5. Yahoo! Inc. v. La Ligue Contre le Racisme, 433 F.3d 1199, 1203 (9th Cir. 2006).6. Adam D. Thierer, “Web Restrictions Unlikely to Muzzle Neo-Nazi Speech,” Cato Insti-

tute Web Site (Jan 15, 2001) (available at link #102).7. Available at link #103. John Borland, “BroadcastersWin Battle Against iCraveTV.com,”

CNET NEWS, Jan. 28, 2000, available at link #104.8.Michael Geist, “Is There a There There? Towards Greater Certainty for Internet Jurisdic-

tion,” Berkeley Technology Law Journal 16 (2001): 1345.9. Yahoo! Inc. v. La Ligue Contre le Racisme, 433 F.3d 1199 (9th Cir. 2006).10. Reidenberg points out that the translation of the French ruling offered to the District

Court in the United States was flawed. Joel R. Reidenberg, “Technology and Internet Jurisdic-tion,” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 153 (2005): 1951, 1959.

11. Yahoo! Inc. v. La Ligue Contre le Racisme, 433 F.3d 1199, 1203 (9th Cir. 2006).12. Jack Goldsmith and Timothy Wu,Who Controls the Internet: Illusions of a Borderless

World (2006), 41.13. There has been a rich, and sometimes unnecessary, debate about whether indeed

cyberspace is a “place.” I continue to believe the term is useful, and I am confirmed at leastpartly by Dan Hunter,“Cyberspace as Place and the Tragedy of the Digital Anti-commons,”Cal-ifornia Law Review 91 (2003): 439.Michael Madison adds a valuable point about what the placemetaphor misses in Michael J. Madison, “Rights of Access and the Shape of the Internet,”Boston College Law Review 44 (2003): 433. Lemley too adds an important perspective. See“Place and Cyberspace,”California Law Review 91 (2003): 521.

14. See Restatement (Third) of Foreign Relations Law (1986), 402(2) and comment (e).15. Child Sexual Abuse Prevention Act, 18 USC 2423(b) (1994). See Margaret A. Healy,

“Prosecuting Child Sex Tourists at Home: Do Laws in Sweden, Australia, and the United StatesSafeguard the Rights of Children as Mandated by International Law?,” Fordham InternationalLaw Journal 18 (1995): 1852, 1902–12.

16. Castronova, Synthetic Worlds (2005), 7.17. See Bill Grantham, “America the Menace: France’s Feud With Hollywood,”World

Policy Journal 15, 2 (Summer 1998): 58; Chip Walker, “Can TV Save the Planet?,” AmericanDemographics (May 1996): 42.

18. See, for example, David R. Johnson and David Post,“Law and Borders: The Rise of Lawin Cyberspace,” Stanford Law Review 48 (1996): 1379–80.

19. Jack Goldsmith and Timothy Wu,Who Controls the Internet. See Jack L. Goldsmith,“Against Cyberanarchy,”University of Chicago Law Review 65 (1998): 1199; Jack L. Goldsmith,“The Internet and the Abiding Significance of Territorial Sovereignty,” Indiana Journal of GlobalLegal Studies 5 (1998): 475; see also David Johnston, Sunny Handa, and Charles Morgan,Cyber-law: What You Need to Know About Doing Business Online (Toronto: Stoddart, 1997), ch. 10.Allan R. Stein (“The Unexceptional Problem of Jurisdiction in Cyberspace,”The InternationalLawyer 32 [1998]: 1167) argues that the jurisdictional problems in cyberspace are like thosefound in real-space international law.

20. See Jessica Litman,“The Exclusive Right to Read,”Cardozo Arts and Entertainment LawJournal 13 (1994): 29.

21. Ibid.22. See John Perry Barlow, “A Declaration of the Independence of Cyberspace” (1996),

available at link #105.23. See Communications Decency Act, PL 104-104, 110 Stat. 56 (1996).24. Yochai Benkler, “Net Regulation: Taking Stock and Looking Forward,” University of

Colorado Law Review 71 (2000): 1203, 1206–07 (15 in 101; 23 in 102; 34 in 103; 66 in 104; 275in 105; 348 for first session of 106).

25. Ibid., 1203, 1232, 1234, 1237.

notes to chapter fifteen 391

0465039146-RM 12/5/06 12:31 AM Page 391