3D and NLTE analysis for large stellar surveys Karin Lind Uppsala University, Sweden Martin Asplund,...

Post on 15-Jan-2016

220 views 0 download

Tags:

Transcript of 3D and NLTE analysis for large stellar surveys Karin Lind Uppsala University, Sweden Martin Asplund,...

3D and NLTE analysis for large stellar surveys

Karin LindUppsala University, Sweden

Martin Asplund, Paul Barklem, Andrey Belyaev, Maria Bergemann, Remo Collet, Zazralt Magic, Anna Marino, Jorge Meléndez, Yeisson Osorio

Outline

- Introduction- 1D LTE/NLTE

- Worst-case scenarios- Recent progress- Calibration techniques- Practical implementation- Applications

- 3D LTE/NLTE- Worst-case scenarios- Observational tests- Mg : 1D/<3D>/LTE/NLTE- Ca : 1D/<3D>/3D/LTE/NLTE - Applications

Motivation

Galactic archaeology by chemical tagging of FGK stars

- Statistics : Soon > 106 stars

- Precision (S/N, wavelength range) : σ[X/H] < 0.1dex, σTeff<150K, σlog(g)<0.3dex

- Accuracy (assumptions: 1D, LTE, atomic data) : σ [X/H]< 0.5 dex, σTeff<400K, σlog(g)< 1 dex

Methods

Model atmosphere Detailed rad. Transfer1D/<3D>/3D LTE 1D/3D LTE/NLTE

R. Collet

NLTE line formation

(1D)

Is it really necessary?

Is it safe?

N-

Worst-case scenario I

NaD lines in metal-poor horisontal branch stars Lind et al. 2011, Marino et al. 2011

B-I

Worst-case scenario II

OI 777nm triplet at very low metallicities

Fabbian et al. 2009

LTE trend

Input data for NLTE analysis

Energy levels + oscillator strengths + photo-ionization cross sectionsRed boxes : have sufficient(?) data

Blue boxes : missing e.g. QM photo-ionisation, but NLTE still attempted

Input data for NLTE analysis

Blue boxes : QM hydrogen collisions exist or will exist

Input data for NLTE analysis

Solar neighborhood MDF Halo MDF [X/Fe] vs [Fe/H]

Most important free parameter in NLTEmodelling of Fe is FeI+HI collisional cross-section

Black – LTE Blue – NLTE with no hydrogen collisions

Calibration techniques: ionisation balance

Korn et al. 2003

FeI/FeII ionisation equilibrium calibrated using Hipparcos gravities

S(H)=3

Calibration techniques: excitation balance

Bergemann & Gehren 2008

“Thus, NLTE can solve the discrepancy between the abundances derived from the MnI resonance triplet at 403 nm and excited lines, which is found in analyses of metal-poor subdwarfs and subgiants”

S(H)=0.05

Calibration techniques: CLV

Allende Prieto et al. (2004)Solar centre-to-limb variation of OI lines

Practical implementation I

“Curves-of-growth” from UV-NIR:

3200 FeI lines107 FeII lines

ΔNLTE

Teff=6500Klog(g)=4.0ξ=2km/s

Lind et al. (2012)

Practical implementation II

Pre-computed departure coefficients NLTE synthesis

T. Nordlander

FeI NLTE grid

Lind et al. (2012)

Application : metal-poor stars

Ruchti et al. (2012)

LTE NLTE+PHOT

Application : metal-poor stars

LTE NLTE+PHOT

Serenelli et al. (2013)

3D (LTE/NLTE)

Is it really necessary?

Is it safe?

Stagger grid

Magic et al. 2014

Abundance patterns

3D

N-LTE

Keller et al. (2014)

Dashed –200 Msun PISNSolid – 60Msun fallback

Worst-case scenario III

Li isotopic abundances

Asplund et al. 2006Lind et al. 2013

3DN-LTE

Observational tests: the Sun

Pereira et al. 2013

“We confronted the models with observational diagnostics of the [solar] temperature profile: continuum centre-to-limb variations (CLVs), absolute continuum fluxes, and the wings of hydrogen lines. We also tested the 3D models for the intensity distribution of the granulation and spectral line shapes. ”

“We conclude that the 3D hydrodynamical model is superior to any of the tested 1D models.”

Observational tests: low [Fe/H]

Klevas et al. 2013

FeI line assymmetriesin the metal-poor giant HD122563

1.5/3D + NLTE

LiI : Asplund et al. 2003, Sbordone et al. 2010

OI, FeI : Shchukina et al. 2005

OI : Pereira et al. 2010, Prakapavičius et al. 2013

LiI, NaI, CaI : Lind et al. 2013

Ways forward

Model LTE/NLTE Time Performance

1D LTE Seconds

1D NLTE Minutes (seconds using interpolation)

3D LTE Hours

3D NLTE Days The ultimate goal, reference point

<3D> LTE Seconds

<3D> NLTE Minutes (seconds using interpolation)

Mg b in a VMP SG

1D LTE1D NLTE<3D> LTE<3D> NLTE

HD140283

Teff=5780Klog(g)=3.7[Fe/H]=-2.4

“No” free parameters!

Yeisson Osorio

Ca in a VMP dwarf

LTE NLTE1D<3D> 3D

HD19445Teff=6000Klog(g)=4.5[Fe/H]=-2.0

Ca in a VMP dwarf

LTE NLTE1D<3D> 3D

HD19445Teff=6000Klog(g)=4.5[Fe/H]=-2.0

Start ? Goal

Bullets: Optical CaI linesSquares: NIR CaII triplet

Ca in a EMP TO

G64-12Teff=6430Klog(g)=4.0[Fe/H]=-3.0

Start ? Goal

Bullets: Optical CaI linesSquares: NIR CaII triplet

Ca in a EMP TO

Start ? Goal

Bullets: Optical CaI linesSquares: NIR CaII triplet

Ca in a EMP TO

Start ? Goal

Bullets: Optical CaI linesSquares: NIR CaII triplet

Ca in a EMP TO

Start ? Goal

Bullets: Optical CaI linesSquares: NIR CaII triplet

Ca in a EMP TO

Ways forward

Model LTE/NLTE Time Performance

1D LTE Seconds Varied

1D NLTE Minutes (seconds using interpolation)

Improves for ANo change for B

3D LTE Hours May worsen for AImproves for B

3D NLTE Days The ultimate goal, reference point

<3D> LTE Seconds May worsen for AImproves for B

<3D> NLTE Minutes (seconds using interpolation)

Improves for AImproves for B

A : NLTE-sensitive, B : not NLTE-sensitive