12 Common Missteps Resulting from Decentralized HazMat Programs

Post on 22-Mar-2017

141 views 0 download

Transcript of 12 Common Missteps Resulting from Decentralized HazMat Programs

12 Common Missteps Resulting

from Decentralized HazMat

Programs

Meet Your Moderator

During This Webinar All lines will be muted – please communicate

via the questions pane in your webinar panel.

There will be a Q&A session at the end of the

presentation – submit your question(s) anytime

throughout the webinar.

Stick around to learn about in-person training

opportunities being offered.

The presentation will be emailed to you

tomorrow.

Meet Your Presenter

Doug Graham, CHMM

Sr. EH&S Consultant &

External Training Manager

dgraham@triumvirate.com

Over 23 years training hazmat shippers.

Objective

Learn from the common missteps

often encountered with decentralized

hazmat programs to help ensure you

have a compliant hazardous materials

shipping program.

Hazardous materials transportation compliance issues can cast a wide net

across an organization and impact many people and departments. It’s not

unusual for compliance in this area be de-centralized and not fall completely

under an EH&S department’s or manager’s responsibility.

Compliance goes well beyond the shipping of chemical and biological wastes.

12 Common Missteps

1. Not understanding the regulatory differences between modes (air, hwy, water, rail)

2. Offering electronics, batteries, devices, and instruments mistakenly as non-hazardous

3. Improperly preparing packages for return to suppliers

4. Assuming the competency and MSDS/SDS reliability of original suppliers

12 Common Missteps

5. Not controlling access to shipping accounts to only trained employees

6. Inadvertently creating inspection and enforcement triggers

7. Increasing regulatory burden and liability by shipping by air when not necessary

8. Improperly preparing hazardous materials for self-transport or hiring of untrained couriers to move hazardous materials

12 Common Missteps

9. Not obtaining the correct software, pre-approval and/or contract to ship hazmats

10. Not determining “competency” of hazmat employees

11. Not training receivers in issues related to proper identification and emergency response

12. Not having administrative control over the hazardous materials program (security, registration, inspection

preparedness, recordkeeping, reporting, etc.)

1. Not understanding the

regulatory differences

between modes

Oh No!

I’ve been shipping these infectious patient specimens on

dry ice with a courier for years and never had to do

anything special.

Then I sent it FedEx and it got rejected and the sample was

ruined!!

“I didn’t know FedEx used air

regulations”

Employees must understand the

applicability of modal-specific regulations.

One of the most common mistakes is not

realizing that FedEx Express requires all

hazmat shipments, even domestic

shipments, to be prepared in accordance

with the International Air Transport

Association (IATA) Dangerous Goods

Regulations.

UPS Domestic air: 49 CFR

FedEx Express: IATA

International: IATA

Int’l Water: IMDG

Domestic Water: 49 CFR

Ground: 49 CFR

“I didn’t know FedEx used air

regulations”

2. Offering electronics,

batteries, devices, and

instruments mistakenly

as non-hazardous

FAA is at the front desk

because I shipped a

colleague a spare battery for

his laptop yesterday. . . . .

I was supposed to ship it

Cargo Air Only and follow all

these IATA (what!?) rules!

And we might get fined

what!!??

Do Employees Know

These are Regulated!

• Lithium batteries, packed alone, with,

or installed in equipment

• Magnets

• Instruments with compressed gas

chambers (e.g., shock absorbers)

• Flame ionization detectors (air

monitoring device with hydrogen fuel

cell and lithium battery power supply).

• Electron tubes

3. Improperly preparing

packages for return to

suppliers

Returns

Too often, shipping/receiving personnel believe that returning

hazardous materials shipments involve nothing more that re-offering

it in the original packaging with the original markings and labels.

These employees who have not been trained as “hazmat shippers”

may try to wing it and try to figure out how to get it out the door and

back to the supplier.

Returns

Potential problems:

• Shipped ground, then returned air- requirements

are vastly different;

• Not recognizing incoming shipments prepared

under exceptions as hazardous, then attempting

to return as non-hazardous;

• Incoming shipment improperly prepared, return

mimics errors of original shipper.

4. Assuming the

competency and MSDS/SDS

reliability of original

suppliers

“Floyd’s Industrial Use Miracle Glue”… contains

xylene, methyl ethyl ketone, toluene and acetone…

keep away from flames and heat... highly flammable…

yada, yada, yada…

Oh here! Transportation: not regulated

for transport…

Cool!

OK, the boss wants this in Cleveland

by tomorrow 4 pm…

Relying on Transportation Sec. of

MSDS/SDS

Although a transportation section is common on

MSDSs and is now a standard section of a GHS-

compliant SDS (Sec. 14), the information is not

mandatory and it may not be accurate. Shippers

are expected to have the tools to spot errors.

Too often, it’s taken on faith that the information is

accurate and employers don’t think of “QC-ing”

this information.

Relying on Transportation Sec. of

MSDS/SDS

Looking at the constituents, properties, and

usage of the article or substance and then going

through the classification, packing group

assignment, and shipping name selection

process is the manner in which it should be

approached.

Although oftentimes accurate, Sec. 14 can be a

dangerous short-cut.

5. Not controlling access to

shipping accounts to only

trained employees

What do you mean “what do you

mean is it hazardous?”

No? as in… it’s not hazardous?

Or…

No, as in… you don’t really know

what that means but… you just

really want me to take it?

Not Having a Gatekeeper

Unrestricted access to shipping accounts,

especially air shipping (e.g., FedEx Express

Service, international, and UPS Air) is a recipe for

disaster.

Without well-trained employees acting to screen

shipments, or a central trained gatekeeper to

funnel all shipments through, undeclared

hazardous materials shipments may be offered

for transport.

Less obvious hazmats, like lithium batteries,

magnets, GMOs, gas-containing articles, and dry

ice are the most likely offenders.

6. Inadvertently creating

inspection and enforcement

triggers

And this nice man from the FAA wouldn’t be here today speaking

with us if you followed the Excepted Quantities Provision that

doesn’t require a Dangerous Goods Declaration… you know,

the one with the red candy stripes…

LIKE WE TALKED ABOUT, PATTY!

Staying Under the Radar Whenever

Possible

The most frequent hazardous materials

shipping-related inspections at shipper

sites are those performed by FAA.

Random inspections based upon FAA

selecting Dangerous Goods

Declarations at UPS or FedEx locations

are the most common trigger.

Staying Under the Radar Whenever

Possible

Avoid the Declaration through

the use of exceptions

whenever possible (Excepted

Quantities- IATA Sec. 2.6),

and the risk of an FAA

inspection is greatly reduced.

7. Increasing regulatory

burden and liability by

shipping by air when

not necessary

No, no, not at all.

I know you don’t need the

chemicals until Thursday, but

we’ll overnight them just as an

added bonus!

That’s just what we call SUPER

SERVICE!

For SUPER CUSTOMERS like

you!

Ship By Ground, Not By Air,

Whenever Possible

The level of scrutiny, the chance of rejection, and the higher

penalties for non-compliance associated with air shipments are

all strong incentives to keep hazmat shipments on the ground.

8. Improperly preparing

hazardous materials for

self-transport or hiring of

untrained couriers to move

hazardous materials

We’ll take my car?...

I got gas… you drove

last time… then we’ll

hit a Mickey-D’s?

Self-Transport, Local Couriers-

Common Mistakes

Self transport to support the

principal business is the most

common “Materials of Trade”

(MOT) definition. The MOT

exception is commonly used and

offers great advantages in reducing

the regulatory requirements.

There are common mistakes,

however…

Self-Transport, Local Couriers-

Common Mistakes

1. The Materials of Trade exception (49

CFR 173.6) does have requirements and

restrictions, and does contain a training

requirement;

2. Third party transport, like hiring local

courier services does not fall under the

MOT exception (interp letter 06-0115);

3. The use of personal vehicles can create

personal liabilities

9. Not obtaining the correct

software, pre-approval

and/or contract to

ship hazmats.

Examples

FedEx Express requires that Shipper’s Declarations for

dangerous goods shipments be prepared using approved

software with compliance edit checks.

FedEx Express and United Parcel Service require that all

shipments of lithium metal batteries UN3090 (all sizes) require

pre-approval.

In order to ship hazardous materials/dangerous goods with

United Parcel Service, you must enter into an Agreement.

10. Not determining

competency of hazmat

employees

Son, we’ve sent you to your first and only offsite training, you have zero

experience, and little or no working knowledge of the regulations…

congratulations, you’re our new Hazmat Shipping Department

NOW GO GET ‘EM, TIGER!!

Training is Step One

With such lengthy and complicated regulations as the 49 CFR

and the IATA DGR, initial training should be viewed as the first

step in a process of becoming qualified and competent;

It’s the employer’s responsibility to determine competency since

they are ultimately responsible for ensuring shipments go out

compliantly;

Learning-by-doing under the direction of an experienced hazmat

shipper for a period of time prior to being allowed to prepare

shipments independently is the best approach.

11. Not training receivers in

issues such as proper

hazard identification and

emergency response

Right there yonder, that’s where

Shipping/Receiving used to be… before

the “incident”, that is.

“Limited quantity” is what they called it-

had a black and white diamond on it with

no words… sounds nasty, don’t it!

Yes, Receivers are “Hazmat Employees”

Actions taken by receivers may impact transportation safety.

Key issues for them to understand:

• How to identify incoming hazardous materials, especially-

- those with exception markings (not obvious to an trained eye)

- salvage containers (containing leaking or damaged contents)

- temperature sensitive materials (organic peroxides and self-reactives

- Radioactives

How to initiate an emergency response if materials released in the

vehicle, outside, or on the loading dock.

12. Not having administrative control

over the hazardous materials

program (security, registration,

inspection preparedness,

recordkeeping, reporting, etc.)

Doesn’t Corporate

do that?

Administrative Issues

Some hazmat shipping compliance issues are

not strictly related to the preparation of a

shipment, but are administrative in nature and

require a person or department to often take

ownership.

Key issues: • Annual registration

• Written security planning

• Recordkeeping

• Points of contact for inspections

• Special permits

Conclusion

Final ThoughtsAn EH&S Director/Manager is well advised to either manage or

facilitate the management of a hazardous materials program

and look into the many activities and compliance areas

impacting a facility beyond the shipping of wastes.

Do it proactively so you don’t get drawn into

problems you weren’t prepared to deal with.

Thank You for

Attending!Interested in DOT Hazardous Materials Training? Visit:

http://www.triumvirate.com/training/open-enrollment-

training/dot-hazardous-materials-training Call Us!1-888-834-9697www.triumvirate.com

Doug Graham:

dgraham@triumvirate.com

Contact: