13 functional calibration (nov 2014)

Post on 11-Jul-2015

212 views 0 download

Tags:

Transcript of 13 functional calibration (nov 2014)

Functional Calibration

Richard Baker

Professor of Clinical Gait Analysis

Blog: wwRichard.net

1

Model Calibration

Scaling the model to fit the person we are

measuring

2

Kinematic fitting

(Inverse kinematics, Global optimisation)

Fitting a model to the marker trajectories

captured during the movement being

analysed.

3

Kinematic fitting4

Calibration

• Where are the joint

centres?

• Where are the joint

axes?

• Where are the

markers?

5

Static calibration – hip

Assume

• hip joint centres can be estimated from position of pelvic markers.

6

Static calibration - knee7

Assume

• knee joint centres is half-way between condyles

• line between condyles defines femur coronal plane

Static calibration - ankle8

Assume

• anklle joint centres is half-way between malleoli

• line between malleioli defines tibia coronal plane

Static calibration - foot9

Assume

• long axis is parallel ot the floor

• long axis is parallel to line from heel to tip of second ray

Problems - Hip1

0

Bell AL, et al. (1990). Journal of Biomechanics 23:617-621Davis R et al. (1991). Hum. Movemt Sci. 10:575-587.Leardini A et al. (1999). Journal of Biomechanics 32:99-103

Problems - Knee1

1

Functional calibration

Use data from movement trials to calibrate

the model

12

Hip calibration1

3

Hip calibration1

4

Knee calibration1

5

Knee calibration1

6

Functional calibration

• Growing number of different mathematical

techniques to determine joint centres and

axes.

17

Does it work?

18

19

Errors in mm (with standard deviations)

Compared to RSA Functional Bell Davis

Anterior-posterior 3.8 (6.1) -2.5 (5.9) -11.6 (16.7)

Medio-lateral -2.1 (3.7) 5.3 (9.7) 16.5 (10.2)

Proximal-distal 2.5 (5.9) -18.7 (8.2) 8.2 (9.7)

Total 11.8 (4.1) 23.2 (10.3) 29.1 (7.6)

Wrong regression equations?2

0

3d- ultrasound2

1

Sangeux, M., A. Peters, and R. Baker, Hip joint centre localization: Evaluation on normal subjects in the

context of gait analysis. Gait Posture, 2011. 34(3): p. 324-8.

PiG HAR Geometrical Algebraic CTT SCoRE Kylie

Sphere Transformational

REGRESSION LOCAL GLOBAL

Hip validation – 19 adults

PiG HAR Geometrical Algebraic CTT SCoRE Kylie

Sphere Transformational

REGRESSION LOCAL GLOBAL

Hip validation – 19 adults

In healthy adults functional calibration performs about as well as Harrison’s regression equations

Hip validation – 46 Children with CP

REGRESSION

In children with CP Harrington’s regression equations outperform functional calibration

Knee calibration

• Much bigger problem?

• Much more difficult to find gold standard

• Informal data suggests that skilled marker

placers can be reasonably accurate

(particularly using medial knee markers).

• Functional calibration is at least as

repeatable as they are.

• Should be independent of experience?

25

Summary

• Functional calibration of hip does not

appear to offer much over the correct

regression equations.

• Functional calibration of knee should be

more repeatable for most marker placers.

26

Practicalities

• None of the manufacturers have

implemented easy to use software for

functional calibration.

27

Thanks for listening

Richard Baker

Professor of Clinical Gait Analysis

Blog: wwRichard.net

28