Post on 18-Dec-2015
Acceleration of particles with lasers at RAL
Peter A Norreys
Physics Group LeaderCentral Laser Facility
CCLRC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
visiting Professor of Physics,Imperial College London.
Ele
ctro
n E
ne
rgy
World's First Observation of Mono-energetic Electrons from a Laser Plasma Accelerator
• Laser Plasma Accelerators have 1,000 higher electric field than conventional accelerators
• Implies kilometer’s to centimeters reduction in size for same electron energy - attractive
• To date have always produced broad range of energies which severely limited application
• Quasi Mono-energetic electrons up to 100 MeV produced for the first time at RAL
• Astra “Gemini” may increase this to the GeV level
• Experiments performed on the Astra ultra-high power laser system in the CLF
• Major success for the RCUK Basic Technology Programme
IC / RAL / Strathclyde / UCLA collaboration
Mangales et alNature, 431 , 535 (2004)
Astra Target Area 2
Outline
• Introduction to the ASTRA laser facility
• Basic concepts for electron acceleration
• Laser wakefield acceleration
• Beam pointing
• Photon acceleration in laser wakefield accelerators
• Scaling to multi-GeV energies - Astra Gemini laser at RAL
• Physics group modelling team in the CLF
15 TW = 1.5 1013 W
Power = Energy = 0.6 J = 1.51013 W
pulse duration 40 fs
To maximise the intensity on target, the beam must be focused to a small spot.
The focal spot diameter is 20 m and is focused with an f/17 off-axis parabolic
mirror
Intensity = Power = 1.5 x 1018 W cm-2
Focused area
Laser characteristics
Astra
diffraction gratings
Astra laser
• Single Beam Titanium Sapphire laser system• 10 TW optical pulse at 10Hz / 25TW at 1Hz• Operates to 2 target areas • Experiments in Laser-Plasma Physics
• A single electron in an intense infinite plane polarised laser field exhibits a figure of eight motion due to the vxB term in the Lorentz force F = -e(E+vxB)
• At relativistic intensities, electrons are accelerated in the direction of the propagation direction k twice every laser cycle.
• The kinetic energy the electron acquires is roughly proportional to the ponderomotive potential energy Up
Electron motion in an intense laser field
k
E
B
1016 Wcm-2 1018 Wcm-2 1021 Wcm-2
Up 1 keV 0.4 MeV 14 MeV
Intensity on target
kT~E ( )mc I / . keVosc Wcm
1 511 1 137 12
10
12
18 2
• Perturbing ‘object’ passes through a medium which is displaced from equilibrium
• The medium then returns creating oscillations
• Areas of high and low electron density create extreme electric fields
High intensity laser pulse
Laser wakefield acceleration
Gas Jet
Electron density
OSIRIS simulations
Electron density plot at 3.1ps
0 200 400
0
100
200
300
x1
x2
-0.125 -0.100 -0.075 -0.050 -0.025Phasespace_x2x1
Electron acceleration
Laser pulseWakefield
Projection of electron density
Electroninjection
Plasma electrons are trapped and accelerated by the laser’s wakefield
Collaboration between CCLRC, IST Lisbon, University of Strathclyde Glasgow,UCLA, and Imperial College London
Measured electron spectra
a) ne= 1.6 x 1019 cm-3
b) ne= 1.8 x 1019 cm-3
c) ne= 3 x 1019 cm-3
d) ne = 5 x 1019 cm-3
at E = 350 mJ, t = 40 fsec.
Mono-energetic spikes in the spectra observed
Analysis
3
202
ped
cL
~600μm
~600μm
Two independent measurements of the plasma length
When the density is such that the dephasing length,
is shorter than the plasma, the monoenergetic features are lost
Measured electron spectrum using a 500 mJ laser pulse at a density of 2 1019 cm-3.
The energy spread is ± 3%.
(1) Self-focusing of laser: electrons first appear
(2) Wavebreaking first occurs
(3) More breaking occurs - multiple bunches
(4) Dephasing causes smoothing of the spectrum
Mono-energetic electron beams observed
Plasma density: 2.1 x 1019 cm-3
• Fritzler et al., measured the emittance of an electron beam from a laser wakefield accelerator (with a ‘thermal’ distribution) using the pepperpot technique and radiochromic film as the diagnostic.
• The normalised emittance is defined as the rms correlation between the space (x) and reduced momentum (x’) coordinates of all beam electrons in the (x,x’) 2D phase space
x’ = px/pz is the electron angle wrt laser axis.
• (x,x’) phase space plot is a measure of the divergence of the electron beam as a function of position across the beam.
• At 55 MeV electron energy, measurements of the normalised emittance were 2.7 (0.9) mm mrad.
S.Fritzler et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 92 165006 (2004)
222 '', xxxxnrmsx
Good beam properties measured at LOA in France
According to Wei Lu and Warren Mori (UCLA) the theoretical energy gain E is
provided that the laser focal width is matched to the bubble size.
This indicates that the maximum energy gain is simply proportional to the laser power (within the dephasing limit)
Should scale to multi-GeV energies
Courtesy of Prof L.O.Silva, IST, Lisbon
3D simulations of laser wakefield accelerators
2
00
2
pk
kaCmcE
3D explicit PIC simulations using OSIRIS typically take 1 week to run on a 256 node cluster with 2GB memory per node.
2D simulations are needed for parameter scans. They take 12 - 24 hours to run on 32-node clusters
Proof of principle: towards a super compact proton accelerator
Basic set-up (top view)
Target:3-25 µm Al
Proton/ion beam
CPALaser
• Large accelerating fields exist throughout the target
• Hydrocarbon surface contaminants provide the protons for acceleration on both front and rear surface.
• Acceleration takes place over 10’s of µm (E~1012 V/m)(Standard accelerators E~106 V/m, typical scale 10’s of metres)
Proton/ion beam
A.P.Fews, P.A.Norreys et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 73,1801 (1994)
E.L.Clark, K.Krushelnick et al.,Phys. Rev. Lett. 84, 670 (2000)
James Green
Alex RobinsonRaoul TrinesPeter Hakel
Kate Lancaster
The Physics Group, Central Laser Facility
Christopher Murphy took the photo!
Dr Mark Sherlock has also joined us and Prof Roger Evans has arrived as a consultant
Summary
• The first observations of mono-energetic electron beams from laser wakefield accelerators has been made using the ASTRA laser facilities at RAL.
• These beams have excited wide interest because of the huge accelerating electric fields generated (> GeV m-1).
• There is much to do - pointing stability of the beam, shot to shot energy fluctuation, scaling with laser power.
• Theory indicates that the energy gain is proportional to the laser power - multi-GeV energies may be possible on ASTRA-GEMINI. Scaling to 10 PW, it is possible that energies of interest to HEP science can be generated - needs experimental validation on the Vulcan 10 PW capability.
• There also have been a number of proposed applications for these beams such as for injectors into subsequent conventional acceleration stages, new light sources, probing of dense plasmas and for inertial fusion energy.
• S. P. D. Mangles, C.D.Murphy, Z. Najmudin,
A. G. R. Thomas, J. L. Collier, A. E. Dangor, E. J. Divall, P.S. Foster, J.G. Gallacher, C. J. Hooker, D.A. Jaroszynski, A. J. Langley, W. B. Mori, R. Viskup, B. R. Walton,
and K. Krushelnick
• CLF laser, target area and engineering staff.
• RCUK, EPSRC & CCLRC
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The mono energetic electron acceleration work described here was performed as part of the RC
UK Basic Technology alpha-X grant
Long-Wavelength Hosing Instability in a Self-Injected Laser-Wakefield Accelerator
M. C. Kaluza, S. P. D. Mangles, A. G. R. Thomas, C. D. Murphy, Z. Najmudin, A. E. Dangor, K. M. Krushelnick
Plasma Physics Group, Imperial College London
J. L. Collier , E. J. Divall, K. Ertel, P. S. Foster, C. Hooker, A. J. Langley, D. Neely, J. Smith
CCLRC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Photon acceleration
x – ct (m)
Final photondistribution Initial photon
distribution
Wakefield
Sca
led
elec
tron
den
sity
Photon frequency (rad/s)
Image taken from simulations using a dedicated wave-kinetic code
The laser’s photons are accelerated by the laser’s own wakefield!
Photon spectra
• Asymmetric redshift/blueshift qualitatively reproduced
• Numerical shifts too big; caused by use of 1-D plasma model
• Large blueshift because scaled wakefield amplitude exceeds 1
• No blueshift of the spectrum as a whole
• Rise and fall of blueshift with increasing density explained from wakefield behaviour.
C.D.Murphy, R.Trines et al., Phys. Plasmas, March 2006