Post on 18-Jan-2016
1
VT
2
Ontology
Barry Smith
3
Aristotle
author of The Categories
Aristotle
4
From Species to Genera
canary
animal
bird
5
Species Genera as Tree
canary
animal
bird fish
ostrich
6
Species-genusgenus trees can be represented also as map-like partitions
7
From Species to Genera
canary
animal
bird
8
From Species to Genera
animal
bird
canarycanary
9
Species Genera as Tree
canary
animal
bird fish
ostrich
10
Species-Genera as Map/Partition
animal
bird
canary
ostrich
fish
canary
11
If Aristotelian realism is right,
then such partitions are transparent to the reality beyond
12
Tree and Map/Partition
13
Alberti’s Grid
c.1450
14
Coarse-grained Partition
15
Fine-Grained Partition
16
Scientific theories
comprehend in their underlying category systems veridical partitions of reality
often there are many veridical partitions of reality,
cross-cutting each other,
differing only in nuances)
17
What is a gene?
GDB: a gene is a DNA fragment that can be transcribed and translated into a protein
Genbank: a gene is a DNA region of biological interest with a name and that carries a genetic trait or phenotype
(from Schulze-Kremer)
GO does not tell us which of these is correct, or indeed whether either is correct, and it does not tell us how to integrate data from the corresponding sources
18
Question:
what other sorts of partitions have this feature of transparency?
the partitions of common sense (folk biology, folk physics, folk psychology ...)
Answer:
19
Aristotle
the ontologist of common-sense reality
Aristotle
20
The world we grasp in natural language
= the world as apprehended via that conceptualization we call common sense
= the normal environment (the niche) shared by children and adults in everyday perceiving and acting
21
The world of mothers, milk, and mice ...
22
The Empty Mask (Magritte)
mama
mouse
milk
Mount Washington
23
our common-sense partition of the world of common sense is transparent
(common sense, like science, is [mostly*] true)
mothers exist ...
* “mostly” because of the problem of vagueness
24
Problem of vagueness solved
by recognizing that our categories apply to reality in such a way as to respect an opposition
... between standard or focal or prototypical instances
... and non-standard or ‘fringe’ instances
25
birds
ostrich
Natural categories have borderline cases
sparrow
26
... they have a kernel/penumbra structure
kernel of focal
instances
penumbra of borderline cases
27
animal
bird
canary
ostrich
fish
every cell in every common-sense partition is subject to this same kernel-penumbra structure:
28
What is common-sense reality?
the mesoscopic space of everyday human action and perception
– a space centered on objects organized into hierarchies of species and genera
... and subject to prototypicality
29
but more:
30
in addition to objects (substances),
which pertain to what a thing is at all times at which it exists:
cow man rock planet
31
the common-sense world contains also accidents
which pertain to how a thing is at some time at which it exists:
red hot suntanned spinning
32
An accident
= what holds of a substance per accidens
33
quid? substance quantum? quantity quale? qualityad quid? relationubi? placequando? timein quo situ? status/contextin quo habitu? habitusquid agit? actionquid patitur? passion
Nine Accidental Categories
34
= relations of inherence(one-sided existential dependence)
John
hunger
Substances are the bearers of accidents
35
Both substances and accidents
instantiate universals at higher and lower levels of generality
36
siamese
mammal
cat
organism
substancespecies, genera
animal
instances
frog
37
Common nouns
pekinese
mammal
cat
organism
substance
animal
common nouns
proper names
38
siamese
mammal
cat
organism
substancetypes
animal
tokens
frog
39
Our clarification
accidents to be divided into
two large and essential distinct families of
QUALITIES
and
PROCESSES
40
There are universals
both among substances (man, mammal)
and among qualities (hot, red)
and among processes (run, movement)
There are universals also among spatial regions (triangle, room, cockpit)
and among spatio-temporal regions (orbit)
41
Substance universals
pertain to what a thing is at all times at which it exists:
cow man rock planetVW Golf
42
Quality universals
pertain to how a thing is at some time at which it exists:
red hot suntanned spinningClintophobic Eurosceptic
43
Process universals
reflect invariants in the spatiotemporal world taken as an atemporal whole
football match
course of disease
exercise of function
(course of) therapy
44
Processes and qualities, too, instantiate genera and species
Thus process and quality universals form trees
45
Accidents: Species and instances
quality
color
red
scarlet
R232, G54, B24
this individual accident of redness (this token redness – here, now)
46
substance
one substantial categoryJohn, man
nine accidental categorieshunger, your hunger, being hungryyour sun-tanyour being taller than Mary
accidents
47
substance
place (in the Lyceum)
time (yesterday)
position (is sitting)
possession (has shoes on)
action (cuts)
passion (is cut)
quantity (two feet long)
quality (white)
relation (taller than)
John
accidents
48
substance
Substances are the bearers of accidents
accidentsBearers
49
substance
Substances are the bearers of accidents
accidents
John = relations of inherence(one-sided existential dependence)
Bearers
hunger
50
s
substance
51
Substance + Accident = State of Affairs
setting into relief
States of Affair
s
52
instances
Prototypicality among instances too
albino frogalbino frog
53
Aristotle 1.0
an ontology recognizing:substance tokensaccident tokenssubstance typesaccident types
54
Is everything in common-sense reality either a substance or an accident?
55
well, what about artefacts ?
56
Standard Aristotelian theory of artefacts:
artefacts are mereological sums of substances
57
Positive and negative parts
positivepart
negativepartor hole
(made of matter)
(not made of matter)
58
quid? substance quantum? quantity quale? qualityad quid? relationubi? placequando? timein quo situ? status/contextin quo habitu? habitusquid agit? actionquid patitur? passion
Nine Accidental Categories
59
Places
For Aristotle the place of a substance is the interior boundary of the surrounding body
(for example the interior boundary of the surrounding water where it meets a fish’s skin)
60
What is missing from Aristotle?
Gibson: affordancesniches
Barker: behavior settings
61
Places are holes
62
niches, environments are holes
63
The metaphysics of holes
64
Aristotle 1.5
an ontology ofsubstances + accidents+ holes (and other entities not made of matter)+ fiat and bona fide boundaries+ artefacts and environments
is true
65
folk biology
Aristotelian folk biology, folk physics, folk psychology, etc., are true of the common-sense world as it currently exists
(they have nothing to offer regarding its pre-history, its long term evolution, its position in the cosmos)
66
reference vs. theory
They have not much to offer, either, by way of good explanatory theories of the entities in their respective domains,
but they are transparent to those domainsnonetheless
67
reference realism vs. theory realism
this distinction applied not only to science (against T. S. Kuhn et al.) but also to common sense (against sceptics of various stripes)
the sun exists, and has existed for a long time – the very same object
68
Both scientific partitions and common-sense partitions
are based on reference-systems which have survived rigorous empirical tests
69
The $64000 Question
How do those parts and dimensions of reality which we call the common-sense world
... relate to those parts and dimensions of reality which are studied by science?
70
Aristotle 2000
71
Universe/Periodic Table
animal
bird
canary
ostrich
fishfolk biology
partition of DNA space
72
Universe/Periodic Table
animal
bird
canary
ostrich
fish
both are transparent partitions of one and the same reality
73
many transparent partitions
at different levels of granularity
will operate with species-genus hierarchies
and with an ontology of substances (objects) and accidents (attributes, processes)
along the lines described by Aristotle
74
relative hylomorphism
substances and accidents reappear in the microscopic and macroscopic worlds of e.g. molecular biology and astronomy
(Aristotelian ontological zooming)
75
we do not assert
that every level of granularity is structured in substance-accident form -- perhaps there are pure process levels, perhaps there are levels structured as fields
76
Perspectivalism
PerspectivalismDifferent partitions may represent cuts through the same reality which are skew to each other
77
An organism is a totality of molecules
An organism is a totality of cells
An organism is a single unitary substance
... all of these express veridical partitions
An organism is a totality of atoms
78
all express partitions which are transparent,
at different levels of granularity,
to the same reality beyond
79
Coarse-grained Partition
what happens when a fringe instance arises ?
80
Coarse-grained Partition
what happens when a fringe instance arises ?
Aristotle 1.0: you shrug your shoulders
81
Aristotle 2000:you go out to find a finer grained partition which will recognize the phenomenon in question as prototypical
82
The advance of science
is not an advance away from Aristotle towards something better.
Provided Aristotle is interpreted aright, it is a rigorous demonstration of the correctness of his ontological approach
83
IFOMIS
Institute for Formal Ontology and Medical Information Science
Faculty of Medicine
University of Leipzig
http://ifomis.de
84
The Idea
Computational medical research
will transform the discipline of medicine
… but only if communication problems can be solved
85
Medicine
desperately needs to find a way
to enable the huge amounts of data
resulting from trials by different groups
to be (f)used together
86
How resolve incompatibilities?
Ganze Industrie von ‘Ontologien’ in der heutigen Informationswissenschaft
“ONTOLOGY” = the solution of first resort (compare: kicking a television set)
But what does ‘ontology’ mean?Current most popular answer: a hierarchy of concepts (a thesaurus, a list of terms)
87
First ontology
(from Porphyry’s Commentary on Aristotle’s Categories)
88
Linnaean Ontology
89
Medical Diagnostic Ontology
90
Example: The Gene Ontology (GO)
hormone ; GO:0005179
%digestive hormone ; GO:0046659 %peptide hormone ; GO:0005180 %adrenocorticotropin ; GO:0017043 %glycopeptide hormone ; GO:0005181 %follicle-stimulating hormone ; GO:0016913
91
as tree
hormone
digestive hormone peptide hormone
adrenocorticotropin glycopeptide hormone
follicle-stimulating hormone
92
Gene Ontology
Cellular Component Ontology: subcellular structures, locations, and macromolecular complexes;examples: nucleus, telomere
Molecular Function Ontology: tasks performed by individual gene products; examples: transcription factor, DNA helicase
Biological Process Ontology: broad biological goals accomplished by ordered assemblies of molecular functions; examples: mitosis, purine metabolism
93
Problem: There exist multiple databases
genomic cellular
structural phenotypic
… and even for each specific type of information, e.g. DNA sequence data, there exist several databases of different scope and organisation
94
What is a gene?
GDB: a gene is a DNA fragment that can be transcribed and translated into a protein
Genbank: a gene is a DNA region of biological interest with a name and that carries a genetic trait or phenotype
GO does not tell us which of these is correct, or indeed whether either is correct, and it does not tell us how to integrate data from the corresponding sources
95
Reference Ontology
An ontology is a theory of a domain of entities in the world
Ontology is outside the computer
seeks maximal expressiveness and adequacy to reality
and sacrifices computational tractability for the sake of representational adequacy
96
Methodology
Get ontology right first
(realism; descriptive adequacy; rather powerful logic);
solve tractability problems later
97
The Reference Ontology Community
IFOMIS (Leipzig) Laboratories for Applied Ontology (Trento/Rome,
Turin)Foundational Ontology Project (Leeds)Ontology Works (Baltimore)BORO Program (London)Ontek Corporation (Buffalo/Leeds)LandC (Belgium/Philadelphia)
98
Recall:
GDB: a gene is a DNA fragment that can be transcribed and translated into a protein
Genbank: a gene is a DNA region of biological interest with a name and that carries a genetic trait or phenotype
99
Ontology
Note that terms like ‘fragment’, ‘region’, ‘name’, ‘carry’, ‘trait’, ‘type’
… along with terms like ‘part’, ‘whole’, ‘function’, ‘substance’, ‘inhere’ …
are ontological terms in the sense of traditional (philosophical) ontology
100
Three types of reference ontology
1. formal ontology = framework for definition of the highly general concepts – such as object, event, part – employed in every domain
2. domain ontology, a top-level theory with a few highly general concepts from a particular domain, such as genetics or medicine
3. terminology-based ontology, a very large theory embracing many concepts and inter-concept relations
101
MedO
including sub-ontologies:
cell ontology
drug ontology
protein ontology
gene ontology
102
and sub-ontologies:
anatomical ontology
epidemiological ontology
disease ontology
therapy ontology
pathology ontology
the whole designed to give structure to the medical domain
(currently medical education comparable to stamp-collecting)
103
If sub-domains like these
cell ontology
drug ontology
protein ontology
gene ontology
are to be knitted together within a single theory,
then we need also a theory of granularity