Post on 16-Jan-2016
4 E’s for Early MobilityPat Posa RN, BSN, MSA, FAANSystem Performance Improvement LeaderSt. Joseph Mercy HospitalAnn Arbor MI
CUSP 4 MVP – VAPImproving Care for Mechanically Ventilated Patients
2 CUSP 4 MVP – VAP: Improving Care for Mechanically Ventilated Patients Principles for Tests of Change
Early Mobility Implementation – Importance of Nurse-led Mobilization
• Goal for Early ICU Mobility– Nursing led– Physician driven– Therapist supported and guided
• Activity prescription or activity/ADL prescription
Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality
2
3 CUSP 4 MVP – VAP: Improving Care for Mechanically Ventilated Patients Principles for Tests of Change
Importance of Nurse-led Mobilization
• Most ICU nurses know why Early Mobility in the ICU is critically important
• Need to do root cause analysis of barriers and address each through education, training, policies, equipment, communication
• Barriers found upon Beaumont survey:– Safety is a high concern– Risk of injury to patient and self– Accurately dosing mobility, choosing equipment,
and communicating
3
4 CUSP 4 MVP – VAP: Improving Care for Mechanically Ventilated Patients Principles for Tests of Change
Translating Evidence into Practice (Johns Hopkins model)
5 CUSP 4 MVP – VAP: Improving Care for Mechanically Ventilated Patients Principles for Tests of Change
Problems Associated withCritical Illness
• When deconditioning and muscle weakness occur the course becomes complicated, the stay in the ICU is prolonged, and mortality increases
• Risk developing ICU-associated weakness due to polyneuropathy, myopathy, or a combination of both
• The cumulative effect of the complications are functional limitations that might or might not resolve.
6 CUSP 4 MVP – VAP: Improving Care for Mechanically Ventilated Patients Principles for Tests of Change
Potential body/structure effects of critical illness
Nordon-Craft A, Moss M, Quan D, Schenkman M: Intensive care unit-acquired weakness: Implication for physical therapist management. Phys Ther. 2012;
92:1494-1506.
7 CUSP 4 MVP – VAP: Improving Care for Mechanically Ventilated Patients Principles for Tests of Change
Herridge, MS et al. NEJM 348: 8, 2003
Long-Term Effects of Neuromuscular Disease
8 CUSP 4 MVP – VAP: Improving Care for Mechanically Ventilated Patients Principles for Tests of Change
“The complications experienced by ICU
survivors include: Deterioration of strength, physical abilities, and
psychological abilities. The persistence of symptoms such as reduced ability to
perform activities of daily living, reduced capacity for ambulation, depression, posttraumatic stress syndrome, and anxiety contributes to an adverse effect on the individual’s quality of life and long-term survival.
‘Post–intensive care syndrome’ (PICS) is the preferred designation for this constellation of complications that endure well past the stay in the ICU.”Bemis-Dougherty AR, Smith JM. What follows survival of critical illness? Physical therapists’
management of patients with post–intensive care syndrome. Phys Ther. 2013;93:179–185.
9 CUSP 4 MVP – VAP: Improving Care for Mechanically Ventilated Patients Principles for Tests of Change
Early Mobilization Protocol in Mechanically Ventilated Patients
Schweickert et al, Lancet 2009;373:1874-82
10 CUSP 4 MVP – VAP: Improving Care for Mechanically Ventilated Patients Principles for Tests of ChangeSchweickert et al, Lancet 2009;373:1874-82
11 CUSP 4 MVP – VAP: Improving Care for Mechanically Ventilated Patients Principles for Tests of Change
Better outcomes
Schweickert et al, Lancet 2009;373:1874-82
12 CUSP 4 MVP – VAP: Improving Care for Mechanically Ventilated Patients Principles for Tests of Change
Summary
• Early PT and OT, paired with Wake Up and Breathe SAT/SBT protocol is…
• Safe and well-tolerated.
• Resulted in…– 24% improvement (1.7-fold better) return to
independent functional status at discharge (NNT=4)
– 50% reduction in the duration of delirium
Schweickert et al, Lancet 2009;373:1874-82
13 CUSP 4 MVP – VAP: Improving Care for Mechanically Ventilated Patients Principles for Tests of Change
Translating Evidence into Practice (Johns Hopkins model)
Walk your current process—ID the
defects at each step
14 CUSP 4 MVP – VAP: Improving Care for Mechanically Ventilated Patients Principles for Tests of Change
What Are Your Barriers?
14Needham and Korpolu, Top Stroke Rehabil 2010;17(4):271–281
15 CUSP 4 MVP – VAP: Improving Care for Mechanically Ventilated Patients Principles for Tests of Change
4E’s Early Mobility Frontline Staff Early Mobility
Engage
Adaptive
Ask, how will Early Mobility make the world a better place?-Help staff understand preventable harm-Share stories about patients affected-Develop a business care-Include execute champion/physician leadership
-Define evidence related to preventing VAEs (short and long term cognitive affects, and physical/psychological disabilities)-Share success stories, videos, or explore the IRN website during CUSP 4 MVP-VAP mtgs-Plan a site visit with experienced units/facilities-Create business case related to the impact of early mobility, including increased time off the ventilator, decreased hospital LOS and decreased ICU LOS-Share business case with executive champion/ physician leadership
Educate
Technical
What do we need to mobilize critically ill patients?-Convert evidence into behaviors-Evaluate awareness and agreement
-Discuss Post-Intensive Care Syndrome (PICS)-Review the literature-develop mobility criteria and progressive mobility protocol/guideline-Define your education plan (utilizing workshops, hands-on trainings, conferences, slides, presentations and interactive discussions via multiple modalities to cater to different learning styles)-Identify support through outreach to the leadership team
Execute
Adaptive
How will we implement early mobility at our hospital give local culture and resources?-Listen to resisters-Standardize care and create independent checks-Make it easy to do the right thing-Learn from mistakes
-What is the process for mobilizing a patient?-Is there a policy on the unit?-Who should be involved?-Do we have all the equipment?-Discuss as part of interdisciplinary rounds/daily goals-Learn from defects
Evaluate
Technical
How will we know that our efforts to mobilize our patients made a difference?-Define measures-Regularly assess measures-Provide feedback to staff and celebrate success
-Collect Early Mobility Daily Rounding measures and review at CUSP 4 MVP-VAP meetings-Use CECity to trend performance
16 CUSP 4 MVP – VAP: Improving Care for Mechanically Ventilated Patients Principles for Tests of Change
Educate / Engage at all Opportunities
• CUSP meetings / Executive meetings– Have therapy (PT/OT/Speech) as a member
• Group (Staff) meetings q6 weeks• Board meetings (huddles)• Email (pictures only please)• Newsletter• Bulletin Boards/Bathroom• 1:1 (opportunity to talk with staff while collecting data)
16
17 CUSP 4 MVP – VAP: Improving Care for Mechanically Ventilated Patients Principles for Tests of Change
Engage All Staff
17
• Communication tools• Sitters/Observers• Clinical Technicians/
Nursing Assistants– Ambulate– Turn– ROM– Document
• Ancillary Personnel
18 CUSP 4 MVP – VAP: Improving Care for Mechanically Ventilated Patients Principles for Tests of Change
Engage - Family Resources
18
19 CUSP 4 MVP – VAP: Improving Care for Mechanically Ventilated Patients Principles for Tests of Change
EducateTurn evidence into behaviors
• Define/Approve Mobilization readiness criteria• Develop early/progressive mobility
protocol/guideline
Question: Our unit has protocol for early exercise and progressive mobility for ALL patients
Question: Immobile patients on our unit receive passive range of motion regularly, if tolerated.
20 CUSP 4 MVP – VAP: Improving Care for Mechanically Ventilated Patients Principles for Tests of Change
Medical Readiness Assessment
Armstrong Institute for Patient Safety and Quality 20
21 CUSP 4 MVP – VAP: Improving Care for Mechanically Ventilated Patients Principles for Tests of Change
Readiness Assessment: Other Considerations
• Patient factors– Sedation level – Breathing support for EM
intervention– Femoral Lines– ECMO (Extracorporeal Membrane
Oxygenation)– Presence of lines, drains, catheters
• Other factors– The right equipment– Sufficient staffing / multidisciplinary
focus
21
Recent Publication:Expert Consensus and
Recommendations on safety criteria for active mobilizationCritical Care (2014) 18:658
22 CUSP 4 MVP – VAP: Improving Care for Mechanically Ventilated Patients Principles for Tests of Change
St. Joseph Mercy HospitalAdapted from AACN
23 CUSP 4 MVP – VAP: Improving Care for Mechanically Ventilated Patients Principles for Tests of Change
Early Mobility Protocols
24 CUSP 4 MVP – VAP: Improving Care for Mechanically Ventilated Patients Principles for Tests of Change
Early Mobility Protocols
Stand at bedside
with assistance
Absolute Exclusion Criteria Presence of:
*Consult Respiratory Therapy prior to Levels 3-5 or Level 2 if using lift for ET tube stability or new trach less than 24 hours old.
*Consider ambulating in hallway after Level 5
Relative Exclusion - Discuss with provider if presence of:FiO2 ≥ 60%PEEP ≥ 10RR ≥ 35O2 Sat <85%Femoral line
>1 VasopressorVasopressor rateUnstable arrhythmiaHR > 15090 < SBP > 200
PROGRESSIVE PATIENT MOBILITYThis is a guideline to facilitate and standardize mobility for all patients. Please ensure appropriate activity orders are
obtained. Using excellent communication between all members of the healthcare team will promote success.
*in bed or lift to chair
Mobility Progression Levels 1-5
Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5
All patients at all levels are repositioned every 2 hours with PROM
Chair Position up to 20 minutes
3x/d
Active transfer OOB to chair.
Minimum 20 min/d
Dangle edge of
bed
Can they lift head from
pillow & arms against gravity?
Active Resistance
with PT
Can they move legs
against gravity?
Perform Level 1 mobility.
andInvestigate underlying
causes of exclusion with continuous re-
evaluation.
Yes
yes
no
Begin Mobility Progression at Level 1. Evaluate tolerance using Exclusion
Criteria at each level.
no
RASS -2 to +1
Consider Sedation Vacation per unit
guideline if appropriate and Re-evaluate in 6-8
hrs.
no
IABPCRRTNeuromuscular BlockadeBalanced Skeletal Taction
EVD open to drainUncontrolled ICPAcute phase TBI, ICH, SAH, per neurosurg
yes
Re-evaluate in 24 hrs
24
25 CUSP 4 MVP – VAP: Improving Care for Mechanically Ventilated Patients Principles for Tests of Change
Executemake it easy to do the right thing
•What is the process for mobilizing a patient?•Is there a policy on the unit?•Who should be involved?•Do we have all the equipment?•Discuss as part of interdisciplinary rounds/daily goals
Question: Mobility is addressed during daily rounds.
Added Mobility level to report sheet and nursing handoff
26 CUSP 4 MVP – VAP: Improving Care for Mechanically Ventilated Patients Principles for Tests of Change26
St. Joseph Mercy HospitalAdapted from AACN
27 CUSP 4 MVP – VAP: Improving Care for Mechanically Ventilated Patients Principles for Tests of Change
Evaluate
•Collect Early Mobility Daily Rounding measures and review at CUSP 4 MVP-VAP meetings– We identified that we had no documentation standard
related to mobility. We corrected that, which made our data collection easier.
•Use CECity to trend performance
28 CUSP 4 MVP – VAP: Improving Care for Mechanically Ventilated Patients Principles for Tests of Change
29 CUSP 4 MVP – VAP: Improving Care for Mechanically Ventilated Patients Principles for Tests of Change
30 CUSP 4 MVP – VAP: Improving Care for Mechanically Ventilated Patients Principles for Tests of Change