Post on 12-Apr-2017
Agency Lake Treatment Wetland Design Proposal
CIV/ENV 489/469
Winter 2014
Prepared by: Team BaNG
Taylor Balakrishnan
Miranda Barrus
Taylor Bars
Raefield Benson
Joshua Henry
Kenneth Shultz
Submitted March 14, 2014
CE/ENV 489/469 Team BaNG Proposal
1
BACKGROUND The prospective site for the wetland advocated for in this proposal, Agency Lake Ranch,
is approximately 35 miles from the nearest town, Klamath Falls (Google 2014).
According to the Census Bureau, the combined communities of Klamath Falls and
Altamont have an approximate population of 40,000 persons. The larger geographic
setting, the Klamath Basin, is considered climatically to be high desert. See Figure 1, a
location map, below.
Figure 1: Land Use Map (USGS 2014)
CE/ENV 489/469 Team BaNG Proposal
2
Currently, Agency Lake Ranch is zoned as an Agriculture and Recreation area (Klamath).
There are three properties directly adjacent to Agency Lake: Barnes Ranch to the North
and West of the property, Upper Klamath Lake National Wildlife Refuge to the South
and West of the property, and the Wood River Wetland to the North and East of the
property (USGS). With the exception of Barnes Ranch, which is zoned as agricultural
land (Klamath), all of the adjacent properties are currently being used for Restoration and
Habitat (USGS). Barnes Ranch is privately owned, the US Department of Fish and
Wildlife owns the Wildlife Sanctuary, and the US Bureau of Reclamation owns the Wood
River Wetland (Klamath). The property is also adjacent to Agency Lake, with the lake
bordering the East side of the property (Google 2014).
Upon visual inspection, the current vegetation breakdown is estimated as follows: 5% -
15% emergent vegetation, 85% to 95% meadow lands (Google 2014). The emergent
vegetation has not been directly observed, but it is assumed to be present within the
irrigation ditches on the property. While there should be not a limiting land uses on the
Agency Ranch Property itself, the adjacent three wetlands, the Upper Klamath Lake
National Wildlife Refuge, the Wood River Wetland, and the Williamson River Delta
Wetland, are sensitive for wildlife and water quality requirements. As such, preserving
the quality of these nearby water bodies, as well as Agency Lake itself, may limit what
can be done on the Agency Lake Ranch Property.
The predicted water sources for this prospective wetland are the sevenmile canal and
groundwater influx; the predicted outlet is into Agency Lake. Locally, the major
endangered species that will be driving the water rights and outlet concentrations of
nutrients will be the Lost River and Short Nose Sucker Fish (Nature Conservancy 2014).
Based on adjacent property usage (Upper Klamath Lake National Wildlife Refuge and
Wood River Wetland), some possible positive benefits from developing the site may
include improved fish and avian habitat, improved water quality, and recreational use.
PROJECT SCOPE The proposal prepared by the members of team BaNG will discuss a possible land use
option for the Agency Lake Ranch site currently owned by the Bureau of Reclamation.
This option is a hybrid between the “Blow and Go” scenario (blow out the levies holding
back the surrounding waters, BG for short) and a “Store and Grow” scenario (maintain
the levies in place and pump water into and out of the wetland, SG for short) for creating
a wetland on the property, with a focus on the Blow and Go methodology. As team
BaNG is supposed to be focusing on the “Blow and Go” approach for creating a wetland,
any analysis on the portions containing a “Store and Grow” type treatment wetland will
be conceptual only.
The main focus of this report will be to determine what kind of wetland vegetation
(submergent or emergent) is likely to colonize in the newly inundated grassland within
the “Blow and Go” portion of the project site. The main indicator for what kind of
wetland plants will colonize in Agency Lake Ranch will be elevation relative to lake
levels, as found from LIDAR data. The locations of the breaches in the levees and the
inlet pumps from sevenmile canal will be determined so as to maximize retention time.
CE/ENV 489/469 Team BaNG Proposal
3
Water balance values will be based on existing water rights for the water bodies, as well
as direct scaling of values such as Evapotranspiration and Groundwater Influx. The type
of wetland being considered in this report will be a Free Water Surface (FWS); no
attempts will be made to force the wetland to assume other types of flow characteristics,
as the group believes that this would be contrary to the spirit behind a “Blow and Go”
project.
No direct numerical analysis will be performed on the portion(s) of the property that will
remain contained by levees will be done. The only parameters that will be reported about
these wetland cells are as follows: locations within the parcel, justification for chosen
location, intended function, and conceptual design.
This report is a preliminary study only; the numbers that will be used and generated by
this report will be approximate only. No detailed modeling will be done to determine the
actual flow paths or retention times within the wetland. Likewise, any data used to
determine the value of nutrient or metal uptake/detention within the prospective wetland
will be based on previous data from adjacent projects; no pilot wetlands will be created to
determine actual performance on site. The purpose of this report is to assess the viability
of a predominantly “Blow and Go” wetland creation scenario; design specifics are
beyond the scope of this proposal.
GEOLOGY The soil on the project site is classified by the United States Department of Agriculture
(USDA) as a Lather Muck (Web Soil Survey 2014). According to Dr. Matthew Sleep,
associate professor at the Oregon Institute of Technology, Lather Muck is very similar to
a peat soil. This implies that the soil is very high in organic matter, and will benefit our
wetland, because it will help with the establishment of vegetation. Also, this soil is
currently compacted more than it ever has been. Therefore, even though there is evident
subsidence from the drainage and grazing that occurred on this land, there was no further
compaction that needs to be addressed. Lather muck is not a very permeable soil; thus, it
could restrict the infiltration and exfiltration between the water in our wetland and the
ground water.
CLIMATE The following section covers the regional climate description, the receiving water
hydrograph, a general water budget, and a summary of the pollutant loading for Agency
Lake Ranch.
Regional Climate Description The climate of the Upper Klamath Lake region is designated to both Climate Division 5
and Climate Division 7. These divisions have been defined by the National Climatic Data
Center. Climate Division 5 encompasses high plateau climates. Klamath County is
rimmed by large and small scale mountain ranges, and its high plateau climate is
represented by high elevations, high altitude, and snowfall. Given the combination of the
Cascade mountain range located to the west of the basin and air patterns, the region is
CE/ENV 489/469 Team BaNG Proposal
4
home to higher wind speeds and drier air. Precipitation for the area is not entirely
comparable to that of the more mountainous regions that surround it (Taylor, 2000).
The following statement was borrowed from section 1.3.2 Climate of the “Upper
Klamath Lake Drainage Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) and Water Quality
Management Plan (WQMP)”:
The mean annual precipitation for the Upper Klamath Lake subbasin is 27 inches.
The mean annual precipitation is 23 inches in the Williamson River subbasin
upstream from the confluence with the Sprague River and 20 inches in the
Sprague River subbasin. Mean annual snow accumulation ranges from 15 inches
in the valleys to more than 160 inches in the mountainous areas of the basin.
Snowfall represents 30 percent of the annual precipitation in the valleys and more
than 50 percent of the total at higher elevations.
This document was developed in May of 2002 by a team from the Oregon Department of
Environmental Quality. Recognizing that the data was observed over 10 years ago,
precipitation patterns may have changed within the decade. This is true for the last couple
of years, especially the most recent, which produced minimal precipitation.
With more than a hundred miles between the west coast and Klamath Falls, combined
with the region’s high elevation, cold temperatures are generated on any given month
throughout the year (Taylor 2000). Although this scenario is likely, it is not as common
as the dry, hot summers separate from the wet, freezing winter season. Additionally, the
storms passing through the region travel southeast from the northern part of the Pacific
Ocean (Boyd 2002).
Climate Division 7 is classified as South Central Oregon, which is defined as the mixture
of high prairie and mountain range climates. This division covers a large area of the state
and includes land that is used for agriculture. Agriculture uses encompass harvesting
crops and raising livestock. Specific to Klamath County, much of what is harvested or
raised are beef cattle, sheep, dairy herds, horses, pigs, potatoes, various hay crops, mint,
wheat, oats, barley and onions. As a result, the area is heavily irrigated (Taylor 2000).
Agency Lake Ranch, the project site, has been utilized for agricultural purposes,
primarily as cattle pasture. This plays heavily into the pollutant loading for the proposed
wetland, which is detailed later in this report. Receiving Waters’ Hydrograph The proposed wetland project site is located at Agency Lake Ranch, and the wetland’s
receiving water body is Agency Lake to its east. Provided below in Figure 2 is the
hydrograph for Agency Lake that illustrates the lake’s depth over time. Note that the
graph was produced by USGS and is current to date, but the period of record is only 10
months. The gage is located at the southeast end of the lake, which is 1.4 miles upstream
from the outlet and 2.5 miles northwest of Main Street Bridge in Klamath Falls (USGS
2014).
CE/ENV 489/469 Team BaNG Proposal
5
Figure 2: Upper Klamath Lake Hydrograph from 5/1/2013 to present
According to the general blow-n-go wetland scenerio, existing levees are removed
allowing external water sources to fill the site.Agency Lake is the essential water supply
for the proposed wetland location. As reported by ArcGIS LIDAR data, Agency Lake
Ranch is currently at an average elevation of 4139ft, and can be shown in Figure 3 on the
following page. This land subsidence is caused by a number of factors, but is primarily a
result of livestock grazing the pasture through decades of ranching.
CE/ENV 489/469 Team BaNG Proposal
6
Figure 3: Elevation of Agency Lake Ranch running parallel to Sevenmile Creek
It is safe to assume that the land will be inundated by Agency Lake fromlevee removal
during the tail end of the winter through the spring season. The depth of water within the
wetland will mainly be dictated by lake levels, subject to seasonal changes, and can vary
from less than a foot to three feet. Water depth of the wetland will also be affected by
climatic factors, so it was necessary to develop a water budget that could be considered in
design.
Generalized Water Budget
Agency Lake Ranch secures many water inputs as well as outputs, but the general water
balance is composed of precipitation, snowmelt, surface water inflow, groundwater
fluctuations, evaporation, and evapotranspiration. A water budget was developed using
actual data from the region, and resulted in a change of depth per one acre. Table 1
on the following page summarizes the data.
4136.00
4138.00
4140.00
4142.00
4144.00
4146.00
4148.00
4150.00
0.00 2000.00 4000.00 6000.00 8000.00 10000.00 12000.00
Ele
va
tio
n (
ft)
Distance Along Sevenmile Creek (ft)
Agency Lake Ranch Elevation Parallel to
Sevenmile Creek
CE/ENV 489/469 Team BaNG Proposal
7
Table 1: General water budget for Agency Lake Ranch
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
Inputs (in)
Precip (in) 2.02 1.42 1.37 1.15 1.12 0.67 0.38 0.34 0.55 0.83 1.75 2.58
SM (in) 8.1 4.2 2.2 0.2 0.1 0 0 0 0 0.3 3.2 13.4
SW (in) 6.15 5.55 6.15 5.95 6.15 5.95 6.15 6.15 5.95 6.15 5.95 6.15
GW (in) 5.36 3.31 4.28 3.12 1.95 2.31 1.29 1.11 2.16 1.75 1.87 1.90
Outputs (in)
Evap (in) 0.44 0.83 1.77 2.98 4.55 5.54 6.45 5.93 3.97 2.75 0.00 0.42
ET (in) 0.071 0.134 0.272 0.408 0.64 0.809 0.927 0.765 0.528 0.291 0.114 0.063
Change in Storage (in)
21.11 13.52 11.95 7.03 4.14 2.59 0.44 0.90 4.16 5.99 12.66 23.54
Change in Storage (ft)
1.76 1.13 1.00 0.59 0.34 0.22 0.04 0.07 0.35 0.50 1.06 1.96
Precipitation and snowmelt data were provided by the National Climatic Data Center
(NCDC), and are a summary of monthly normals from 1981 to 2010. The primary source
of surface water inflow is Sevenmile Creek, directly north of the proposed wetland. A
portion of the Wood River further north is diverged into Sevenmile before it reaches
Agency Lake Ranch, but flow data only reflects Sevenmile. It was collected from the
Oregon Water Resources Department (OWRD) who has an inactive gage located near
Fort Klamath. Although the gage is inactive, it is the most recent data available, and
Figure 4 on the following page shows that monthly flows are generally consistent. Water
rights played a significant role in the water budget, and how much flow was actually
allowed. OWRD allows Agency Lake Ranch to use approximately 0.0125cfs.
Figure 4: Sevenmile Creek flows from 1993 to 1999
Groundwater contributions are challenging to estimate, because they can either be
inflows or outflows depending on the season. Fortunately, data was available by Andy
Hamilton’s research on the Wood River Wetland for the Bureau of Land Management. In
CE/ENV 489/469 Team BaNG Proposal
8
using Andy’s data, groundwater activity at the Wood River Wetland was assumed to
reflect similar activity at Agency Lake Ranch. Groundwater activity was recorded daily
between 2006 and 2011, approximately.
Regarding outputs, evaporation data used for the water budget was pan evaporation
values collected by the Western Regional Climate Center from 1949 to 2004. The values
were converted to lake evaporation using the general equation from Gupta’s third edition
of Hydrology and Hydraulic Systems. Furthermore, these evaporation values were
factored to reflect 90% of the wetland having an open-water surface. The remaining 10%
was designated to the evapotranspiration data, which was provided by the Bureau of
Reclamation. The period of record was from 1999 to 2010. Ten percent
evapotranspiration assumes that approximately 10% of the Agency Lake Ranch wetland
will be occupied by vegetation.
Current Pollutant Loads Summary
In order to design for pollutant treatment goals, it is necessary to have a sound
understanding of what pollutants are entering the treatment wetland zone, and per state
regulations, what levels are allowed to be deposited into the receiving water body. As
previously mentioned, Agency Lake Ranch is the proposed site for a treatment wetland,
which collects water from both Wood River and Sevenmile Creek, and the outflow is
delivered to Agency Lake. There is a pollutant load associated with these water sources,
but is not comparable to the existing pollutants in the soil of Agency Lake Ranch and the
water column of Agency Lake.
According to the Upper Klamath Lake Drainage TMDL and WQMP, total phosphorus in
Upper Klamath Lake is the pollutant source that violates water quality standards for pH,
DO, and chlorophyll-a. On average annually from 1992 to 1999, “internal phosphorus
loading was approximately 61% of the total loading to the lake, while external loading
comprised 39% of the total phosphorus sources, with each having a standard deviation of
9%” (Boyd 2002). This data was gathered for a water quality monitoring program by the
Klamath Tribes, U.S. Department of the Interior, and the U.S. Geological Survey (Walker
2001). The external loads accounted for precipitation, agricultural sources, the
Williamson River, and other tributaries in addition to Wood River and Sevenmile Creek
(Kann and Walker 2001).
In addition to the pollutant load of Agency Lake, the standing pollutant load of Agency
Lake Ranch is critical for design considerations, because these pollutants may be released
into the wetland when it is inundated by Agency Lake. A similar approach to the
groundwater contributions was made toward the standing pollutant load: data was derived
from Andy Hamilton’s research. His information provided the existing pollutants in the
Wood River Wetland soil column from 2007 to 20011. The data was converted to a per
acre unit so that it could be applied to the Agency Lake Ranch soil column. Table 2 on
the following page provides the pollutants and their loads.
CE/ENV 489/469 Team BaNG Proposal
9
Table 2: Standing pollutants in Agency Lake Ranch soil column
Average Monthly Standing Pollutants in Agency Lake Ranch
(kg/acre) 2007-2011
Jan Feb
Ma
r
Ap
r
Ma
y Jun Jul
Au
g
Se
p
Oc
t
No
v Dec
TKN 141 175 219 195 149
13
1
10
5 63 49 45 69 100
TN 144 176 221 195 150
13
1
10
5 63 49 46 72 104
Ammonia 10 9 14 10 11 10 8 3 3 6 7 10
Nitrate+Nitrite 3 1 2 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 3 4
Total P 26 34 45 38 36 23 16 6 5 4 6 12
Ortho P 17 25 33 30 29 18 12 4 3 2 3 6
Water quality standards with respect to pollutant loading in Oregon water bodies are set
by the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ). “These regulations include
the Federal Clean Water Act of 1972 and its amendments Title 40 Code of Federal
Regulations 131, and Oregon’s Administrative Rules (OAR Chapter 340) and Oregon’s
Revised Statutes (ORS Chapter 468).” Each state is required to develop a Total
Maximum Daily Load, which is the maximum pollutant load that can be released into the
receiving water body without exceeding the state’s water quality standards (Boyd, 2002).
According to Oregon Administrative rules, Oregon water quality standards for pH, DO
and Chlorophyll-a are as follows:
pH:
OAR 340-41-962(2)(d): pH (hydrogen ion concentration) values shall not fall
outside the ranges identified in paragraphs (A) and (B) of this subsection. The
following exception applies: Waters impounded by dams existing on January 1,
1996, which have pHs that exceed the criteria shall not be considered in violation
of the standard if the Department determines that the exceedance would not occur
without the impoundment and that all practicable measures have been taken to
bring the pH in the impounded waters into compliance with the criteria: (A)
Freshwaters except Cascade lakes: pH values shall not fall outside the range of
6.5 – 9.0. When greater than 25 percent of ambient measurements taken between
June and September are greater than pH 8.7, and as resources are available
according to priorities set by the Department, the Department shall determine
whether the values higher than 8.7.
DO:
OAR 340-41-962 (2)(E): For water bodies identified by the Department as
providing cool-water aquatic life, the dissolved oxygen shall not be less than 6.5
mg/l as an absolute minimum. At the discretion of the Department, when the
Department determines that adequate information exists, the dissolved oxygen
shall not fall below 6.5 mg/l as a 30-day mean minimum, 5.0 mg/l as a seven-day
minimum mean, and shall not fall below 4.0 mg/l as an absolute minimum.
CE/ENV 489/469 Team BaNG Proposal
10
Chlorophyll-a: OAR 340-041-150: The following values and implementation program shall be
applied to lakes, reservoirs, estuaries and streams, except for ponds and reservoirs
less than ten acres in surface area, marshes and saline lakes: (2) (b) Nuisance
Phytoplankton Growth: Natural lakes that do not stratify, reservoirs, rivers and
estuaries: 0.015 mg/L.
It is ideal that our wetland would be used to treat existing pollutants, like total
phosphorus, in order to regulate pH, DO, and Chloraphyll-a. Total phosphorus in
particular is a challenging pollutant to treat is it can only be taken up by vegetation.
Unfortunately, a “Blow and Go” type wetland has minimal vegetation, because it is
primarily a deep open-water surface. This hinders vegetation from establishing, therefore
pollutants may not be treated to what is desired.
HABITAT AND BIOLOGY
The following section covers the habitat and biology in the Upper Klamath Basin,
including sensitive, threatened and endangered species, wetland effects on wildlife,
wetland vegetation, and habitat restoration concepts.
Wetland Habitat of Sensitive, Threatened, or Endangered Species Currently the Upper Klamath Basin is critical habitat for endangered to sensitive species.
These include: Lost River and Shortnose Sucker, Klamath Lake Bull Trout and Redband
Trout.
Aquatic Habitat in the Upper Klamath Lake and its tributaries are used different times of
the year for various life stages of endangered Lost River and Shortnose suckers. These
suckers belong to part of lake suckers that are large, long-lived, and long-maturing. They
spend most of their life in lake systems when not spawning, very few remain river
residents. Larvae suckers live only a short time within tributaries. Once in the lake they
rely heavily on near-shore areas, including emergent wetlands and non-vegetated areas as
they mature (Stillwater Sciences 2013).
Sub-adult and adult suckers need water depths of 3 feet or deeper, then move back up the
tributaries to spawn, and some even spawn in gravel substrates at the shoreline springs
along the Upper Klamath Lake (Stillwater Sciences 2013). They seek out emergent
wetland vegetation for habitat, which helps against predation, heavy currents and
turbulence, and is a large source of food for the suckers.
Bull Trout are a native to Upper Klamath Lake- they were listed in 1998 by USFWS as
threatened within the Klamath Basin. Current distribution of bull trout is only a fraction
of the historical presence of the species in the basin. Decline in habitat, isolation, loss of
migratory corridors, poor water quality, and introduction of non-native species has
disrupted most populations to extinction, Sevenmile is one of the now extinct areas for
bull trout.
CE/ENV 489/469 Team BaNG Proposal
11
Redband Trout are distinct to Jenny Creek (above a waterfall), upper Williamson and
upper Sprague rivers. A separate species from the salmon family, they have their own
distinct characteristics from other trout. They are a separated subspecies, isolated from all
other trout by physical isolation of their basins thousands of years ago. They spend most
of their life in the lake in fall, winter, and spring. In summer they travel back up the
tributaries and springs to avoid bad water quality. Effects on Wetland Wildlife Habitat
One goal of designing a FWS wetland with the Blow and Go scenario on the Agency
Lake project site should be to reduce N and P loading, while improving wildlife habitat.
Kadlec and Wallace explain that the amount of N and P processed by wetland are not
much higher than what microbes and algae would consume (2009). The amount of
nutrient loading in a wetland system is quantified by the concentration of TP (µg/L) and
NH4 –N (mg/L). These rating are listed in the Table 3 below.
Table 3: Nutrient Level Delineations (Kadlec, 2009)
Nutrient status TP NH4-N
Poor < 20 µg/L 0.2 mg/L
Moderate < 200 µg/L < 1.0 mg/L
Rich ~ 1.0 mg/L ~ 5.0 mg/L
Very rich < 5.0 mg/L < 10.0 mg/L
Ideally, for a wetland design to be effective, sufficient biomass should be available for
total nutrient uptake so that more nutrients are consumed by vegetation in the wetland
itself instead of the phytoplankton in the adjacent Agency Lake.
Ray, Hamilton, and Aquino demonstrated that the tissue nutrient concentrations and
nutrient ratios can provide information about the availability and enrichment of N and P
for a given wetland (2012). The significance of this demonstration may be useful in
identifying which nutrient, if any that is limiting productivity in the wetland. This
information may be important to where a wetland is unproductive in vegetative stands
and results in a poor habitat for fish and wildlife.
Wetlands may not only have ecological benefits for improving water quality, but may
also provide habitat for endangered fish species. It is generally understood that sucker
fish species in the Upper Klamath Lake are either in decline or have a small recruitment
rate of juveniles into adult population. Researchers believe that the lack of recruitment
can be credited to many factors. Some of the factors could include: poor water quality,
predation, disease, and loss of habitat from wetland drainage.
Studies have shown that wetland restoration may be positive impacts to habitat recovery
for the endangered fish. One study suggests that wetlands may serve as refuge for
fisheries from predatory fish. Lauren and Colin Chapman suggest that the structural
complexity wetlands, and low oxygen conditions may reduce predation (1996).
CE/ENV 489/469 Team BaNG Proposal
12
Wetland Vegetation
Emergent vegetation in the Upper Klamath Lake typically consists of Tule, hard-
stemmed bulrush, and cattail. Each takes up nutrients incorporated into the plant roots,
forming peat soils below. Each year previous year’s growth dies back and replaced by
new growth, retaining carbon and other nutrients. This is the major cycle for building
organic soils within the wetland. A great comparison to what Agency Ranch should have
in terms of vegetation is the success of obligate wetland vegetation growth at Wood River
Wetland.
Wood River Wetland Vegetation Similarly to Agency Ranch, Wood River Wetland once was a grazing pasture for cattle.
Typical drainage of the wetland removed organic wetland peat soils, which has led to
land subsidence and loss of mineral and nutrient content in soil cores (Carpenter 2009).
The plant community was once full of grazing resistant, edge, and upland plants and now
has been transformed into typical obligate wetland vegetation (Carpenter 2009).
Vegetation includes willow thickets and obligate wetland species like cattail, giant bur-
reed, and spikerush. New high nutrient loads enhance growth of many species, including
submergent vegetation like coontail, Canadian waterweed, and curly pondweed
(Carpenter 2009). Green algae blooms occur in the open water areas, along with
duckweed, and shallow ponds in summer (Carpenter 2009). The wetland fringe however
creates abundant food for bird life like diving beetles and zooplankton. Zooplankton also
becomes a food source for Lost River and Shortnose suckers.
Habitat Restoration Concepts Habitat improvement is almost equal to water treatment in the design of our project.
Improved shoreline wetland and vegetation would create habitat for fish, more so Lost
River and Shortnose sucker. Improved habitat will lead to overall better water quality as
demonstrated in the Wood River Wetland. They were able to increase habitat function
with water quality to double the capabilities of the wetland. We would like to see
something similar duplicated at Agency Ranch.
A design consideration may be a more sloped wetland. Levee removal and filling in
canals by dredged material which would lower costs off-site material removal and add
more variability and better vegetation diversity. According to Stillwater Sciences, water
treatment efficiency in wetlands typically occurs at 2-2.5ft water depth, which can
support dense growth of emergent aquatic vegetation like cattail and bulrush. They can
work double-duty to fulfill both water treatment and habitat improvement for shortnose
and Lost River sucker, given that suckers need certain water depths and vegetation cover
for survival through their lifespan.
RECOMMENDED TREATMENT WETLAND DESIGN
Our group was given the “Blow and Go” scenario for the wetland rehabilitation of Agency
Lake Ranch. We realized that a purely “Blow and Go” scenario would be severely
shortsighted and would not produce a natural wetland environment. This is due to the
fact that the water column would be too deep for emergent vegetation to be able to take
CE/ENV 489/469 Team BaNG Proposal
13
root. The group came to the consensus that implemented a mixture of both “Blow-and-
Go” and “Store-and Grow.” See Figure 4 below.
Figure 4: Overall Design
There were three major cells to be renovated, and a unique solution was proposed for
each of the three cells:
1. Northeast cell: This is the most complex of the three cells. Before we began
designing this cell we found that this cell slopes slightly downhill from North to
South using LIDAR data that was provided by Dr. Hughes.
CE/ENV 489/469 Team BaNG Proposal
14
The North-most portion of this cell is a reservoir that would be filled with the
allotted water from Sevenmile Creek in compliance with the water rights set by
the Oregon Water Resources Department. The function of the reservoir is to store
water during the spring when it is plentiful, and then be able to transfer that water
to our wetlands when needed. The extents of the reservoir is shown below. The
edges of the reservoir will be shallow (shown by tan line in figure below) to allow
emergent vegetation to grow.
A “Store-and-Grow” wetland will be implemented South of the reservoir. Water
will be drawn from two different spots on the levee, the northeast head gate is
already in place so we would only have to install one head gate. The water drawn
from the lake will be fed by gravity and built of water head, and it will be
distributed by the minor gates that will be placed along the levees to ensure the
desired water level is achieved throughout cell. This water that is treated within
these cells will then be discharged back into the lake. See Figure 5 below.
Figure 5: Northeast Cell Design
2. Southwest cell: The proposed restoration plan for this property is to strategically
place head gates in the south and west levees in order to control the flow of water
CE/ENV 489/469 Team BaNG Proposal
15
into the cell. The plan also plan to lower the levees within the cell in order to
allow water to spill over, but make sure that they remain high enough to allow
emergent vegetation to take root. The hope is that this cell will eventually regain
some of the elevation that was lost due to subsidence, and that it will eventually
take on the characteristics of the surrounding wetlands. The tentative locations of
the head gates are shown in the figure below. If there happens to be a shortage of
water in a given summer, this design will allow for the movement water from our
reservoir in the northeast cell down to this cell when needed. See Figure 6 below.
Figure 6: Southwest Cell Design
3. Southeast cell: This cell will incorporate the “Blow-and-Go” scenario. Charges
will be set the specified locations (shown in the figure below), and then we will
allow the water to fill the cell until it reaches equilibrium with the current lake
level. This will cause a large influx of chemicals into the lake due to the fact that
this cell used to be used for agricultural purposes. The plan to help mitigate the
large influx of chemical is to discharge treated water from the “Store-and-Grow”
wetlands just to the North into the northwest corner of this cell. See Figure 7 on
the following page.
CE/ENV 489/469 Team BaNG Proposal
16
Figure 7: Southeast Cell Design
The purpose of the design was to restore wildlife habitat for not only the endangered
suckers, but also for the numerous other species that benefit from wetlands in the
Klamath Basin. Additionally, we wanted to improve the quality of water by treating it in
the “Store-and-Grow” cells being implemented in the Northeast cell. This helps both the
water quality for the fish and wildlife, and works towards meeting water quality
standards.
CE/ENV 489/469 Team BaNG Proposal
17
SOURCES
Boyd, Matthew, Brian Kasper, Steve Kirk and Mike Wiltsey. 2002. Upper Klamath Lake
Drainage Total Maximum Daily Load (TMDL) and Water Quality Management
Plan (WQMP). State of Oregon Department of Environmental Quality. Accessed
February 2014.
Carpenter, K.D., Snyder, D.T., Duff, J.H., Triska, F.J., Lee, K.K., Avanzino, R.J., and
Sobieszczyk, Steven. 2009. Hydrologic and water-quality conditions during
restoration of the Wood River Wetland, upper Klamath River basin, Oregon.
2003–05: U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2009-5004, 66
p. (Available at http://pubs.usgs.gov/sir/2009/5004)
Census Bureau, United States. 2014. State and County Quick Facts. http://quickfacts.
census.gov/qfd/states/. Accessed March 3, 2014.
Chapman, Lauren J., and Colin A. Chapman. 1996. “Wetland Ecotones as Refugia for
Endangered Fishes.” Biological Conservation 78(3): 263-270. DOI:
10.1016/s0006-3207(96)00030-4
Google. 2014. Google Maps. https://maps.google.com/. Accessed March 3, 2014.
Gupta, R.S. 2008. Hydrology and Hydraulic Systems, 3rd Edition. Waveland Press, Long
Grove, Illinois. Accessed March 2014.
Hamilton, Andy. 2011. Bureau of Land Management. “Wood River Wetland Data.”
Period of record: 2006-2011. Accessed March 2014.
Kadlec, Robert H., and Scott Wallace. 2009. “Sizing of FWS Wetlands.” Treatment
Wetlands, 2nd ed. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida. 1016 pp.
Kann J. & W. W. Walker, 2001. Nutrient and Hydrological Loading to upper Klamath
Lake, Oregon, 1991-1998. Prepared for Klamath Tribes Natural Resources
Department & U.S. Bureau of Reclamation.
Klamath, County of. Klamath Map. GIS Map. Klamath County: Houston Engineering.
Online: http://klamathcounty.houstoneng.com/. Accessed March 3, 2014.
Mathew Sleep, (Assistant Professor, Oregon Institute of Technology), interview by Josh
Henry, March 10, 2014.
Nature Conservancy. 2014. In Class Presentation, February 24, 2014.
(NCDC) National Climatic Data Center of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric
Administration. 2010. 1981-2010 Normals Data Access. Monthly Normals.
Klamath Falls Station 2 SSW, OR US. Available at:
CE/ENV 489/469 Team BaNG Proposal
18
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/land-based-station-data/climate-normals/1981-2010-
normals-data.Accessed January 2014.
(OWRD) Oregon Water Resources Department. 1999. Near Real Time Hydrographic
Data. Sevenmile Creek near Fort Klamath, Station 61420303. Available at:
http://apps.wrd.state.or.us/apps/sw/hydro_near_real_time/display_hydro_graph.as
px?station_nbr=61420303. Accessed February 2014.
Ray, Andrew M., Hamilton, Andy, and Chelsea Aquino. 2012. “Using Vegetative
Nutrient Stocks to Compare Restored and Reference Wetlands in the Upper
Klamath Basin, Oregon.” Wetlands 32(5): 827-839. DOI: 10.1007/s13157-012-
0313-9
Stillwater Sciences, Jones & Trimiew Design, Atkins, Tetra Tech, Riverbend Sciences,
Aquatic Ecosystem Sciences, and NSI/Biohabitats. 2013. “Water Quality
Improvement Techniques for the Upper Klamath Basin: A Technical Workshop
and Project Conceptual Designs.” Prepared for California State Coastal
Conservancy, Oakland, California
Taylor, George. 2000. Climate of Klamath County. Oregon Climate Service. Available
at: http://www.ocs.orst.edu/county_climate/Klamath_files/Klamath.html.
Accessed February 2014.
(USDA) United States Department of Agriculture, "Web Soil Survey." Accessed March
4, 2014. http://websoilsurvey.sc.egov.usda.gov/App/HomePage.htm.
(USGS) United States Geological Survey, Digital Raster Graphics and Elevation. Map.
In Class Presentation, January 22, 2014.
(USGS) United States Geological Survey. 2014. “Upper Klamath Lake Hydrograph,
Gage 11507000.” Available at:
http://waterdata.usgs.gov/nwis/dv?referred_module=sw&site_no=11507000.
Accessed February 2014.
Walker W., William. 2001. Development of a Phosphorus TMDL for Upper Klamath
Lake, Oregon. Prepared for the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality.
Accessed February 2014.