1 SMART ANTENNAS FOR THIRD GENERATION TDMA (EDGE) Jack H. Winters AT&T Labs - Research Red Bank, NJ...

Post on 18-Dec-2015

215 views 0 download

Transcript of 1 SMART ANTENNAS FOR THIRD GENERATION TDMA (EDGE) Jack H. Winters AT&T Labs - Research Red Bank, NJ...

1

SMART ANTENNAS FOR THIRD GENERATION TDMA (EDGE)

Jack H. Winters

AT&T Labs - Research

Red Bank, NJ 07701-7033

jhw@research.att.com

October 3, 2000

2

OUTLINE

• Smart Antenna Overview

• 2G System Applications

• 3G System Applications:– EDGE– MIMO-EDGE– OFDM-MIMO-EDGE

• Conclusions

3

WIRELESS SYSTEM IMPAIRMENTSWireless communication systems are limited in performance and capacity by:

Delay Spread CoChannel

Interference

Rayleigh Fading

Limited Spectrum

4

SMART ANTENNAS

Today: Cellular systems with sectorization (120°) handoffs between sectors

For higher performance Narrower sectors Too many handoffs

Smart Antenna definition: Multibeam antenna or adaptive array without handoffs between beams

f1

f2

f3

f4

f5

f6

5

Smart Antennas

Smart Antennas can significantly improve the performance of wireless systems

• Higher antenna gain / diversity gain Range extension and multipath mitigation

• Interference suppression Quality and capacity improvement

• Suppression of delayed signals Equalization of ISI for higher data rates

• Multiple signals in the same bandwidth Higher data rates

Switched Multibeam versus Adaptive Array Antenna: Simple beam tracking, but limited interference suppression and diversity gain

SIGNAL OUTPUT

SIGNAL

INTERFERENCE

INTERFERENCEBEAMFORMER

WEIGHTS

SIGNAL OUTPUT

BEAM SELECT

SIGNAL

BE

AM

FOR

ME

R

Adaptive Antenna ArraySwitched Multibeam Antenna

6

BASE STATION DIVERSITY OPTIONS (4 ANTENNAS)

24 (12 ft)3 (1.5 ft)

3 or 24

Spatial Diversity Angle DiversityPolarization

Diversity

7

Smart Antennas

Rooftop Base Station Antennas

11.3 ft

Prototype Dual Antenna Handset

Prototype Smart

Antenna for Laptops

8

INTERFERENCE NULLINGLine-Of-Sight Systems

Utilizes spatial dimension of radio environment to:• Maximize signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio• Increase gain towards desired signal• Null interference: M-1 interferers with M antennas

User 1

User 2

User 1

Signal•••

9

INTERFERENCE NULLINGMultipath Systems

User 1

User 2

User 1

Signal•••

Antenna pattern is meaningless, but performance is based on the number of signals, not number of paths (without delay spread).

=> A receiver using adaptive array combining with M antennas and N-1 interferers can have the same performance as a receiver with M-N+1 antennas and no interference, i.e., can null N-1 interferers with M-N+1 diversity improvement (N-fold capacity increase).

10

MIMO CAPACITY INCREASE

• With M antennas at both the base station and mobiles, M independent channels can be provided in the same bandwidth if the multipath environment is rich enough.

• 1.2 Mbps in a 30 kHz bandwidth using 8 transmit and 12 receive antennas demonstrated by Lucent (indoors).

• Separation of signals from two closely-spaced antennas 5 miles from the base station demonstrated by AT&T/Lucent.

11

• Delay spread: Delay spread over [(M-1) / 2]T or M-1 delayed signals (over any delay) can be eliminated

• Typically use temporal processing with spatial processing for equalization:

EQUALIZATION

LE

LE

MLSE/DFE

12

SMART ANTENNAS IN SECOND GENERATION SYSTEMS

• IS-136 TDMA:– On uplink, with two receive antennas, in 1999

changed from maximal ratio combining to MMSE combining

• Software change only - provided 3-4 dB gain in interference-limited environments

• Combined with power control on downlink (software change only) - increased capacity through frequency reuse reduction

13

SMART ANTENNAS IN SECOND GENERATION SYSTEMS

• Techniques proposed a decade before implementation, but:– MMSE combining: SMI degrades performance

when interference is not present• Solution: Diagonal loading with beta=f(I/N)

– Power control: 1 second reporting delay of mobile BER and RSSI – unstable at pedestrian speeds

• Solution: Use uplink RSSI (diversity) with mobile BER

14

SMART ANTENNAS IN SECOND GENERATION SYSTEMS

• IS-136 TDMA:– On uplink, with two receive antennas, in 1999 changed

from maximal ratio combining to MMSE combining• Software change only - provided 3-4 dB gain in interference-

limited environments

• Combined with power control on downlink (software change only) - increased capacity through frequency reuse reduction

– Use of 4 antennas (adaptive array uplink/multibeam, with power control, downlink) extends range and/or doubles capacity (N=7 to 4 or 3)

• Clears spectrum for EDGE deployment (2001)

15

IS-136 Smart Antenna System

ADAPTIVE ANTENNA RECEIVER

4 Branches

TRANSMITTER

RADIO UNIT

RSSI, BER

DUPLEXERS

BEAM SCANNING RECEIVER

1 per N radios•

SP

LIT

TE

R

Power ControlShared LPAs

Atten

Atten

Atten

Atten

• 4 Branch adaptive antenna uplink for range extension and interference suppression

• Fixed switched beam downlink with power control for increased coverage and capacity

• Uplink and downlink are independent

• Shared linear power amplifiers reduce amplifier requirements to handle maximum traffic load

16

SMART ANTENNAS IN THIRD GENERATION SYSTEMS: EDGE

• High data rate ( 384 kbps) service based on GSM, for both Europe and North America

• 8PSK at 270.833 ksps

• 26 symbol training sequence

• 1/3, 3/9 or 4/12 reuse

576.92 s

58 5826 8.2533

17

ADAPTIVE ARRAYS IN EDGE

Spatial-Temporal processing using DDFSE for interference suppression

18

ADAPTIVE ARRAYS IN EDGE

DDFSEEqualizer

ChannelDecoder

Rx

Rx

OutputData

EDGE Smart Antenna ProcessingDual Diversity Receiver Using Delayed Decision Feedback Sequence Estimator

for Joint Intersymbol Interference and Co-channel Interference Suppression

• Simulation results show a 15 to 30 dB improvement in S/I with 2 receive antennas

• Real-time EDGE Test Bed supports laboratory and field link level tests to demonstrate improved performance

Wireless Systems Research

Blo

ck E

rro

r R

ate

Signal -to-Interference Ratio (dB)

EDGE with Interference Suppression in a Typical Urban Environment

Multiple-Input Multiple-Output (MIMO) Techniques for 3G Wireless Systems

• Multiple antennas at both the base station and terminal can significantly increase data rates if the multipath environment is rich enough

sufficient multipath low correlation high spectral efficiency

• With 4 transmit and receive antennas 4 independent data channels can be provided in the same bandwidth

• Data rates as high as 1.5 Mbps (4x384 kbps) may be possible for EDGE or as high as 40 Mbps for Wideband OFDM (also can be used in WCDMA/HDR)

21

MIMO-EDGE

• Goal: 4 transmit / 4 receive antennas in EDGE can theoretically increase capacity 4-fold with the same total transmit power (3.77X384 kbps = 1.45 Mbps is actual theoretical increase)

• Issues:– Joint spatial-temporal equalization

– Weight adaptation

– Mobile channel characteristics to support MIMO-EDGE

• Our approach:– Development of multi-antenna EDGE testbed

– Development of 2X2 and 4X4 DDFSE architecture with MMSE combining using successive interference cancellation

– Mobile channel measurements

22

MIMO Channel Testing

TxW1

TxW2

TxW3

TxW4

LO

Synchronoustest

sequences

Rx

Rx

Rx

Rx

• Record complex correlation of each transmit waveform on each receive antenna, C4x4

• Compute CHC correlation matrix to determine potential capacity and predict performance

• Compute fading correlation across receive array

LO

Mobile Transmitter Test Bed Receiver with RooftopAntennas

Transmit Antenna Configurations

Space diversity

Space / polarization diversity

Space / pattern diversity

Space / polarization / pattern diversity

23

MIMO Channel Measurement System

Transmitter

• 4 antennas mounted on a laptop

• 4 coherent 1 Watt 1900 MHz transmitters with synchronous waveform generator

Receive System

• Dual-polarized slant 45° PCS antennas separated by10 feet and fixed multibeam antenna with 4 - 30° beams

• 4 coherent 1900 MHz receivers with real-time baseband processing using 4 TI TMS320C40 DSPs

24

25

EDGE with Wideband OFDM - MIMO Downlink

• High data rates (>1 Mbps) required on downlink only

• OFDM eliminates need for temporal processing => simplified MIMO processing for much higher data rates

• With 1.25 MHz bandwidth, QPSK, OFDM-MIMO with 4 antennas at base station and terminal => 10 Mbps downlink

26

SMART ANTENNA EVOLUTION FOR TDMA

• IS-136:

• Optimum combining uplink / power control downlink at all base stations with existing 2Rx/1Tx antennas

• 4Rx/4Tx antenna upgrade (adaptive uplink/multibeam downlink) for N=7 to 4 to clear spectrum for EDGE

• EDGE:

• S-T processing with IS-136 smart antennas (Data followed by VoIP)

• MIMO-EDGE (1.5 – 2.4 Mbps)

• Wideband OFDM-MIMO downlink (10 - 40 Mbps)

• 4Rx/4Tx base station with software radio for software evolution at base station with terminal replacements

• Research issues: Deployment strategies / integration with DCA, PC, adaptive modulation and coding / improved weight adaptation with CCI