Post on 28-Mar-2015
10.06.2011
Nino AbzianidzePhD. Student
E-Mail: nineza_abzianidze@hotmail.comTelefon: +41 (0) 44 634 501Adresse: Affolternstrasse 56, 8050 Zurich, Switzerland Internet: http://www.nccr-democracy.uzh.ch
“Perception of Abkhaz as Enemy by Georgian Print Media in
1991-93”
Table of contents
I. Introduction
I.II Aim of the research
I.III Research Question and Hypothesis
I.IV Methodology
II. Theoretical Framework
III. Case study
IV.I Identification of perceptions of Abkhaz by Georgian media in 1991-93
IV. II Uncertainty of the enemy image – stable or unsteady?
iV. Conclusions
210.06.2011
10.06.2011 3
Introduction
Why Abkhaz?
• Problem of Abkhazia still significant • Returning land factor of people
Why perceptions?
• Crucial role of a well-defined image of the enemy• Georgians vs. ???
Why medi
a?
• Perceptions may vary according to the different layers of society
• Print media as one of the social groups
10.06.2011 4
Aim of the Research
Identify how Abkhaz were perceived by the Georgian print media in
1991-93
How well-defined was perception of
the enemy image?
At what extent did the enemy image imply
Abkhaz?Was the
perception of the enemy image affected by the
government changes?
10.06.2011
Research Questions and Hypothesis
How well-defined were perceptions of Abkhaz as enemy by the Georgian print media in 1991-93?
- Abkhaz as an ethnic group
- Abkhaz as separatists
Did the government change affect perception of Abkhaz as the enemy?
Perception of the enemy by Georgian print media was not well defined i.e. was uncertain. Though, Abkhaz people were not perceived as enemy
Despite the change of governments, uncertainty of the enemy image was maintained. Though, the state of war could have affected certain aspects of perceptions.
5
10.06.2011 6
Research Period
• 1991-1993
– Divided into three time periods
• Gamsakhurdia period – June-December, 1991• Military/State Council period – January-Sept., 1992• Shevardnadze period – October-September, 1993
Division made according to the government changes
10.06.2011 7
Methodology The Case Study – “Literary Georgia” – sample of 122 articles
Arguments:• Tribune of writers, scholars and
other public figures
Published more analytical than news-based articles.
• As a result of government change in 1991-92 editorial stuff was changed ( editorial stuffs supported existing Gov.)
Definitions:• Articles for analyzes –
articles, which concern issue of Abkhazia, including those, which concern the issue at the smallest extent
• Analytical articles – articles, which along with the facts contain assessments and analyzes on a certain issue.
• Data – citations of certain parts of relative articles.
10.06.2011 8
Theoretical Framework
• Postulates of the CONSTRUCTIVIST approach and the IMAGE THEORY
• combined in the book “Face of the Foe” (2010) by Kjeld Hald Galster.
– Twofold dimension of the enemy image
– Problem of uncertainty over the enemy image
10.06.2011 9
Theoretical Framework
Enemy Image
Tangible component Intangible component
Intelligence Deep-rooted pers.
Abkhaz as separatists Abkhaz as ethnic group
Uncertainty about the enemy
Multi-faceted enemy
10.06.2011 10
1st part – Identification of the perception of Abkhaz by Georgian print media
Two steps of observation
• Abkhaz as ethnic group
• Abkhaz as political separatists
• Did the perception of Abkhaz depict clear picture of the ENEMY?
10.06.2011 11
1st part – Identification of the perception of Abkhaz by Georgian print media
Abkhaz as ethnic group
• „Genuine Christian Abkhaz of Georgian origins“
• „Islamist Absua came from North Caucasus in XVI and XVII centuries“
Citation for Evidence:
“In order to restore historical justice I think it is necessary to restore
ancient name of Georgian inhabitants of Abkhazia and to
call them Georgian Abkhaz. And those, whom we call Abkhaz
today, should be called Absua
Abkhaz.”(Sulakauri, 1993. “We should call Georgian
Abkhaz and Absua Abkhaz”, April 2, p. 3)
10.06.2011 12
1st part – Identification of the perception of Abkhaz by Georgian print media
Abkhaz as political separatists
• „Separatists“ – political elite, not the Abkhazian people
• „Abkhaz political elite – provocateur of separatist sentiments among Abkhaz people“
• Abkhaz people – „Brothers“ and „Friends“
Citation for Evidence:
Unfortunately, we have to say that some politicians with no ability of
foresight still push diligent and high moral Abkhaz man to
confront Georgians”.(Tasoev, 1992, “Tomorrow could be late!
March 8, p. 10)
10.06.2011 13
1st part – Identification of the perception of Abkhaz by Georgian print media
Ethnic Group
Abkhaz
VS.
Absua
Separatists
Ordinary people
VS.
Political elite
10.06.2011 14
1st part – Identification of the perception of Abkhaz by Georgian print media
Multi-faceted
image of the enemy
Enemy #1 – “Absua
Separatists”
Enemy #2 - Former President and his
supporters
Enemy #3 – Confederation of
Mountainous People
Enemy #4 - Russia
10.06.2011 15
2nd part – Uncertainty of the enemy image – stable or unsteady?
Step 1
Content analyze of the last articles of each period
enemy image in the conflict remained uncertain along the whole research period
Step 2
Trends of slight change in perceptions
Previously
“Abkhaz politicians” and “Absua separatists”
After
“Abkhaz man” and “Abkhaz” tend to become part of the enemy image
10.06.2011 16
Conclusion
– Hypothesis proved• By combination results of
observing “Abkhaz as ethnic group” and “Abkhaz as separatists” and adding to this all the components that enemy image implied, a picture of multifaceted enemy, which does not include “indigenous Abkhaz people” is obvious.
– Hypothesis proved• Government change did
not affect major trends of perceptions of Abkhaz by the print media, i.e. multi-faceted enemy image remained uncertain. The state of war definitely caused some trends of slight change, which contributed to the uncertain and multifaceted enemy image once more.
Part 1 Part 2
10.06.2011 17
Perspective for PhD project
Aim:– Generalizing research
– Extending time and scope of the research
– Adding comparative component
10.06.2011 18
Perspective for PhD project
Shaping Political Identities through Mass Media in Post-War SettingsA Comparative Study of the Caucasus and the Western Balkans
– Cases of Georgia and Bosnia-Herzegovina
10.06.2011 19
Perspective for PhD project
Focus on representation not the perception
Proposed RQ:
– Do media contribute to the reconciliation of the warring parties in the post-war environment?
10.06.2011 20
Perspective for PhD project
Case of Georgia
• Focus on war periods – 1991-1996/2006-2011
• Abkhaz + South Ossetians
• More representative media
10.06.2011 21
Perspective for PhD project
Proposed methodology:
– Content Analyzes
– Quantitative approach
– Survey
10.06.2011 22
Questions
– Is this rough picture of the PhD project on the right track?
– What would be your suggestions concerning methodology?
– What would be your suggestions for further steps?
10.06.2011 23
Thank you!