div class=trans-pagebuttonPage 1button div class=trans-image amp-img class=trans-thumb alt=Page 1: 580 CC In short the Applicants argue that that decision referred to as the Nkandla decision concluded that remedial actions by the Public Protector are binding and should be implemented src=https:reader034fdocumentsusreader034viewer20220423155f0361437e708231d408ed62html5thumbnails1jpg width=142 height=106 layout=responsive amp-img divdivdiv class=trans-pagebuttonPage 2button div class=trans-image amp-img class=trans-thumb alt=Page 2: 580 CC In short the Applicants argue that that decision referred to as the Nkandla decision concluded that remedial actions by the Public Protector are binding and should be implemented src=https:reader034fdocumentsusreader034viewer20220423155f0361437e708231d408ed62html5thumbnails2jpg width=142 height=106 layout=responsive amp-img divdivdiv class=trans-pagebuttonPage 3button div class=trans-image amp-img class=trans-thumb alt=Page 3: 580 CC In short the Applicants argue that that decision referred to as the Nkandla decision concluded that remedial actions by the Public Protector are binding and should be implemented src=https:reader034fdocumentsusreader034viewer20220423155f0361437e708231d408ed62html5thumbnails3jpg width=142 height=106 layout=responsive amp-img divdivdiv class=trans-pagebuttonPage 4button div class=trans-image amp-img class=trans-thumb alt=Page 4: 580 CC In short the Applicants argue that that decision referred to as the Nkandla decision concluded that remedial actions by the Public Protector are binding and should be implemented src=https:reader034fdocumentsusreader034viewer20220423155f0361437e708231d408ed62html5thumbnails4jpg width=142 height=106 layout=responsive amp-img divdivdiv class=trans-pagebuttonPage 5button div class=trans-image amp-img class=trans-thumb alt=Page 5: 580 CC In short the Applicants argue that that decision referred to as the Nkandla decision concluded that remedial actions by the Public Protector...