good percentile in their final examination.
Encouraging them to participate in seminars/conferences in different institutes.
Encouraging them to guide their weak classmates. Teaching others make them more perfect.
Effectiveness: Effectiveness of this process is analyzed through feedback from the students, through
their performance in examinations, from the Alumni, from Industries feedback etc.
2.2.2. Quality of internal semester Question papers, Assignments and Evaluation (20)
Question papers, assignments are aligned with Bloom‟s Taxonomy and evaluated according to
rubrics defined. Sample is given bellow:
Sample of Question Paper of Mid Semester Examination - I
Amrita Sai Institute of Science and Technology, Kanchikacherla
Mid Sem -I Examination, August-2016
Course-B.Tech Branch-ECE, Sem-VI
Subject: Microprocessors and Interfacing.
Duration: 1:30 Hrs Max Marks: 15 Min Passing Marks:08
Levels of
Bloom's
taxonomy
CO
Note: All Questions are compulsory. Question 1 through 3 carry 5
marks each.
Q.1 Explain internal architecture of 8085 microprocessor (05) Remembering,
Understanding CO1
Q.2 Draw and explain Timing diagram for fetch, read and
write machine cycle. (05)
Remembering,
Understanding
Q.3
WALP to Calculate the sum of series of even numbers
from the list of numbers. The length of the list is in
memory location 2200H and the series itself begins
from memory location 2201H. Assume the sum to be 8
bit number so you can ignore carries and store the sum
at the end of data block in memory
(05) Applying CO2
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-23
Sample of Question Paper of Mid Semester Examination - II
Amrita Sai Institute of Science and Technology, Kanchikacherla
Mid Sem -II Examination, October-2016
Course-B.Tech Branch-ECE, Sem-VI
Subject: Microprocessors and Interfacing.
Duration: 1:30 Hrs Max Marks: 15 Min Passing Marks:08
Levels of Bloom's
taxonomy CO
Note: All Questions are compulsory. Question 1 through 3 carry 5
marks each.
Q.1 Write note on INTR interrupt and its process when an
interrupt occur (5) Understanding CO3
Q.2 Describe peripheral controlled data transfer technique. (5) Applying CO4
Q.3
Why RST instruction is known as one byte CALL
instruction? Explain the function of RST instruction as a
break point instruction
(5) Applying and
Analyzing CO5
Sample of Question Paper of Assignment
Assignment-5 (Sample):
Q. No. Note: Attempt all questions. Total marks: 5.
Levels of
Bloom's
taxonomy
CO
1. Design a decoder circuit using NAND gate and Using 3:8
decoder for full address decoding Creating
CO1 2.
Explain Fold back memory effect or memory shadowing
effect. What are the advantages and disadvantages of Fold
back memory
Creating
3. Determine the range of addresses for the following memories:
8KB ROM, 4KB EPROM, 2KB EEPROM and 1KB RAM Creating
Evaluation Process:
Mid Semester Examination - I
S.
No
MID-I
Questions Aligned to Course Outcomes and Marks
Obtained
Course Outcome
Attainment with
target in %
Course
Outcomes CO1 CO2
CO1 CO2 AVG
CO Q.1 Q.2 Total Q.3 Total
Roll No.
Distribution
of Marks--> 5 5 10 5 5 80% 80% 80%
Set Target
Level---->
80% 80%
1 15AJ1A0401 A Durgesh 4 4 8 4 4 1 1 2
2 15AJ1A0402 A Vennela 4 5 9 4 4 1 1 2
3 15AJ1A0403 A Gopi 3 4 7 4 4 0 1 1
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-24
Mid Semester Examination - II
Evaluation Process for Assignments:
2.2.3. Quality of student projects (25)
Guidelines for evaluation of project work may include the following:
Nature of project
Quality of work report and final outcome
Presentation/ Viva-Voce
For each component/ element to be evaluated and weightages to be assigned to each component are
given in Table below for awarding sectional marks:
S.
No
MID-II
Questions Aligned to Course Outcomes and
Marks Obtained
Course Outcome Attainment
with target in %
Course
Outcomes CO3 CO4 CO5
CO3 CO4 CO5 AVG
CO Q.1 Total Q.2 Total Q.3 Total
Roll No.
Distribution
of Marks--> 5 5 5 5 5 5 80% 80% 80% 80%
Set Target
Level----> 80% 80% 80%
1 15AJ1A0401 A
Durgesh 4 4 4 4 4 4 1 1 1 3
2 15AJ1A0402 A Vennela 4 4 5 5 4 4 1 1 1 3
3 15AJ1A0403 A Gopi 4 4 3 3 3 3 1 0 0 1
S. No
CO1 & CO2 (Assignment-I)
CO3, CO4 & CO5 (Assignment-II)
Course outcome attainment with target
in %
Q.1 Q.2 Q.3 Total Q.1 Q.2 Q.3 Total CO1
& CO2
CO3,CO4 & CO5
AVG CO
Distribution of Marks 5 5 5 15 5 5 5 15 70% 70% 70%
Set Target Level 70% 70%
1 A Durgesh 3 4 4 11 3 3 3 9 1 0 1
2 A Vennela 3 4 4 11 3 4 4 11 1 1 2
3 A Gopi 3 3 3 9 2 3 3 8 0 0 0
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-25
S.No. Items Maximum
Weightage
1.
Nature of Project
Relevance (5%)
Novelty/ Originality (5%)
Degree of Challenges Involved (5%)
15%
2.
Quality of work Report and Final Outcome
I. Quality of work (20%):
General appearance, binding and neatness; Utility/ feasibility for practical
applications; Organization and presentation of text; language and style; quality
of diagrams/ graphs etc,; accuracy in drawing conclusions; cross references;
bibliography; suggestions for further work.
II. Quality of Final Outcome (30%)
Aesthetics; functionality; user friendliness; cost effectiveness.
50%
3.
Presentation/ Viva-voce
Understanding Concepts, Principles, Practices, Design Considerations,
Results, Implementation, etc,. (15%)
Communication Skills (10%)
Viva Voce Skills (10%)
35%
Project presentation is taken thrice per semester in the presence of a project panel as well as
weekly/bi-weekly meetings and discussion with the concerned project supervisor.
Projects given to the students are related to state-of-art, industry relevant, hardware, and
latest software.
Projects offered are with latest and new technological development in the area of Electronics
and Communication Engineering.
Projects are based on mathematical modelling through simulation to analyze the operation
and performance under various operating condition.
The hardware prototyping through various building blocks are carried out in the respective
laboratories for these projects.
MINOR PROJECT:
As per the university curriculum, the student has to complete minor project in seventh semester. The
project work is inside the campus. The project work is executed under the guidance of a faculty
member. Finally, the project work is assessed by external and internal examiners through
presentation and viva- voce.
CO1: Able to acquire system integration skills, documentation skills, project management skills and
problem solving skills.
CO2: Able to identify problems and solutions and also solve real-life problems.
CO3: Able to develop professionalism.
CO4: Able to develop oral as well as written presentation skills.
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-26
MAJOR PROJECT:
Every final year student undertakes project which is spread over a period of one semester. The
student selects a topic of his/her interest and then performs literature survey, formulates the problem
formally and then Implements it.
The project is carried-out under guidance of faculty member. The project work is assessed by
external and internal examiners through presentation and viva- voce. Our students have exhibited a
high degree of innovation, commitment and team work in executing the project work. Assessment of
final year students‟ projects must be done considering criteria such as – (i) their quality, (ii) the state-
of the-art technology used in execution, (iii) their relevance to industry and academics, (iv) the use
and development of theoretical and experimental methods, and (v) the coverage of boarder areas of
the programme. At the end of the semester, a report is submitted by the students. Progress is
continuously monitored by supervisor and an advisory committee. Midterm evaluation is done based
on presentation and midterm report submission. Final evolution is based on presentation, report
submitted, examination and demonstration. The ethical values are imbibed through proper
referencing. The project is evaluated by Project Coordination committee which consists of subject
expert within the department, supervisor and an expert from outside the college apart from B &
project coordinator. All the POs are thus satisfied. A list of good and average projects is given
below:
Projects are taken in groups of 4 students.
Students are guided by faculty members.
Projects are taken on a large variety of problems and many a times of a multidisciplinary
nature.
Projects are both theoretical and experimental.
CO1: Able to make comprehensive use of the technical knowledge gained from previous courses.
CO2: Able to understand electronics circuits/systems concerned with the project.
CO3: Able to apply project management skills (scheduling work, procuring parts and documenting
expenditures and working within the confines of a deadline).
CO4: Able to analyze, develop and demonstrate troubleshooting ability in electronics and
communication technology.
CO5: Able to communicate technical information by means of written and oral reports.
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-27
Summary Report of Best Projects Mapped with POs and PSOs for the year 2016-17
Project Mapping with POs
S.No Name of the
Project
Project
Guide
Outcomes
a b c d e f g h I j k l
1 Robotic Arm P. Srinivas 2 3 2 3 2 1 2 2 3 2 1 3
2
Enhanced
Reconstruction
frame work on
Cardiac MRI Image
perception
Dr. S
Koteswara
Rao 1 2 2 2 1 3 2 2 2 3 2 2
3
Student Tracking
and Attendance
Monitoring System
Y. Richard
Jayanand 1 3 2 3 2 3 2 2 2 3 2 3
1: Slight (Low) 2: Moderate (Medium) 3: Substantial (High)
Summary Report of Best Projects Mapped with POs and PSOs for the year 2015-16
Project Mapping with POs
S.No Name of the Project Project
Guide
Outcomes
a b c d e f g h I j k l
1
Detection of brain
tumour using image
segmentation
VGNS
PRASAD 2 1 1 2 2 2 1 2 3 1 1 1
2 A 32- point FFT using
Vedic mathematics
N
SURESH 2 1 2 2 1 2 1 2 2 3 2 2
3
SOLAR TRACKING
PANEL USING
89C51
MICRCONTROLLER
AND LDR
Y PHANI
KUMAR 2 3 2 3 2 1 2 2 3 2 1 3
Summary Report of Average Projects Mapped with POs and PSOs for the year 2015-16
Project Mapping with POs
S.No Name of the Project Project Guide Outcomes
a b c d e f g h I j k l
1
Identifying Vehicle
position system,
Accident detection
and Theft control
system
R V
SHASHANK 2 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1
2 A Novel technique
for CC segmentation
M
NARASIMHA
RAO
2 1 2 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 2 2
3
Automated
Segmentation of
blood vessels in
retinal images using
optimized Gabor
filter
VGNS
PRASAD 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 1
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-28
Summary Report of Best Projects Mapped with POs and PSOs for the year 2014-15
Project Mapping with POs
S.No Name of the Project Project Guide Outcomes
a b c d e f g h I j k l
1
DESIGN OF
IMPLEMENTATION
OF 32 BIT SIGNED
MULTIPLIER USING
CLAA AND CSLA
M.NARASIMHA
RAO 2 3 2 1 3 1 2 2 1 1 2 2
2
HI-SPEED IEEE 754
FLOATING POINT
DOUBLE PRECISION
MULTIPLIER
G.SIVA
KUMAR 2 1 1 2 1 2 1 2 3 2 1 1
3
MODIFIED
HISTOGRAM BASED
CONTROL
ENHANCEMENT
USING UNSHARP
FILTERING FOR
MEDICAL IMAGES
B.SURESH 2 1 2 2 1 2 1 2 2 3 2 2
Summary Report of Average Projects Mapped with POs and PSOs for the year 2014-15
Project Mapping with POs
S.No Name of the Project Project Guide Outcomes
a b c d e f g h I j k l
1 FIRE FIGHTING
ROBOT R.V.SHASHANK 2 1 1 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 1 1
2
VEHICLE
TRACKING
SYSTEM
M.VENKATA
RAO 2 1 2 1 1 1 1 2 2 1 2 2
3
CHANNEL
ESTIMATION OF
MIMO OFDM
SYSTEMS
B.RAMA RAO 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 1 2 1 1
Summary Report of Best Projects Mapped with PSO's for the year 2016-17
Regd No
of the
Student(s)
Project Title Areas of
Specialization
Project
Guide
Contributions/
Achievements/
Research Outputs
Matching
with
Stated
PSOs
13AJ1A0401
13AJ1A0425
13AJ1A0418
13AJ1A0468
13AJ1A0430
Robotic Arm
Communication
and Radar
Systems
P. Srinivas Award of B.Tech
Degree P1, P2,
13AJ1A0431
13AJ1A0443
13AJ1A0457
Enhanced
Reconstruction frame
work on Cardiac MRI
Image
Processing
Dr.s
koteswara
Rao
Award of B.Tech
Degree P1, P2
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-29
13AJ1A0417
13AJ1A0408
Image perception
13AJ1A0436
13AJ1A0412
13AJ1A0448
13AJ1A0467
13AJ1A0453
Student Tracking and
Attendance
Monitoring System
Embedded
Systems
Y. Richard
Jayanand
Award of B.Tech
Degree P1, P3
13AJ1A0465
13AJ1A0411
13AJ1A0428
13AJ1A0470
13AJ1A0460
Tamper proof water
mark for color images
using reversible data
embedding
Image
Processing B. Suresh
Award of B.Tech
Degree P1, P2
13AJ1A04A5
13AJ1A0495
13AJ1A04C9
14AJ5A0413
14AJ5A0416
Automatic Vacuum
Cleaning
Robot Using Arduino
Embedded
Systems
Y.Phani
Kumar
Award of B.Tech
Degree P1, P3
Summary Report of Best Projects Mapped with PSO's for the year 2016-17
Regd No of
the
Student(s)
Project Title Areas of
Specialization
Project
Guide
Contributions/
Achievements/
Research
Outputs
Matching
with
Stated
PSO's
13AJ1A0401
13AJ1A0425
13AJ1A0418
13AJ1A0468
13AJ1A0430
Robotic Arm
Communication
and Radar
Systems
P.
Srinivas
Award of
B.Tech Degree
P1, P2,
P3
13AJ1A0431
13AJ1A0443
13AJ1A0457
13AJ1A0417
13AJ1A0408
Enhanced
Reconstruction
frame work on
Cardiac MRI
Image perception
Image
Processing
Dr.s
koteswara
Rao
Award of
B.Tech Degree P1, P2
13AJ1A0436
13AJ1A0412
13AJ1A0448
13AJ1A0467
13AJ1A0453
Student Tracking
and Attendance
Monitoring System
Embedded
Systems
Y.
Richard
Jayanand
Award of
B.Tech Degree
P1, P2,
P3
13AJ1A0465
13AJ1A0411
13AJ1A0428
13AJ1A0470
13AJ1A0460
Tamper proof
water mark for
color images using
reversible data
embedding
Image Processing B.Suresh
Award of
B.Tech Degree P1, P2
13AJ1A04A5
13AJ1A0495
13AJ1A04C9
14AJ5A0413
14AJ5A0416
Automatic
Vacuum Cleaning
Robot Using
Arduino
Embedded
Systems
Y.Phani
Kumar
Award of
B.Tech Degree P1, P2
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-30
Summary Report of Average Projects Mapped with PSO's for the year 2015-16
Name of the
Student(s) Project Title
Areas of
Specialization Project Guide
Contributions/
Achievements/
Research Outputs
Matching
with Stated
PSOs
12AJ1A0413
12AJ1A0441
12AJ1A0411
12AJ1A0463
12AJ1A0457
Identifying
Vehicle position
system, Accident
detection and
Theft control
system
Communication
Systems
R V
SHASHANK
Award of B.Tech
Degree P1, P2
12AJ1A0456
12AJ1A0447
12AJ1A0453
12AJ1A0448
12AJ1A0435
A Novel
technique for CC
segmentation
VLSI AND ES
M
NARASIMHA
RAO
Award of B.Tech
Degree P1, P2, P3
12AJ1A04A3
12AJ1A0471
12AJ1A0444
12AJ1A0409
12AJ1A04A5
Automated
Segmentation of
blood vessels in
retinal images
using optimized
Gabor filter
Image
Processing
VGNS
PRASAD
Award of B.Tech
Degree P1, P3
Attainment of COs - PROJECTS (Sample Sheet for 2 groups only)
Grou
p S.
No.
Student Name
Project Rubric performance indicator
aligned to Course Outcomes and marks
obtained
Course Outcome
Attainment with target in
%
T
o
ta
l
PI1 PI2 PI3 PI4 PI5 Total CO
1
CO
2
CO
3
CO
4
CO
5
Distribution of
Marks 15 20 15 25 25 100
Target Set to 80%
80
%
80
%
80
%
80
%
80
%
1
A Prathiba
Bharathi 14 18 14 25 24 95 3 3 2 2 3
1
3
Ch Swarajya
Lakshmi 13 19 14 24 24 94 2 2 3 1 2
1
0
Ch Gopala
Krishna 13 17 14 23 22 89 1 2 2 3 1 9
Muthineni
Shankar 12 17 15 22 23 89 2 1 2 1 2 8
Ch Takhur
Niharika Singh 12 18 13 24 23 90 1 0 1 1 1 4
2
Gadhi Priyanka 14 19 13 24 23 93 2 2 3 4 1 1
2 Kilaru Bhavitha 13 17 12 22 22 86 2 1 1 1 2 7
M Deepika 13 19 14 24 24 94 2 2 3 1 2 1
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-31
0
B.Narasimha
Reddy 13 18 13 23 22 89 1 1 2 3 2 9
Attuluri
Saireddy 13 19 14 22 23 91 1 1 0 1 2 5
Average/Total 13 18.1 13.6 23.3 23 91 13 13 14 16 14
Avg % PI 86.6
7
90.5
0
90.6
7
93.2
0
92.0
0
91.0
0
PI 1: Motivation and Reason of developing the project: Relate with Social, Environmental and
Ethical values
PI 2: In depth use of an extensive range of relevant literature
PI 3: Broad study of the advantages and Disadvantages of earlier existing projects related with the
same idea.
PI 4: Clearly demonstrated analysis of own research in relation to academic research and theory.
PI 5: Sound Analysis of Different strategies available with related project is done
2.2.4. Initiatives related to industry interaction (15)
(Give details of the industry involvement in the program such as industry-attached laboratories,
partial delivery of appropriate courses by industry experts etc. Mention the initiatives,
implementation details and impact analysis)
Industry trainings and visits.
Industry Expert lectures.
Membership to professional societies.
Industry projects.
Value added programs and seminars organized and participated by students.
As evident from above both Traditional and Innovative Techniques are used to ensure course
objectives and delivered effectively such as Chalk and board, Laboratory /workshop practical,
tutorials, Seminars/guest lectures, Assignments, Surprise Tests and technical Quizzes, practical
training in industry/project work in industry, Industrial training and PPTs which are more traditional.
For innovative approaches for delivery following strategies are used:
Innovative Approaches
Learning through Problem solving
Designing lab experiments
E-tutorials
NPTEL
Cooperative learning
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-32
Problem solving/ Brainstorming
Active learning
Self-learning through simulations/software
An expert from Industry is considered to be a member of Department Advisory Committee
who takes active role in the design of curriculum gap.
The institution has MOU‟s with various industries to strengthen the relationships with
industry
Students are provided and given internship facility in BSNL, Door Darshan, Vizag steel
plant, Efftronics etc., for their project work.
Industrial visits are arranged at Radar Station, Radio station, Door Darshan etc
Effectiveness: Feedback from students about industrial visit and training is collected and impact of
such interventions is assessed. Based on which corrective actions are taken.
Corrective action points: Training report of the student is collected and analyzed for positive
impact. Student feedback is utilized for exposure to better industries Students are exposed to real
working environment in the industry. Students are required to deliver presentation about their
industrial visit and training Feedback from industries where the internship is conducted is also
obtained from students as well as from the industry. Based on above feedback corrective action is
taken to streamline the internship and training for subsequent batches. Care is taken such that POs
and PSOs are MET through these activities.
S.No Event Topic Resource
Person
Number of
Students Particip
ated
Date of
Event Summary of Event
PO's
met with
1 Works
hop
21st
century
Engineering
Education
Dr. P G
Sastry
100 30-10-
2017
Outcome based
educations in 21st
century
PO2
2 Guest
Lecture IOT
Mr. Sk KHADAR Baba
103 26-08-2017
He speaks about:
Basics of MICRO Controllers and their types. What is IoT, Its use and what are latest industrial requirements
8,9,10
3 Guest
Lecture
Industrial
expectation
from young
Engineers
Mr.
Devendar
Asst
Technical
Director
118 06-10-
2016
Speaker for this event;-
Devendar –Trainer and
HR consultant. He
speaks about:
1. Tips to prepare for
campus placement
7,8,12
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-33
CAP
Industries
-Guntur
2.Knowledge about
today's industrial
requirements. to
encourage students for
placement and prepare
according to latest
industrial requirements
4 Guest
Lecture
Campus to Corporate meeting Industry
Expectations
Mr. Ajay Misra HR
93 02-04-
2015
Speaker for this event;-
Ajay Misra-Trainer and
HR consultant. He
speaks about:
1.Tips to prepare for
campus placement
2.Knowledge about
today's industrial
requirements. to
encourage students for
placement and prepare
according to latest
industrial
requirements.
6,7, 12
5 Guest
Lecture
Industrial
expectation
from young
Engineers
Mr. A. K.
Naidu
ROYAL
Electronic
s
Vijayawad
a
65 04-10-
2014
Speaker for this event;-
A.K.Naidu -Trainer and
HR consultant. He
speaks about:
1. Tips to prepare
for campus placement
2. Knowledge about
today's industrial
requirements. to
encourage students for
placement and prepare
according to latest
industrial requirements
6,8,11
2.2.5. Initiatives related to industry internship/summer training (15)
The student has to execute a project work preferably at industry/R&D institution. The industrial
training is assessed by external and internal examiners through presentation and viva- voce.
I. Industrial Training Details:
S.NO Name of the
student Year Internship
Duration Month year-
Month Year Company
1 NANDIGAM
KEERTHANA 2016-17
MICRO
CONTROLLER
07-12-2016
to
06-01-2017
MSME_TOOL
ROOM
2 M BALA
BHARATHI 2016-17
Analyzing and
creating replica
of Face Book and
24-04-2017
to
30-05-2017
Innogeecks
Technologies,
Vijayawada
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-34
News Hunt App
development
3 SAI KRISHNA
CHAKKA 2016-17
Practical study
and Creating
replica of
Google Search
Engine and
Share text app
development
24-04-2017
to
30-05-2017
Innogeecks
Technologies,
Vijayawada
3 CHANDRA
SHEKHAR
MORE
2016-17
Analyzing and
creating replica
of
Amritasai.edu.in.
and Live
streaming
Mobile App
development
24-04-2017
to
30-05-2017
Innogeecks
Technologies,
Vijayawada
II. Industrial Visits:
CAY (2017-18)
S. No. Name of Industry Resource Person Duration Month year-
Month Year
Number of
Students
1 Radar Station-
MACHILIPATNAM
P.SRINIVASARAO
Asst Engineer 1Day 103
CAY (2016-17)
S. No. Name of Industry Resource Person Duration Month year-
Month Year
Number of
Students
1 Radio Station-
VIJAYAWADA
JAMAL REDDY
Asst Engineer 1Day 145
2 Radar Station-
MACHILIPATNAM
P.SRINIVASARAO
Asst Engineer 2 Days 103
CAY -1 (2015-16)
S. No. Name of Industry Resource Person Duration Number of Students
1 DD Studio-
VIJAYAWADA
JAMAL REDDY
Asst Engineer 2 Days 124
2 Coca Cola-
MANGALAGIRI
G V Prasad Section
Engineer 1Day 130
CAY-2 (2014-15)
S. No. Name of Industry Resource Person Duration Number of Students
1 Coca Cola-MANGALAGIRI Dakshina murthy
Section Engineer 1Day 120
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-35
2 DD Studio- VIJAYAWADA JAMAL REDDY
Asst Engineer 2 Days 124
3 Radar Station-
MACHILIPATNAM
P.SRINIVASARAO
Asst Engineer 1 Day 98
Implementation Details and Impact Analysis: The College/placement cell will facilitate and
monitor the student internship program. The College/Department/placement cell will strongly
encourage students to undergo Internship during vacation. The internal guide has to visit the
origination to know the performance of students during internship period. The student shall make a
midterm presentation of the activities undertaken during the internship to a panel comprising
Internship guide, a senior faculty from the department and Head of the Department. The student has
to submit internship report to the Department. In case, if student makes any patents/copyrights, then
royalty will be shared among all (Industry side, college side).
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-36
CRITERION 3
3. COURSE OUTCOMES AND PROGRAM OUTCOMES (120)
Program Outcomes:
Engineering knowledge: Apply the knowledge of mathematics, science, engineering fundamentals,
and an engineering specialization to the solution of complex engineering problems.
Problem analysis: Identify, formulate, review research literature, and analyze complex engineering
problems reaching substantiated conclusions using first principles of mathematics, natural sciences,
and engineering sciences.
Design/development of solutions: Design solutions for complex engineering problems and design
system components or processes that meet the specified needs with appropriate consideration for the
public health and safety, and the cultural, societal, and environmental considerations.
Conduct investigations of complex problems: Use research-based knowledge and research
methods including design of experiments, analysis and interpretation of data, and synthesis of the
information to provide valid conclusions.
Modern tool usage: Create, select, and apply appropriate techniques, resources, and modern
engineering and IT tools including prediction and modeling to complex engineering activities with
an understanding of the limitations.
The engineer and society: Apply reasoning informed by the contextual knowledge to assess
societal, health, safety, legal and cultural issues and the consequent responsibilities relevant to the
professional engineering practice.
Environment and sustainability: Understand the impact of the professional engineering solutions
in societal and environmental contexts, and demonstrate the knowledge of, and need for sustainable
development.
Ethics: Apply ethical principles and commit to professional ethics and responsibilities and norms of
the engineering practice.
Individual and team work: Function effectively as an individual, and as a member or leader in
diverse teams, and in multidisciplinary settings.
Communication: Communicate effectively on complex engineering activities with the engineering
community and with society at large, such as, being able to comprehend and Write effective reports
and design documentation, make effective presentations, and give and receive clear instructions.
Project management and finance: Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of the engineering
and management principles and apply these to one‟s own work, as a member and leader in a team, to
manage projects and in multidisciplinary environments.
Life-long learning: Recognize the need for, and have the preparation and ability to engage in
independent and life-long learning in the broadest context of technological change
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-37
Program Specific Objectives
PSO1
An ability to understand the concepts of basic Electronics & Communication Engineering
and to apply them to various areas like Signal processing, VLSI, Embedded systems,
Communication Systems, Digital & Analog Devices, etc.
PSO2
An ability to solve complex Electronics and Communication Engineering problems, using
latest hardware and software tools, along with analytical skills to arrive cost effective and
appropriate solutions.
PSO3
Wisdom of social and environmental awareness along with ethical responsibility to have a
successful career and to sustain passion and zeal for real-world applications using optimal
resources as an Entrepreneur.
3.1 Establish the correlation between the courses and the Program Outcomes (POs) and
Program Specific Outcomes (PSOs) (20)
Correlation between POs PSO’s
PO’S PS01 PS02 PS03
PO1 3 1 --
PO2 2 -- --
PO3 2 3 --
PO4 2 -- --
PO5 -- 2 2
PO6 -- 1 --
PO7 -- 2 2
PO8 1 2 3
PO9 -- 2 3
PO10 -- 2 2
PO11 -- 2 3
PO12 3 3 3
1: Slight (Low) 2: Moderate (Medium) 3: Substantial (High)
3.1.1Course Outcomes (COs)
(SAR should include course outcomes of one course from each semester of study, however, should
be prepared for all courses and made available as evidence, if asked)
Note: Number of Outcomes for a Course is expected to be around 6
Course Name: Electronic Devices and Circuits Course Year : 2016-2017
Items Description
C201.1 Understand: To Understand the basic concepts of different types of basic electronic
Devices.
C201.2 Analyze: To Analyze the devices/components its characteristics in graphical manner.
C201.3 Draw: To draw the hybrid parameters of various amplifier circuits under different
configurations
C201.4 Recognize: To recognize the needs and requirements of various types of Biasing
C201.5 Comparison: To compare various electronic devices properties
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-38
Course Name
: Switching Theory & Logic Design Course Year : 2016-2017
Items Description
C202.1 Understand: To Understand the basic concepts of Boolean Algebra
C202.2 Analyze: To Analyze different Minimizing Techniques
C202.3 Describe: To Describe the function and structure of Different Types of programmable
logic devices.
C202.4 Design: To Design sequential circuits such as counters and registers.
C202.5 Draw: To Draw the ASM chart for both sequential and combinational circuits. Course Name
: Control Systems Course Year : 2016-2017
Items Description
C301.1 Understand control systems in brief- its types, classifications. Identify its basic
elements & write the performance Modeling.
C301.2 Determine the transfer function of given system or equivalent system based on
various methods.
C301.3 Determine the steady state and transient response characteristics of different order
systems for standard test signals and find the relative stability.
C301.4
Define frequency domain specifications, correlate between time domain & frequency
domain. Draw the frequency response in graph using different methods to analyze
stability.
Course Name : Digital Communications Course Year : 2016-2017
Items Description
C3 02.1 Understand different pulse digital modulation techniques and their comparison
C302.2 Familiarize various digital modulation techniques and calculation of their error
probabilities
C302.3 Understand the concept of entropy and different source coding techniques
C302.4 Familiarize with block codes, cyclic codes and convolution codes
Course Name : Optical Communication Course Year : 2016-2017
Items Description
C401.1 Able to understand the basic operating principles of physics, optical fiber, and its
types, transmission characteristics of optical fibers.
C401.2 Able to learn the optical source and detectors, couplers and connectors.
C401.3 Able to understand the concept of analog and digital link, WDM concept and
components
C401.4 Able to learn optical network SONET/SDH, WDM, high speed optical network
Such as GPON, FTTX, and High speed optical links.
Course Name : CELLULAR MOBILE COMMUNICATIONS Course Year : 2016-2017
Items Description
C402.1 Distinguish the major cellular communication standards (1G/2G/3G).
C402.2 Characterize the tradeoff among frequency reuse, signal to interference ratio,
capacity and spectral efficiency.
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-39
C402.3 Able to understand the characteristics of different multiple access methods
C402.4 Able to understand the wireless communication systems and standards GSM, IS-95.
3.1.2. CO-PO matrices of courses selected in 3.1.1 (six matrices to be mentioned; one per
semester from 3rd
to 8th
semester) (05)
Course Name: Electronic Devices and Circuits
Course PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12
C201.1 2 2 1 2 1 1 2 2 2 3 3 2
C201.2 2 2 1 2 3 2 1 2 3 1 1 3
C201.3 2 2 1 1 3 3 1 2 1 2 2 1
C201.4 3 3 1 2 2 3 3 2 2 3 1 1
C201.5 3 2 1 2 1 1 3 1 3 1 3 2
Average 2.4 2.2 1 1.8 2 2 2 1.8 2.2 2 2 1.8
Course Name: Switching Theory and Logic Design
Course PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12
C202.1 3 3 1 1 2 2 2 3 3 3 2 1
C202.2 3 3 3 2 1 2 3 1 1 1 3 1
C202.3 3 3 3 3 1 2 1 2 2 2 1 2
C202.4 3 3 3 3 3 2 2 3 1 3 1 2
C202.5 3 3 3 3 3 1 3 1 3 1 2 1
Average 3 3 2.6 2.4 2 1.8 2.2 2 2 2 1.8 1.4
Course Name: Control Systems Course PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12
C301.1 3 3 - - - 1 - - - 1 - -
C301.2 1 1 1 3 2 - 1 - 2 - 1 1
C301.3 1 1 2 1 3 - - 1 - - - 1
C301.4 1 1 2 1 3 - - - 1 - - 1
Average 1.5 1.5 1.67 1.67 2.67 1 1 1 1.5 1 1 1 Course Name: Digital Communication Course PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12
C302.1 3 3 1 1 2 1 2 3 1 1 3 3
C302.2 2 2 3 3 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1
C302.3 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1
C302.4 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 2 1 1 1
Average 2.25 2.25 2 2 1.25 1 1.25 1.5 1.5 1 1.75 1.5 Course Name: Optical Communication
Course PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12
C401.1 2 2 2 2 2 3 3 2 3 3 2 2
C401.2 2 2 3 2 1 1 1 1 2 3 1 1
C401.3 2 2 3 2 3 2 2 3 2 2 3 3
C401.4 1 1 2 3 3 2 3 2 1 1 1 2
Average 1.75 1.75 2.5 2.25 2.25 2 2.25 2 2 2.25 1.75 2
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-40
Course Name: Cellular Mobile Communication
Course PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12
C402.1 2 3 3 2 2 3 3 2 3 3 2 2
C402.2 2 2 3 3 0 1 1 1 2 3 1 1
C402.3 2 3 3 0 2 2 2 3 2 2 3 3
C402.4 1 3 3 2 2 2 3 2 1 1 1 2
Average 1.75 2.75 3 1.75 1.5 2 2.25 2 2 2.25 1.75 2
3. CO- PSO Matrixes of the selected courses
Course Name: Electronic Devices and Circuits Year of Study: 2016 – 17
Course PSO1 PSO2 PSO3
C201.1 3 2 3
C201.2 3 2 1
C201.3 3 2 2
C201.4 3 3 3
C201.5 1 2 2
Average 2.6 2.2 2.2
Course Name: Switching Theory and Logic Design Year of Study: 2016 – 17
Course PSO1 PSO2 PSO3
C202.1 1 2 1
C202.2 3 3 1
C202.3 3 3 1
C202.4 3 3 2
C202.5 3 3 1
Average 2.6 2.8 1.2
Course Name: Control Systems Year of Study: 2016 – 17
Course PSO1 PSO2 PSO3
C301.1 3 3 2
C301.2 2 3 1
C301.3 2 3 2
C301.4 2 3 3
Average 2.25 3 2
Course Name: Digital Communication Year of Study: 2016– 17
Course PSO1 PSO2 PSO3
C302.1 3 1 2
C302.2 3 2 1
C302.3 3 2 3
C302.4 3 3 1
Average 3 2 1.75
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-41
Course Name: Optical Communication Year of Study: 2016– 17
Course PSO1 PSO2 PSO3
C401.1 2 3 2
C401.2 3 3 2
C401.3 2 3 2
C401.4 3 3 1
Average 2.5 3 1.75
Course Name: Cellular Mobile Communication Year of Study: 2016 – 17
Course PSO1 PSO2 PSO3
C402.1 3 3 2
C402.2 3 2 2
C402.3 3 2 2
C402.4 2 3 1
Average 2.75 2.5 1.75
3.1.3. Program level Course-PO matrix of all courses including first year courses (10) Course PO
1
PO
2
PO
3
PO
4
PO
5
PO
6
PO
7
PO
8
PO
9
PO
10
PO
11
PO
12
Semester-I
English 3 3 2 2 2 0 0 0 2 2 0 2
Mathematics 3 2 3 3 0 0 2 3 0 0 0 2
Mathematics –
II
(Mathematical
Methods)
3 3 2 3 2 2 3 1 2 1 1 1
Engineering
Physics 3 3 3 3 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 1
Professional
Ethics and
Human Values
3 3 3 3 3 0 0 0 2 2 2 0
Engineering
Drawing 2 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2
Semester-II
English – II 2 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2
Mathematics – III 3 3 2 3 0 0 0 2 0 2 2 1
Engineering
Chemistry 3 3 3 2 2 0 0 0 2 2 0 1
Engineering
Mechanics 3 3 3 2 2 0 0 0 2 2 0 1
Computer
Programming 3 3 3 3 0 0 0 3 2 2 0 0
Network
Analysis 3 3 3 2 3 0 0 0 0 3 3 0
Semester-III
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-42
Managerial
Economics and
Financial
Analysis
3 2 2 2 2 0 1 0 1 1 0 2
Electronic
Devices and
Circuits
3 2 2 2 1 1 1 1 0 0 2 3
Data Structures 3 3 3 3 0 0 0 3 2 2 0 0
Environmental
Studies 3 2 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 1
Signals &
Systems 0 0 2 2 2 2 0 2 1 0 0 1
Semester-IV
Electromagnetic
theory and
transmission
lines
3 1 2 2 1 2 1 2 2 0 0 0
Random
variables and
Stochastic
process
2 3 2 2 3 2 1 1 2 3 2 1
Analog
Communication 2 3 3 2 2 2 2 3 2 3 3 2
Electrical
Technology 2 3 2 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
Management
Science 1 2 2 3 1 0 0 2 2 1 2 3
Semester-V
Pulse & Digital
Circuits 2 3 2 2 2 2 1 3 2 2 2 3
Linear IC
Applications 3 3 3 2 0 0 0 2 2 1 0 0
Control
Systems
2 2 2 2 2 1 1 1 2 1 1 1
Digital System
Design & DIC A 1 2 2 3 3 2 1 1 0 0 0 1
Antennas and
Wave
Propagation
3 2 2 2 0 0 1 1 1 1 1 2
Semester-VI
Microprocessors
and
Microcontrollers 3 2 3 2 1 2 2 1 0 0 2 1
Digital Signal
Processing 2 1 2 2 1 1 2 1 1 2 1 2
Digital
Communications 3 3 2 2 2 1 2 2 2 1 2 2
Microwave
Engineering 2 2 2 1 1 1 0 1 1 2 2 1
Bio Medical 3 2 3 2 2 0 0 1 1 1 2 1
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-43
Engineering
Semester-VII
VLSI Design 2 2 2 2 3 2 2 2 2 2 2 3
Computer
Networks 3 3 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 2 0 0
Digital Image
Processing 2 2 3 3 0 3 0 2 1 2 2 2
Computer
Architecture &
Organization
1 1 2 1 1 0 0 2 0 0 1 2
Optical
Communication 2 2 3 2.25 2.25 2 2.25 2 2 2.25 2 2
Radar Systems 2 2 0 1 1 0 0 3 0 3 1 1
Semester-VIII
Cellular Mobile
Communication 1.75 2.75 3 1.75 1.5 2 2.25 2 2 2.25 1.75 2
Electronic
Measurements
and
Instrumentation
2 2 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 3 1 1
Satellite
Communication 2 2 3 3 0 2 0 3 2 0 2 1
Wireless Sensors
and Networks 2 2 3 2 0 2 0 3 3 1 2 1
Program level Course-PSO matrix of all courses including first year courses Correlation levels 1, 2 or3 as defined below:
1: Slight (Low) 2: Moderate (Medium) 3: Substantial (High)
If there is no correlation, put “-” It may be noted that contents of Table 3.1.2 must be consistent within formation available in Table 3.1.3 for all the courses
Program Level CO-PSO matrices for all courses including first year courses.
Course PSO1 PSO2 PSO3
English 2 2 1
Mathematics 1 2 2
Mathematics – II (Mathematical Methods) 2 1 2
Engineering Physics 1 2 3
Professional Ethics and Human Values 2 2 1
Engineering Drawing 2 1 1
English – II 2 2 3
Mathematics – III 1 2 1
Engineering Chemistry 2 1 2
Engineering Mechanics 1 2 3
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-44
Computer Programming 2 2 2
Network Analysis 1 1 2
Managerial Economics and Financial
Analysis
2 1 2
Electronic Devices and Circuits 1 2 1
Data Structures 2 3 1
Environmental Studies 1 2 1
Signals & Systems 1 2 1
Pulse & Digital Circuits 3 2 1
Linear IC Applications 3 2 2
Control Systems 3 3 2
Digital System Design & Digital IC
Applications
2 2 2
Antennas and Wave Propagation 2 2 1
Microprocessors and Microcontrollers 1 2 1
Digital Signal Processing 2 2 2
Digital Communications 1 2 1
Microwave Engineering 2 2 3
Bio Medical Engineering 1 2 2
VLSI Design 2 2 1
Computer Networks 1 2 1
Digital Image Processing 2 1 2
Computer Architecture & Organization 2 2 1
Radar Systems 1 2 2
Cellular Mobile Communication 1 2 1
Electronic Measurements and
Instrumentation
2 2 3
Satellite Communication 1 2 2
Wireless Sensors and Networks 2 2 1
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-45
3.2. Attainment of Course Outcomes (50)
3.2.1. Describe the assessment processes used to gather the data upon which the evaluation of
Course Outcome is based (10)
Scheme and Syllabus (Subject wise) is provided by the University. All course outcomes are
developed using Bloom‟s taxonomy and consequently assignments, mid semester tests, quiz,
practical and projects are aligned to CO addressing same level of Bloom‟s taxonomy. Each unit
covers one or two Cos, generally 1st
unit covers Remembering and understanding level, 2nd
unit cover applying level, 3rd
unit covers analyzing level, 4th
and 5th
unit covers Evaluating
and creating level. But it may vary from subject to subject. Some subjects may cover only four
levels; some may five or all the six levels.
In department of ECE two internal class test (Known as mid-semester examination I and II)
are held per semester. Each test covers 3 units (Maximum) out of 06 Units from the syllabus of
respective subject. Question paper format is decided by the academic committee headed by HOD.
Question paper format is given in point no. 2.2.2., where each mid semester paper covers two or
Three COs maximum. But it may vary in different subjects depending upon syllabus and
course coverage in classroom before commencement of mid semester examination.
For evaluation of COs well defined statistical technique is used to map the questions with the
COs and Pos. Since the question wise result of students from the university semester
examination are not available, analysis of CO with questions is limited to internal
examinations, assessment of lab practical, assignments, Quiz only.
Process used for collection, evaluation of data and Attainment of course outcome for Mid-
semester Exam I & II, Assignments and Project is already described in point no.2.2.2. And
2.2.3 of criterion 2:
Following table shows only the process used to gather the data, which can be used for further
evaluation of course outcomes of practical, Quiz and University examination.
Attainment of course outcome for Practical Internal Viva-voce:
SNo Roll No Name P1,P2 P3,P4 P5,P6 P7,P8 P9,P10
Lab
Record
Exp
t
resu
Vi
va
T
ot
Lab
reco
rd
Ex
p.
res
Vi
va
T
ot
Lab
reco
rd
Ex
p.
res
Vi
va
tot
al
Lab
reco
rd
Ex
p.
res
Vi
va
tot
al
Lab
reco
rd
Ex
p.
res
Vi
va
tot
al
1 3 5 9 1 3 6 10 1 2 5 8 1 2 5 8 1 2 5 8
1 15AJ1A0401 A.Durgesh 2 2 4 8 1 2 4 7 2 2 4 8 1 2 4 7 2 2 4 8
2 15AJ1A0402 A.Vinneal 1 2 4 7 2 2 4 8 1 2 4 7 2 2 4 8 2 2 4 8
3 15AJ1A0403 A.G V Sai
Chand 1 2 4 7 2 2 4 8 2 2 4 8 1 2 4 7 2 2 4 8
4 15AJ1A0404 A.Gopi
Reddy 1 2 4 7 2 2 4 8 2 2 4 8 2 2 4 8 2 2 4 8
5 15AJ1A0405 A.Chaitanya 1 2 4 7 2 2 4 8 1 2 4 7 2 2 4 8 2 2 4 8 6 15AJ1A0406 B.Prathyush
a 1 2 4 7 2 2 4 8 2 2 4 8 1 2 4 7 2 2 4 8
7 15AJ1A0407 B.N Sai
Santoshi 2 2 4 8 1 2 4 7 2 2 4 8 2 2 4 8 2 2 4 8
8 15AJ1A0408 B.V Tejesh 1 2 4 7 2 2 4 8 1 2 4 7 2 2 4 8 2 2 4 8
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-46
9 15AJ1A0409 B.Rama
Krishna 1 2 4 7 2 2 4 8 2 2 4 8 2 2 4 8 2 2 4 8
10 15AJ1A0410 B.Srinias
Naveen 2 2 4 8 1 2 4 7 2 2 4 8 2 2 4 8 2 2 4 8
11 15AJ1A0411 B.Tharani 1 2 4 7 2 2 4 8 1 2 4 7 2 2 4 8 2 2 4 8 12 15AJ1A0412 B.Gopinadh 1 2 4 7 2 2 4 8 2 2 4 8 2 2 4 8 2 2 4 8
13 15AJ1A0413 B.Naga
Lakshmi 1 2 4 7 2 2 4 8 2 2 4 8 2 2 4 8 2 2 4 8
14 15AJ1A0414 B.Naga
Lakshmi 1 2 4 7 2 2 4 8 2 2 4 8 2 2 4 8 2 2 4 8
15 15AJ1A0415 B.Mounika 1 2 4 7 2 2 4 8 2 2 4 8 1 2 4 7 2 2 4 8 16 15AJ1A0416 Ch.Ashok 2 2 4 8 1 2 4 7 2 2 4 8 2 2 4 8 2 2 4 8 17 15AJ1A0417 Ch.Ravi 2 2 4 8 1 2 4 7 2 2 4 8 2 2 4 8 2 2 4 8
18 15AJ1A0418 Ch.Govardh
an Reddy 1 2 4 7 2 2 4 8 2 2 4 8 1 2 4 7 2 2 4 8
Attainment of course outcome for quiz:
S.NO Roll no Name of the
student
Practical‟s aligned to course outcomes and marks obtained
Co1 Co2 Co3 Co4 Co5
Quiz
1 total
Quiz
2 total
Quiz
3 total
Quiz
4 total
Quiz
5 total Co1 Co2 Co3 Co4 Co5
Average
co
Distribution of Marks 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 70% 70% 70% 70% 70% 70%
Set Target Level 70% 70% 70% 70% 70% -- -- -- -- --
1 15AJ1A0401 A.Durgesh 2 2 3 3 2 2 3 3 2 2 1 1 1 0 0 3
2 15AJ1A0402 A.Vinneal 3 3 4 4 3 3 4 4 3 3 2 2 2 1 1 8
3 15AJ1A0403 A GVSai
Chand 1 1 5 5 1 1 5 5 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 3
4 15AJ1A0404 A. Gopi
Reddy 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 2 2 2 1 1 8
5 15AJ1A0405 A.Chaitanya 5 5 3 3 5 5 3 3 5 5 2 2 2 1 1 8
6 15AJ1A0406 B.Prathyusha 4 4 5 5 4 4 5 5 4 4 2 2 2 1 1 8
7 15AJ1A0407 B.N S Santoshi 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 1 1 1 0 0 3
8 15AJ1A0408 B.Venkata
Tejesh 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 1 1 1 0 0 3
9 15AJ1A0409 B.Rama
Krishna 4 4 2 2 4 4 2 2 4 4 1 1 1 0 0 3
10 15AJ1A0410 B.Srinias
Naveen 5 5 3 3 5 5 3 3 5 5 2 2 2 1 1 8
11 15AJ1A0411 B.Tharani 4 4 1 1 4 4 1 1 4 4 2 2 2 1 1 8
12 15AJ1A0412 B.Gopinadh 3 3 4 4 3 3 4 4 3 3 1 1 1 0 0 3
13 15AJ1A0413 B.Naga
Lakshmi 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 1 1 1 0 0 3
14 15AJ1A0414 B.Naga
Lakshmi 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 2 2 2 1 1 8
15 15AJ1A0415 B.Mounika 3 3 4 4 3 3 4 4 3 3 1 1 1 0 0 3
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-47
Attainment of CO (MET/ NOT MET) in University examination.
S.NO Roll No
Questions aligned to
course outcomes and
marks obtained
Attainment
CO
Met or
Not
Met
Met = 1 Not met = 0
Maximum Marks 75.00 35
Set target level 45
1 15AJ1A0401 A.Durgesh 36 2 Met 1
2 15AJ1A0402 A.Vinneal 38 3 Met 1
3 15AJ1A0403 A.Gopi Venkata Sai
Chand 41 2 Met 1
4 15AJ1A0404 A.Gopi Reddy 43 5 Met 1
5 15AJ1A0405 A.Chaitanya 45 3 Met 1
6 15AJ1A0406 B.Prathyusha 35 2 Met 1
7 15AJ1A0407 B.Naga Sai Santoshi 37 4 Met 1
8 15AJ1A0408 B.Venkata Tejesh 32 2 Met 1
9 15AJ1A0409 B.Rama Krishna 35 3 Met 1
10 15AJ1A0410 B.Srinivas Naveen 33 4 Met 1
11 15AJ1A0411 B.Tharani 32 2 Met 1
12 15AJ1A0412 B.Gopinadh 31 3 Met 1
3.2.2. Record the attainment of Course Outcomes of all courses with respect to set attainment
levels (40)
Program shall have set Course Outcome attainment levels for all courses.
Semester Course Name PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12
3rd
semester
Managerial Economics and
Financial Analysis 2.2 2.1 2.4 2.6 2.9 2.2 2.9 2.8 2.8 2.1 1.9 2.2
Electronic Devices and
Circuits 2.4 2.2 1 1.8 2 2 2 1.8 2.2 2 2 1.8
Data Structures 2.2 2.1 2.4 2.6 2.9 2.2 2.9 2.8 2.8 2.1 1.9 2.2
Environmental Studies 2.4 2.6 2.9 2.6 2.4 1.8 2.8 2.7 2.1 2.4 1.8 1.6
Signals & Systems 2.8 2.1 1.9 2.2 2.7 2.1 2.6 2.4 1.8 2.9 2.2 2.9
4th
semester
Electromagnetic theory and
transmission lines 2.9 2.2 2.9 2.8 2.1 1.9 2.2 2.7 2.1 2.6 2.4 1.8
Random variables and
Stochastic process 2.9 2.2 2.9 2.8 2.1 1.9 2.2 2.7 2.1 2.6 2.4 1.8
Analog Communication 2.2 2.1 2.4 2.6 2.9 2.2 2.9 2.8 2.8 2.1 1.9 2.2
Electrical Technology 2.2 2.1 2.4 2.6 2.9 2.2 2.9 2.8 2.8 2.1 1.9 2.2
Management Science 2.2 2.1 2.4 2.6 2.9 2.6 2.4 1.8 1.6 2.1 2.4 2.6
5th
semester
Pulse & Digital Circuits 2.4 2.6 2.9 2.6 2.4 1.8 2.8 2.7 2.1 2.4 1.8 1.6
Linear IC Applications 2.2 2.1 2.4 2.6 2.9 2.2 2.9 2.8 2.8 2.1 1.9 2.2
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-48
Control Systems 2.4 2.6 2.9 2.6 2.4 1.8 2.8 2.7 2.1 2.4 1.8 1.6
Digital System Design &
Digital IC Applications 2.2 2.1 2.4 2.6 2.9 2.2 2.9 2.8 2.8 2.1 1.9 2.2
Antennas and Wave
Propagation 2.2 2.1 2.4 2.6 2.9 2.2 2.9 2.8 2.8 2.1 1.9 2.2
6th
semester
Microprocessors and
Microcontrollers 2.9 2.2 2.9 2.8 2.1 1.9 2.2 2.7 2.1 2.6 2.4 1.8
Digital Signal Processing 2.2 2.1 2.4 2.6 2.9 2.2 2.9 2.8 2.8 2.1 1.9 2.2
Digital Communications 2.9 2.2 2.9 2.8 2.1 1.9 2.2 2.7 2.1 2.6 2.4 1.8
Microwave Engineering 2.4 2.6 2.9 2.6 2.4 1.8 2.8 2.7 2.1 2.4 1.8 1.6
Bio Medical Engineering 2.8 2.1 1.9 2.2 2.7 2.1 2.6 2.4 1.8 2.9 2.2 2.9
7th
semester
VLSI Design 2.9 2.2 2.9 2.8 2.1 1.9 2.2 2.7 2.1 2.6 2.4 1.8
Computer Networks 2.9 2.2 2.9 2.8 2.1 1.9 2.2 2.7 2.1 2.6 2.4 1.8
Digital Image Processing 2.2 2.1 2.4 2.6 2.9 2.2 2.9 2.8 2.8 2.1 1.9 2.2
Computer Architecture &
Organization 2.2 2.1 2.4 2.6 2.9 2.2 2.9 2.8 2.8 2.1 1.9 2.2
Radar Systems 2.4 2.6 2.9 2.6 2.4 1.8 2.8 2.7 2.1 2.4 1.8 1.6
8th
semester
Cellular Mobile
Communication 2.2 2.1 2.4 2.6 2.9 2.6 2.4 1.8 1.6 2.1 2.4 2.6
Electronic Measurements and
Instrumentation 2.9 2.2 2.9 2.8 2.1 1.9 2.2 2.7 2.1 2.6 2.4 1.8
Satellite Communication 2.8 2.7 2.1 2.4 2.6 2.9 2.6 2.4 1.8 1.6 1.8 2.3
Wireless Sensors and
Networks 2.9 2.2 2.9 2.8 2.1 1.9 2.2 2.7 2.1 2.6 2.4 1.8
Action taken for all shortfall of target against each PO is reported in Criterion 7 in Item no. 7.1
(The attainment levels shall be set considering average performance levels in the university
examination or any higher value set as target for the assessment years. Attainment level is to be
measured in terms of student performance in internal assessments with respect to the Course
Outcomes of a course in addition to the performance in the University examination)
Measuring Course Outcomes attained through University Examinations
Target may be stated in terms of percentage of students getting more than the university
average marks or more as selected by the Program in the final examination. For cases where
the university does not provide useful indicators like average or median marks etc., the
program may choose an attainment level on its own with justification.
Example related to attainment levels Vs. targets:
(The examples indicated are for reference only. Program may appropriately define levels)
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-49
Attainment Level 1: 60% students scoring more than University average percentage marks or set
attainment level in the final examination.
Attainment Level 2: 70% students scoring more than University average percentage marks or set
attainment level in the final examination.
Attainment Level 3: 80% students scoring more than University average percentage marks or set
attainment level in the final examination.
Attainment is measured in terms of actual percentage of students getting set percentage
of marks.
If targets are achieved then all the course outcomes are attained for that year. Program
is expected to set higher targets for the following years as a part of continuous
improvement.
If targets are not achieved the program should put in place an action plan to attain the
target in subsequent years.
Measuring CO attainment through Internal Assessments:
(The examples indicated are for reference only. Program may appropriately define levels) Target
may be stated in terms of percentage of students getting more than class average marks or set by the
program in each of the associated COs in the assessment instruments (midterm tests, assignments,
mini projects, reports and presentations etc. as mapped with the COs) Example Mid-term test 1
addresses C202.1 and C202.2. Out of the maximum 20 marks for this test 12 marks are associated
with C202.1 and 8 marks are associated with C202.2. Examples related to attainment levels Vs.
targets:
Attainment Level 1: 60% students scoring more than 60% marks out of the relevant maximum
marks. 13
Attainment Level 2: 70% students scoring more than 60% marks out of the relevant maximum
marks.
Attainment Level 3: 80% students scoring more than 60% marks out of the relevant maximum
marks.
Attainment is measured in terms of actual percentage of students getting set percentage
of marks.
If targets are achieved then the C202.1 and C202.2 are attained for that year. Program
is expected to set higher targets for the following years as a part of continuous
improvement.
If targets are not achieved the program should put in place an action plan to attain the
target in subsequent years.
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-50
Similar targets and achievement are to be stated for the other midterm tests/internal assessment
instruments Course Outcome Attainment: For example: Attainment through University Examination:
Substantial i.e. 3 Attainment through Internal Assessment: Moderate i.e. 2 Assuming 80% weightage to
University examination and 20% weightage to Internal assessment, the attainment calculations will
be (80% of University level) + (20% of Internal level ) i.e. 80% of 3 + 20% of 2 = 2.4 + 0.4 = 2.8
Note: Weightage of 80% to University exams is only an example. Programs may decide weightages
appropriately for University exams and internal assessment with due justification.
3.3. Attainment of Program Outcomes and Program Specific Outcomes (50)
3.3.1 Describe the assessment tools and processes used for measuring the attainment of each of
the Program Outcomes and Program Specific Outcomes (10)
In Outcome based Education, assessment done through one or more than one processes, carried out
by the institution, that identify, collect, and prepare data to evaluate the achievement of programme
educational objectives, program outcomes and course objectives and outcomes.
PO Assessment Tools Assessment tools are categorized into direct and indirect methods to assess
the programme educational objectives, program outcomes and course outcomes.
Direct methods: Display the student‟s knowledge and skills from their performance in the continuous assessment tests, end–semester examinations, presentations, and classroom assignments
etc. these methods provide a sampling of what students know and/or can do and provide strong
evidence of student learning.
Indirect methods: such as surveys and interviews ask the stakeholders to reflect on student‟s learning. They assess opinions or thoughts about the graduate‟s knowledge or skills and their valued by different stakeholders.
Direct Assessment methods are formative as well as summative: For some of the POs that are
abstract, rubrics has been designed using performance indicators and shared with the students in
advance. This helps students understand against which parameter their work will be judged with the
“scoring rules”. These rubrics can be used by students in, revising, and judging their own work and progress.
Assignment/Quiz/Class Test: The Assignment, Quiz and class test are a qualitative
performance assessment tool designed to assess students‟ knowledge of engineering practices,
Framework, and problem solving. An Analytic rubric was developed to assess students‟ knowledge with respect to the learning outcomes associated with scenario tool.
Group discussion/Brain storming: This is designed to assess student‟s analytical capacity
along with the capability to communicate with others.
Few more Direct Assessment methods: Midterm Examinations/End examinations: Midterm
and semester end examinations are metric for assessing whether all POs are attained or not.
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-51
Examination is more focused on attainment of course outcomes and program outcomes using a
descriptive exam.
Lab Practical: This is mainly to assess students practical knowledge with their.
Use of Rubrics for Evaluation and Assessment of POs The Course/Programme outcomes are
difficult to measure such as assessing critical thinking, creativity, analytical skills, and problem
solving etc. Hence the department has adopted Criterion Referenced Rubrics to assess the POs and
COs wherever appropriate. The Rubric criteria are either developed by department faculty or
sometimes even with consultation with students and distributed before an assignment, project or test.
Rubrics are used for both formative and summative assessment of students. Same rubric is used for
assessing an outcome so that the faculty is able to assess student progress and maintain the record of
the same for each student. The rubrics are shared with students before being evaluated so that they
are aware of the performance criteria and their weightage.
Program Outcome assessment process: For each outcome the ACP along with program and course
coordinators define performance indicators (Assessment criteria) and their targets. Each performance
indicator is aligned to the courses and targets set for each performance indicator. The faculty
members then keep the POs in front of them develop COs (4-5 for each course) and then break each
of their unit outcome into elements of Blooms Taxonomy and define set of attributes for each
outcome. These are used for planning lectures, assignments, tests, projects etc. while developing
their course files. Each outcome is assessed in several courses to ensure that students acquire an
appropriate level in terms of knowledge/skills of an outcome. The course coordinators collect the
qualitative and quantitative data and use these for outcome assessment in a continual process. Each
faculty pre-sets out targets for assessment of course outcomes and prepares analysis of their course
outcome based on student performance, their own assessment and student feedback and present the
same to the ACP along with his/her suggestion for improvement. The course assessment is done at
both formative and summative levels. The Program ACP studies the course analysis report of each
faculty and decides course of assessed and planned schedule for their assessment and submits the
same to the IACC for initiating action of sending out survey instruments to relevant alumni,
employers and other external stakeholders. The IACC initiates action of indirect assessment of POs
based on the pre-defined and agreed schedule with each ACP. The ACP analyzes the collected data.
If the assessment meets the performance targets the outcome is attained. Otherwise, corrective
actions are initiated and results presented to the IACC which then presents the same to Academic
Advisory Board and seeks their suggestions and approval for corrective action. The Department
Advisory Board recommends content delivery methods/course outcomes/ curriculum improvements
as needed. Schedule of Assessment of POs: The department plans to complete the exercise of
assessing POs in a 5 year cycle given below:
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-52
Data Collection Cycle for POs (2014-2018)
PO 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Even odd Even odd Even Odd Even odd Even Odd
1. Engineering knowledge: Apply the knowledge
of mathematics, science, Electronics &
Communication Engineering fundamentals, and an
engineering specialization to the solution of
complex engineering problems
x x x
2. Problem analysis: Identify, formulate, review
research literature, and analyze complex
engineering problems reaching substantiated
conclusions using first principles of mathematics,
natural sciences, and Electronics & Communication
Engineering sciences.
x x x
3. Design/development of solutions: Design
solutions for complex Electronics &
Communication Engineering problems and design
system components or processes that meet the
specified needs with appropriate consideration for
the public health and safety, and the cultural,
societal, and environmental considerations.
x
4. Conduct investigations of complex problems:
Use research-based knowledge and research
methods including design of experiments, analysis
and interpretation of data, and synthesis of the
information to provide valid conclusions in the
field of Electronics & Communication Engineering.
x x
5. Modern tool usage: Create, select, and apply
appropriate techniques, resources, and modern
engineering and CAD tools including prediction
and modeling to complex Electronics &
Communication Engineering activities with an
understanding of the limitations.
x x
6. The Engineer and society Apply reasoning
informed by the contextual knowledge to assess
societal, health, safety, legal and cultural issues and
the consequent responsibilities relevant to the
professional Electronics & Communication
Engineering practice.
x x x
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-53
7. Environment and sustainability: Understand
the impact of the Electronics & Communication
Engineering solutions in societal and environmental
contexts, and demonstrate the knowledge of and
need for sustainable development.
x x
8. Ethics: Apply ethical principles and commit to
professional ethics and responsibilities and
norms of the engineering practice
x x
9. Individual & Team Work: Function effectively
as an individual, and as a member or leader in
diverse teams, and in multidisciplinary settings.
x x
10. Communication: Communicate Effectively on
complex Electronics & Communication Engineering
activities with the engineering community and with
society at large, such as, being able to comprehend
and write effective reports and design
documentation, make effective presentations, and
give and receive clear instructions.
x x x
11. Project Management & Finance: Demonstrate
knowledge and understanding of the Electronics &
Communication Engineering and management
principles and apply these to one‟s own work, as a member and leader in a team, to manage projects
and in multidisciplinary environments.
x x x
12. Life Long Learning: Recognize the need for,
and have the preparation and ability to engage in
independent and life- long learning in the broadest
context of technological change.
x x
Although the data will be collected every 3 years on select POs, as indicated above, there will be
activity taking place on each outcome every year
Cycle of activity planned for each PO over 6 year period is as below:
Activity for Each PO 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018
Review of performance indicators that define the
outcome x x
Review educational strategies related to
performance indicators x
Review mapping and identify where data will be
collected x
Develop and/or review assessment methods to be
used to assess performance indicators x
Collect Data x
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-54
Evaluate assessment data including processes x
Report findings x
Take action where necessary x
Assessment of POs and PSOs– Methodology
Assessment Tool Assessment
Frequency
Assessment
Responsibility Reviewed by
End of the course survey Semester end Faculty Coordinator IQAC
Student performance in
university examinations Semester End HOD IQAC
Rubrics (PO specific) As per need As Per Need IQAC
Faculty evaluation reports Semester end HOD IQAC
Department performance
report Annually HOD IQAC
Exiting student survey Annually Faculty Coordinator IQAC
Alumni survey Annually Faculty Coordinator IQAC
Employer survey 1-2 year Faculty Coordinator IQAC
CO Assessment Methodology and Tools
Assessment frequency Assessment tool Who will do it Who will Review it.
End of course survey Semester End Faculty AC(P)
Student Feedback & Comments Semester End Exam Cell IQAC
Rubrics (PO Specific) As per need Faculty AC(P)
Faculty Evaluation reports Semester End Faculty AC(P) & PIAC
Internal assessment and Home
assignments Every 2 months Faculty AC(P)
Semester end performance report End of semester Faculty AC(P)
Course Performance history plots As per need Faculty HOD
End of the semester Examinations End of semester Faculty AC(P)
Group Tasks As per need Faculty HOD
Projects As per need Faculty AC(P)
Assignments As per need Faculty HOD
Faculty assessment As per need HOD Director/HOD
Department performance report Annually AC(P) to present
to IACC
IACC/ Academic
Advisory Board
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-55
3.3.2 Provide results of evaluation of PO&PSO (40)
Program shall set Program Outcome attainment levels for all POs & PSOs.
The attainment levels by direct (student performance) and indirect (surveys) are to be
presented through Program level Course – PO & PSO matrix as indicated
FACULTY : S Ramakoteswara Rao
SUBJECT: Linear Integrated Circuits and Analysis Above average :3
SUBJECT CODE : Average :2
CO Attainment : Below Average:1
Direct Internal Assessment (20%) Direct External Assessment (80%)
Cos
A
100%
IA
B
60%
OF
A
C 2
OF B
D
100%
EA
E = 3
OF D F= C+E
CO-1 1.0 0.61 1.22 0.35 1.03 2.25
CO-2 1.0 0.92 1.84 0.35 1.03 2.87
CO-3 1.0 0.94 1.88 0.35 1.03 2.91
CO-4 1.0 0.93 1.86 0.35 1.03 2.89
CO – PO MAPPING
PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 P10 P11 P12
CO1 3 2 1 2 3 2 - - - - 2 -
CO2 3 2 1 2 1 - - - - - - 2
CO3 - - - 3 2 2 - - - 3 - 3
CO4 - 2 3 1 - - - - - 2 - 2
PO Attainment
Course PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12
C211 0 0 0 0 0 2 3 2 1 3 0 0
C212 2 3 2 2 2.1 2.2 2 1 1 0 0 0
C213 3 2 2 1 2.4 1.7 1.6 1.5 1.9 1.8 2.1 0
C214 2 2 1 - 1 1 2.5 1 1 2.3 2 1
C215 2 2.3 2 1 2 3 1 2 2 0 1 2.3
C216 2 2 2.3 2.3. 3 2.2 2.1 0 2.1 2.3 3 2
PO Attainment Level
Course PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12
CO Attainment 2.22 2.20 1.59 0.95 1.93 1.8 1.92 1.42 0.92 2.87 1.91 1.4
Direct Attainment 2.25 2.25 1.67 1 2 2 2 1.5 1 3 2 1.5
Indirect
Attainment 2.1 2 1.25 0.75 1.65 1 1.6 1.1 0.6 2.35 1.54 1
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-56
PSO Attainment
Course PSO1 PSO2 PSO3 C211 1 2 1 C212 3 1 2 C213 2 1 1 C214 3 1 2 C215 1 3 2 C216 1 3 1
PSO Attainment Level
Course PSO1 PSO2 PSO3
Direct Attainment 1.83 1.83 1.5
Indirect Attainment 1.65 1.36 1.42
CO Attainment 1.79 1.74 1.48
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-57
CRITERION 4 Students’ Performance 150
4. STUDENTS’ PERFORMANCE (150)
Item (Information to be provided cumulatively
for all the shifts with explicit headings, wherever
applicable)
2017-18 2016-17 2015-
16 2014-
15
2013-
14
Sanctioned intake of the program (N) 180 180 180 180 180
Total number of students admitted in first year
minus number of students migrated to other
programs/institutions plus no. of students
migrated to this program (N1)
174 142 145 97 130
Number of students admitted in 2nd year in the
same batch via lateral entry (N2) --- 11 8 9 17
Separate division students, if applicable (N3) --- 0 0 0 0
Total number of students admitted in the Program (N1 + N2 + N3) 174 153 153 106 147
Table4.2
Year of entry
N1 + N2 + N3
(As defined
above)
Number of students who have successfully graduated
without backlogs in any semester/ year of study
(Without Backlog means no compartment or failures
in any semester/year of study)
I Year II Year III Year IV Year
2017-2018 174 0 0 0 0
2016-2017 153 45 0 0 0
2015-2016 153 63 64 0 0
2014-2015(LYG) 106 46 45 52 0
2013-2014 (LYGm1) 147 67 74 68 80
2012-2013 (LYGm2) 132 76 63 64 89
Table4.3
Year of entry
N1 + N2 + N3
(As defined
above)
Number of students who have successfully graduated
(Students with backlog in stipulated period of study)
I Year II Year III Year IV Year
2017-2018 174 0 0 0 0
2016-2017 152 46 0 0 0
2015-2016 153 70 65 0 0
2014-2015(LYG) 106 55 54 58 0
2013-2014 (LYGm1) 147 75 85 79 82
2012-2013 (LYGm2) 132 82 66 65 89
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-58
4.1. Enrolment Ratio (20)
Enrolment Ratio= N1/N
YEAR N1 N Percentage
2017-18 174 180 96.67
2016-17 142 180 78.80
2015-16 145 180 80.55
85.37
Average [(ER1 + ER2 + ER3) / 3]: 85.37% Assessment: 18.00
4.2. Success Rate in the stipulated period of the program (40)
4.2.1. Success rate without backlogs in any semester/year of study (25)
SI= (Number of students who have graduated from the program without backlog)/ (Number of
students admitted in the first year of that batch and admitted in 2nd year via lateral entry and
separate division, if applicable)Average SI = Mean of Success Index (SI) for past three batches
Success rate without backlogs in any year of study = 25 × 0.63=15.75
Item Latest Year of
Graduation, LYG
(2016-2017)
Latest Year of
Graduation, LYG
(2015-2016)
Latest Year of
Graduation,
LYGm1
(2014-2015)
Latest Year of
Graduation
minus1, LYGm2
(2013-2014)
Number of students admitted in
the corresponding First Year
admitted in 2nd
year via lateral
entry and separate division, if
applicable
147 129 117 102
Number of students who have
graduated without backlogs in the
stipulated period
38 22 65 60
Success Index (SI) 0.25 0.17 0.55 0.59
Average SI 0.32
Average SI [(SI1 + SI2 + SI3) / 3]:0.32 Assessment [25 * Average SI]:8.08
4.2.2. Success rate with backlog in stipulated period of study (15)
SI= (Number of students who graduated from the program in the stipulated period of course
duration)/ (Number of students admitted in the first year of that batch and admitted in 2nd year via
lateral entry and separate division, if applicable) Average SI = mean of Success Index (SI) for past
three batches Success rate = 15 × 0.63=9.45
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-59
Item
Latest Year of
Graduation,
LYG
(2016-2017)
Latest Year of
Graduation,
LYG
(2015-2016)
Latest Year of
Graduation,
LYGm1
(2014-2015)
Latest Year of
Graduation
minus1, LYGm2
(2013-2014)
Number of students admitted in the
corresponding First Year +
admitted in 2nd year via lateral
entry and separate division, if
applicable
147 129 117 102
Number of students who have
graduated with backlog in the
stipulated period
78 70 89 84
Success Index (SI) 0.53 0.54 0.76 0.82
Average Success Index 0.61
Average SI[ ( SI1 + SI2 + SI3) / 3 ]: 0.61 Assessment [15 * Average SI]:9.15
4.3. Academic Performance in Third Year (15)
Academic Performance = 1.5 * Average API (Academic Performance Index) API = ((Mean of 3rd
Year Grade Point Average of all successful Students on a 10 point scale) or (Mean of the percentage
of marks of all successful students in Third Year/10)) x (number of successful students/number of
students appeared in the examination)
Successful students are those who are permitted to proceed to the final year.
Academic Performance 2014-2015 2013-2014 2012-2013
Mean of CGPA or Mean Percentage of all successful
students (X) 6.37 6.90 6.60
Total no. of successful students (Y) 69.00 79.00 65.00
Total no. of students appeared in the examination (Z) 71.00 85.00 66.00
API = x* (Y/Z) 6.19 6.41 6.50
Average API = (AP1 + AP2 + AP3)/3 6.37
Average API [(AP1 + AP2 + AP3)/3]:6.37 Assessment [1.5 * Average API]:09.55
4.4. Academic Performance in Second Year (15)
Academic Performance Level = 1.5 * Average API (Academic Performance Index) API = ((Mean of
2nd
Year Grade Point Average of all successful Students on a 10 point scale) or (Mean of the
percentage of marks of all successful students in Second Year/10)) x (number of successful
students/number of students appeared in the examination)
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-60
Successful students are those who are permitted to proceed to the Third year.
Academic Performance 2014-2015 2013-2014 2012-2013
Mean of CGPA or Mean Percentage of all successful
students (X) 7.37 6.93 6.73
Total no. of successful students (Y) 49 68 66
Total no. of students appeared in the examination (Z) 61 92 85
API = X* (Y/Z) 5.92 5.12 5.23
Average API = (AP1 + AP2 + AP3)/3 5.42
Average API [ (AP1 + AP2 + AP3)/3 ] :5.42 Assessment [1.5 * Average API]:08.13
4.5. Placement, Higher Studies and Entrepreneurship (40)
Assessment Points = 40 × average placement
Item 2014-2015 2013-2014 2012-2013
Total No. of Final Year Students (N) 65 70 65
No. of students placed in companies or Government
Sector (x) 25 20 20
No. of students admitted to higher studies with valid
qualifying scores (GATE or equivalent State or National
Level Tests, GRE, GMAT etc.) (y)
15 12 12
No. of students turned entrepreneur in
engineering/technology (z) 3 2 2
x + y + z = 43 34 34
Placement Index : (x + y + z )/N 0.66 0.49 0.52
Average placement= (P1 + P2 + P3)/3 0.55
Average Placement [(P1 + P2 + P3)/3]: 0.55 Assessment [40 * Average Placement]:22.00
4.6. Professional Activities (20)
4.6.1. Professional societies/chapters and organizing engineering events (5)
SNO Professional Body
01 IEI
02 ISTE
03 PACE
04 MISTE
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-61
S.No. Name of the Event Organized under Date(s) No. of
Participants
1 Tongue Twister , JAM PACE 25/06/2011 60
2 Technical Quiz IEI 18/08/2011 60
3 Teachers Day Celebrations PACE 05/09/2011 180
4 Technical Essay Writing IEI 26/07/2012 60
5 Mock Press ISTE 30/06/2012 60
6 Talent Expo, Group Discussion ISTE 17/07/2013 60
7 JAM IEI 26/06/2013 60
9 Guest Lecture on Computer Virus IEI Student Chapter 30/11/2017 200
10 Guest Lecture on Ethical Hacking IEI Student Chapter 22/12/2017 180
4.6.2. Publication of technical magazines, newsletters, etc. (5)
(The Department shall list the publications mentioned earlier along with the names of the editors,
publishers, etc.) SRUJANA NEWLETTER IS PUBLISHED QUARTERLY.
S. No Publication Publication
Name Coordinator Convener Publisher Month & Year
1 News Letter ASIST
WAVES R V SHASHANK
HOD ECE
Dept
Association of
ECE Dept., Oct - Dec 2015
2 News Letter ASIST
WAVES R V SHASHANK
HOD ECE
Dept
Association of
ECE Dept., Jul - Sep 2015
3 News Letter ASIST
WAVES R V SHASHANK
HOD ECE
Dept
Association of
ECE Dept., Apr-Jun 2015
4 News Letter ASIST
WAVES R V SHASHANK
HOD ECE
Dept
Association of
ECE Dept., Jan- Mar 2015
5 News Letter SRUJANA R V SHASHANK
INSTITUTION
LEVEL
COMMITTEE
INSTITUTION
LEVEL Mar-June 2016
6 News Letter SRUJANA R V SHASHANK
INSTITUTION
LEVEL
COMMITTEE
INSTITUTION
LEVEL Jul-Sep 2016
7 News Letter SRUJANA R V SHASHANK
INSTITUTION
LEVEL
COMMITTEE
INSTITUTION
LEVEL Oct-Dec 2016
8 News Letter SRUJANA R V SHASHANK
INSTITUTION
LEVEL
COMMITTEE
INSTITUTION
LEVEL Jan-Mar 2017
9 News Letter SRUJANA A.ENOCH
INSTITUTION
LEVEL
COMMITTEE
INSTITUTION
LEVEL Apr-Jun 2017
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-62
10 News Letter SRUJANA A.ENOCH
INSTITUTION
LEVEL
COMMITTEE
INSTITUTION
LEVEL Jul-Aug 2017
4.6.3 Participation in inter-institute events by students of the program of study (10)
VIKAS INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY-QUIZ-FIRST PRIZE BY
S.MANI TEJA, G KANAKA JYOTHI AND P V S D PREMA TANMAYA
VIKAS INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY- PARTICIPATED IN PPT
MVR WOMEN‟S DAY, COLLEGE ELOCUTION - FIRST PRIZE BY G PRIYANKA.
MVR COLLEGE WOMEN‟S DAY, PAINTING - SECOND PRIZE BY B L BHARGAVI
MVR COLLEGE WOMEN‟S DAY, RANGOLI – FIRST PRIZE BY R BHAVYA
MVR COLLEGE WOMEN‟S DAY, COOKING – THIRD PRIZE BY A REVATHI
MVR COLLEGE WOMEN‟S DAY, MEHANDI – FIRST PRIZE BY R BHAVYA
VVIT COLLEGE PROJECT EXPO, PARTICIPATED BY G PRIYANKA
VVIT COLLEGE PROJECT EXPO, SECOND PRIZE BY SWAROOP
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-63
CRITERION-5 Faculty Information and Contributions 200 2014-2015
Nam
e of
the
Fac
ult
y M
ember
Qualification
Curr
ent
Des
ignat
ion
All
the
Des
ign
atio
ns
since
join
ing t
he
Inst
ituti
on
Dat
e of
join
ing t
he
In
stit
uti
on
Distribution of
teaching load (%)
Academi
c
Research
Sponso
red R
esea
rch (
Funded
Res
earc
h)
Consu
ltan
cy a
nd P
roduct
Dev
elopm
ent
Spec
iali
zati
on
Deg
ree
(sta
rtin
g f
rom
hig
hes
t deg
ree)
Univ
ersi
ty
Yea
r o
f G
raduat
ion
1st
Yea
r
UG
PG
Fac
ult
y r
ecei
vin
g P
h.D
duri
ng t
he
asse
ssm
ent
yea
r
Ph.D
Guid
ance
Res
earc
h P
aper
Publi
cati
ons
Ser
vin
g 1
00%
in p
rogra
mm
e
Fro
m o
ther
pro
gra
mm
e to
this
pro
gra
mm
e
Fro
m t
his
pro
gra
mm
e t
o o
ther
pro
gra
mm
e
Ms P V
L
Suvarc
hala
M
Tec
h
JNT
UK
200
6
Assoc.
Prof
Asso
c.
Prof
19-
06-
2013
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 8 0 0
Image
Process
ing
Sri B.
Rama
Rao
MT
ech
IT-
BH
U
200
3
Assoc.
Prof
Asso
c.
Prof
07-
05-
2008
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 8 0 0
Micro
Electro
nics
Sri B
Suresh
MT
ech
JNT
UK
201
3
Assoc.
Prof
Asst
Prof
19-
11-
2008
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 6 0 0
Image
process
ing
Sri M
Venkat
Rao
ME
/ M
Tec
h
JNT
UH
201
0
Assoc.
Prof
Asst
Prof
13-
09-
2011
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 6 0 0 DECS
Sri Ch
Suresh
MT
ech
JNT
UK
201
6
Asst
Prof
Asst
Prof
01-
06-
2012
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 2 0 0 DECS
Sri R
Vijay
Shasha
nk
MT
ech
JNT
UK
201
3
Asst
Prof
Asst
Prof
03-
06-
2013
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 2 0 0
VLSI &
E S
Sri S
Ramak
oteswar
a Rao
MT
ech
JNT
UK
200
8
Associ
ate
Profes
sor
Asst
Prof
14-
07-
2014
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 4 0 0
MICR
O
WAVE
Engine
ering
Sri N
Suresh
MT
ech
JNT
UK
201
3
Assist
ant
Asst
Prof
03-
08-0
10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 2 0 0
VLSI
& E S
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-64
prof. 2014
Sri G
Siva
Kumar
MT
ech
JNT
UK
201
1
Assist
ant
Profes
sor
Asst
Prof
15-
07-
2014
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 3 0 0
Embed
ded
System
s
Sri A
Enoch
MT
ech
JNT
UK
201
2
Assist
ant
Profes
sor
Asst
Prof
03-
08-
2014
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 4 0 0
Embed
ded
System
s
Sri Y V
N M
Sarma
MT
ech
JNT
UK
201
2
Assist
ant
Profes
sor
Asst
Prof
03-
08-
2014
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 2 0 0 DECS
Ms M
Divya
Manasa
MT
ech
JNT
UK
201
4
Assist
ant
Profes
sor
Asst
Prof
06-
08-
2014
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 1 0 0
VLSI
AND
ES
Sri V G
N S
Prasad
MT
ech
JNT
UK
200
8
Assoc.
Prof
Asst
Prof
16-
07-
2013
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 1 0 0 DECS
Sri
B.Ram
u
MT
ech
JNT
UK
201
4
Assist
ant
Profes
sor
Asst
Prof
02-
11-
2014
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 1 0 0 DECS
Sri
A.Mad
hu
MT
ech
JNT
UK
201
4
Assist
ant
Profes
sor
Asst
Prof
01-
12-
2014
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 1 0 0
VLSI
AND
ES
Sri G U
K
Bharga
v
MT
ech
JNT
UK
201
4
Assist
ant
Profes
sor
Asst
Prof
06-
12-
2014
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 1 0 0 DECS
Sri B R
V
Pradeep
MT
ech
JNT
UK
201
4
Assist
ant
Profes
sor
Asst
Prof
13-
12-
2014
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 1 0 0 DECS
M.NAR
ASIMH
ARAO
MT
ech
JNT
UK
201
4
Assist
ant
Profes
sor
Asst
Prof
01-
06-
2012
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 1 0 0
VLSI
AND
ES
D
Sriniva
s Reddy
MT
ech
JNT
UK
201
3
Assist
ant
Profes
sor
Asst
Prof
01-
06-
2014
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 0 0 0 ECE
Sri
SK.KH
ASIM
MT
ech
JNT
UK
200
8
Assoc.
Prof
Asst
Prof
03-
06-
2013
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 2 0 0
EMBE
DDED
Dr
A.Sai
Sunil
MT
ech
JNT
UK
200
8
Profes
sor
Prof
essor
01-
06-
2014
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 1 0 0 ECE
Dr.M.S Ph KL 201 Profes Prof 02- 0 10 0 0 0 N 0 5 0 0 microw
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-65
UMAN D U 4 sor essor 06-
2014
0 o ave
Dr.M S
G
Prasad
Ph
D
JNT
UK
201
3
Profes
sor
Prof
essor
02-
06-
2014
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 6 0 0
microw
ave
Sri Y
Phani
Kumar
MT
ech
JNT
UH
201
2
Assoc.
Prof
Asst
Prof
29-
01-
200
9
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 6 0 0
VLSI
DESIG
N
Sri.D.L
akshmi
murthy
MT
ech
JNT
UK
201
2
Assist
ant
Profes
sor
Asst
Prof
01-
06-
2013
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 2 0 0 DECS
G
Naresh
MT
ech
JNT
UH
201
2
Assist
antPro
fessor
Asst
Prof
02-
06-
2014
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 1 0 0 VLSID
Dr.Ch.
Sriniva
s
Ph
D
AN
U
201
1
PROF
ESSO
R
PRO
FES
SOR
01-
07-
2013
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 2 0 0 ECE
Sri.CH.
Gopala
krishna
MT
ech
JNT
UK
201
0
Assist
ant
Profes
sor
Asst
Prof
01-
06-
2013
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 2 0 0
EMBE
DDED
SYSTE
MS
Sri.V.R
ajesh
MT
ech
JNT
UK
200
8
Assist
ant
Profes
sor
Asst
Prof
01-
06-
2013
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 2 0 0 DECS
Sri
P.Sridh
ar
MT
ech
JNT
UK
201
0
Assist
ant
Profes
sor
Asst
Prof
01-
06-
2013
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 3 0 0 DECS
V
Suresh
Babu
MT
ech
JNT
UK
201
0
Assist
ant
Profes
sor
Asst
Prof
01-
06-
2013
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 1 0 0 DSCE
Sri P.
Sriniva
s
MT
ech
AN
U
200
5
Assoc.
Prof
Asst
Prof
01-
02-
201
4
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
O 0 0 0 0
Comm
unicati
on &
radar
system
s
V
Narahar
i
MT
ech
JNT
UK
201
4
Asst
Prof
Asst
Prof
01-
02-
2015
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
O 0 1 0 0 CESP
Ms.J.R
ajya
Lakshm
i
MT
ech
JNT
UK
201
4
Asst
Prof
Asst
Prof
04-
04-
201
4
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 2 0 0 DECS
Sri
B.Usho
da
MT
ech
JNT
UK
201
4
Asst
Prof
Asst
Prof
01-
02-
15
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 0 0 0
VLSI
AND
ES
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-66
Sri G.
Hussian
Babu
MT
ech
JNT
UH
201
3
Assist
ant
Profes
sor
Assi
stant
Prof
essor
05-
02-
14
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
O 0 0 0 0 DECS
G Ravi
Raju
MT
ech
JNT
Uh
201
0
Asst
Prof
Asst
Prof
27-
08-
14
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 2 0 0
Comm
unicati
on
System
s
K Kiran
Kumar
MT
ech
JNT
UH
201
1
Asst
Prof
Asst
Prof
27-
08-
14
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 2 0 0 ECE
K
Gaddan
na
MT
ech
JNT
UH
201
1
Asst
Prof
Asst
Prof
27-
08-
14
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 1 0 0 ES
Ms.B.Ra
jya
Lakshmi
MT
ech
JNT
UK
201
4
Asst
Prof
Asst
Prof
04-
04-
14
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 1 0 0
VLSI
& ES
B
Naresh
Reddy
MT
ech
JNT
UK
201
4
Asst
Prof
Asst
Prof
04-
04-
14
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 1 0 0
VLSI
& ES
2015-2016
Nam
e of
the
Fac
ult
y M
ember
Qualification
Curr
ent
Des
ignat
ion
All
the
Des
ignat
ions
since
jo
inin
g t
he
Inst
ituti
on
Dat
e of
join
ing t
he
Inst
ituti
on
Distribution of
teaching load (%)
Academic
Research
Sponso
red R
esea
rch (F
unded
Res
earc
h)
Consu
ltan
cy a
nd
Pro
duct
Dev
elopm
ent
Spec
iali
zati
on
Deg
ree
(sta
rtin
g f
rom
hig
hes
t deg
ree)
Univ
ersi
ty
Yea
r o
f G
raduat
ion
1st
Yea
r
UG P
G
Fac
ult
y r
ecei
vin
g P
h.D
duri
ng t
he
asse
ssm
ent
yea
r
Ph.D
Guid
ance
Res
earc
h P
aper
Publi
cati
ons
Ser
vin
g 1
00%
in p
rogra
mm
e
Fro
m o
ther
pro
gra
mm
e to
this
pro
gra
mm
e
Fro
m t
his
pro
gra
mm
e t
o o
ther
pro
gra
mm
e
Ms P V
L
Suvarch
ala
M
Tec
h
JNT
UK
200
6
Assoc
. Prof
Asso
c.
Prof
19-
06-
2013
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 8 0 0
Image
Proces
sing
Sri B.
Rama
Rao
MT
ech
IT-
BH
U
200
3
Assoc
. Prof
Asso
c.
Prof
07-
05-
2008
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 8 0 0
MICR
O
ELEC
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-67
TRON
ICS
Sri B
Suresh
MT
ech
JNT
UK
201
3
Assoc
. Prof
Asst
Prof
19-
11-
2008
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 6 0 0
Image
proces
sing
Sri M
Venkat
Rao
ME
/ M
Tec
h
JNT
UH
201
0
Assoc
. Prof
Asst
Prof
13-
09-
2011
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 6 0 0 DECS
Sri Ch
Suresh
MT
ech
JNT
UK
201
6
Asst
Prof
Asst
Prof
01-
06-
2012
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 2 0 0 DECS
Sri R
Vijay
Shasha
nk
MT
ech
JNT
UK
201
3
Asst
Prof
Asst
Prof
03-
06-
2013
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 2 0 0
VLSI
&ES
Sri S
Ramak
oteswar
a Rao
MT
ech
JNT
UK
200
8
Assoc
. Prof
Asst
Prof
14-
07-
2014
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 4 0 0
MICR
O
WAV
E
Engine
ering
Sri N
Suresh
MT
ech
JNT
UK
201
3
Asst
Prof
Asst
Prof
03-
08-
2014
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 2 0 0
VLSI
&ES
Sri G
Siva
Kumar
MT
ech
JNT
UK
201
1
Asst
Prof
Asst
Prof
15-
07-
2014
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 3 0 0
Embed
ded
Syste
ms
Sri A
Enoch
MT
ech
JNT
UK
201
2
Asst
Prof
Asst
Prof
03-
08-
2014
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 4 0 0
Embed
ded
Syste
ms
Sri Y V
N M
Sarma
MT
ech
JNT
UK
201
2
Asst
Prof
Asst
Prof
03-
08-
2014
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 2 0 0 DECS
Ms M
Divya
Manasa
MT
ech
JNT
UK
201
4
Asst
Prof
Asst
Prof
06-
08-
2014
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 1 0 0
VLSI
AND
ES
Sri
B.Ram
u
MT
ech
JNT
UK
201
4
Asst
Prof
Asst
Prof
02-
11-
2014
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 1 0 0 DECS
Sri
A.Mad
hu
MT
ech
JNT
UK
201
4
Asst
Prof
Asst
Prof
01-
12-
2014
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 1 0 0
VLSI
AND
ES
Sri G U
K
Bharga
v
MT
ech
JNT
UK
201
4
Asst
Prof
Asst
Prof
06-
12-
2014
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 1 0 0 DECS
Sri B R
V
MT
ech
JNT
UK
201
4
Asst
Prof
Asst
Prof
13-
12-0
10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 1 0 0 DECS
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-68
Pradeep 2014
Sri.M.N
ARASI
MHAR
AO
MT
ech
JNT
UK
201
4
Asst
Prof
Asst
Prof
01-
06-
2012
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 4 0 0
VLSI
AND
ES
MS.J.N
AGA
PRATI
MA
MT
ech
JNT
UK
201
5
Asst
Prof
Asst
Prof
06-
01-
2016
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 2 0 0
VLSI
AND
ES
Dr.A.
Sai
Sunil
Ph
D UA
200
8
Profes
sor
Prof
essor
01-
06-
2014
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 7 0 0 ECE
Dr.M.S
UMAN
Ph
D
KL
U
201
4
Profes
sor
Prof
essor
02-
06-
2014
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 5 0 0
micro
wave
Sri V G
N S
Prasad
MT
ech
JNT
UK
200
8
Assoc
. Prof
Asst
Prof
16-
07-
2013
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 1 0 0 DECS
Dr.Ch.S
rinivas
Ph
D
AN
U
201
1
PRO
FESS
OR
PRO
FES
SOR
01-
07-
2013
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 5 0 0 ECE
Sri Y
Phani
Kumar
MT
ech
JNT
UH
201
2
Assoc
. Prof
Asst
Prof
29-
01-
2009
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 6 0 0
VLSI
DESI
GN
Sri.D.L
akshmi
murthy
MT
ech
JNT
UK
201
2
Asst
Prof
Asst
Prof
01-
06-
2013
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 2 0 0 DECS
Sri
G.Satti
Babu
MT
ech NIT
201
1
Asst
Prof
Asst
Prof
01-
06-
2013
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 1 0 0 ACS
Sri
P.Sridh
ar
MT
ech
JNT
UK
201
0
Asst
Prof
Asst
Prof
01-
06-
2013
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 3 0 0 DECS
S.Kotes
wara
Rao
Ph
D
JNT
UK
201
6
Assoc
. Prof
ASS
OC
PRO
F
01-
04-
2016
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 6 0 0
WIRE
LESS
K.Ram
Babu
MT
ech
JNT
UK
200
9
Assoc
. Prof
Asst
Prof
01-
04-
2016
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 3 0 0
VLSI
AND
ES
Y.Rich
ard
jayanad
MT
ech
JNT
UK
201
4
Asst
Prof
Asst
Prof
01-
06-
2015
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 2 0 0
VLSI
AND
ES
Sri
N.Satis
h Babu
MT
ech
JNT
UK
201
4
Asst
Prof
Asst
Prof
02-
11-
2015
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 1 0 0 VLSI
Ms
B.Anus
ha
MT
ech
JNT
UK
201
4
Asst
Prof
Asst
Prof
02-
11-
2015
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 1 0 0 DECS
Ms. T
Puspha
MT
ech
JNT
UK
201
5
Asst
Prof
Asst
Prof
12/1
0/200
10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 1 0 0 DECS
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-69
Latha 15
Sri
B.Usho
da
MT
ech
JNT
UK
201
4
Asst
Prof
Asst
Prof
01-
02-
2015
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 0 0 0
VLSI
AND
ES
Ms.J.Ra
jya
Lakshm
i
MT
ech
JNT
UK
201
4
Asst
Prof
Asst
Prof
04-
04-
2014
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 2 0 0 DECS
Dr.M S
G
Prasad
Ph
D
JNT
UK
201
3
Profe
ssor
Prof
essor
02-
06-
2014
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 6 0 0
micro
wave
K Kiran
Kumar
MT
ech
JNT
UH
201
1
Asst
Prof
Asst
Prof
27-
08-
2014
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 2 0 0 ECE
Sri V.
Venkat
a
Krishna
MT
ech
JNT
UK
201
5
Asst
Prof
Asst
Prof
05/0
33/2
015
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
O 0 0 0 0
VLSI
&ES
Sri G.
Hussian
Babu
MT
ech
JNT
UH
201
3
Asst
Prof
Asst
Prof
05-
02-
2014
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
O 0 0 0 0 DECS
B.
Naresh
Reddy
Ph
D
OPJ
S
UN
IVE
RSI
TY
201
7
Profe
ssor
Prof
essor
01-
04-
2015
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
O 0 2 0 0 VLSI
Sri P.
Srinivas
MT
ech
AN
U
200
5
Assoc
. Prof
Asst
Prof
01-
02-
2014
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
O 0 0 0 0
Comm
unicati
on &
radar
system
s
Sri V.
Srinivas
a Rao
MT
ech
JNT
UH
201
4
Asst
Prof
Asst
Prof
05-
02-
2016
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
O 0 0 0 0 ECE
Sri V
Narahar
i
MT
ech
JNT
UK
201
5
Asst
Prof
Asst
Prof
05-
02-
2016
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
O 0 0 0 0 ECE
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-70
2016-2017
Nam
e of
the
Fac
ult
y M
ember
Qualification
Curr
ent
Des
ignat
ion
All
the
Des
ignat
ions
since
j
oin
ing t
he
Inst
ituti
on
Dat
e of
join
ing t
he
Inst
ituti
on
Distribution of
teaching load (%)
Academic
Research
Sponso
red R
esea
rch (
Fund
ed R
esea
rch)
Consu
ltan
cy a
nd P
roduct
Dev
elopm
ent
Spec
iali
zati
on
Deg
ree
(st
arti
ng f
rom
hig
hes
t deg
ree)
Univ
ersi
ty
Yea
r o
f G
raduat
ion
1st
Yea
r
UG
PG
Fac
ult
y r
ecei
vin
g P
h.D
duri
ng t
he
asse
ssm
ent
yea
r
Ph.D
Guid
ance
Res
earc
h P
aper
Publi
cati
ons
Ser
vin
g 1
00%
in p
rogra
mm
e
Fro
m o
ther
pro
gra
mm
e to
this
pro
gra
mm
e
Fro
m t
his
pro
gra
mm
e t
o o
ther
pro
gra
mm
e
Ms P V
L
Suvarc
hala
M
Tec
h
JNT
UK
200
6
Asso
c.
Prof
Asso
c.
Prof
19-
06-
2013
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 8 0 0
Image
Proces
sing
Sri B.
Rama
Rao
MT
ech
IT-
BH
U
200
3
Asso
c.
Prof
Asso
c.
Prof
07-
05-
2008
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 8 0 0
MICR
O
ELEC
TRON
ICS
Sri B
Suresh
MT
ech
JNT
UK
201
3
Asso
c.
Prof
Assis
tant
Prof
19-
11-
2008
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 6 0 0
Image
proces
sing
Sri M
Venkat
Rao
ME
/ M
Tec
h
JNT
UH
201
0
Asso
c.
Prof
Assis
tant
prof.
13-
09-
2011
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 6 0 0 DECS
Sri Ch
Suresh
MT
ech
JNT
UK
201
6
Assis
tant
prof.
Assis
tant
prof.
01-
06-
2012
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 2 0 0 DECS
Sri R
Vijay
Shasha
nk
MT
ech
JNT
UK
201
3
Assis
tant
prof.
Assis
tant
prof.
03-
06-
2013
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 2 0 0
VLSI
&ES
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-71
Sri S
Ramak
oteswar
a Rao
MT
ech
JNT
UK
200
8
Asso
c.
Prof
Assis
tant
prof.
14-
07-
2014
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 4 0 0
MICR
O
WAV
E
Engine
ering
Sri P.
Sriniva
s
MT
ech
AN
U
200
5
Asso
c.
Prof
Assis
tant
prof.
01-
02-
2014
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
O 0 0 0 0
Comm
unicati
on &
radar
system
s
Sri K.
Phani
Sriniva
s
MT
ech
AN
U
200
8
Asso
ciate
Profe
ssor
Asso
ciate
Profe
ssor
05-
02-
2016
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
O 0 2 0 0
Comm
unicati
on &
radar
system
s
Sri N
Suresh
MT
ech
JNT
UK
201
3
Assis
tant
prof.
Assis
tant
prof.
03-
08-
2014
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 2 0 0
VLSI
&ES
Sri G
Siva
Kumar
MT
ech
JNT
UK
201
1
Assis
tant
Profe
ssor
Assis
tant
Profe
ssor
15-
07-
2014
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 3 0 0
Embed
ded
Syste
ms
Sri A
Enoch
MT
ech
JNT
UK
201
2
Assis
tant
Profe
ssor
Assis
tant
Profe
ssor
03-
08-
2014
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 4 0 0
Embed
ded
Syste
ms
Sri Y V
N M
Sarma
MT
ech
JNT
UK
201
2
Assis
tant
Profe
ssor
Assis
tant
Profe
ssor
03-
08-
2014
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 2 0 0 DECS
Ms M
Divya
Manasa
MT
ech
JNT
UK
201
4
Assis
tant
Profe
ssor
Assis
tant
Profe
ssor
06-
08-
2014
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 1 0 0
VLSI
AND
ES
Sri
B.Ram
u
MT
ech
JNT
UK
201
4
Assis
tant
Profe
ssor
Assis
tant
Profe
ssor
02-
11-
2014
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 1 0 0 DECS
Sri
A.Mad
hu
MT
ech
JNT
UK
201
4
Assis
tant
Profe
ssor
Assis
tant
Profe
ssor
01-
12-
2014
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 1 0 0
VLSI
AND
ES
Sri.M.
NARA
SIMHA
RAO
MT
ech
JNT
UK
201
4
Assis
tant
Profe
ssor
Assis
tant
Profe
ssor
01-
06-
2012
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 4 0 0
VLSI
AND
ES
MS.J.N
AGA
MT
ech
JNT
UK
201
5
Assis
tant
Assis
tant
06-
01-0
10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 2 0 0
VLSI
AND
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-72
PRATI
MA
Profe
ssor
Profe
ssor
2016 ES
Dr.A.
Sai
sunil
Ph
D UA
200
8
Profe
ssor
Profe
ssor
01-
06-
2014
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 7 0 0 ECE
Dr.M.S
UMAN
Ph
D
KL
U
201
4
Profe
ssor
Profe
ssor
02-
06-
2014
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 5 0 0
Micro
wave
Sri Y
Phani
Kumar
MT
ech
JNT
UK
201
6
ASS
OCI
ATE
PRO
FESS
OR
Assis
tant
Profe
ssor
29-
01-
2009
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 6 0 0
VLSI
DESI
GN
Dr.S.K
oteswar
a Rao
Ph
D
JNT
UK
201
6
Profe
ssor
Profe
ssor
01-
04-
2016
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 6 0 0
WIRE
LESS
Dr G. V
Hari
Prasad
Ph
D AU
200
6
Profe
ssor
Profe
ssor
01-
04-
2016
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
O 0 2 0 0
Signal
Proces
sing
Dr B.
Naresh
Reddy
Ph
D
OPJ
S
UNI
VE
RSI
TY
201
7
Profe
ssor
Profe
ssor
01-
04-
2015
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
O 0 2 0 0 VLSI
K.Ram
Babu
MT
ech
JNT
UK
200
9
ASS
OCI
ATE
PRO
FESS
OR
Assis
tant
prof.
01-
04-
2016
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 3 0 0
VLSI
AND
ES
Y.Richar
d
jayanad
MT
ech
JNT
UK
201
4
Assis
tant
Profe
ssor
Assis
tant
Profe
ssor
01-
06-
2015
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 2 0 0
VLSI
AND
ES
Sri
N.Satis
h Babu
MT
ech
JNT
UK
201
4
Assis
tant
Profe
ssor
Assis
tant
Profe
ssor
02-
11-
2015
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 1 0 0 VLSI
Ms
B.Anus
ha
MT
ech
JNT
UK
201
4
Assis
tant
Profe
ssor
Assis
tant
Profe
ssor
02-
11-
2015
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 1 0 0 DECS
Ms. T.
Puspha
Latha
MT
ech
JNT
UK
201
5
Assis
tant
Profe
ssor
Assis
tant
Profe
ssor
12-
10-
2015
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 1 0 0 DECS
Sri
B.Usho
da
MT
ech
JNT
UK
201
4
Assis
tant
Profe
Assis
tant
Profe
01-
02-
2015
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 0 0 0
VLSI
AND
ES
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-73
ssor ssor
Ms.J.R
ajya
Lakshm
i
MT
ech
JNT
UK
201
4
Assis
tant
Profe
ssor
Assis
tant
Profe
ssor
04-
04-
2015
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 2 0 0 DECS
Sri K.
Tirumal
a Rao
MT
ech
JNT
UK
201
1
Assis
tant
Profe
ssor
Assis
tant
Profe
ssor
05-
06-
2016
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
O 0 0 0 0
VLSI
DESI
GN
Sri M.
Ranjith
Kumar
MT
ech
JNT
UK
201
4
Assis
tant
Profe
ssor
Assis
tant
Profe
ssor
05-
06-
2016
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
O 0 0 0 0
ECE&
ES
Sri J.
Satish
MT
ech
JNT
UK
201
5
Assis
tant
Profe
ssor
Assis
tant
Profe
ssor
05-
06-
2016
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
O 0 0 0 0 DECS
Sri J.
Mallikh
arjuna
Rao
MT
ech
KL
U
201
4
Assis
tant
Profe
ssor
Assis
tant
Profe
ssor
05-
06-
2016
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
O 0 0 0 0
VLSI
DESI
GN
Sri K.
Chandr
a Rao
MT
ech
JNT
UK
201
2
Assis
tant
Profe
ssor
Assis
tant
Profe
ssor
05-
06-
2016
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
O 0 0 0 0 ES
Sri G.
Hussian
Babu
MT
ech
JNT
UH
201
3
Assis
tant
Profe
ssor
Assis
tant
Profe
ssor
05-
02-
2014
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
O 0 0 0 0 DECS
Sri V.
Sriniva
sa Rao
MT
ech
JNT
UH
201
4
Assis
tant
Profe
ssor
Assis
tant
Profe
ssor
05-
02-
2016
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
O 0 0 0 0 ECE
Ms K.
Anurad
ha
MT
ech
JNT
UH
201
1
Assis
tant
Profe
ssor
Assis
tant
Profe
ssor
05-
06-
2016
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
O 0 0 0 0
VLSI
DESI
GN
Sri M.
Venkat
a
Krishna
MT
ech
JNT
UK
201
3
Assis
tant
Profe
ssor
Assis
tant
Profe
ssor
05-
06-
2016
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
O 0 0 0 0
VLSI
DESI
GN
Sri V.
Venkat
a
Krishna
MT
ech
JNT
UK
201
5
Assis
tant
Profe
ssor
Assis
tant
Profe
ssor
05/0
3/20
15
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
O 0 0 0 0
VLSI
&ES
Sri G.
Naresh
MT
ech
JNT
UH
201
3
Assis
tant
Profe
ssor
Assis
tant
Profe
ssor
05/0
3/20
16
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
O 0 0 0 0
VLSI
DESI
GN
Sri M.
Vijaya
MT
ech
JNT
UK
201
3
Assis
tant
Assis
tant
05/0
6/200
10
0 0 0 0
N
O 0 0 0 0 ES
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-74
Bhaska
r
Profe
ssor
Profe
ssor
16
Sri B.
Raj
Kumar
MT
ech
JNT
UK
201
2
Assis
tant
Profe
ssor
Assis
tant
Profe
ssor
05/0
6/20
16
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
O 0 0 0 0
ES &
VLSI
DESI
GN
2017-2018
Nam
e of
the
Fac
ult
y M
ember
Qualification
Curr
ent
Des
ignat
ion
All
the
Des
ignat
ions
since
j
oin
ing t
he
Inst
ituti
on
Dat
e of
join
ing t
he
Inst
ituti
on
Distribution of
teaching load (%)
Academic
Research
Sponso
red R
esea
rch (
Funded
Res
earc
h)
Consu
ltan
cy a
nd P
roduct
Dev
elopm
ent
Spec
iali
zati
on
Deg
ree
(st
arti
ng f
rom
hig
hes
t deg
ree)
Univ
ersi
ty
Yea
r o
f G
raduat
ion
1st
Yea
r
UG
PG
Fac
ult
y r
ecei
vin
g P
h.D
duri
ng t
he
asse
ssm
ent
yea
r
Ph.D
Guid
ance
Res
earc
h P
aper
Publi
cati
ons
Ser
vin
g 1
00%
in p
rogra
mm
e
Fro
m o
ther
pro
gra
mm
e to
this
pro
gra
mm
e
Fro
m t
his
pro
gra
mm
e t
o o
ther
pro
gra
mm
e
Ms P V
L
Suvarc
hala
M
Tec
h
JNT
UK
200
6
Asso
c.
Prof
Asso
c.
Prof
19-
06-
2013
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 8 0 0
Image
Proces
sing
Sri B.
Rama
Rao
MT
ech
IT-
BH
U
200
3
Asso
c.
Prof
Asso
c.
Prof
07-
05-
2008
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 8 0 0
MICR
O
ELEC
TRON
ICS
Sri B
Suresh
MT
ech
JNT
UK
201
3
Asso
c.
Prof
Assis
tant
Prof
19-
11-
2008
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 6 0 0
Image
proces
sing
Sri M
Venkat
Rao
ME
/ M
Tec
h
JNT
UH
201
0
Asso
c.
Prof
Assis
tant
prof.
13-
09-
2011
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 6 0 0 DECS
Sri Ch
Suresh
MT
ech
JNT
UK
201
6
Assis
tant
prof.
Assis
tant
prof.
01-
06-
2012
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 2 0 0 DECS
Sri S
Ramak
oteswar
MT
ech
JNT
UK
200
8
Asso
c.
Prof
Assis
tant
prof.
14-
07-
2014
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 4 0 0
MICR
O
WAV
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-75
a Rao E
Engine
ering
Sri P.
Sriniva
s
MT
ech
AN
U
200
5
Asso
c.
Prof
Assis
tant
prof.
01-
02-
2014
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
O 0 0 0 0
Comm
unicati
on &
radar
system
s
Sri K.
Phani
Sriniva
s
MT
ech
AN
U
200
8
Asso
ciate
Profe
ssor
Asso
ciate
Profe
ssor
05-
02-
2016
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
O 0 2 0 0
Comm
unicati
on &
radar
system
s
Sri N
Suresh
MT
ech
JNT
UK
201
3
Assis
tant
prof.
Assis
tant
prof.
03-
08-
2014
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 2 0 0
VLSI
&ES
Sri G
Siva
Kumar
MT
ech
JNT
UK
201
1
Assis
tant
Profe
ssor
Assis
tant
Profe
ssor
15-
07-
2014
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 3 0 0
Embed
ded
Syste
ms
Sri A
Enoch
MT
ech
JNT
UK
201
2
Assis
tant
Profe
ssor
Assis
tant
Profe
ssor
03-
08-
2014
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 4 0 0
Embed
ded
Syste
ms
Sri Y V
N M
Sarma
MT
ech
JNT
UK
201
2
Assis
tant
Profe
ssor
Assis
tant
Profe
ssor
03-
08-
2014
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 2 0 0 DECS
Ms M
Divya
Manasa
MT
ech
JNT
UK
201
4
Assis
tant
Profe
ssor
Assis
tant
Profe
ssor
06-
08-
2014
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 1 0 0
VLSI
AND
ES
Sri
B.Ram
u
MT
ech
JNT
UK
201
4
Assis
tant
Profe
ssor
Assis
tant
Profe
ssor
02-
11-
2014
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 1 0 0 DECS
Sri
A.Mad
hu
MT
ech
JNT
UK
201
4
Assis
tant
Profe
ssor
Assis
tant
Profe
ssor
01-
12-
2014
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 1 0 0
VLSI
AND
ES
Sri.M.
NARA
SIMHA
RAO
MT
ech
JNT
UK
201
4
Assis
tant
Profe
ssor
Assis
tant
Profe
ssor
01-
06-
2012
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 4 0 0
VLSI
AND
ES
MS.J.N
AGA
PRATI
MA
MT
ech
JNT
UK
201
5
Assis
tant
Profe
ssor
Assis
tant
Profe
ssor
06-
01-
2016
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 2 0 0
VLSI
AND
ES
Dr.A.
Sai
Ph
D UA
200
8
Profe
ssor
Profe
ssor
01-
06-0
10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 7 0 0 ECE
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-76
sunil 2014
Dr.M.S
UMAN
Ph
D
KL
U
201
4
Profe
ssor
Profe
ssor
02-
06-
2014
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 5 0 0
Micro
wave
Sri Y
Phani
Kumar
MT
ech
JNT
UK
201
6
ASS
OCI
ATE
PRO
FESS
OR
Assis
tant
Profe
ssor
29-
01-
2009
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 6 0 0
VLSI
DESI
GN
Dr.S.K
oteswar
a Rao
Ph
D
JNT
UK
201
6
Profe
ssor
Profe
ssor
01-
04-
2016
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 6 0 0
WIRE
LESS
Dr G. V
Hari
Prasad
Ph
D AU
200
6
Profe
ssor
Profe
ssor
01-
04-
2016
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
O 0 2 0 0
Signal
Proces
sing
Dr B.
Naresh
Reddy
Ph
D
OPJ
S
UNI
VE
RSI
TY
201
7
Profe
ssor
Profe
ssor
01-
04-
2015
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
O 0 2 0 0 VLSI
K.Ram
Babu
MT
ech
JNT
UK
200
9
ASS
OCI
ATE
PRO
FESS
OR
Assis
tant
prof.
01-
04-
2016
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 3 0 0
VLSI
AND
ES
Y.Richar
d
jayanad
MT
ech
JNT
UK
201
4
Assis
tant
Profe
ssor
Assis
tant
Profe
ssor
01-
06-
2015
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 2 0 0
VLSI
AND
ES
Sri
N.Satis
h Babu
MT
ech
JNT
UK
201
4
Assis
tant
Profe
ssor
Assis
tant
Profe
ssor
02-
11-
2015
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 1 0 0 VLSI
Ms
B.Anus
ha
MT
ech
JNT
UK
201
4
Assis
tant
Profe
ssor
Assis
tant
Profe
ssor
02-
11-
2015
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 1 0 0 DECS
Ms. T.
Puspha
Latha
MT
ech
JNT
UK
201
5
Assis
tant
Profe
ssor
Assis
tant
Profe
ssor
12-
10-
2015
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 1 0 0 DECS
Sri
B.Usho
da
MT
ech
JNT
UK
201
4
Assis
tant
Profe
ssor
Assis
tant
Profe
ssor
01-
02-
2015
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 0 0 0
VLSI
AND
ES
Ms.J.R
ajya
Lakshm
MT
ech
JNT
UK
201
4
Assis
tant
Profe
Assis
tant
Profe
04-
04-
2015
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
o 0 2 0 0 DECS
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-77
i ssor ssor
Sri K.
Tirumal
a Rao
MT
ech
JNT
UK
201
1
Assis
tant
Profe
ssor
Assis
tant
Profe
ssor
05-
06-
2016
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
O 0 0 0 0
VLSI
DESI
GN
Sri M.
Ranjith
Kumar
MT
ech
JNT
UK
201
4
Assis
tant
Profe
ssor
Assis
tant
Profe
ssor
05-
06-
2016
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
O 0 0 0 0
ECE&
ES
Sri J.
Satish
MT
ech
JNT
UK
201
5
Assis
tant
Profe
ssor
Assis
tant
Profe
ssor
05-
06-
2016
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
O 0 0 0 0 DECS
Sri J.
Mallikh
arjuna
Rao
MT
ech
KL
U
201
4
Assis
tant
Profe
ssor
Assis
tant
Profe
ssor
05-
06-
2016
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
O 0 0 0 0
VLSI
DESI
GN
Sri K.
Chandr
a Rao
MT
ech
JNT
UK
201
2
Assis
tant
Profe
ssor
Assis
tant
Profe
ssor
05-
06-
2016
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
O 0 0 0 0 ES
Sri G.
Hussian
Babu
MT
ech
JNT
UH
201
3
Assis
tant
Profe
ssor
Assis
tant
Profe
ssor
05-
02-
2014
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
O 0 0 0 0 DECS
Sri V.
Sriniva
sa Rao
MT
ech
JNT
UH
201
4
Assis
tant
Profe
ssor
Assis
tant
Profe
ssor
05-
02-
2016
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
O 0 0 0 0 ECE
Ms K.
Anurad
ha
MT
ech
JNT
UH
201
1
Assis
tant
Profe
ssor
Assis
tant
Profe
ssor
05-
06-
2016
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
O 0 0 0 0
VLSI
DESI
GN
Sri M.
Venkat
a
Krishna
MT
ech
JNT
UK
201
3
Assis
tant
Profe
ssor
Assis
tant
Profe
ssor
05-
06-
2016
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
O 0 0 0 0
VLSI
DESI
GN
Sri V.
Venkat
a
Krishna
MT
ech
JNT
UK
201
5
Assis
tant
Profe
ssor
Assis
tant
Profe
ssor
05/0
3/20
15
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
O 0 0 0 0
VLSI
&ES
Sri G.
Naresh
MT
ech
JNT
UH
201
3
Assis
tant
Profe
ssor
Assis
tant
Profe
ssor
05/0
3/20
16
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
O 0 0 0 0
VLSI
DESI
GN
Sri M.
Vijaya
Bhaskar
MT
ech
JNT
UK
201
3
Assis
tant
Profe
ssor
Assis
tant
Profe
ssor
05/0
6/20
16
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
O 0 0 0 0 ES
Sri B.
Raj
MT
ech
JNT
UK
201
2
Assis
tant
Assis
tant
05/0
6/200
10
0 0 0 0
N
O 0 0 0 0
ES &
VLSI
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-78
Kumar Prof Prof 16 DES
Sri
T.Sikha
mani
M.
Tec
h
JNT
UK
201
7
Assis
tant
Profe
ssor
Assis
tant
Profe
ssor
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
O 0 0 0 0
Vlsi &
Design
S.Sand
hya
M.
Tec
h
JNT
UK
201
7
Asst
Profe
ssor
Asst
Profe
ssor
0 10
0 0 0 0
N
O 0 0 0 0
VLSI
& D
Sri V.
Narahari
MT
ech
JNT
UK
201
4
Asst
Profe
ssor
Asst
Profe
ssor 0 10
0 0 0 0
N
O 0 0 0 0
Comm
unicati
on &
signal
process
ing
5.1. Student-Faculty Ratio (SFR) (20)
S: F ratio = N/F; N = No. of students = 3*X where x is (approved intake + 20% lateral entry intake +
separate division, if any) F = No. of faculty = (a+b–c) for every assessment year a: Total number of
full-time regular Faculty serving fully to 2nd, 3rd and 4th year of the this program b: Total number
of full-time equivalent regular Faculty(considering fractional load) serving this program from other
Program(s) c: Total number of fulltime equivalent regular Faculty(considering fractional load )of
this program serving other program(s) Regular Faculty means: Fulltime on roll with prescribed pay
scale. An employee on contract for a period of more than two years and drawing consolidated salary
more than applicable gross salary shall only be counted as a regular employee. Prescribed pay scales
means pay scales notified by the AICTE/ Central Government and implementation as prescribed by
the State Government. In case State Government prescribes lesser consolidated salary for a particular
cadre then same will be considered as reference while counting faculty as a regular faculty.
Marks to be given proportionally from a maximum of 20 to a minimum of 10 for average SFR
between 15:1 and 20:1, and zero for average SFR higher than 20:1
Year X N (3*X) F [(a+b-c)/100] SFR(N/F)
2017-2018 216 648 46 14.08
2016-2017 216 648 42.5 15.24
2015-2016 216 648 42.5 15.24
2014-2015 216 648 40.5 16
Average SFR for three assessment years: 15.49 Assessment SFR: 18.00
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-79
5.2. Faculty Cadre Proportion (25)
Year Professors
Required F1 Available
Associate Professors
Required F2 Available
Assistant Professors
Required F3 Available
2017-2018 3.8 5
9.60 10
29 31
2016-2017 3.8 5
9.60 10
29 29
2015-2016 3.8 5
9.60 9
29 27
2014-2015 3.8 5
9.60 9
29 26
Average
Numbers 3.8 5.0
9.60 9.33
29 27.33
If AF1 = AF2=0 then zero marks Maximum marks to be limited if it exceeds 25 Example: Student
No. =180; Required number of Faculty: 12; RF1=1, RF2=2and RF3=9 Case1:AF1/RF1=1;
AF2/RF2=1; AF3/RF3=1; Cadre proportion marks= (1+0.6+0.4) x12.5 = 25 Case 2: AF1/RF1= 1;
AF2/RF2 = 3/2; AF3/RF3 = 8/9; Cadre proportion marks = (1+0.9+0.3) x12.5 =limited to 5
Case3:AF1/RF1=0; AF2/RF2=1/2; AF3/RF3=11/9; Cadre proportion marks= (0+0.3+0.49) x12.5
=9.87
5.3. Faculty Qualification (25)
FQ=2.5x [(10X+4Y)/F)] where x is no. of regular faculty with Ph.D., Y is no. of regular faculty with
M. Tech., F is no. of regular faculty required to comply 1:15 Faculty Student ratio (no. of faculty and
no. of students required are to be calculated as per 5.1)
X Y F FQ = 2.5 x [(10X + 6Y) / F )]
2017-2018 5 41 41.6 17.6
2016-2017 5 39 41.6 17.05
2015-2016 5 37 41.6 16.34
2014-2015 5 37 41.6 16.34
5.4. Faculty Retention (25) No. of regular faculty members in CAYm2= 2014-15 CAYm1= 2015-16 CAY=2016-17
Description 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017 2017-2018
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-80
No of Faculty Retained 20 26 31 43
Total No of Faculty 42 42 44 46
% of Faculty Retained 48.78 61.9 70.45 93.47
5.5. Innovations by the Faculty in Teaching and Learning (20)
Content Based Question Making: Students are made to develop Questions Based on the
topic and then taught accordingly how to answer the questions
Video Based Student Enhancement: Application videos of the topics are showed, based on
which students get a real life exposure of the scenario where the concepts they have learned
is applied
Simulated Software Based Learning: Topics are simulated using software tools by which
the students can directly relate to the topics being taught
e-based Link Exposure: The links are provided for the students where they can do self study
or go for in depth knowledge of any topics
Animated Method of Learning: Concepts hard to visualize are taught using Animations
Role Playing: For easy understanding the students are made into various formations like
block diagrams or components etc
Brainstorming: The students are made to discuss the topics before starting and the lectures
are based on the discussions made
5.6. Faculty as participants in Faculty development/training activities/STTPs (15)
A Faculty scores maximum five points for participation in 2 to 5 days Faculty development program:
3 Points Participation>5 days Faculty development program: 5 points
Name of the faculty Max 5 Per Faculty
2017-2018 2016-2017 2015-2016
Ms P V L Suvarchala 0 3 5
Sri B. Rama Rao 0 3 5
Sri B Suresh 0 3 5
Sri S.Koteswara Rao 0 3 5
Sri Y Phani Kumar 0 5 3
Sri M Venkat Rao 0 3 3
Sri Ch Suresh 0 3 3
Sri M Narasimha Rao 3 3 3
Sri R Vijay Shashank 0 3 3
Sri S Rama koteswara Rao 0 3 3
Sri N Suresh 0 5 0
Sri G Siva Kumar 0 3 5
Sri A Enoch 3 5 5
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-81
Sri Y V N M Sarma 0 3 3
Ms M Divya Manasa 0 3 3
P.Srinivas 3 3 5
K.Ram Babu 0 3 5
Y.Richard jayanad 0 3 5
Dr Siva Kumar swamy 0 5 5
Dr CH Srinivas 0 5 3
V Suresh Babu 0 3 0
D Lakshmi Murthy 0 0 5
M Pratap 0 5 0
Ch Gopal Krishna 0 0 0
V Rajesh 0 3 0
Sum 9 81 82
RF = Number of Faculty required to
comply with 15:1 Student
Faculty Ratios per 5.1
46
43.2
38.4
Assessment [3*(Sum / 0.5RF)] 1.17 11.25 12.81
Average assessment over 3 years: 8.41
5.7. Research and Development (30)
5.7.1. Academic Research (10)
Academic research includes research paper publications, Ph.D. guidance, and faculty receiving
Ph.D. during the assessment period. Number of quality publications in refereed/SCI Journals,
citations, Books/Book Chapters etc. (6)
ISSETR (4)
IJER (2)
IJIRAT (4)
IJRECE
IJERT (19)
Ph.D. guided /Ph.D. awarded during the assessment period while working in the institute (4) Dr.
S.KOTESWARARAO, Associate Professor has received his Ph.D. during the academic year 2016-
2017.
S.N
O NAME TITLE JOURNALS
1 Ch. Lakshmi Tirupathamma, G.
Siva Kumar
A Critical task enabled
wireless robot for rescue
and searching activities
executions in military
applications
ISSN:2319-8885
VOLUME:4 ISSUE:52
ISSETR-2015 DEC
2
J.Naga prathima, S.Rama
Koteswara Rao, M.Narasimha
Rao, R.Vijaya Shashanka
A 32-point FFT using
Vedic mathematics
ISSN:2321-7758
VOLUME:3 ISSUE:6
IJER-DEC-2015
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-82
3 K.Girija Sravani, B.Rama Rao
Design and simulation of
RF MEMS switch for
wireless communication
VOLUME:195
ISSUE:12 IJSETR:2015-
DEC
4 K.Durga Rao, B.Suresh, G.Siva
Kumar, M.Divya Manasa
Fixed width modified
Baugh Wooley multiplier
using verilog
VOLUME:4 ISSUE:11
IJSETR:2015-DEC
5 M.Manjusha M.Venkata Rao
A communication
development approach
based on vlc for short
range data transmission
VOLUME:03 ISSUE:5
IJRECE-2015-DEC
6 S.Baby Jamuna Rani A.Enoch Y.
VNM Sarma
Design an enhanced
transform core for high
throughput application
ISSN:2189-3128
VOLUME:1 ISSUE:1
IJIRAT-2015-NOV
7 V.Bhavani Y.Phani Kumar
N.Suresh
Face recognition and
immediate alert for human
localization using
embedded wireless
networks
VOLUME:3 ISSUE:5
IJRECE-DEC-2015
8 V.Venkata Krishna, M.Venkata
Rao
Design and
implementation of parallel
prefix adders using
reversible logic gates
ISSN:2319-8885
VOLUME:3
IJRECE:2015-DEC
9 P.V.L. Suvarchala, A. Uma Devi,
Ch. Sireesha, P. Rajesh,
Multimedia Image
Compression using Multi
Resolution Transforms‟
ISSN:2278-5841
VOLUME:4 ISSUE:2
IJRECE-2015-FEB
10
Mrs. P. V. L Suvarchala, A.
Lavanya, P. Radhika, G. Naga
Lakshmi, B. Nagateja, K. Sai Babu
Noise Reduction in
Digital Hologram using
Contour let Transform
IJERT, NCACSPV-2016
Conference Proceedings,
VOLUME 4, ISSUE 18
11
B. Rama Rao, Ch. Veera Narendra,
Sd. Musheer, V. Rama Krishna
Reddy, Ch. Hari, A. Sai Sundar
Teja
PAPR Reduction in
OFDM using Joint Hybrid
Techniques
IJERT, NCACSPV-2016
Conference Proceedings,
VOLUME 4, ISSUE 18
12
N. Suresh, Shaik Saidulu, N.
Vishnu Priya, M. Siva Reddy, M.
Venkata sudha, K. Vamsi Krishna
Embedded Transition
Inversion Coding with
Low
Switching Activity for
Serial Links
IJERT, NCACSPV-2016
Conference Proceedings,
VOLUME 4, ISSUE 18
13
M. Narasimha Rao, J. Appa Rao,
K. Sai Kiran, K. Govardhan, K.
Navya, G. Gopi Chand
A Noval Technique for
CC Seg
IJERT, NCACSPV-
2016 Conference
Proceedings, VOLUME
4, ISSUE 18
14
Mr Vijay Shashanka R, Neeharika,
Swapna Kumari. K, Azees Sayyad,
Naga Srinu. G, Gopal Rao. P
A Vehicular Wireless
Sensor Network for
Vehicle
Emission Monitoring and
Fuel Indication
IJERT, NCACSPV-2016
Conference Proceedings,
VOLUME 4, ISSUE 18
15
Mr. V. G. N. S. Prasad, S K.
Kaleem Ansari, V. Naveen, B.
Anitha, G. Sai Deepthi, S.
Manikanta
Automated Segmentation
of Retinal Blood Vessels
using Optimized Gabor
Filter with Local Entropy
IJERT, NCACSPV-2016
Conference Proceedings,
VOLUME 4, ISSUE 18
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-83
Thresholding and
Adaptive Histogram
Equalization
16
A. Saipriya, A. S. V. V. N. S.
Pavan Kumar, G. Madhuri, A.
Kanaka Mahalakshmi, N. Kumar
Swamy
Segmentation of the
Blood Vessels and Optic
Disk in Retinal Images
using SVM Classifier
IJERT, NCACSPV-2016
Conference Proceedings,
VOLUME 4, ISSUE 18
17
A. Enoch, C H. Sindhura, G.
Narasimha Rao, B. Lakshmi, G.
Krishna Jayanth, G. Vamsi Krishna
Smart Automatic Fire
Guard
IJERT, NCACSPV-2016
Conference Proceedings,
VOLUME 4, ISSUE 18
18
V G N S Prasad, M. Madhavi
Kalyani, A. Bala Bharathi, T.
Geethanjali, G. T. Pravanya, T.
Sathish
Detection of Brain Tumor
and EDEMA using
Image Segmentation
IJERT, NCACSPV-2016
Conference Proceedings,
VOLUME 4, ISSUE 18
19
M. Venkata Rao, G. Charan Teja,
M. Gopi Chand, D. Lakshmi
Sudha, Ch. V. L. Suvarchala, K.
Anvesh
A Modernized Speech
Enrichment Method using
Intuitive Weighting Factor
IJERT, NCACSPV-2016
Conference Proceedings,
VOLUME 4, ISSUE 18
20
M.Narasimharao,Ranganageswara
Reddy,A.Leela Prasad,V.Dilip
Kumar,CH.Satyam,P.S.N.M.Vinay
Hybrid Median Filter for
Impulse Noise Removal
IJERT, NCACSPV-2016
Conference Proceedings,
VOLUME 4, ISSUE 18
21
A.Enoch,charanReddy,MD.Nasurul
la
,S.venkateswararao,K.Harshavardh
an,V.Venkatesh
Baby Face Predictor using
Parents Facial Features
IJERT, NCACSPV-2016
Conference Proceedings,
VOLUME 4, ISSUE 18
22
G.Siva
Kumar,T.Saikumar,Y.Srinath
L.Ramkumar,CH.Sri Pavan
Kumar,B.Mahesh Nayak
An RTOS based Wireless
Robot for Rescue
Operations in Military
Applications
IJERT, NCACSPV-2016
Conference Proceedings,
VOLUME 4, ISSUE 18
23
P. V. L. Suvarchala, Ch. Srivani, K.
Venkateswarlu, L. Pradeep, K.
Vidhitha, M. Vidya Sagar
Detection and Estimation
of Brain Tumor
Parameters using Fuzzy C
- Means Clustering
IJERT, NCACSPV-2016
Conference Proceedings,
VOLUME 4, ISSUE 18
24
Mr. V N M Sarma Y, Lakshmi
Durga T, Sireesha R, Mr. Anil
Kumar P, Mr. P T S Kiran G Mr.
Mahaboob Ali S K
Saving Data Base
Memory in Surveillance
Camera by Real Time
Motion Detection
IJERT, NCACSPV-2016
Conference Proceedings,
VOLUME 4, ISSUE 18
25
N. Suresh, V. Phani Kumar, R.
Jyothi, M. Navya, U. Manikanta,
S. Kiran
A 32-Point Fft using
Vedic Mathematics
IJERT, NCACSPV-2016
Conference Proceedings,
VOLUME 4, ISSUE 18
26
R. Vijay Shashanka, B. Suneetha,
G. Neelima B. Krishna Prasad, K.
Ashok Reddy, K. Vijay Bhaskar
Identifying Vehicle
Positioning System,
Accident
Detection and Theft
Control by using ARM 7
LPC 2148 Micro
Controller
IJERT, NCACSPV-2016
Conference Proceedings,
VOLUME 4, ISSUE 18
27
B. Suresh, K. Triveni, Y. V.
Lakshmi P. Saritha, K. Sriharsha,
D. Srinivas Reddy
Determination of Moving
Vehicle Speed
using Image Processing
IJERT, NCACSPV-2016
Conference Proceedings,
VOLUME 4, ISSUE 18
28 M.venkat Rao ,K.Tirumala Rao A new speech IJITR,VOL-5 Issue no 6
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-84
G.Siva Kumar Enhancement technique
using WIENER filter
ISSN NO -7626-7630
29 M.RANJITH KUMAR
NOVEL AREA
EFFICIENT T-
DECODERS
IJR VOL4 IUSSUE NO
14
ISSN 2348-6848
30 J.MALLIKARJUNA RAO
,B.RAMA RAO
CARDENCE DESIGN
TRANSIT FAULT
TOLARENT LATENCY
IN 45mm
TECHNOLOGY
IJIRT VOL-4 ISSUE
NO 7 ISSN 2349-60022
31 B.SURESH
APPLICATION OF
CELLURAR
AUTOMATE AND
NOVEL NETWORK
IJIEMR VOL-6 ISSUE
NO 11 ISSN 2456-5083
5.7.2 Sponsored Research (5)
The college has not derived any Sponsored Research projects from outside; however, The
Management has taken an initiative to provide seed funding for the students and post graduate
researchers at institutional levels out of their own funds. The following are the details:
Seed funds allotted for the year 2017-2018
S. No Allotted seed fund
1 Rs. 250000
2015-2016
Project Title Duration Funding Agency Amount
Multipurpose Trainer Kit 3 Months Perfect Electronic 30000.00
Total Amount(X): 30000.00
2014-2015
Project Title Duration Funding Agency Amount
Wireless Amplifier 3 Months S M Technology 25000.00
Total Amount(Y): 25000.00
2013-2014
Project Title Duration Funding Agency Amount
0 0 0 0.00
Total Amount(Z): 0.00
Cumulative Amount(X + Y + Z) = 55000.00
5.7.3. Development activities (10)
Provide details:
R&D CELL Product Development
Research laboratories
Instructional materials
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-85
Working models/charts/monograms etc.
Research laboratories
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-86
S.No Licensed Software/Hardware Description
1. Microprocessor and Interfacing/MASM
2. Ardino Board
3. Mat Lab Arm Processor MCU IDE Tool
Instructional materials Smart Class (Multimedia) Projector Lab Manual NPTEL videos
Assignments PPT Scanned Copy of Handwritten Notes according to university Syllabus provided
to students for every subject. University Question Papers are being provided with solutions. Links
of websites with Instructional materials for each unit are provided. Lab Manuals: Sample
lab manuals are available. Video clips uploaded on web sites. Lab Charts working
models/charts/monograms etc.
CHARTS:
Lan Description Charts
Resistor Color Coding
Thevenin‟s and Norton‟s Theorem
8085 architecture Instruction set - 8085, 8051
Inverting and Non-Inverting Amplifier
Timer IC 555
WORKING MODELS:
S.No Projects Developed
1 A Digital Security System for Door Lock System Using RFID Technology
2 Automated Home Area Control System
3 Automatic Irrigation for Large Farms Based On Soil Moisture Content Controls Irrigation
4 Automatic Water Level Controller in DAMs
5 Earthquake Detection Alert Alarm for People Security
6 Fire Detections in Buses
7 Intelligent Helmet System
8 Password Based Door Lock System
9 PC to Microcontroller Communication Display in Lcd
10 Power Saving System for Shopping Malls With Visitors Counting
11 Real Time Environment Monitoring System and Status Updating In Pc.
12 RF Based Metal Detecting Robot
13 Smart Door Accessing System
5.7.4 Consultancy (from Industry) (5)
(Provide a list with Project Title, Funding Agency, Amount and Duration)
Funding amount (Cumulative during three academic years):
Amount >10 Lacs – 5Marks
Amount >=8 Lacs and <= 10 lacs– 4 Marks
Amount >=6 Lacs and < 8 lacs – 3 Marks
Amount >=4 Lacs and < 6 lacs – 2 Marks
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-87
Amount >=2Lacsand < 4 lacs – 1 Mark
Amount <2 Lacs– 0 Mark
2015-2016
Project Title Duration Funding Agency Amount
IR Based Dust Bin
Controlling
2 Months Royal Electronics 2,50,000.00
Cumulative Amount(X + Y + Z) = 2, 50,000
2017-2018
Project Title Duration Funding Agency Amount
WIRELESS MESSAGE
DISPLAY SYSTEMS
3 Months Perfect electronics 2,50,000.00
Cumulative Amount(X + Y + Z) = 2, 50,000
5.8. Faculty Performance Appraisal and Development System (FPADS) (30)
Faculty members of Higher Educational Institutions today have to perform a variety of tasks
pertaining to diverse roles. In addition to instruction, Faculty members need to innovate and conduct
research for their self-renewal, keep a breast with changes in technology, and develop expertise for
effective implementation of curricula. They are also expected to provide services to the industry and
community for understanding and contributing to the solution of real life problems in industry.
Another role relates to the shouldering of administrative responsibilities and co-operation with other
Faculty, Heads-of-Departments and the Head of Institute. An effective performance appraisal system
for Faculty is vital for optimizing the contribution of individual Faculty to institutional performance.
The assessment is based on:
A well-defined system for faculty appraisal for all the assessment years
(i) Faculty Self-Assessment – A format is being provided which the faculty has to fill twice
every year
(ii) Departmental Assessment Committee – It assess results after every end semester
examinations
(iii)Feedbacks from Students – Discussion with student representatives and gets
feedbacks about every individual faculty monthly once
Its implementation and effectiveness:
Faculty Self Assessment:-
Implementation:- The faculty fills a form by which he can know what all shortcomings he has
done in teaching a particular subject
Effectiveness: - The faculty hence becomes aware so as not to repeat the same thing again, as well
as it helps him to cover the subject effectively in the coming semesters
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-88
Departmental Assessment Committee Implementation:-The End semester results are assessed
using various criteria‟s as well as compared with the internal exams conducted
Effectiveness:-This helps a faculty to motivate and help students to improve in the subject
Feedbacks from Students Implementation:-Every month a meeting is held with the students
committee
Effectiveness:-It helps the teacher to improve his teaching style
Sample format for Faculty Self Assessment:
Amrita Sai Institute of Science and Technology Approved by AICTE, New Delhi; Permanently Affiliated to JNTUK, Kakinada
ISO 9001:2015 Certified Institution, Accredited by NAAC with „A‟ grade
Amrita Sai Nagar, Paritala, Krishna District, Andhra Pradesh – 521 180
www.amritasai.edu.in, 0866 2428399
Ref: ASIST/FAC/SA/16.
FACULTY SELF APPRAISAL FORM
1. Name :
2. Designation :
3. Department :
ACADEMIC WORKS
4. Progress Report for the Academic Year : Odd / Even Sem
Particulars Annual/Semester I Annual/Semester II
Subject 1 Subject 2 Subject 1 Subject 2
Subject Title
% of Syllabus Covered
No. of Units Completed
No. of Periods Conducted
No of Students Registered
Percentage of Pass
Percentage of Fail
Highest Mark
Average Mark
No. of Students Securing > 60%
5. (a) Type & No. of Innovative methods (Class Room):
(b) Extra Coaching Arranged :
6. Laboratory :
No. of Session Conducted :
No. of Experiments prescribed in the syllabus:
No. of Experiments Completed :
7. List of Seminars / Workshops Attended During this Academic Year
8. List of Papers / Articles Published / Presented during the Year
9. List of Sponsorship / Consultancy / Project Work
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-89
10. Any other Assignments (Non – Academic Works) pertaining to:
(a) College :
(b) University :
(c) Any other Organization:
11. a) Appreciation / Awards / Recognition earned :
b) Disciplinary Actions faced :
12. Other activities Inside/Outside the campus towards development of self & students
13. Any other Information
14. Whether proficient with the rules, regulations and management systems: Yes No
15. Leave Details:
Period CL Loss of Pay Number of Late comings
Date Signature of the Faculty
a) REMARKS OF THE HEAD OF THE DEPARTMENT AND POINTS AWARDED: (Based on
inter personal relationship with faculty members and students, specific contribution to the
department etc)
Signature of the HOD
b) REMARKS OF THE PRINCIPAL AND POINTS AWARDED: (Based on specific contribution
to the institutional and departmental activities, on-time completion etc)
STAFF APPRAISAL – POINTS EARNED:
Students
Feedback- 25
University
Results- 50
HOD 15 Principal 10 Total 100
Date: Signature of PRINCIPAL
5.9. Visiting/Adjunct/Emeritus Faculty etc. (10)
Adjunct faculty also includes Industry experts. Provide details of participation and contributions in
teaching and learning and /or research by visiting/adjunct/Emeritus faculty etc. for all the assessment
years: Provision of inviting/having visiting/adjunct/emeritus faculty (1) Minimum 50 hours per
year interaction with adjunct faculty from industry/retired professors etc. (Minimum 50 hours
interaction in a year will result in 3 marks for that year; 3 marks x 3 years = 9 marks) We are inviting
Adjunct faculty also includes Industry experts for guest lectures, training programs based on
industrial needs. The details of the Guest faculty:
S.NO DATE NAME
1 12-09-2017 Dr.M V D Prasad Professorof ECE KL University
2 03-03-2017 Dr R.S Rao Professor of ECE Gudlavalleru Engg College
3 26-09-2016 Dr.B.Pollaiah Prof.of ECE KL UNIVERSITY
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-90
4 11-03-2016 Dr.E.Gopinadhan Former Director, NIT Calicut
5 11-03-2016 Prof.Dipankarpal Professor BITS Pilani,Goa
6 12-03-2016 Dr.Rajendra Prasad Scientist-“E” NARL,Tirupathi 7 12-03-2016 Dr.A.Srinivasulu R&D Director Vignan University, vadlamudi
8 12-03-2016 Dr. V.N. Mani Scientist “F” C-MET,Hyderabad
9 04-07-2014 Dr.A.Subbirami Reddy Dean of ECE and EIE L.B.R.C.E Mylavaram
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-91
CRITERION-6 Facilities and Technical Support 80
6. FACILITIES AND TECHNICAL SUPPORT (80)
6.1. Adequate and well equipped laboratories, and technical manpower (30)
S.N
O
Name of
the
Laboratory
No. of
student
per setup
Name of the
Important
Equipment
Weekly
Utilizati
on
Name of
Technical
Staff
Designatio
n
Qualificati
on
1 IC/PDC
Lab 30
IC Trainer kits-
12,
Min/Max IC
Tester-01,
CRO-12,
Function
Genretors-12
57.1%
(24/42)
Ratna
Prabha
Lab.
Technician B.Tech
2 E-CAD
Lab 30
DSP Kits-06,
Desktop
System-40
71.4%
(30/42) Sd.Nagurvali
Lab.
Technician B.Tech
3 MPMC
Lab 30
8086 Trainer
kits-12,
8051 Trainer
kits-05,
Interfacing
Kits-14,
Desktop
systems-17
57.1%
(24/42)
Ratna
Prabha
Lab.
Technician B.Tech
4 MW&OC
Lab 60
Optical
Communicatio
n Trainer kits-
06,
Klystron
source Micro
wave Bench-05
42.8%
(18/42) Sd.Nagurvali
Lab.
Technician B.Tech
5 EDC Lab 60
Regulated
Power Supply-
15,
1Mhz Function
Generator-15,
Digital Storage
Oscilloscope-
15,
Digital Multi
meters-30,
Bread boards-
15
42.8%
(18/42) Sd.Nagurvali
Lab.
Technician B.Tech
6 Communic
ation Lab 30
Analog
Communicatio
n Kits-21,
Digital
Communicatio
71.4%
(30/42)
Ratna
Prabha
Lab.
Technician B.Tech
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-92
n Kits-24,
Spectrum
Analyzer-01
6.2. Additional facilities created for improving the quality of learning experience in
laboratories (25)
Sr.
No
Facility
Name Details
Reason(s)
for creating
facility
Utilization
Areas in which students
are expected to have
enhanced learning
Relevance
to
POs/PSOs
1 M.Venkat
Rao
SR and JK
Flip FLOP
To provide
sound
knowledge
XILINX To get good knowledge
on VHDL programming Po4,Po5
2 YVNM
Sarma
ARM Micrco
controller
To
Create
Interest
Microcontroller
Kit
Incorporation
of Transferable skills Po4,Po5
3 B.suresh
Image
compression
and
Transmission
To
Create
Enthusiasm
MATLAB application oriented
related to experiments Po4,Po5
4 R.V.
Shashank
Add-On
Experiments
To
Impose the
Knowledge
of Industry
All
Laboratories Industry Oriented Po4,Po5
6.3. Laboratories: Maintenance and overall ambiance (10)
To maintain the laboratories a departmental committee is constituted headed by head of the
department. This committee is responsible for maintenance. All the laboratories are maintained
periodically. Annual maintenance contract is given to the vendor for smooth maintenance of the
laboratory. In house maintenance is also carried out as per requirement. Overall ambience of the
laboratories is maintained.
Policy: Equipment is operated in accordance with manufacturer‟s instructions and in a way which
minimizes the cost of repairs and maintenance. Procedure: Do‟s and Don‟ts and Safety measures
rules are displayed in each laboratory. Well Technical Staff are available for maintenance of
Electronic equipment and software. Department having four 10 KVA UPS, 240 VDC along with
Batteries is used in case of power failure in the PC system Labs. Servicing of each laboratory is
doing frequently. Calibration of the each laboratory is done frequently. Department having internet
of 100 Mbps and Wi-Fi of 35 Mbps is maintained for students and Faculty usage. All necessary PC
system regular software like Microsoft office, browser, lab software; antivirus software etc, is
installed and maintained.
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-93
Ambiance: Department has Full furnished State of Art laboratories with well-equipped equipment
which shall cater to all UG and PG courses as per curriculum requirements. Conditions of
chairs/benches are in good condition. Chair with desk are provided for individual students in Labs.
Department has experienced faculty to educate them in all the fields of engineering. All the labs are
conducted and evaluated every week. . Labs are equipped with sufficient hardware and licensed
software to run program specific curriculum and off program curriculum. Laboratory manual are
distributed to students. Sufficient number of windows is available for ventilation and natural light
and every lab has one exit. Lighting system is very effective, along with the natural light in every
corner of the rooms. Cup-boards are available in each lab for students to place their belongings.
Each Lab is equipped with white/black board, computer, Internet, and such other amenities.
Research laboratory/dept library is available 24X7 for all faculties and students to carry research
work and projects. Exclusively, a project lab has been provided for the students to carry out their
mini and major project work.
6.4. Project laboratory (5)
(Mention facilities & Utilization)
The final year projects of students are performed in the various laboratories as per the requirement of
project. All the project work is done in house. The project report are preserved and made available to
the students for reference. A dedicated lab is there exclusively for the project works to be carried out
by the students.
S. No. Sr. No. Name of the Facilities
Utilization Utilization
1 Matlab licensed version software
and DSP kits in DSP lab – 25 user
UG/PG students, Research Scholars and Faculty
members utilize for their mini projects, projects, and
research activities.
2
Keil micro vision 3 free version
software tool and Microcontroller
8051, MSP 430 kit in
Microcontroller Lab
UG/PG students, Research Scholars and Faculty
members utilize for their mini projects, projects, and
research activities
3
Antenna and microwave
components in communication
system Lab
UG/PG students, Research Scholars and Faculty
members utilize for their mini projects, projects, and
research activities
4
Xilinx free version software for
designing and verifying codes of
digital logic.
UG/PG students, Research Scholars and Faculty
members utilize for their mini projects, projects, and
research activities
5
MULTISIM/L--Spice free version
software for implementation of
power circuits
UG/PG students, Research Scholars and Faculty
members utilize for their mini projects, projects, and
research activities
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-94
6 Lab view free Version software
UG/PG students, Research Scholars and Faculty
members utilize for their mini projects, projects, and
research activities
7
Project seminar hall which
includes projector, PC system,
software, audio systems.
UG/PG students, Research Scholars and Faculty
members utilize for their mini projects, projects, and
research activities presentation.
8 R & D Lab
UG/PG students, Research Scholars and Faculty
members utilize the R & D Lab for their projects
and research activities
9 Project Lab
UG/PG students, Research Scholars and Faculty
members utilize the R & D Lab for their mini
projects, projects, and research activities
10 Internet of 10Mbps and Wi-Fi of
35Mbps
UG/PG students, Research Scholars and Faculty
members utilize the internet and Wi-Fi facility for
their Project and research activities
6.5. Safety measures in laboratories (10)
6.5.1 Safety Norms and Checks
Sr.
No Laboratory Name Safety Measures
1 Electronic devices and circuits lab
Specific Safety Rules like Do‟s and Don‟ts are displayed and instructed for all students. First aid box
and fire extinguishers are kept in each laboratory.
Students are supposed to wear Lab Apron. Well
trained technical supporting staff monitor the labs at
all times. Damaged equipment are identified and
serviced at the earliest. Periodical calibration of the
lab equipment are regularly done a clean and
organized laboratories are maintained the use of cell
phones is prohibited. Appropriate storage areas are
available. Fully and rightly loaded PC Systems with
needed software are readily available for students‟ usage.
2 IC and PDC LAB
Specific Safety Rules like Do‟s and Don‟ts are displayed and instructed for all students. First aid box
and fire extinguishers are kept in each laboratory.
Students are supposed to wear Lab Apron. Well
trained technical supporting staff monitor the labs at all
times. Damaged equipment are identified and serviced
at the earliest.
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-95
3 ECAD LAB
Students are restricted from carrying pen drives, CDs
or any other storage devices into the laboratories to
avoid data misuse and prevent systems from virus
attacks. Students are restricted from carrying cell
phones or any other electronic gadgets to prevent any
sort of distraction. CC cameras are placed in corridors
to monitor students and prevent them from doing any
hazardous activity or theft.
4 Microwave and Optical
Communication Lab
Specific Safety Rules like Do‟s and Don‟ts are displayed and instructed for all students. First aid box
and fire extinguishers are kept in each laboratory.
Students are supposed to wear Lab Apron.
Appropriate storage areas are available.
Checks for wiring and electrical installations for leakage and ear thing The safety of electrical
equipment is taken care by properly selecting the Conductor size (Wire size) so that the wire will
withstand during short Circuits and unbalances. The safety of equipment and wires are provided by
MCB and ELCB. MCB provides protection during short circuits. Fuses provide protection from over
currents. Every piece of equipment is provided with proper ear thing so that it will be provide
protections from internal faults.
6.5.1.1 Earthlings & Earth pits As the college has a multi-block academic ambience precautions
have been taken for proper ear thing. All the major pieces of equipment are provided with proper ear
thing materials. Required amount of charcoal, salt, and earthling rods are made available to the
personnel. We are testing all the ear things periodically and strengthening each ear thing by adding
needed salt, coals, red soil & sand. Loosen nut & bolt by tightening as per norms.
6.5.2 Firefighting measurements All the academic floors have two or more entrances / exits.
Firefighting is very essential where student‟s gatherings are large. Labs are the places where large
number of students work with equipment carrying considerable amount of current and having
voltages. To avoid damage to the equipment and to the furniture and students firefighting equipment
should be placed at all the places where large gatherings are expected. These will help in saving
lives, property from fire. To do firefighting generally firefighting cylinders containing powder
mixtures to emit CO2 to extinguish fire. These are available in different sizes. In case of large fire,
multiple exits should be designed to the buildings and places so that immediate evacuation is
required
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-96
Table : Details of firefighting equipment provided by ECE department
Type and size of the equipment ABC 6KG/4KG Fire Extinguishers
No of pieces of equipment 5
Cost of the equipment ABC 6 kgs - Rs. 2450 ( per equipment) ABC 4
kgs-Rs. 2250 ( per equipment)
The placement of the equipment All laboratories
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-97
CRITERIA 7:
7. CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT (50)
7.1. Actions taken based on the results of evaluation of each of the POs & PSOs (20)
Identify the areas of weaknesses in the program based on the analysis of evaluation of POs &
PSOs attainment levels. Measures identified and implemented to improve POs & PSOs
attainment levels for the assessment years.
POs Attainment Levels and Actions for Improvement- (2017-2018)
Pos Target
Level
Attainment
Level
Observations
PO 1: Engineering Knowledge
PO 1 2.01 1.33
Electronics and communication engineering curriculum
requires strong foundation of practical and theoretical
knowledge.
Action 1: Tutorials based on real application inclusion of simulation software in teaching learning
process.
Action 2: We inspire students to participate in technical events, other events where their basic
knowledge should convert to application matching with defined level of their standards.
PO 2: Problem Analysis
PO 2 2.31 1.55 The problem solving and analyzing skills gained through
first and second year courses helps
Action 1: Students are encouraged to observe, their homes and surroundings to gain insight into
real life engineering problems and think of possible approaches/solutions to these problems.
Action 2: Gained knowledge on complex engineering problems and solution on visiting industries.
PO 3: Design/development of Solutions
PO 3 2.31 1.6 Some of the projects developed by the students as hobby
projects or major projects
Action 1: Students are motivated to include all standard parameters and constraints according to
National and International safety norms and to address environmental concerns
PO 4: Conduct Investigations of Complex Problems
PO 4 1.80 1.23
It is observed that most of the project abstract and
literature survey are addressing the research based
approach but does not end with valid conclusions
Action 1: Academic workshops are coming into picture to apply more knowledge in terms of
conduction of experiments and analysis of results at required level.
PO 5: Modern Tool Usage
PO 5 1.98 1.10 It is observed that Up-gradations of tools and resources
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-98
are necessary to meet the industry standards and
research
Action 1: Modern labs are developed to demonstrate the use of Modern tools like MATLAB,
Adriano, Lab View, Cadence etc. to specify fulfillment of requirement in engineering applications
in new industrial era
PO 6: The Engineer and Society
PO 6 1.01 0.46 The courses of electronics and communication
engineering are addressing the needs of health.
Action 1: To understand the safety concerns and social aspects, students visited industry to expand
their practical knowledge with the effect of improved practices in engineering
PO 7: Environment and Sustainability
PO 7 0.68 0.36 The issues of global and environmental awareness
among the student should be improved.
Action 1: Students are encouraged to indulge in projects, in which global and environmental issues
are improved, with respect to consumption of energy and utilization of renewable energy
resources.
PO 8: Ethics
PO 8 0.75 0.27 The students are doing better to improve the overall
performance
Action 1: Career readiness program, corporate lectures and motivational talks are arranged to
overcome the above observations.
PO 9: Individual and Team Work
PO 9 0.97 0.6 The students are not able to work as individual
Action 1: Institute has initiated Program which provides a platform to work in individual as well as
a group in the fields of Engineering helps the students to groom the skills like leadership, effective
team member
PO 10: Communication
PO 10 0.71 0.37
Students are not able to Communicate effectively on
complex engineering activities with the engineering
community and with society at large
Action 1: Soft skills training is imparted to students to enhance various aspects of
communication/technical talks by group discussions, presentations and new learning outcomes.
PO 11: Project Management and Finance
PO 11 0.77 0.44 Unable to Demonstrate knowledge and understanding
of the engineering and management principles
Action 1: The awareness created among the student regarding the management principles and
managing projects
PO 12: Life-long Learning
PO 12 1.12 0.74
The pre final year and final year courses of the program
are demonstrating the resource for contemporary issues
and lifelong learning.
Action 1: Using ICT facilities, such as PPTs, live demonstration of topic imparted using video
lecture.
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-99
Action 2: Lecture content includes new technological developmental tools and knowledge of new
Products.
Table 1- POs Attainment Levels and Actions for Improvement- (2016-2017)
Pos Target Level Attainment Level Observations
PO 1 : Engineering Knowledge
PO 1 2.05 1.3
Graduates of the program will not have much
knowledge of mathematics, science, engineering
fundamentals and core engineering subjects
Action 1: An ability to apply knowledge of mathematics, science and engineering as appropriate to
the field of electronics & communication engineering practice.
Action 2: Assist them to find the solution to complex engineering problems.
PO 2 : Problem Analysis
PO 2 2.31 1.55
The problem solving and analyzing skills gained
through first and second year courses helps the
students to apply in real time application.
Action 1: Encouraging students by giving sample problems related real life
PO 3 : Design/development of Solutions
PO 3 2.31 1.45
Some of the projects developed by the student as
hobby projects/major projects (final year) are not
fully considering the social and environmental
issues.
ACTION1: Students are motivated to include all standard parameters and constraints according to
National and International safety norms and to address environmental concerns
PO 4 : Conduct Investigations of Complex Problems
PO 4 1.8 1.23
It is observed that most of the project abstract
and literature survey are addressing the research
based approach but does not end with valid
conclusions.
ACTION1: Academic workshops are coming into picture to apply more knowledge in terms of
conduction of experiments and analysis of results at required level.
PO 5 : Modern Tool Usage
PO 5 1.98 1.1 It is observed that Up-gradations of tools and
resources are necessary to meet the industry
standards and research.
ACTION1: Modern labs are developed to demonstrate the use of Modern tools like MATLAB,
Adriano, Lab View, Cadence etc. to specify fulfillment of requirement in engineering applications
in new industrial era.
PO 6 : The Engineer and Society
PO 6 1.01 0.52
The courses of Electronics and communication
Engineering are addressing the needs of, health,
safety and social concerns regarding engineering
practices in real life.
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-100
ACTION1: To understand the safety concerns and social aspects, students visited industry to
expand their practical knowledge with the effect of improved practices in engineering.
PO 7 : Environment and Sustainability
PO 7 0.68 0.36
The issues of global and environmental
awareness among the student should be
improved.
ACTION1: Students are encouraged to indulge in projects, in which global and environmental
issues are improved, with respect to consumption of energy and utilization of renewable energy
resources.
PO 8 : Ethics
PO 8 0.75 0.35
The students are doing better in improving the
overall expertise in field of engineering but due
to lack of communications and other ethical
moral knowledge, some are lagging in real life
situations.
ACTION1: Career readiness program, corporate lectures and motivational talks are arranged to
overcome the above observations.
PO 9 : Individual and Team Work
PO 9 0.97 0.60 The students are not able to work as individual as
well as in team.
ACTION1: Institute has initiated Program which provides a platform to work in individual as well
as a group in the fields of Engineering helps the students to groom the skills like leadership,
effective team member.
PO 10 : Communication
PO 10 0.71 0.35
The communication, presentation and report
writing skills are to be further improved among
the students.
ACTION1: Soft skills training is imparted to students to enhance various aspects of
communication/technical talks by group discussions, presentations and new learning outcomes.
PO 11 : Project Management and Finance
PO 11 0.77 0.40
Few courses of curriculum give knowledge of
Management principle and applying managerial
principles to his/her work including financial
implications and to manage the project in
multidisciplinary
ACTION1: The awareness created among the student regarding the management principles and
managing projects.
PO 12 : Life-long Learning
PO 12 1.12 0.70
The pre final year and final year courses of the
program are demonstrating the resource for
contemporary issues and lifelong learning.
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-101
ACTION1: Using ICT facilities, such as PPTs, live demonstration of topic imparted using video
lecture. ACTION2: Lecture content includes new technological developmental tools and
knowledge of new Products.
POs Attainment Levels and Actions for Improvement- (2015-2016)
Pos Target Level Attainment Level Observations
PO 1 : Engineering Knowledge
PO 1 2.01 1.3 Students are unable to solve problems through
analytical thinking.
action 1 : motivated by improving mathematical skills
PO 2 : Problem Analysis
PO 2 2.31 1.5
Students are unable to solve problems in electronics
and communication engineering using mathematical
techniques and scientific knowledge.
Academic workshops and conferences are coming into picture to apply more knowledge in terms
of conduction of experiments and analysis the as required level.
PO 3 : Design/development of Solutions
PO 3 2.31 1.33 Not aware of techniques, hardware and software tools
for engineering applications.
Action 1: motivated by conducting workshops and additional lab sessions
PO 4 : Conduct Investigations of Complex Problems
PO 4 1.8 1.1 Lack of knowledge on solutions for existing problems
within practical constraints.
Action 1: Academic workshops are coming into picture to apply more knowledge in terms of
conduction of experiments and analysis of results at required level.
PO 5 : Modern Tool Usage
PO 5 1.98 1.0 Lack of knowledge of Engineering tools
Action 1:Modern labs are developed to demonstrate the use of Modern tools
PO 6 : The Engineer and Society
PO 6 1.01 0.46
The courses of Electronics and communication
Engineering are addressing the needs of, health, safety
and social concerns regarding engineering practices in
real life.
ACTION1: To understand the safety concerns and social aspects, students visited industry to
expand their practical knowledge with the effect of improved practices in engineering.
PO 7 : Environment and Sustainability
PO 7 0.68 0.36 The issues of global and environmental awareness among
the student should be improved.
ACTION1: Students are encouraged to indulge in projects, in which global and environmental
issues are improved, with respect to consumption of energy and utilization of renewable energy
resources.
PO 8 : Ethics
PO 8 0.75 0.27 The students are doing better in improving the overall
expertise in field of engineering but due to lack of
communications and other ethical moral knowledge,
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-102
some are lagging in real life situations.
ACTION1: Career readiness program, corporate lectures and motivational talks are arranged to
overcome the above observations.
PO 9 : Individual and Team Work
PO 9 0.97 0.5 The students are not able to work as individual as well
as in team.
Action 1: ACTION1: Institute has initiated Program which provides a platform to work in
individual as well as a group in the fields of Engineering helps the students to groom the skills like
leadership, effective team member.
PO 10 : Communication
PO 10 0.71 0.35 The communication, presentation and report writing
skills are to be further improved among the students.
ACTION1: Soft skills training is imparted to students to enhance various aspects of
communication/technical talks by group discussions, presentations and new learning outcomes.
PO 11 : Project Management and Finance
PO 11 0.77 0.4
Few courses of curriculum give knowledge of Management
principle and applying managerial principles to his/her work
including financial implications and to manage the project in
multidisciplinary environments.
ACTION1: The awareness created among the student regarding the management principles and
managing projects.
PO 12 : Life-long Learning
PO 12 1.12 0.6
The pre final year and final year courses of the program
are demonstrating the resource for contemporary issues
and lifelong learning.
ACTION1: Using ICT facilities, such as PPTs, live demonstration of topic imparted using video
lecture.
ACTION2: Lecture content includes new technological developmental tools and knowledge of new
Products. PSOs Attainment Levels and Actions for Improvement- (2017-2018)
PSOs Target
Level
Attainment
Level
Observations
PSO 1 : An ability to understand the concepts of basic Electronics & Communication Engineering
and to apply them to various areas like Signal processing, VLSI, Embedded systems,
Communication Systems, Digital & Analog Devices, etc.
PSO 1 0.60 0.51
The courses of the program are demonstrating the
resource fullness for contemporary issues. The project
titles of the final year and pre- final year students are
addressing the real life problems.
ACTION1: Students are motivated to take up the real life problems during their project work so
that they can design, analyze and find solution which gives exposure to latest technologies.
PSO 2 : An ability to solve complex Electronics and Communication Engineering problems, using
latest hardware and software tools, along with analytical skills to arrive cost effective and
appropriate solutions. ,
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-103
PSO 2 0.60 0.49
Usage of different tools and designs are used to develop,
implement, test, manufacture and maintain the electronics
systems for consumer electronics/telecommunication/ optical
communication/ automobile/ Industrial Equipment /Machinery
control, articulate/ publish/ exhibit/ innovations/ conference,
journals etc.
ACTION1: Academic workshops and conferences are coming into picture to apply more
knowledge in terms of conduction of experiments and analysis the as required level.
PSO 3: Wisdom of social and environmental awareness along with ethical responsibility to have a
successful career and to sustain passion and zeal for real-world applications using optimal resources
as an Entrepreneur
PSO 3 0.55 0.44
To inculcate ethics, good interpersonal relationships,
ability to communicate, leadership and project
management.
ACTION1: Career readiness program and corporate lectures are arranged to meet required
expertise in field of engineering.
PSOs Attainment Levels and Actions for Improvement- (2016-2017)
PSOs Target
Level
Attainment
Level Observations
PSO 1 : An ability to understand the concepts of basic Electronics & Communication Engineering
and to apply them to various areas like Signal processing, VLSI, Embedded systems,
Communication Systems, Digital & Analog Devices, etc.
PSO 1 0.6 0.47
The courses of the program are demonstrating the
resource fullness for contemporary issues. The project
titles of the final year and pre- final year students are
addressing the real life problems.
ACTION1: Students are motivated to take up the real life problems during their project work so
that they can design, analyze and find solution which gives exposure to latest technologies.
PSO 2 : An ability to solve complex Electronics and Communication Engineering problems, using
latest hardware and software tools, along with analytical skills to arrive cost effective and
appropriate solutions.
PSO 2 0.6 0.4
Usage of different tools and designs are used to develop,
implement, test, manufacture and maintain the electronics systems
for consumer electronics/telecommunication/ optical
communication/ automobile/ Industrial Equipment /Machinery
control, articulate/ publish/ exhibit/ innovations/ conference,
journals etc.
ACTION1: Academic workshops and conferences are coming into picture to apply more
knowledge in terms of conduction of experiments and analysis the as required level.
PSO 3: Wisdom of social and environmental awareness along with ethical responsibility to have a
successful career and to sustain passion and zeal for real-world applications using optimal resources
as an Entrepreneur
PSO 3 0.55 0.42 To inculcate ethics, good interpersonal relationships, ability to
communicate, leadership and project management.
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-104
ACTION1: Career readiness program and corporate lectures are arranged to meet required expertise
in field of engineering.
PSOs Attainment Levels and Actions for Improvement- (2015-2016)
PSOs Target
Level
Attainment
Level Observations
PSO 1 : An ability to understand the concepts of basic Electronics & Communication Engineering
and to apply them to various areas like Signal processing, VLSI, Embedded systems,
Communication Systems, Digital & Analog Devices, etc.
PSO 1 0.60 0.45
The courses of the program are demonstrating the
resource fullness for contemporary issues. The project
titles of the final year and pre- final year students are
addressing the real life problems.
ACTION1: Students are motivated to take up the real life problems during their project work so
that they can design, analyze and find solution which gives exposure to latest technologies.
PSO 2 : An ability to solve complex Electronics and Communication Engineering problems, using
latest hardware and software tools, along with analytical skills to arrive cost effective and
appropriate solutions.
PSO 2 0.55 0.35
Usage of different tools and designs are used to develop,
implement, test, manufacture and maintain the electronics
systems for consumer electronics/telecommunication/ optical
communication/ automobile/ Industrial Equipment /Machinery
control, articulate/ publish/ exhibit/ innovations/ conference,
journals etc.
ACTION1: Academic workshops and conferences are coming into picture to apply more
knowledge in terms of conduction of experiments and analysis the as required level.
PSO 3: Wisdom of social and environmental awareness along with ethical responsibility to have a
successful career and to sustain passion and zeal for real-world applications using optimal resources
as an Entrepreneur.
PSO 3 0.55 0.38 To inculcate ethics, good interpersonal relationships, ability to
communicate, leadership and project management.
ACTION1: Career readiness program and corporate lectures are arranged to meet required expertise
in field of engineering.
7.2 Academic Audit and actions taken thereof during the period of Assessment (10)
Academic Audit
The Departments of an institution are the backbone of the core business of any institution where
trifocal activities i.e. teaching, research and service are conducted. An academic audit reviews the
processes and procedures used by Departments to enhance the quality of their Programs in terms of
program objectives and ensure graduate attributes as program outcomes as defined by each
Department are achieved against the stipulated targets for which standard practices and processes
need to be put in place.
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-105
Objectives of Academic Audit The main objective of an academic audit is to ascertain departments
have put in place adequate and effective quality assurance mechanisms in terms of strategies,
procedures, their applicability, that ensures quality inputs and consequently quality outputs; their
agility in ensuring continuous improvements along with review of available resources, their optimal
utilization, additional resource requirements for providing quality education.
1) Unit of Audit
The primary unit of academic audit is the Department.
2) Focus Areas
Defining intended Course and Program Outcomes
Identifying curricular gaps and strategy to bridge the gaps
Designing effective teaching and learning processes
Developing and using outcome based student assessment
Assuring implementation of quality education - significant activities such as research and
services, co- curricular and extracurricular activities to support program outcomes
3) Methodology
3.1 Approach Institution creates various committees for conduct and review of activities at the
institution and department levels. The compositions, functions of the committees are as follows:
(a) Institutional Level Committee - Institution Assessment Core Committee (IACC)
Composition:
Chairman - Head of the Institution
Members - All HODs.
Special member - TPO,
Member Secretary -
Broad Functions
Contribute to preparation of SAR especially information related to institutional and
finance.
Seek timeline and action plan from each department for Direct and Indirect assessment
and ensure its compliance.
Interact with employers/industry/alumni and prepare manpower market analysis
Conduct end of Semester analysis of results and achievement of POs/PSOs for all
Departments.
Prepare annual report of success/failures on various parameters
Taking corrective actions and additional inputs for meeting POs/PSOs
Assessment and revision of PEOs
Review of Institutional and Departmental Vision and Mission
Present the analysis of all departments to the BOS/Management
Develop faculty appraisal system and assess faculty performance annually; report to
BOG Frequency of Meetings
The committee preferably meets twice a month, with agenda and action taken record
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-106
(b) Department Level Committees
1. Department Advisory Committee (DAC)
Composition Chairman: HOD,
Faculty - Members and special external members - (Alumni, Industry, Professional Society
Representation).
Broad Functions
Review assessment of Course Outcomes and their relationship with POs/PSOs prepared
by HODs.
HOD collects recommendations and suggestions and through department advisory
committee come out with implementable actions or items points for continuous
improvements of POs and PEOs.
HOD presents report to IACC with resource requirements and academic directions.
Frequency of meeting:
Meeting may be held at the end of the semester and report prepared.
(c) Program Assessment Committee
Composition: Chairman - HOD
Members - All faculties
Broad Functions:
Prepare and finalize the PEOs and POs/PSOs, Align them with the Mission and write the
process of development of PEOs and POs.
Conduct assessment of placement record for ensuring PEOs attainments or revision, if
required.
Conduct assessment of curriculum and resources available to meet the developed PEOs and
POs, decide additional course contents, electives to bridge the gaps and inform the shortfalls
in resources to the Institutional Core Committee which will evaluate the needs and present
the additional requirement to the management.
Supervises the COs and their alignment to POs, assignments, tests, quiz, activities, Bloom‟s Taxonomy and ensures targets set by faculty are realistic.
Develop common Performance Indicators for respective Courses aligned to the PO and
ensures the faculty develop activities, tests, quiz, assignments related to the common
performance indicators as well as for their course specific indicators.
Monitors progress periodically.
Develop a description of the process with questionnaires and tools required for continuous
assessment.
Develop faculty self-appraisal questionnaire and student feedback questionnaire.
Decide frequency of assessment of POs – internal and external.
Obtain COs from respective faculty for concerned PO along with their alignment with PO,
Bloom‟s Taxonomy and target of expected achievements. For direct assessment collects the student results for respective courses aligned to the PO and
analyze the average achievement of performance.
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-107
Hold discussions with concerned faculty on shortfalls for the achievement of pre-set targets.
Collects recommendations for improvements.
Prepare and conduct indirect assessment and prepare report.
Record the results and presents to the IACC of direct and indirect assessment.
Maintain and update website.
Frequency of Meeting:
Monthly monitoring and also at the end of semester
3.2 The Process
The Management through BOG will decide the main guidelines of academic audit indicating special
reference to investigation to be made about the various practices being followed by the departments.
The emphasis would remain on teaching, research and services. All attempts will be made to ensure
that continuous growth of all major parameters related to quality of education is achieved. The
achievement with specific reference to the plan of action related to PEOs and POs/PSOs will be
monitored. The BOG will authorize IACC to conduct the audit and collect information through
various records that may include the following: Department action plan and targets Minutes of
Departmental meetings of various committees Record of content delivery through lectures, practical
etc. and Result analysis semester/annual of courses in relation to set targets. Results and
interpretation of indirect assessment Corrective action envisaged Recommendations of department
Advisory Board Any other evidential material
3.3. Reporting
The purpose of academic audit is not judgmental but to cause development to happen. The IACC
will produce a report that describes the strengths and weaknesses of the each department's efforts to
improve academic quality of their programs and identify plans for improvements. The main
components of the report will be: Recognition of Good practice Recognition of well performing
departments Recommendations for improvement the audit report is presented to the BOG and made
available to the departments who will be required to respond to the issues raised in the report. The
response of the departments will be part of the final audit report. The audit report shall be presented
to BOG and thereafter displayed on Department/institutional website.
7.3. Improvement in Placement, Higher Studies and Entrepreneurship (10)
Assessment is based on improvement in: Placement: number, quality placement, core industry, pay
packages etc. Higher studies: performance in GATE, GRE, GMAT, CAT etc., and admissions in
premier institutions Entrepreneurs Placement:
Based on the evaluation and review of the attainment of POs, modification are done in the
program curriculum, aspects such as increase or decrease in the components of theory, practical,
project work, communication skills courses and elective courses are considered. In
addition, attempt is made to introduce new courses, labs, experiments, exercises for project work,
etc on the basis of external interaction with the industry and academia at seminars or conferences.
Some of the improvements that have been carried out in the past are listed below:
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-108
• Some new experiments have been added in the lab courses
• New elective courses have been added from time to time
• Micro Controller Simulation Lab was introduced to focus on Simulation of MCs.
Apart from the above, we are conducting soft skill classes of aptitude, reasoning and to improve the
communication skill. For improvement in placement of the students expert lectures are arranged
from the industry exports. We are conducting mock test before any campus drive it includes
technical interview, HR interview and group discussion
Higher studies: We are motivating students to go for higher studies within India and Abroad. We
encourage our students to appear and perform in GATE, GRE, GMAT, CAT etc., and admissions in
premier institutions
Entrepreneurs: In our institute entrepreneurship development cell is organizing workshop on
entrepreneurship. Through entrepreneurship development cell interaction with the entrepreneur is
organized. Through entrepreneurship development cell competitions are arranged for new
innovative business ideas.
Details of Placement in CAY (2017-18)
Sr.
No. Name of student Company
Core /
IT
Package Per Annum
(In Lacs of Rs)
1 V.MOUNIKA SRI VARI
ENTERPRISES ECE 1,40,000
2 T SARALA CONSORTAX IT 1,80,000
3
B Prasanna Kumari,
CHANDRA SHEKHAR M,
K NASEEMA,
P RAVI TEJA,
SK MY MUNNISA BEGUM
IBEON Info Tech
Pvt Ltd IT 1,50,000
Details of Placement in CAY (2016-17)
Sr.
No. Name of student Company
Core /
IT
Package Per Annum
(In Lacs of Rs)
1 V. GANESH NARAYANA TRI BRO SOFT
TECH IT 1,40,000
2 A.REVATHI MAINTEC IT 1,80,000
3 V.RAMYA SRI MAINTEC IT 1,80,000
4 SYED FATHIMA MAINTEC IT 1,80,000
5 N.SIREESHA MAINTEC IT 1,80,000
6 G.PRIYANKA MAINTEC IT 1,80,000
7 M.PRAVALLIKA MAINTEC IT 1,80,000
8 S.LAKSHMI VASANTHI MAINTEC IT 1,80,000
9 S.PAVANI MAINTEC IT 1,80,000
10 S.RADHIKA ORENG IT 1,30,000
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-109
Sr.
No. Name of student Company
Core /
IT
Package Per Annum
(In Lacs of Rs)
11 V.PRATHYUSHA ORENG IT 1,30,000
12 P.JYOTHI SAI SWAROOP ORENG IT 1,30,000
13 S.SAI SANDHYA
BHAVANI ORENG IT 1,30,000
14 B.SRAVYA SRIJA ORENG IT 1,30,000
15 CH. SIVA PARVATHI GAMMA IT 1,40,000
16 A.VIJAYA BHARATHI GAMMA IT 1,40,000
17 SK. GOUSA JANI
SHAHEED GAMMA IT 1,40,000
18 RAJITHA BHARGAVA GAMMA IT 1,40,000
19 M.PRAVALLIKA PAYTM IT 1,80,000
20 B.PAVANI ERICSON CORE 2,10,000
21 N.TARANI ERICSON CORE 2,10,000
22 T.NAGA JYOTHI ERICSON CORE 2,10,000
23 R.MOUNIKA ERICSON CORE 2,10,000
24 SHAIK ZEENATH ERICSON CORE 2,10,000
25 G.VIJAYA SRI ERICSON CORE 2,10,000
26 B.L.BHARGAVI AVONTIX IT 1,80,000
27 CH.NAVEENA AVONTIX IT 1,80,000
28 N.JAYA SREE AVONTIX IT 1,80,000
29 P.THIRUPATHI RAO AVONTIX IT 1,80,000
30 B.AKSHITA FLIPKART IT 2,40,000
31 G.V SRAVANTHI FLIPKART IT 2,40,000
32 R.V.L.S. PAVANI FLIPKART IT 2,40,000
33 SK. MEERABI IBEON IT 1,80,000
34 SK. KARISHMA IBEON IT 1,80,000
35 S. LALITHA IBEON IT 1,80,000
36 N. GOPI REDDY IBEON IT 1,80,000
37 BHAGYA SRI KALYANI AXIUS IT 2,16,000
38 G.PRIYANKA AXIUS IT 2,16,000
39 A.REVATHI AXIUS IT 2,16,000
40 C T NIHARIKA SINGH LG ELECTRONICS Core 1,40,000
41 M VENKATA SRIRAM LG ELECTRONICS Core 1,40,000
42 SK GOUSE JANI
SHAHEED LG ELECTRONICS Core 1,40,000
43 R BHAVYA LG ELECTRONICS Core 1,40,000
7.4. Improvement in the quality of students admitted to the program (10)
Assessment is based on improvement in terms of ranks/score in qualifying state level/national level
entrances tests, percentage marks in Physics, Chemistry and Mathematics in 12th
Standard and
percentage marks of the lateral entry students
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-110
Item 2017-2018 2016-2017 2015-2016
State/University/Level
Entrance Examination/Others
(Name of the Entrance
Examination) - EAMCET
No. of Students admitted 174 112 143
Opening Score/Rank 23705 52404 29886
Closing Score/Rank 133276 130012 133282
Name of the Entrance
Examination for Lateral Entry
or lateral entry details – ECET
No. of Students admitted 11 8 17
Opening Score/Rank 3599 711 2800
Closing Score/Rank 5008 5008 12547
Average CBSE/Any other Board Result of admitted
students (Physics, Chemistry & Maths) 80 83 77
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-111
CRITERIA 8:
8. FIRST YEAR ACADEMICS (50)
8.1. First Year Student-Faculty Ratio (FYSFR) (5)
Assessment = (5 × 15)/Average FYSFR (Limited to Max. 5)
Data for first year courses to calculate the FYSFR:
Year
Number of students
(approved intake
strength)
Number of faculty
members
(considering
fractional load)
FYSFR
2017-2018 540 36 1:15
2016-2017 540 36 1:15
2015-2016 540 36 1:15
Average 500 34.66 1:15
Assessment= (5 × 15)/Average
FYSFR (Limited to Max. 5) 2.16
8.2. Qualification of Faculty Teaching First Year Common Courses (5)
Assessment of qualification = (5x +3y)/RF, x= Number of Regular Faculty with Ph.D, y = Number of
Regular Faculty with Post-graduate qualification RF= Number of faculty members required as per
SFR of 15:1, Faculty definition as defined in 5.1
Year X Y RF Assessment of faculty
qualification (5x + 3y)/RF
2017-2018 7 38 36 4.13
2016-2017 7 38 36 4.13
2015-2016 7 38 32 4.65
Average Assessment 4.48
8.3. First Year Academic Performance (10)
Academic Performance = ((Mean of 1st Year Grade Point Average of all successful Students on a 10
point scale) or (Mean of the percentage of marks in First Year of all successful students/10)) x
(number of successful students/number of students appeared in the examination) Successful students
are those who are permitted to proceed to the second year.
Academic Performance 2014-2015 2015-2016 2016-2017
Mean of CGPA or mean percentage of all successful
students(X) 7.50 8.50 7.70
Total Number of successful students(Y) 70.00 52.00 75.00
Total Number of students appeared in the examination(Z) 138.00 97.00 130.00
API [X*(Y/Z)] 3.80 4.56 4.44 Average API[ (AP1+AP2+AP3)/3 ] : 4.27
Assessment [ 1.5 * Average API] : 4.27
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-112
8.4. Attainment of Course Outcomes of first year courses (10)
8.4.1. Describe the assessment processes used to gather the data upon which the evaluation of
Course Outcomes of first year is done (5)
Scheme and Syllabus (Subject wise) is provided by the University. We have developed our co all
course outcomes are developed using Bloom taxonomy and consequently assignments tests quiz
practical and internal exams and projects are aligned to the Cos addressing the same levels of
Blooms Taxonomy. Each unit covers one or two Cos, generally 1st
unit covers Remembering
and understanding level, 2nd
unit cover applying level, 3rd
unit covers analysing level, 4th
and 5th
unit covers Evaluating and creating level. But it may vary from subject to subject. Some
subjects may cover only four level, some may five or all six levels. For evaluation of Cos well
defined statistical technique is used to map the question with the CO and mapping with the POs
and PSOs. Since the question wise results of students from university are not available, analysis
of CO with question is limited to internal examinations, assessment of lab practical, assignments,
quiz only.
2017-18
Students have taken R16 regulation stipulated by JNTUK Two Internal tests for
maximum mark of 30 is conducted. The final internal marks have been assessed
80% of maximum internal marks of both exams and 20% of minimum marks of
both internal exams. The performance of a student in internal assessment with
respect to the CO‟s is recorded. End semester University exam performance of students for the maximum mark of 70 is considered for external exam
performance. The summation of these two performances is considered as
cumulative assessment for a prescribed course outcome. The laboratory
assessment is evaluated for 75 marks. 75 marks are divided into 25 as internal
assessment and 50 marks as external assessment. The internal assessment 25 is
further divided into day to day performance – 10, record – 5 and internal
examination-10.
2016-17
Students have taken R16 regulation stipulated by JNTUK Two Internal tests for maximum mark of 30 are conducted. The final internal
marks have been assessed 80% of maximum internal marks of both exams and 20% of minimum marks of both internal exams.
The performance of a student in internal assessment with respect to the CO‟s is recorded.
End semester University exam performance of students for the maximum mark of 70 is considered for external exam performance.
The summation of these two performances is considered as cumulative assessment for a prescribed course out come.
The laboratory assessment is evaluated for 75 marks. 75 marks are divided into 25
as internal assessment and 50 marks as external assessment. The internal
assessment 25 is further divided into day to day performance – 10, record – 5 and
internal examination-10.
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-113
2015-16
Students have taken R13 regulation stipulated by JNTUK Two Internal tests for
maximum marks of 30 are conducted. Best of those two tests is being finalized as
internal assessment. The performance of a student in internal assessment with
respect to the CO‟s is recorded. End semester University exam performance of
students for the maximum mark of 70 is considered for external exam
performance. The summation of these two performances is considered as
cumulative assessment for a prescribed course outcome. The laboratory
assessment is evaluated for 75 marks. 75 marks are divided into 25 as internal
assessment and 50 marks as external assessment. The internal assessment 25 is
further divided into day to day performance – 10, record – 5 and internal
examination-10.
The assessment processes used to gather the data upon which the evaluation of Course Outcome:
Fortnightly attendance is collected and compiled.
The students having short attendance are motivated to attend lectures.
After completion of each unit assignments are given and evaluated.
Tutorial classes are conducted to solve queries of the students.
Internal examinations are conducted periodically.
Special classes are arranged for weak students.
Quiz is arranged during regular classes to make students aware.
Guest lectures are arranged to make students aware of real world and real problems.
At the end of semester via voice is been conducted on the basis of theory and laboratory
8.4.2 Record the attainment of Course Outcomes of all first year courses (5)
Program shall have set attainment levels for all first year courses.
(The attainment levels shall be set considering average performance levels in the university
examination or any higher value set as target for the assessment years. Attainment level is to be
measured in terms of student performance in internal assessments with respect the COs of a subject
plus the performance in the University examination)
2016-2017
Subject Sem PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12
Maths – I 1st 1.7 1.2 1.6 1.0 1.6 1.0 1.1 1.6 0.6 1.0 1.0 1.0
English-I 1st 1.4 1.4 1.6 1.4 1.6 1.4 0.5 1.6 0.7 1.4 1.4 1.4
Applied Physics 1st 1.4 1.3 1.1 1.2 1.1 1.2 0.6 1.1 0.5 1.2 1.2 1.2
Engineering drawing 1st 1.9 1.4 1.5 1.6 1.5 1.6 1.0 1.5 0.5 1.6 1.6 1.6
Computer
programming 1
st 1.3 1.0 1.4 1.2 1.4 1.2 1.4 1.4 0.6 1.2 1.2 1.2
Maths – II 2nd
1.7 1.4 0.7 1.1 0.7 1.1 1.2 0.7 0.5 1.1 1.1 1.1
Environmental Studies 2nd
1.2 1.2 0.8 1.2 0.8 1.2 1.6 0.8 0.6 1.2 1.2 1.2
Applied Chemistry 2nd
1.9 1.6 0.8 1.6 0.8 1.6 1.2 0.8 0.5 1.6 1.6 1.6
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-114
Electrical &
Mechanical
Technology
2nd
1.6 1.2 0.7 1.2 0.7 1.2 1.1 0.7 0.5 1.2 1.2 1.2
Maths-III 2nd
1.4 1.1 0.7 1.1 0.7 1.1 0.5 0.7 0.6 1.1 1.1 1.1
8.5. Attainment of Program Outcomes from first year courses (20)
8.5.1. Indicate results of evaluation of each relevant PO and/or PSO, if applicable (15)
The relevant program outcomes that are to be addressed at first year need to be identified by the
institution. Program Outcome attainment levels shall be set for all relevant POs and/or PSOs
through first year courses.
(Describe the assessment processes that demonstrate the degree to which the Program Outcomes
are attained through first year courses and document the attainment levels. Also include
information on assessment processes used to gather the data upon which the evaluation of each
Program Outcome is based indicating the frequency with which these processes are carried out)
POs Attainment:
Course PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12
C101 2.5 2.2 1.3 1.2 2.0 1.7 0.7 0.5 0.25 0.19 1.2 1.0
C102 2.9 2.4 2.1 1.9 1.0 0.5 0.6 1.25 0.3 0.4 0.9 0.6
C103 2.5 2.2 1.3 0.5 1.78 2.6 0.25 0.72 1.3 1.2 0.2 0.4
C104 2.3 1.5 1.75 0.2 2.5 1.5 0.5 2.3 0.6 0.9 1.2 1.0
PO Attainment Level
Course PO1 PO2 PO3 PO4 PO5 PO6 PO7 PO8 PO9 PO10 PO11 PO12
Direct
Attainment
2.55 2.08 1.61 0.95 1.82 1.58 0.51 1.19 0.61 0.67 0.88 0.75
CO Attainment 2.55 2.08 1.61 0.95 1.82 1.58 0.51 1.19 0.61 0.67 0.88 0.75
PSOs Attainment:
Course PSO1 PSO2 PSO3
C101 2.0 2.5 1.8
C102 2.1 1.75 0.75
C103 1.9 2.5 0.95
C104 2.3 1.7 1.0
PSO Attainment Level:
Course PSO1 PSO2 PSO3
Direct Attainment 2.08 2.11 1.12
CO Attainment 2.08 2.11 1.12
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-115
8.5.2. Actions taken based on the results of evaluation of relevant POs (5)
POs Attainment Levels and Actions for Improvement- (2016-2017)
POs Target Level Attainment Level Observations
PO 1: Engineering Knowledge
PO 1 2.05 1.4
Electronics and communication
engineering curriculum requires strong
foundation of practical and theoretical
Action 1: Tutorials based on real application inclusion of simulation software in teaching learning
process.
Action 2: We inspire students to participate in technical events, other events where their basic
knowledge should convert to application matching with defined level of their standards.
PO 2: Problem Analysis
PO 2 2.32 1.55 The problem solving and analyzing skills gained
through first and second year courses helps.
Action 1: Students are encouraged to observe, their homes and surroundings to gain insight into
real life engineering problems and think of possible approaches/solutions to these problems.
Action 2: Gained knowledge on complex engineering problems and solution on visiting industries.
PO 3: Design/development of Solutions
PO 3 2.5 1.7 Some of the projects developed by the students as
hobby projects/major projects
Action 1: Students are motivated to include all standard parameters and constraints according to
National and International safety norms and to address environmental concerns
PO 4: Conduct Investigations of Complex Problems
PO 4 2 1.5 It is observed that most of the project abstract and
literature survey are addressing the research
based approach but does not end with valid
conclusions.
Action 1: Academic workshops are coming into picture to apply more knowledge in terms of
conduction of experiments and analysis of results at required level
PO 5: Modern Tool Usage
PO 5 1.99 1.1
It is observed that Up-gradations of tools and
resources are necessary to meet the industry
standards and research
Action 1: Modern labs are developed to demonstrate the use of Modern tools like MATLAB,
Adriano, Lab View, Cadence etc. to specify fulfillment of requirement in engineering applications in
new industrial era
PO 6: The Engineer and Society
PO 6 1.01 0.46 The courses of electronics and communication
engineering are addressing the needs of health.
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-116
Action 1: To understand the safety concerns and social aspects, students visited industry to expand
their practical knowledge with the effect of improved practices in engineering
PO 7: Environment and Sustainability
PO 7 0.68 0.36 The issues of global and environmental
awareness among the student should be
improved.
Action 1: Students are encouraged to indulge in projects, in which global and environmental issues
are improved, with respect to consumption of energy and utilization of renewable energy resources.
PO 8 : Ethics
PO 8 0.5 0.27 The students are doing better to improve the
overall performance
Action 1: Career readiness program, corporate lectures and motivational talks are arranged to
overcome the above observations.
PO 9: Individual and Team Work
PO 9 0.97 0.6 The students are not able to work as
individual
Action 1: Institute has initiated Program which provides a platform to work in individual as well as
a group in the fields of Engineering helps the students to groom the skills like leadership, effective
team member
PO 10: Communication
PO 10 0.8 0.37 Training is imparted to students to enhance
various aspects of communication
Action 1: Soft skills training is imparted to students to enhance various aspects of
communication/technical talks by group discussions, presentations and new learning outcomes.
PO 11: Project Management and Finance
PO 11 0.645 0.44
Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of
the engineering and management principles and
apply these to one‟s own work
Action 1: The awareness created among the student regarding the management principles and
managing projects.
PO 12: Life-long Learning
PO 12 1.12 0.74
The pre final year and final year courses of the
program are demonstrating the resource for
contemporary issues and lifelong learning.
Action 1: Using ICT facilities, such as PPTs, live demonstration of topic imparted using video
lecture. Action 2: Lecture content includes new technological developmental tools and knowledge
of new Products.
POs Attainment Levels and Actions for Improvement- (2015-2016)
POs Target Level Attainment Level Observations
PO 1: Engineering Knowledge
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-117
PO 1 3.0 1.5
Electronics and communication engineering
curriculum requires strong foundation of
practical and theoretical knowledge.
Action 1: Tutorials based on real application inclusion of simulation software in teaching learning
process.
Action 2: We inspire students to participate in technical events, other events where their basic
knowledge should convert to application matching with defined level of their standards.
PO 2: Problem Analysis
PO 2 3.0 1.7
The problem solving and analyzing skills
gained through first and second year
courses helps
Action 1: Students are encouraged to observe, their homes and surroundings to gain insight into real
life engineering problems and think of possible approaches/solutions to these problems.
Action 2: Gained knowledge on complex engineering problems and solution on visiting industries.
PO 3: Design/development of Solutions
PO 3 2.5 1.7 Some of the projects developed by the
students as hobby projects/major projects
Action 1: Students are motivated to include all standard parameters and constraints according to
National and International safety norms and to address environmental concerns
PO 4: Conduct Investigations of Complex Problems
PO 4 2 1.5
It is observed that most of the project
abstract and literature survey are addressing
the research based approach but does not
end with valid conclusions.
Action 1: Academic workshops are coming into picture to apply more knowledge in terms of
conduction of experiments and analysis of results at required level
PO 5: Modern Tool Usage
PO 5 2.0 1.5
It is observed that Up-gradations of tools and
resources are necessary to meet the industry
standards and research
Action 1: Modern labs are developed to demonstrate the use of Modern tools like MATLAB,
Arduino, LabView, Cadence etc. to specify fulfillment of requirement in engineering applications
in new industrial era
PO 6: The Engineer and Society
PO 6 1.2 0.5
The courses of electronics and
communication engineering are addressing
the needs of health.
Action 1: To understand the safety concerns and social aspects, students visited industry to expand
their practical knowledge with the effect of improved practices in engineering
PO 7: Environment and Sustainability
PO 7 0.7 0.4
The issues of global and environmental
awareness among the student should be
improved.
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-118
PO 8: Ethics
PO 8 0.9 0.4 The students are doing better to improve
the overall performance
Action 1: Career readiness program, corporate lectures and motivational talks are arranged to
overcome the above observations
PO 9: Individual and Team Work
PO 9 1.0 0.8 The students are not able to work as
individual
Action 1: Special sessions are arranged for slow learners. PO 10: Communication
PO 10 0.9 0.4 Rural background people find difficult in
communication Action 1: Soft skills training is imparted to students to enhance various aspects of
communication/technical talks by group discussions, presentations and new learning outcomes.
PO 11: Project Management and Finance
PO 11 0.7 0.5 Student find difficult to work in teams.
Should practice management principles
Action 1: The awareness created among the student regarding the management principles and
managing projects
PO 12: Life-long Learning
PO 12 1.5 0.9
The pre final year and final year courses of
the program are demonstrating the resource
for contemporary issues and lifelong
learning.
Action 1: Using ICT facilities, such as PPTs, live demonstration of topic imparted using video
lecture.
Action 2: Lecture content includes new technological developmental tools and knowledge of new
Products.
POs Attainment Levels and Actions for Improvement- (2014-2015)
POs Target Level Attainment Level Observations
PO 1: Engineering Knowledge
PO 1 2.5 1.8
Electronics and communication
engineering curriculum requires strong
foundation of practical and theoretical
knowledge.
Action 1: Tutorials based on real application inclusion of simulation software in teaching learning
process.
Action 2: We inspire students to participate in technical events, other events where their basic
knowledge should convert to application matching with defined level of their standards.
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-119
PO 2: Problem Analysis
PO 2 3.0 1.9
The problem solving and analyzing skills
gained through first and second year
courses helps
Action 1: Students are encouraged to observe, their homes and surroundings to gain insight into
real life engineering problems and think of possible approaches/solutions to these problems.
Action 2: Gained knowledge on complex engineering problems and solution on visiting industries.
PO 3: Design/development of Solutions
PO 3 2.9 2.0 Some of the projects developed by the
students as hobby projects/major projects
Action 1: Students are motivated to include all standard parameters and constraints according to
National and International safety norms and to address environmental concerns
PO 4: Conduct Investigations of Complex Problems
PO 4 2.1 1.4 It is observed that most of the project
abstract and literature survey are addressing
the research based approach but does not Action 1: Academic workshops are coming into picture to apply more knowledge in terms of
conduction of experiments and analysis of results at required level
PO 5: Modern Tool Usage
PO 5 2.15 1.3
It is observed that Up-gradations of tools
and resources are necessary to meet the
industry standards and research
Action 1: Modern labs are developed to demonstrate the use of Modern tools like MATLAB,
Arduino, LabView, Cadence etc. to specify fulfillment of requirement in engineering applications
in new industrial era
PO 6: The Engineer and Society
PO 6 1.2 0.6
The courses of electronics and
communication engineering are addressing
the needs of health.
Action 1: To understand the safety concerns and social aspects, students visited industry to expand
their practical knowledge with the effect of improved practices in engineering
PO 7: Environment and Sustainability.
PO 7 0.8 0.4
The issues of global and environmental
awareness among the student should be
improved.
Action 1: Students are encouraged to indulge in projects, in which global and environmental issues
are improved, with respect to consumption of energy and utilization of renewable energy
resources. PO 8: Ethics
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-120
PO 8 0.55 0.3 The students are doing better to improve
the overall performance
Action 1: Career readiness program, corporate lectures and motivational talks are arranged to
overcome the above observations.
PO 9: Individual and Team Work
PO 9 1.05 0.65 The students are not able to work as
individual
Action 1: Institute has initiated Program which provides a platform to work in individual as well as
a group in the fields of Engineering helps the students to groom the skills like leadership, effective
team member
PO 10: Communication
PO 10 0.9 0.4 skills training is imparted to students to
enhance various aspects of communication
Action 1: Soft skills training is imparted to students to enhance various aspects of
communication/technical talks by group discussions, presentations and new learning outcomes.
PO 11: Project Management and Finance
PO 11 0.7 0.5 Demonstrate knowledge and understanding of the
engineering and management principles and apply
these to one‟s own work Action 1: The awareness created among the student regarding the management principles and
managing projects.
PO 12: Life-long Learning
PO 12 1.2 0.76
The pre final year and final year courses of the
program are demonstrating the resource for
contemporary issues and lifelong learning.
Action 1: Using ICT facilities, such as PPTs, live demonstration of topic imparted using video
lecture.
Action 2: Lecture content includes new technological developmental tools and knowledge of new
Products.
PSOs Attainment Levels and Actions for Improvement- (2016-2017)
PSOs Target Level Attainment
Level Observations
PSO 1 : An ability to understand the concepts of basic Electronics & Communication Engineering
and to apply them to various areas like Signal processing, VLSI, Embedded systems,
Communication Systems, Digital & Analog Devices, etc.
PSO 1 2.5 1.77
The courses of the program are
demonstrating the resource fullness for
contemporary issues. The project titles of
the final year and pre- final year students
are addressing the real life problems.
ACTION1: Students are motivated to take up the real life problems during their project work so
that they can design, analyze and find solution which gives exposure to latest technologies.
PSO 2 : An ability to solve complex Electronics and Communication Engineering problems, using
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-121
latest hardware and software tools, along with analytical skills to arrive cost effective and
appropriate solutions.
PSO 2 2.136 1.83
Usage of different tools and designs are used to ,
develop/ implement, test, manufacture and
maintain the electronics systems for consumer
electronics/ telecommunication/ optical
communication/ automobile/ Industrial Equipment
/Machinery control, articulate/ publish/ exhibit/
innovations/ conference, journals etc.
ACTION1: Academic workshops and conferences are coming into picture to apply more
knowledge in terms of conduction of experiments and analysis the as required level.
PSO 3: Wisdom of social and environmental awareness along with ethical responsibility to have a
successful career and to sustain passion and zeal for real-world applications using optimal resources
as an Entrepreneur.
PSO 3 1.35 1.0 To inculcate ethics, good interpersonal
relationships, ability to communicate, leadership
and project management. ACTION1: Career readiness program and corporate lectures are arranged to meet required
expertise in field of engineering.
PSOs Attainment Levels and Actions for Improvement- (2015-2016)
PSOs Target Level Attainment
Level
Observations
PSO 1: An ability to understand the concepts of basic Electronics & Communication Engineering
and to apply them to various areas like Signal processing, VLSI, Embedded systems,
Communication Systems, Digital & Analog Devices, etc.
PSO 1 3.0 1.9
The courses of the program are demonstrating the
resource fullness for contemporary issues. The
project titles of the final year and pre- final year
students are addressing the real life problems.
ACTION1: Students are motivated to take up the real life problems during their project work so
that they can design, analyze and find solution which gives exposure to latest technologies.
PSO 2 : An ability to solve complex Electronics and Communication Engineering problems,
using latest hardware and software tools, along with analytical skills to arrive cost effective
and appropriate solutions.
PSO 2 2.5 2.0
Usage of different tools and designs are used to ,
develop/ implement, test, manufacture and
maintain the electronics systems for consumer
electronics/telecommunication/ optical
communication/ automobile/ Industrial
Equipment /Machinery control, articulate/
publish/ exhibit/ innovations/ conference,
journals etc.
ACTION1: Academic workshops and conferences are coming into picture to apply more
knowledge in terms of conduction of experiments and analysis the as required level.
PSO 3: Wisdom of social and environmental awareness along with ethical responsibility to have a
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-122
successful career and to sustain passion and zeal for real-world applications using optimal resources
as an Entrepreneur.
PSO 3 1.5 1.2
To inculcate ethics, good interpersonal
relationships, ability to communicate, leadership
and project management.
ACTION1: Career readiness program and corporate lectures are arranged to meet required
expertise in field of engineering.
PSOs Attainment Levels and Actions for Improvement- (2014-2015)
PSOs Target Level Attainment
Level
Observations
PSO 1: An ability to understand the concepts of basic Electronics & Communication Engineering
and to apply them to various areas like Signal processing, VLSI, Embedded systems,
Communication Systems, Digital & Analog Devices, etc
PSO 1 3.2 2.0
The courses of the program are
demonstrating the resource fullness for
contemporary issues. The project titles of
the final year and pre- final year students
are addressing the real life problems.
ACTION1: Students are motivated to take up the real life problems during their project work so
that they can design, analyze and find solution which gives exposure to latest technologies.
PSO 2 : An ability to solve complex Electronics and Communication Engineering problems,
using latest hardware and software tools, along with analytical skills to arrive cost effective
and appropriate solutions.
PSO 2 2.8 2.2
Usage of different tools and designs are used to
, develop/ implement, test, manufacture and
maintain the electronics systems for consumer
electronics/telecommunication/ optical
communication/ automobile/ Industrial
Equipment /Machinery control, articulate/
publish/ exhibit/ innovations/ conference,
journals etc. ACTION1: Academic workshops and conferences are coming into picture to apply more
knowledge in terms of conduction of experiments and analysis the as required level.
PSO 3: Wisdom of social and environmental awareness along with ethical responsibility to have a
successful career and to sustain passion and zeal for real-world applications using optimal
resources as an Entrepreneur.
PSO 3 1.8 1.5
To inculcate ethics, good interpersonal
relationships, ability to communicate,
leadership and project management.
ACTION1: Career readiness program and corporate lectures are arranged to meet required
expertise in field of engineering.
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-123
9. STUDENT SUPPORT SYSTEMS (50)
9.1 Mentoring system to help at individual level (5)
Type of mentoring: Professional guidance/career advancement/course work specific/laboratory
specific/all-round development. Number of faculty mentors: Number of students per mentor:
Frequency of meeting:
Mentoring System : Yes
Type of Mentoring : Total development
Number of faculty mentors : 06
Number of students per mentor : 20
Frequency of meeting : Weekly
Details of the mentoring system
A faculty mentor is assigned to a group of 20 students to deal with their problems the mentor
maintains record of students.
The mentor maintains record of students.
The mentor observes the overall growth of student and provides counselling whenever
required the mentor also makes sure to maintain a regular parent-teacher dialogue.
Efficiency of such system
The system develops an interaction among the students, teachers and parents the system
helps to improve the academic performance of the students.
The system provides scope for healthy, positive and stress free state of mind.
Teachers are also becoming more responsive to the learner needs day by day which is being
reflected in the proctor diary maintained by the teacher.
The mentors meet the students periodically and monitor their performance and their
activities. Guidance regarding the lagging issues is provided. Occasionally tutor meeting with
the parents is conducted based on the requirement.
Professional Guidance:
The departments are well equipped with knowledgeable Human resources in the form of
members of faculty who by keeping themselves of developments offer guidance to the prospective
professionals in addition to the classroom teaching. The Industry-institute Partnership cell and
Entrepreneurship development cell have been putting efforts in this direction
Career advancement:
The Training and Placement cell has been active not only in arranging campus recruitment
drives, but also offering awareness and training for the students Course work Members of faculty
handling different courses interact with students in clearing all their Concept-oriented and test based
mechanics of the respective courses. The teachers after first of formative evaluation guide the
students as far as student-specific grey areas are concerned.
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-124
Course work:
Members of faculty handling different courses interact with students in clearing all their
Concept-oriented and test based mechanics of the respective course.
The teachers after first of formative evaluation guide the students as far as student-specific
gray areas are concerned.
Lab-specific:
Each of the lab sessions are handled by two faculties in order to have special care for the
students while experiments are being handled. A demonstrative presentation is given by the teacher
concerned before every experiment. The Laboratory records are evaluated after the experiment is
held. In other words, there is active involvement of the members of faculty Pre-experiment stage, at
the time of experiment and after the experiment.
Total Development:
As stated above, the college puts forward efforts to realize total development of the student.
In addition to academics, literary, cultural and sports activities are conducted which offer
leadership qualities, decision making abilities, team spirit, precision, analytical capabilities, socio-
psychological awareness etc. which make an individual a intellectually mature being
9.2. Feedback analysis and reward /corrective measures taken, if any (10)
Feedback collected for all courses (Yes/No): Yes
Specify the feedback collection process:
A standard feedback questionnaire is collected from the students every mid-semester course wise. At
the end of semester, department conduct end course survey in order to take the feedback about the
facilitators as well about the effectiveness of course
Number of Feedback Items : 08
Number of Feedback levels : 01 to 05
Space for descriptive feedback/suggestion etc. : Yes
Any consistency check? : Yes
Any performance/attendance profile : Yes
Frequency of feedback collection : Once in a semester
Feedback collection Hard-copy : Yes
Average percentage of students who participates : 80%
Feedback analysis Process:
The feedback analysis is done manually
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-125
Collected feedback is scrutinized by the Assessment Committee-Program.
The feedback is quantified.
All the parameters mentioned in the feedback form will be analyzed.
Ability of teaching with respect to each item and comprehensive ability of the teachers will
be analyzed
All the comments written by the students in the feedback forms will be communicated to the
respective faculty members along with their feedback levels to know their strengths and
weaknesses and to enhance their teaching skills.
Basis of reward/corrective measure:
Faculty members who get average feedback below 3 on 1-5 scale are identified and provided
with induction program and faculty development program in specified area.
Also the faculty members who get feedback more than 75% are appreciated by management
during Annual function.
Number of Corrective actions in last three years
CAY Organized workshops on teaching methodologies
Induction program for faculties.
Faculty Development Programme
CAYm1 Organized workshops on teaching methodologies
Induction program for faculties.
Faculty Development Programme
CAYm2 Counselled the faculty who scored less than 60%
Guest lectures by experts
9.3. Feedback on facilities (5)
Assessment is based on student feedback collection, analysis and corrective action taken.
Assessment is based on student feedback collection, analysis and corrective action taken Student‟s
feedback on facilities such as class room ambiance, furniture, OHP and tablet is satisfactory.
Student‟s feedback on facilities such as library, no of books to be increased. We have increase
purchase of books for central library. Student‟s feedback on facilities such as speed of internet to be
improved. We have increased the band width.
9.3.1 Methodology of Appraisal Based on the feedback forms carried out following methodology
is adapted
Table-WEIGHTAGE MATRIX
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-126
Category Subject
Pass%
Student
feedback HOD
Co-Curricular
activities
Ex curricular
activities Administration Total
Staff 35 30 15 10 10 100
HOD 30 20 20 10 10 10 100
VP 30 25 25 10 10 100
9.4. Self-Learning (5)
(The institution needs to specify the facilities, materials and scope for self-learning / learning
beyond syllabus, Webinars, Podcast, and MOOCs etc. and evaluate their effectiveness)
The curriculum offers courses like self-study, mini project, major projects where the topics
are self-selected or based on guide suggestion. The component of self-learning is evaluated in
these courses.
Seminars, conference, workshop & guest lecturers were organized.
In every lecture 5-10 minutes discussion on new technology and its application in real life
that is beyond the syllabus occasionally.
Past year projects & working models are made available to students for improvement &
innovation.
Every student has to submit a home assignment in every course which has been evaluated for
5 marks. Some of these tasks are beyond syllabus to encourage out- standing students to
develop their self-learning capabilities.
Some of the tasks in the lab courses are challenge based which has to be solved by the
students on their own enhancing their skills.
Department library with sufficient number of volumes on core and application areas,
technology awareness journals are opened during college working hours.
A state of art Research & Development laboratory is opened for the students to develop
applications and projects. Following video lectures by the NPTEL for the benefit of the
students
The Institute has tie-ups with external agencies for GATE coaching, CAT/GMAT/TOEFL
preparation.
Apart from the above, the college actively promotes self-learning through the following resources
procured through NPTEL, QEEE and other Audio-Video content:
Subject Id Discipline Name Subject Name Coordinators Institute
117101001 Electronics &
Communication
Adv. Digital Signal
Processing - Multirate Prof. V.M. Gadre
IIT
Bombay
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-127
Engineering and wavelets
117101002
Electronics &
Communication
Engineering
Advanced Optical
Communication
Prof. R.K.
Shevgaonkar
IIT
Bombay
117101050
Electronics &
Communication
Engineering
Broadband Networks:
Concepts and
Technology
Prof. Abhay
Karandikar
IIT
Bombay
117101051
Electronics &
Communication
Engineering
Digital Communication Prof. Bikash
Kumar Dey
IIT
Bombay
117101053
Electronics &
Communication
Engineering
Information Theory and
Coding
Prof. S.N.
Merchant
IIT
Bombay
117101056
Electronics &
Communication
Engineering
Transmission Lines and
EM Waves
Prof. R.K.
Shevgaonkar
IIT
Bombay
117102059
Electronics &
Communication
Engineering
Communication
Engineering
Prof. Surendra
Prasad IIT Delhi
117102060
Electronics &
Communication
Engineering
Digital Signal Processing Prof. S.C. Dutta
Roy IIT Delhi
117102061
Electronics &
Communication
Engineering
Semiconductor Devices Dr. G.S.
Visweswaran IIT Delhi
117103064
Electronics &
Communication
Engineering
Digital Circuits
Prof. Anil
Mahanta,Prof.
Roy Paily
Palanthinkal
IIT-
Guwahati
117103065
Electronics &
Communication
Engineering
Electromagnetic Fields Dr. Ratnajit
Bhattacharjee
IIT-
Guwahati
117103066
Electronics &
Communication
Engineering
IC Technology
Prof. Roy Paily
Palanthinkal,Prof.
Indrajit
Chakraborty
IIT-
Guwahati
117103067
Electronics &
Communication
Engineering
Probability and Random
Processes
Prof. Prabin K
Bora
IIT-
Guwahati
117104069
Electronics &
Communication
Engineering
Digital Image Processing Prof. Sumana
Gupta
IIT-
KANPUR
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-128
117104070
Electronics &
Communication
Engineering
Digital Signal Processing Prof. Govind
Sharma
IIT-
KANPUR
117104071
Electronics &
Communication
Engineering
High Speed
Semiconductor Devices
Prof. Anjan
Ghosh
IIT-
KANPUR
117104072
Electronics &
Communication
Engineering
Microcontrollers and
Applications Dr. S.P. Das
IIT-
KANPUR
117105076
Electronics &
Communication
Engineering
Communication
Networks and Switching
Prof. S.L.
Maskara
IIT
Kharagpur
117105077
Electronics &
Communication
Engineering
Digital Communication
Prof. R.V.
Rajakumar,Prof.
Saswat
Chakrabarti
IIT
Kharagpur
117105083
Electronics &
Communication
Engineering
Multimedia processing Prof. Somnath
Sengupta
IIT
Kharagpur
117107094
Electronics &
Communication
Engineering
Analog Circuits Prof. Pramod
Agarwal
IIT-
ROORKEE
117107095
Electronics &
Communication
Engineering
Basic Electronics Prof. Pramod
Agarwal
IIT-
ROORKEE
117108097
Electronics &
Communication
Engineering
Information Theory and
Coding
Prof. Pavan S
Nuggehalli
IIT-
ROORKEE
117102062
Electronics &
Communication
Engineering
Wireless
Communication Prof. Ranjan Bose IIT Delhi
117103017
Electronics &
Communication
Engineering
Queuing Systems Prof. S.K. Bose IIT
Guwahati
117103063
Electronics &
Communication
Engineering
Basic Electronics Prof. Chitralekha
Mahanta
IIT
Guwahati
117104074
Electronics &
Communication
Engineering
Signals and Systems Prof. K.S.
Venkatesh IIT Kanpur
117104099
Electronics &
Communication
Engineering
Advanced 3G and 4G
Wireless Mobile
Communications
Prof. Aditya K.
Jagannatham IIT Kanpur
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-129
117105075
Electronics &
Communication
Engineering
Adaptive Signal
Processing
Prof. Mrityunjoy
Chakraborty
IIT
Kharagpur
117105078
Electronics &
Communication
Engineering
Digital Computer
Organization Prof. P.K. Biswas
IIT
Kharagpur
117105079
Electronics &
Communication
Engineering
Digital Image Processing Prof. P.K. Biswas IIT
Kharagpur
117105080
Electronics &
Communication
Engineering
Digital Systems Design Prof. D.
Roychoudhury
IIT
Kharagpur
117105081
Electronics &
Communication
Engineering
Digital Voice & Picture
Communication
Prof. Somnath
Sengupta
IIT
Kharagpur
117105082
Electronics &
Communication
Engineering
MEMS and
Microsystems
Prof. Santiram
Kal
IIT
Kharagpur
117105084
Electronics &
Communication
Engineering
Neural Networks and
Applications
Prof. Somnath
Sengupta
IIT
Kharagpur
117105085
Electronics &
Communication
Engineering
Probability and Random
Processes
Prof. Mrityunjoy
Chakraborty
IIT
Kharagpur
117106086
Electronics &
Communication
Engineering
Digital Circuits and
Systems
Prof. S.
Srinivasan IIT Madras
117106089
Electronics &
Communication
Engineering
High Speed Devices and
Circuits Prof. K.N. Bhat IIT Madras
117106091
Electronics &
Communication
Engineering
Solid State Devices Prof. S.
Karmalkar IIT Madras
117106092
Electronics &
Communication
Engineering
VLSI Circuits Prof. S.
Srinivasan IIT Madras
117106093
Electronics &
Communication
Engineering
VLSI Technology Dr. Nandita
Dasgupta IIT Madras
117108037
Electronics &
Communication
Engineering
Biophotonics Dr. Manoj Varma IISc
Bangalore
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-130
117108038
Electronics &
Communication
Engineering
Circuits for Analog
System Design
Prof. M.K.
Gunasekaran
IISc
Bangalore
117108044
Electronics &
Communication
Engineering
Error Correcting Codes Prof. P. Vijay
Kumar
IISc
Bangalore
9.5. Career Guidance, Training, Placement (10)
(The institution may specify the facility, its management and its effectiveness for career guidance
including counseling for higher studies, campus placement support, industry interaction for
training/internship/placement, etc.)
The Training & Placement department in coordination with Student section Counsellors keeps
students abreast with the opportunities of higher studies on regular basis. Posters, circulars of all
such opportunities are displayed on T&P notice board. The team for Career counselling comprises
of:
S.No. Name Particulars
1 Dr. P Chiranjeevi Director – HR / Training and Placement
2 Sri. P Ramesh Babu Training and Placement Officer
3 Sri CH SURESH Departmental Coordinator
Functions of the Committee:
To arrange Seminars / Workshops on Career opportunities
To arrange GATE/GRE/TOEFL / IELTS / GMAT / CAT coaching classes
To conduct mock tests for competitive examinations
To arrange interactive sessions between alumni and students
To procure study material and make it available in the Library/Intranet
Display of Posters, Notices relating to Opportunities
Infrastructure in Training and Placement Cell:
Exam Halls (to conduct on line / off line tests
Seminar Hall (350 seated) & Conference Hall (150 seated) (with built –in Sound system&
LCD)
Control Room (for recruiters)(A/C)
G.D. and Interview rooms ( 3A/C Chambers)
Fully equipped training room
Computer centre (with LAN, 20 KVA UPS back up and 10 MBPS Internet connectivity)
Online testing Software
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-131
The following is the list of companies visiting our campus for placements including the recent
recruitment:
S.NO. LIST OF COMPANIES TOTAL
1 TRIBRO SOFT TECH 1
2 MAINTEC 8
3 LG ELECTRONICS 4
4 FLIPKART 3
5 ORENG 5
6 GAMMA 4
7 PAYTM 1
8 ERICSON 4
9 AXIUS 2
10 IBEON 4
11 AVONTIX 4
9.6. Entrepreneurship Cell (5)
(The institution may describe the facility, its management and its effectiveness in encouraging
entrepreneurship and incubation)(Success stories for each of the assessment years are to be
mentioned)
In our institute entrepreneurship development cell is organizing workshop on entrepreneurship.
Through entrepreneurship development cell interaction with the entrepreneur is organized. Through
entrepreneurship development cell competitions are arranged for new innovative business ideas
Entrepreneurship cell and incubation facility The entrepreneurship Development Cell has been
organizing workshops and seminar for the benefit of students. The EDC Cell invites speaker,
Entrepreneurs to share their experiences and also invites professionals from Banks,
Federation of Commerce and Industry to motivate and educate students on Entrepreneurship.
Vision and Ideology of the E-Cell
a. Vision To stimulate, support and sustain all initiatives and endeavors of students, which will
lead to generation of entrepreneurship based on Engineering and Technology
b. Ideology
To motivate and inspire students to take up the challenge of entrepreneurship
To equip them with necessary skills and provide all possible assistance
To promote creative thinking and an entrepreneurial mindset among the students
To promote innovations and help convert them into market accepted Products
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-132
Activities undergoing in E- Cell:
The E-cell Organizes lectures, workshops and seminars by renowned personalities from different
domains of expertise, competitions of various kinds etc. round-the-year in order to create
awareness and to sharpen business acumen of students and aspiring entrepreneurs.
Mentor students/new faculties who have business ideas by bringing expertise to their doorsteps.
The E-cell is network hub for students aspiring to be entrepreneurs and also play a role in team
building as a part of its mentorship. Mentoring the students at an early stage by giving proper
direction and necessary exposure would be crucial in converting technical ideas/projects into
viable business plans.
It is an interface between the entrepreneurial activity in institute and the outside world, a
consolidation of logistic and knowledge resources necessary to make a business plan and set up an
enterprise.
Form permanent associations with professional bodies and organizations, Universities,
corporations, media etc. to facilitate exchange of ideas and to promote entrepreneurial ventures.
Knowledge partnerships will play an important role in engaging good expertise for the benefit of
entrepreneurial activity at institute. Associations with venture capital firms and seed funds would
be crucial in the setup of new ventures.
To achieve the above objectives the E-Cell will focus on some initiatives to foster the spirit of
entrepreneurship in the following steps:
Initiative -1: Innovation Platform: It is aimed at nurturing innovation at the grassroots level, it
is an organized group of selected students getting together to discuss each other‟s ideas. This
discussion is now being done on a wiki page. The discussion helps the students stay motivated
to work on their idea as well as helps build their idea into something feasible.
Initiative -2: In-house Events/competition: To motivate student towards entrepreneurship, e-Cell
will regularly conduct in-house competition of various events such as business idea competition,
case study competition, Business quiz, brand watch, innovation approach, best out- of- waste
competition, innovation approaches in IT industry, new ventures lunched and their idea and
profile, story writing of successful entrepreneur, Expose the youth to the latest innovations and
entrepreneurial success stories etc.
Initiative -3: To connect the students with the start-ups through which start-ups get an
opportunity to interact with the students and pitch their ideas to the panel of Venture
Capitalists and the students get hired for summer internships.
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-133
Initiative -4: Promote E-Cell Brand: for smooth functioning of E-cell and carry out strategic
planning with aligning our vision and mission and promote of E-cell, we should have team of
following:
a. Patron Organization Our endeavor will be finding and make partner with National
Entrepreneurship Network (NEN), Department of Science and Technology, The Indus
Entrepreneurs (TiE), NASSCOM, FICCI etc. This will help to improve the brand value of Rungta
Group as well as E-Cell of the Institutes.
b. Association with VC Panel: The VC PANEL will consist of leading Venture Capitalist
firms of India which will support entrepreneurial activity and innovation by financing new or
growing businesses. The VC firms associated with E-Cell will not only involved in financing the
startups, but also mentor the 'to be entrepreneurs' and share their extensive knowledge and
experiences. Their encouraging involvements in E-cell activities will one of the major sources of
inspiration and E-Cell will attain new heights under their guidance and support.
c. Association with Corporate Panel: Every entrepreneur knows the thrill of a great idea. They‟ve
felt the pride of nurturing a vision and watching it grow. So, when it comes time for them to fly,
they want people who share that spirit and know what it takes to make a company succeed.
Whether you are seeking investment to get your idea off the ground or looking to fuel a
proven idea toward greatness or advice on any entrepreneurial issue, E-CELL is the
organization which helps you make it happen at every stage. The corporate panel of E-CELL
consists of experts from every possible domain who have excelled in their respective fields and
have agreed to help out budding entrepreneurs.
d. Incubator Panel The Entrepreneurship Cell maintains a strong panel of Incubators from
across the country. The panel aims to provide incubation facilities to B-plans from E-business,
Information Technology Domain, ICT, IT enabled service, IT Products, Production
Engineering, Bio Engineering, Bio Diversity, Paramedical, Power Generation, Automobile
Engineering and other areas.
e. Faculty Advisory Panel (External and Internal) The faculty panel of E-Cell will consists of
faculty members from various institutes across India as well as ASIST who have excelled in their
respective fields and have agreed to help out budding entrepreneurs.
f. Faculty Coordinator: There will be faculty coordinator whose role will be to see day to day
affair of E-cell and organize the different events and competition. He will be responsible to
promote E-Cell and will work according the advice from Director and Advisory group of the
cell. He will responsible to work according to vision and mission of the cell. He will be
responsible to prepare the document related with E-Cell.
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-134
g. Student Team: There is a student Coordinator, and Secretary cum treasurer from the student
community, who will work under the guidance of committee member. They will responsible
monitoring E-cell activities and initiatives. They remain in touch various students of E-cell
and other Entrepreneurship network establish in different institute.
h. Student Event management Team: a. We have to identify core team group who will
manage the day to day activities as well as different event plan in a year. The ideal size will
be 25 where there will be 2 boys and 2 girl student from each branch.
9.7. Co-curricular and Extra-curricular Activities (10)
(The institution may specify the co-curricular and extra-curricular activities) (Quantify activities
such as NCC, NSS etc.) For the overall development of the students, the institution is having R&D
cell in which the students are allowed to learn and exhibit their Technical skills. Each department is
having a student association for cultural, Sports, alumni, entrepreneurship, IT etc. under these
committees various activities are arranged frequently. A student‟s newsletter and magazine
SRUJANA is published to exhibit their talent.
Co-curricular Activities
Engineers Day,
Teachers Day,
Quiz Competition,
Tech Fest
Annual Magazine
Seminars,
Workshop,
Conference & Guest Lecture (at least once in a session in each department)
Institute is registered for NSS & Youth Festival for sports and cultural activities. Yearly excursion
cum Industrial tours is conducted for students wherein students are taken to various places of
interest all over India. This year it is planned to take a group to overseas destination as well. Tour In
charges of various departments coordinate entire activity. Games and Sports facilities, and qualified
sports instructors
(5) Outdoor –
Basket Ball
Volley Ball
Hand ball
Badminton
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-135
Cricket
Football
Indoor –
Chess
Carom
Table Tennis
Gymnasium
Extra-curricular activities are:
Activity Detail of activities
Annual Day
Extempore, Mehandi Competitions, Best Out Of Waste , Poster
Competition, Flower Arrangement, Salad Decoration , Classical Vocal ,
Painting , Classical /Western / Folk / Fusion Dances, Clay Modeling etc
Social activities Blood Donation Camps, Rallies on social issues, Swain Flu awareness
Camps and Tree plantation
Other Independence Day, Republic Day
Inter College
Competitions
(Engineering and non
engineering )
Songs, Debate, Extempore , Just a minute session, Essay writing
competition
Foundation Day Speech, Classical /western songs and Dances
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-136
10. GOVERNANCE, INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT AND FINANCIAL RESOURCES (120)
10.1. Organization, Governance and Transparency (40)
10.1.1. State the Vision and Mission of the Institute (5)
(Vision statement typically indicates aspirations and Mission statement states the broad approach to
achieve aspirations)
Vision:
"Striving for a symbiosis of Technological excellence and human values."
Mission:
"To arm young brains with competitive technology and nurture holistic development of the
individuals for a better tomorrow"
10.1.2. Governing body, administrative setup, functions of various bodies, service rules,
procedures, recruitment and promotional policies (10)
List the governing, senate, and all other academic and administrative bodies; their memberships,
functions, and responsibilities; frequency of the meetings; and attendance there in, in a tabular form.
A few sample minutes of the meetings and action-taken reports should be annexed. The published
rules including service rules, policies and procedures; year of publication shall be listed. Also state
the extent of awareness among the employees/students.
S.No. Name Capacity Nominated by
1 Sri Kudaravalli Ramesh Babu
MSc Chairman, Industrialist Society
2
Sri Kudaravalli Ramamohana
Rao
MSc
Member, Academician Society
3 Sri Yanamadala Venkataramaiah
M.A,M.Ed,M.Phil Member, Academician Society
4 Sri Kudaravalli Srinivasarao
BTech Member, Industrialist Society
5 Sri Koratala Eswar Chand
M.Sc Member, Academician Society
6 AICTE AICTE Ex-officio member Nomination Awaited
7 Dr. V. Ravindra
B. Tech., M. Tech., Ph.D Member, Academician University nominee
8 Sri N Seshgiri Rao
B. Tech., M. Tech.
Member, Ex Principal
Govt.Poly .Tech college
Nominee of DTE, Govt. of
AP
9 Dr. P Chiranjeevi
MCA., M. Tech., Ph.D. Member, Assoc prof Representing Teaching Staff
10 Dr. D. Haritha
B. Tech., M. Tech., Ph.D. Member, Prof Representing Teaching Staff
11 Dr. M. Sasidhar
B. Tech., M. Tech., Ph.D. Member Secretary Principal
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-137
Academic Advisory Board
S.No. Name Particular
1 Dr. P Nageswara Rao Director, MLGC, Guntur
2 Dr. P V Subbaiah Professor in ECE, VRSEC, Vijayawada
3 Dr. R S Rao Professor, GEC, Gudlavalleru
College Academic Committee: The academic activity of the institute is supervised by the College
Academic Committee for which, Principal is the Chairman and all heads of the departments and
professors are members. The Committee meets once in a fortnight to discuss the academic
performance and to take decisions on critical academic matters, The Minutes of this meeting is
forwarded to the Management. The salient points of the Academic Committee are made as agenda
for Governing Body.
Sr. No. Name Position Designation
1 Dr. M. Sasidhar Chairman Principal
2 Dr. P Chiranjeevi
Member Head, CSE
4 Mr. S. M Rehman Member Head, EEE
5 Mr. J S Suresh Member Head, ME
7 Dr. A Sai Suneel Member Head, ECE
8 Mr. Sk. Musa
Karimulla
Member Head, MBA
9 Mr. M Rajesh Reddy Member Head, MCA
10 Mr. Ch. Yuvaraj Member Head, Civil
11 Mr.D Pavan Kumar Member Head, Humanities
The college has several committees instituted by the Director who also nominates the Coordinators
of the various committees with their duties and responsibilities. The committees are examination
Cell, Anti Ragging, Student Affairs, Disciplinary, Library, Website, Timetable, Sports & Cultural,
Training & Placement, College Newsletter, Women Welfare Committee and Girl Students‟ Welfare
Committee.
Examination Cell
Dr. M. Sasidhar Chief superintendent
Mr. S M Rehman Additional Supt.
Exams Mr. M Nataraj Assistant Supt. Exams
Mr. T Kiran Kumar Member Exams
Mr. B. Gangadhar Rao Member Exams
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-138
Student Affairs
Mr. P.Srinivas In charge Student Development
Mr. B. Suresh Member Student Development
Mr. M. Venkat Rao Office In-charge
Mr. M. Narasimha
Rao
Hostel & Mess Co-Ordinator Anti Ragging Committee
Mr.P srinivas Chairman
Mr. N.Suresh Member
Mr.S.Ramakoteshwara rao Member
Mr J SATISH Member
Anti Ragging Committee- Girls Hostel
Mrs K Anuradha Coordinator in charge
Ms. M D Manasa Member
Mrs. J N Prathima Member
Apart from above there are committee‟s for Vigilance, Anti-Ragging Committee for Bus routes.
Disciplinary Committee
Mr. P srinivas Coordinator In charge
Mr. N. Suresh Member
Mr. S. Rama koteshwara rao Member
Mr. K Rambabu Member
Mr M D Manasa Member
Mr. P. Ankamarao Campus Manager
Library Committee
Mr. B.suresh Coordinator In charge
Mr. M. Venkat Rao Member
Mr. K. Apparao Librarian
Mr. Giribabu P Member
Mr. Sd. Saissen Member
Time Table Committee
Mr. P.Srinivas Coordinator In charge
Mr. B Suresh Member
Mr. M. Narasimha rao Member
Mr. J Satish Member
Institute has department level Time Table sub-committees who contribute to Institute timetable.
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-139
Sports &Cultural Committee
Mr. Y Phani kumar Coordinator in charge
Mr. A Enoch Member ECE
Mr. CH suresh Member ECE
Mr. P. Srinivasarao Sports Co-ordinator
College Newsletter & Website Committee
Mr. A ENOCH Coordinator in charge
Mr. RV SHASHANKA Member
Mr. G SIVA KUMAR Website Administrator
Female Staff & Girls student’s welfare Committee
Mrs. K ANURADHA Coordinator in charge
Ms M D Manasa Member
Ms J N Prathima Member
Similarly department level committees – constituted by the respective Heads – monitor the
activities of the departments like subject allocation, lab in-charges, time table, discipline, internal
assessment, academic performance, and monitoring the teaching-learning process.
TLP Monitoring Committee
Mr. Nataraj M Chem.
Mr. Rama Krishna Civil
Mr. E. Mahesh CSE
Mr. Ch. Chinnaveraiah EEE
Mr. P. Sureshbabu ME
Dr. Md. Arafath Physics
Defined rules, procedures, recruitment, and promotional policies, etc The College appreciates
the importance of Human Resource to further propel the healthy growth rate of the institute and
hence constituted an exclusive HR Department that takes care of all spheres of HR needs of the
institute. Apart from fulfilling the man power requirement of the institute/group, HR department
ensures proper dissemination of policies amongst staff all cadres by ways of orientation sessions for
newly recruited staff along with maintenance of all records pertaining to staff. HR department is also
entrusted the responsibility of counseling the staff from time to time to ensure that a healthy
environment prevails in the institute and all staff work towards the desired goals and objectives.
Apart from having a published HR manual within the department, that details the procedures relating
to recruitment, promotion, career progression, increments etc, there are detailed policies for: Policy
for Leaves available to staff of different cadre Policy for Leave travel concession (LTC) Policy for
Medi claim for self, spouse and 2 kids of Rs. 100000/- Policy for Attendance registration and Leave
Application processing in Biometric Attendance Recording. Policy for Early Leaving/Late
Coming/Movement outside Campus: Promotional Policy for Ph.D. Program Promotional Policy for
Higher studies (M.Tech.) Promotion policy in time scale.
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-140
10.1.3. Decentralization in working and grievance redressal mechanism (10)
List the names of the faculty members who have been delegated powers for taking administrative
decisions. Mention details in respect of decentralization in working. Specify the mechanism and
composition of grievance redressal cell including Anti Ragging Committee & Sexual Harassment
Committee.
The management has delegated its authority to the Director to administer the institute on sound
principles. Director in-turn has delegated the powers to Vice-Principal, the five Deans and HODs of
various academic departments. Dean (Student Affairs) looks after student performance and
development. Dean (Acad.) looks after the academic timetable and its implementation and
monitoring of all academic activities of the Institute as per the university requirements. Dean (ECS)
looks after the co-curricular and extracurricular activities of the student community and ensures
their participation in maximum number of events to enhance their overall personality. Dean (R &
D) concentrates upon research & development activities and initiatives and looks after the
developments taking place in various departments. Dean (Exams) ensures that the examination
systems are foolproof and exams are conducted with full integrity. Deans are assisted by the Heads
of Dept. in all the matters of interest. The Director holds review meetings on monthly basis and
decisions are collectively taken on the issues pertaining to improvement and functioning of the
Institute. In-turn the Heads of the Departments conduct monthly faculty meetings within respective
departments and obtain the details pertaining to academic and non-academic and any student related
problems. Also all the teachers are student counselors and they are in constant touch with the
students through weekly meetings. The information collected by them is passed on to HODs who in
turn appraise the Deans and the Director. Thus the administration is transparent and trust-worthy
and facilitates smooth conduct and function of the Institute.
All purchases are handled by a Purchase committee who receive requisitions from various
departments and the committee evaluates the need, timeframe of supply, budgetary provisions and
accordingly processes the purchases requirements. The Committee is headed by Director and has
senior faculties and administrators as members. The Director in term a breasts the management
about the purchases to be made and all such proposals are finally put up in Governing Body
meetings for Approval.
Financial power of the Director: 15 Lac for a single procurement
Financial power of the Vice-principal: 10 Lac for a single procurement
Financial power of the HOD: 5 Lac for a single procurement
List of Faculty members who are Administrators/ Decision Makers
PG & Ph.D. Programme
Mr. Y Richard Jayanand M.Tech Programs
Academics P SRINIVAS
Academics Student Section
Mr. B. Suresh Student Development
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-141
R&D
Mr. K Phani Srinivas Dean (R&D)
Mr. B Chanti Member R&D
Data Collection & Newsletter
Mr. R V Shasanka Data Collection & Newsletter
Mr. A Enoch Data Collection & Newsletter
A Grievance redressal committee has been constituted headed by vice - Principal and its existence
is widely circulated. If any major grievance is there, that could not be solved at HOD level, can be
submitted to the Committee. As per the statutory body, institution has established a women
empowerment cell to address the grievances raised from students and faculty.
Note: we are happy to say there is not grievance has been recorded as of now.
The committee will go into details and gives its suggestions to the Director. Director, in consultation
with Management takes appropriate steps for redressal.
In charge - Student Development continuously interacts with student‟s in various platforms to identify student grievances and is brought to the notice of the committee for appropriate action.
10.1.4. Delegation of financial powers (10)
Institution should explicitly mention financial powers delegated to the Principal, Heads of
Departments and relevant in-charges. Demonstrate the utilization of financial powers for each year
of the assessment years. Institution should explicitly mention financial powers delegated to the
Principal, Heads of Departments and relevant in-charges. Demonstrate the utilization of financial
powers for each year of the assessment years. All purchases are handled by a Purchase committee
who receive requisitions from various departments and the committee evaluates the need, timeframe
of supply, budgetary provisions and accordingly processes the purchases requirements. The
Committee is headed by principal and has senior faculties and administrators as members. The
principal in term a breasts the management about the purchases to be made and all such proposals
are finally put up in Governing Body meetings for Approval.
Financial power of the principal: 15 Lac for a single procurement
Financial power of the Vice-principal: 10 Lac for a single procurement
Financial power of the HOD: 5 Lac for a single procurement
10.1.5. Transparency and availability of correct/unambiguous in formation in public domain
(5)
The college website and the local College management software ensures that all information‟s pertaining to students, staff in the CMS to ensure that all stake holders are adequately informed
about the policies and procedures along with the developments taking place that could affect them.
All the information pertaining to the admissions, faculty and supporting staff details, student
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-142
attendance, internal marks, infrastructural facilities, details of programs, information related to
ongoing student training programs, faculty development programs, symposiums etc., are made
available in the college internet based CMS. All Minutes of Meetings like College Academic
Council (CAC), Department Review Meetings (DRM) and other information are displayed in the
Bulletin Board of CMS. The relevant details are available in the departmental files which are readily
accessible to all faculties in the departmental file racks.
10.2. Budget Allocation, Utilization, and Public Accounting at Institute level (30)
Summary of current financial year‟s budget and actual expenditure incurred in Lakhs (for the
institution exclusively) in the three previous financial years.
Table 1 - CFY 2016-2017
Total Income
1194
Actual Expenditure
1068
Total No. of
Students
2180
Fee Govt. Grants
Others
(Interest,
Bus fees,
Misc. fees)
Recurring
including
Salaries
Non-
Recurring
Special
Projects (Land,
Building, WIP
Expenditure
per student
238 544 0 412 836 232 --- 0.54
Table 2 – CFYm1 2015-2016
Total Income
1113
Actual Expenditure
1112
Total No. of
Students
1961
Fee Govt. Grants
Others
(Interest,
Bus fees,
Misc. fees)
Recurring
including
Salaries
Non-
Recurring
Special
Projects (Land,
Building, WIP
Expenditure
per student
211 519 0 383 834 278 --- 0.56
Table 3 – CFYm2 2014-2015
Total Income
878
Actual Expenditure
769.64
Total No. of
Students
1834
Fee Govt. Grants
Others
(Interest,
Bus fees,
Misc. fees)
Recurring
including
Salaries
Non-
Recurring
Special
Projects (Land,
Building, WIP
Expenditure
per student
228 465 0 185 577.15 192.49 --- 0.41
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-143
Table 4 – CFYm3 2013-2014
Total Income
808
Actual Expenditure
647
Total No. of
Students
1758
Fee Govt. Grants
Others
(Interest,
Bus fees,
Misc. fees)
Recurring
including
Salaries
Non-
Recurring
Special
Projects (Land,
Building, WIP
Expenditure
per student
211 443 0 154 468.5 178.5 --- 0.36
Total Income at Institute level: For CFY, CFYm1, CFYm2 &CFYm3 CFY: Current Financial Year,
CFYm1 (Current Financial Year minus 1), CFYm2 (Current Financial Year minus 2) and CFYm3
(Current Financial Year minus 3)
Items
Budgeted
in 2016-
2017
Actual
Expenses
in 2016-
2017 till
Budgeted
in 2015-
2016
Actual
Expenses
in 2015-
2016 till
Budgeted
in 2014-
2015
Actual
Expenses
in 2014-
2015 till
Budgeted
in 2013-
2014
Actual
Expenses
in 2013-
2014 till
Laboratory
equipment 11 10.92 28 27.75 20 15.96 30 28
Salaries 562 560.08 575 570.02 400 388.87 300 296
Library 1.70 1.66 1.23 1.21 1.47 1.45 3.34 3.19
Transport 120 118 125 125 115 114.85 125 120
Maintenance 100 90.99 70 67.02 50 47 60 58
R & D 3 2.77 3 2.26 5 3.25 5 4.24
Training and
Travel 23 21.04 20 16.23 10 9.48 5 3.15
Project
Expo 0 0.0 3 2.35 5 4.25 5 3.25
General
Expenses 280 264.20 370 368.39 200 186.48 150 134.36
Total 1100.7 1069.66 1195.23 1113.21 806.47 771.09 683.34 650.19
10.2.1. Adequacy of budget allocation (10)
(The institution needs to justify that the budget allocated during assessment years was adequate)
Since the department is in growing phase, college management has made it a point that funds should
not be a hindrance factor for the healthy rate of growth. Adequate budget is allocated and
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-144
expenditure is monitored. In no circumstances, teaching learning process is made to suffer because
of fund shortage.
S.No. Assessment
Year
Budget Allocated
in Lakhs (Rs.)
Actual Expenditure
in Lakhs (Rs.)
Adequate / Non
Adequate
1 2016-2017 1194 1068 Adequate
2 2015-2016 1113 1112 Adequate
3 2014-2015 878 769.64 Adequate
4 2013-2014 808 647 Adequate
10.2.2. Utilization of allocated funds (15)
(The institution needs to state how the budget was utilized during assessment years) During last
three years budget allocation and utilization is in order and no deficiency was observed
S.No. Assessment
Year
Budget Allocated
in Lakhs (Rs.)
Actual Expenditure
in Lakhs (Rs.)
Percentage of
Utilization
1 2016-2017 1194 1068 89.44
2 2015-2016 1113 1112 99.91
3 2014-2015 878 769.64 87.65
4 2013-2014 808 647 80.07
10.2.3. Availability of the audited statements on the institute’s website (5)
(The institution needs to make audited statements available on its website)
Institutional audit statements are available on the institute‟s website
10.3. Program Specific Budget Allocation, Utilization (30)
Table 1:: CFY 2016-2017
Total Budget
14397065
Adequate Expenditure
14084637.13
Total Number of students
570
Non-recurring Recurring Non-recurring Recurring Expenditure per Student
343049 14054016 358881.43 13725755.7 24709
Table 2:: CFYm1 2015-2016
Total Budget
17966995
Adequate Expenditure
17229737.1
Total Number of students
541
Non-recurring Recurring Non-recurring Recurring Expenditure per Student
1321516 16645479 1244240.1 15985497 31841
Table 3:: CFYm2 2014-2015
Total Budget
13407913
Adequate Expenditure
12813824.3
Total Number of students
502
Non-recurring Recurring Non-recurring Recurring Expenditure per Student
1161450 12246463 1072107.4 11741716.9 25525
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-145
Table 4:: CFYm3 2013-2014
Total Budget
7423943
Adequate Expenditure
7093438.6
Total Number of students
507
Non-recurring Recurring Non-recurring Recurring Expenditure per Student
273814 7150129 252751.5 6840687.1 13991
Items
Budgeted
in 2016-
2017
Actual
Expenses in
2016-2017
till
Budgeted
in 2015-
2016
Actual
Expenses
in 2015-
2016 till
Budgeted
in 2014-
2015
Actual
Expenses
in 2014-
2015 till
Budgeted
in 2013-
2014
Actual
Expenses
in 2013-
2014 till
Laboratory
equipment 343049 358881.43 1321516 1244240.1 1161450 1072107.4 273814 252751.5
Software 555711 444569 0 0 0 0 0 0
Laboratory
consumable 23500 21789 20000 17850 13500 12250 12000 10782
Maintenance
and
spares
623575 583109.6 197824 211480.8 147617 136261.8 345101 318555
R & D 330318 304909.5 87892 81131.4 30920 28541.7 191104 176404.2
Training and
Travel 83122 76728.3 301685 278478.3 205482 189675.6 78583 72538.2
Salaries 7874914 7559918 10045271 9643461 6455995 6197756 5875329 5640316
Miscellaneous
expenses 4881164 4734732.3 5992807 5753095.5 5392949 5177231.8 648012 622091.7
Total 14715353 14084637.13 17966995 17229737.1 13407913 12813824.3 7423943 7093438.6
10.3.1. Adequacy of budget allocation (10)
The yearly budget is prepared according to the needs & requirements of the departments taking into
consideration of annual intake of students, laboratory & infrastructure developments. Students,
faculty & staff requirements and promotions and latest technologies etc., various departments
submit the annual budget to principal. On receipt of such proposals, principal, in consultation
with departmental HODs, prepares a consolidated proposal. After deliberations formal budget
made altered in departments and forwarded to Principal for preparing final budget at college
level and submits it to the Governing Body for approval and sanction. The Management is
approving almost 100% which was proposed by the institute. The budget allocation and utilization
for the last three years is adequate. All the expenditure needs prior approval from the competent
authority. Funds would be spent only from the approved budget. If funds are required for
expenses not mentioned in the proposal, management‟s approval is a must. Management ensures
the adequacy of the funds from various sources like, fee accrual, donation and bank loans. Since the
department is in growing phase, college management has made it a point that funds should not be a
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-146
hindrance factor for the healthy rate of growth. Adequate budget is allocated and expenditure is
monitored. In no circumstances, teaching learning process is made to suffer because of fund
shortage.
S.No. Assessment Year Budget Allocated in
Lakhs (Rs.)
Actual Expenditure in
Lakhs (Rs.)
Adequate / Non
Adequate
1 2016-2017 14715353 14084637.13 Adequate
2 2015-2016 17966995 17229737.1 Adequate
3 2014-2015 13407913 12813824.3 Adequate
4 2013-2014 7423943 7093438.6 Adequate
10.3.2. Utilization of allocated funds (20)
(Program needs to state how the budget was utilized during the last three assessment years) During
last three years budget allocation and utilization is in order and no deficiency was observed
S.No. Assessment Year Budget Allocated in
Lakhs (Rs.)
Actual Expenditure in
Lakhs (Rs.)
Percentage of
Utilization
1 2016-2017 14715353 14084637.13 95.71
2 2015-2016 17966995 17229737.1 95.89
3 2014-2015 13407913 12813824.3 95.56
4 2013-2014 7423943 7093438.6 95.54
10.4. Library and Internet (20)
(Indicate whether zero deficiency report was received by the Institution for all the assessment
years. Effective availability/purchase records and utilization of facilities/equipment etc. to be
documented and demonstrated)
10.4.1. Quality of learning resources (hard/soft) (10)
Relevance of available learning resources including e-resources
Accessibility to students
Support to student‟s for self-learning activities Relevance of available learning resources
including e-resources Accessibility to students Support to students for self-learning activities
Relevance of available learning resources including e-resources Library Services
Yes Carpet area of library (in m2) 652
Reading space (in m2) 400
Number of seats in reading space 250
Number of users (issue book) per day 600
Number of users (reading space) per day 600
Timings: During working day, weekend & vacation 8:00AM to 6:00Pm & 9:00AM to 1:00PM
Number of library staff 6
Number of library staff with degree in Library 2
Management Computerization for search, indexing,
issue/return records Bar coding used Yes
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT, Part – B
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala Page-147
Library services on Internet/Intranet INDEST or
Other similar membership Archives Yes
Titles and volumes per title
Year Number Of New
Titles Added
Number of New
Editions Added
Number Of New
Volumes Added
2014-2015 61 52 612
2015-2016 73 54 768
2016-2017 43 37 454
2017-2018 38 28 387
Scholarly journal subscription
Year No.of Technical
Magazines/Periodicals
No.of Total Technical
Journals subscribed Scholarly Journal Titles
(in originals, reprints) In Hardcopy In Softcopy
2014-2015 4 6 15
2015-2016 4 6 20
2016-2017 4 6 25
2017-2018 4 6 25
Support to students for self-learning activities
10.4.2. Internet (10)
Name of the Internet provider BSNL, My guru online
Available band width 54 mbps
WiFi availability 5 mbps
Internet access in labs, classrooms,
library and offices of all Departments Yes
Security arrangements Yes
SELF ASSESSMENT REPORT
AMRITA SAI INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, Paritala
Declaration
(The head of the institution needs to make a declaration as per the format given)
I undertake that, the institution is well aware about the provisions in the NBA‟s accreditation manual
concerned for this application, rules, regulations, notifications and NBA expert visit guidelines in
force as on date and the institute shall fully abide by them. It is submitted that information provided in
this Self Assessment Report is factually correct. I understand and agree that an appropriate
disciplinary action against the Institute will be initiated by the NBA, in case any false
statement/information is observed during pre-visit, visit, post visit and subsequent to grant of
accreditation.
Date : 31-10-2017 Signature & Name
Place : Vijayawada Head of the Institution with seal