University Charter Schools2010

APR = Accountability Progress ReportingThe primary goal of California’s Accountability Progress Reporting (APR) system is to measure and report the academic success of California’s nearly 10,000 public schools in over 1,000 school districts and local educational agencies (LEAs). The system includes three major components:

APR = API, AYP, and PI◦ API = Academic Performance Index (State)◦ AYP = Adequate Yearly Progress (Federal)◦ PI = Program Improvement (State/Federal)

Academic Performance Index◦ The API is a single number, ranging from a low

of 200 to a high of 1000, that reflects a school’s, an LEA’s, or a subgroup’s performance level, based on the results of statewide testing. Its purpose is to measure the academic performance and growth of schools.

◦ The API was established by the PSAA, a landmark state law passed in 1999 that created a new academic accountability system for K-12 public education in California.

AYP is required under Title I of the federal ESEA. States commit to the goals of ESEA by participating in Title I, a program under ESEA that provides funding to help educate low-income children. The primary goal of Title I is for all students to be proficient in ELA and mathematics, as determined by state assessments, by 2014.

Title I Schools, LEAs, and the state must meet

all AYP criteria in order to meet federal ESEA accountability requirements. Currently, the consequences of not meeting AYP criteria apply only to those schools and LEAs that receive federal Title I, Part A, funds. Schools and LEAs that receive Title I, Part A, funds face ESEA PI requirements if they do not meet AYP criteria.

P.I. PI is a formal designation for Title I-funded

schools and LEAs. A Title I school or LEA is identified for PI if it does not meet AYP criteria for two consecutive years in specific areas. If a school or an LEA is designated PI, it must provide certain types of required services and/or interventions during each year it is identified as PI. A school or an LEA is eligible to exit PI if it makes AYP for two consecutive years.

How are schools identified for Program Improvement?

For each of two consecutive years,A Title One SchoolDoes not meet Adequate Yearly

Progress

Once identified as PI…

Meet AYP=

Maintain

1. Did at least 95% of students participate?

2. Did enough students score proficient?

3. Did the school meet the target for Academic Performance Index (API)?

Once identified as PI…

Meet AYP two consecutive years=

Exit

Once identified as PI…

Fail to meet AYP=

Advance

View your School’s Report: www.cde.ca.gov“Testing & Accountability”

UPS and UCMS AYP Targets UPS and UCMS API AMO’s not met for AYP Reasons for PI Plan of Action

1. Did at least 95% of students participate? YES.

2. Did enough students score proficient? NO.

3. Did the school meet the target for Academic Performance Index (API)? YES.

1. Did at least 95% of students participate? YES.

1. Did at least 95% of students participate? YES.

3.Did the school meet the target for Academic Performance Index (API)? YES.

2009-10: 680 2010-11: 710

APR Booklet

2010 Information Guide, p. 25

ScoresGroup 2003

Scores2004

Scores2005

Scores2006

Scores2007

Scores2008

Scores2009

Scores2010 APIScores

School-wide 717 736 761 786 770 757 790 773Socio-economicallyDisadvantaged

628 643 664 671 646 628 669 658

English Learners 550 571 590 616 616 565 659 618

White 841 850 872 905 857 841 891 880

Hispanic/Latino 635 656 672 699 718 688 727 719

UCMS APIGroup

2007 Scores

2008 Scores

2009 Scores

2010 API Scores

School wide 781 760 758 759SocioeconomicallyDisadvantaged

704 692 699 654

English Learner

N/A N/A 637 N/A

Hispanic/Latino

725 714 703 709

White N/A N/A N/A 850

2. Did enough students score proficient? NO.

2009-10: 56.8% 2010-11: 67.6%

APR Booklet

2010 Information Guide, p. 25

2009-10: 58% 2010-11: 68.5%

APR Booklet

2010 Information Guide, p. 25

UPS – ◦15 of 21 AYP Criteria

UCMS - ◦11 of 17 AYP Criteria

UPS

“Choice for All”“Choice for All”

“Additional Support for Some”“Additional Support for Some”

Notify parents of PI identification Notify parents of “choice” and SES 10% of school’s Title I for Professional

Development 20% of LEA’s Title I held for SES &

Transportation 5% of LEA’s Title I towards HQT

What Does SES Mean?

• Supplemental Educational Services

• Additional academic instruction: tutoring, remediation, small classes

• Notification is sent to parents of “eligible” students

• Enlist community partners to notify

• Must be offered outside the school day (before school, after school, intersession, Saturday school, summer)

Offered only to students who are “low income.”

To avoid running out of SES funds:1. Prioritize student socio-economic and

academic status.2. Determine priority serving lowest

achieving, low-income students at all grade levels first

Consider using same priority system with providers having limited service capacity.

Begin SES Continued analysis of subgroup

performance and gaps in achievement levels

Set-aside for professional development Intervention Specialist Safe Harbor Focus along with school-wide

improvement Acquisition of new intervention materials

Continue to… Notify parents of PI identification Notify parents of school choice and

SES options Hold 20% of LEA’s Title I for Transportation Hold 5% of LEA’s Title I towards HQT 10% of school’s Title I for PD NOT required

Corrective Action: Provide, for all relevant staff, appropriate, scientifically research-based professional development that is likely to improve academic achievement of low-performing students.

Ventura County Office of Education support Re-assessment of school plan Continued analysis of subgroup performance

and gaps in achievement levels

Continued SES Continued analysis of subgroup performance

and gaps in achievement levels Set-aside for professional development Learning Center Safe Harbor Focus along with school-wide

improvement Acquisition of new intervention materials

WHAT NEXT? Meet % Proficient Targets

Safe Harbor

If… The school, LEA, or subgroup had at least a 95%

participation rate on assessments. The school, LEA, or subgroup met API criteria.

And… The percentage of students in the school, LEA,

or subgroup performing below the proficient level decreased by at least 10 percent of that percentage from the preceding school year.

Then…

Then… AMO targets are considered achieved, and AYP criteria are met.

Grade SubjectNumber Tested

Percent of

Students Not Prof.

# of Students Not Prof

10% of Not Prof

Students to move

to Proficient

2 ELA 65 67 43.55 4.36 ≈4

2 Math 65 59 38.35 3.84 4

3 ELA 66 61 40.26 4.03 ≈4

3 Math 67 37 24.79 2.48 3

4 ELA 78 33 25.74 2.57 3

4 Math 79 37 29.23 2.92 3

UPS Safe Harbor Strategy

UPS – PI Year 4? UCMS – PI Year 5?

Will all schools in the U.S. meet the AYP Percent Proficient Targets of 100% by 2014?

The Future is unknown for federal legislation◦ (re-authorization of NCLB???)

Questions?