Post on 15-Dec-2015
1
Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt’s
Real Estate and Business Seminar Series
Tax Saving Strategies forApartment Building Owners
March 8, 2006Seattle, WA
2
IMPORTANT NOTICE
To comply with IRS regulations, we are required to inform you that this presentation, if it contains advice relating to federal taxes, cannot be used for the purpose of avoiding penalties that may be imposed under federal tax law. Any tax advice that is expressed in this presentation is limited to the tax issues addressed in this presentation. If advice is required that satisfies applicable IRS regulations, for a tax opinion appropriate for avoidance of federal tax law penalties, please contact an Schwabe attorney to arrange a suitable engagement for that purpose.
3
Our Goals Today
• Learn several tax saving strategies
• Understand why and how each strategy works
• Know the pros and cons of each strategy
• Learn to avoid or minimize risk of IRS audit
4
Overview of Current Tax Regime
Federal Estate Tax
Year of Death Federal Estate Tax Exempt Amount
2006 $2 million
2007 $2 million
2008 $2 million
2009 $3.5 million
2010 Repeal (no tax)
2011 and After $1 million
5
Overview of Current Tax Regime
Federal Gift Tax
Year of Death Federal Estate Tax Exempt Amount
Federal Gift Tax Exempt Amount
2006 $2 million $1 million
2007 $2 million $1 million
2008 $2 million $1 million
2009 $3.5 million $1 million
2010 Repeal (no tax) $1 million
2011 and After $1 million $1 million
6
Overview of Current Tax Regime
Washington State Estate Tax
Year of Death Federal Estate Tax Exempt Amount
Federal Gift Tax Exempt Amount
Washington Estate Tax Exempt Amount
2006 $2 million $1 million $2 million
2007 $2 million $1 million $2 million
2008 $2 million $1 million $2 million
2009 $3.5 million $1 million $2 million
2010 Repeal (no tax) $1 million $2 million
2011 and After $1 million $1 million $2 million
7
Harry and Sally’s Family Tree
Harry Sally
JenniferJake Mary Julie MarkDavid
Jason Justin Emma Claire Eva Alex
8
Harry and Sally’s Assets
Asset Value
Home $700,000
Apartment A $3,000,000
Apartment B $3,000,000
Apartment C $3,000,000
Other Assets $300,000
Total Assets $10,000,000
9
Simple Will
Harry’s Share
$5 Million
Sally’s Share
$5 Million
Case #1No Tax Planning (Simple Wills)
Harry and Sally’s Estate
$10 Million
Harry Dies
Sally Dies
(all subject to taxes)
Sally’sEstate
$10 Million
10
State Credit Shelter Trust
$2 Mil
Fed Credit Shelter$1.5 Mil
Marital Trust$1.5 Mil
Harry Dies
Harry’s Share
$5 Million
Sally’s Share
$5 Million
Sally Dies
1/3
Julie’s
Share
1/3
Jennifer’s
Share
1/3
Jake’s
Share
Harry and Sally’s Estate
$10 Million
Case #2Basic Estate Tax Planning
11
Pros: Cons:• Saves substantial taxes
• Ensures first spouse’s estate goes to intended heirs
• Do not need to set up trusts during lifetimes of both spouses
• Must be included in Wills prior to first spouse’s death
• Somewhat more expensive to prepare Wills with Credit Shelter Trusts
• Requires trust administration
Case #2Basic Estate Tax Planning
12
Member and Co-Manager
Member and Co-Manager
Case #3Family LLC Structure
Harry50%
Sally50%
Apartment A, LLC
13
Case #3Discounts of LLC Interests
• Lack of marketability– 30% to 35%
• Lack of control– 44% (Trusts & Estates)
• ¼ exceeded 60%!
• Rev. Ruling 93-12– IRS “throws in the towel”
14
Case #3Family LLC Strategy
Apartment A
$3 MillionOwned by Harry andSally Jointly
All three apartmentsTotal: $9 million
Apartment A, LLC
Harry50%
Sally50%
Discounted Value @ 35%$1,950,000
All three LLCsTotal: $5,850,000
15
What, me worry?
16
Family LLC
Strangi Than Fiction
• $11 million transferred to FLP
• Strangi died two months later
• Heirs claimed 40% discount
• RESULT: Taxed on the full $11 million!
WHY?
17
Family LLC
Strangi Than Fiction
• Waited too long (two months before death)
• Transferred too much to FLP (did not retain enough for Strangi’s needs)
• FLP paid Strangi’s bills
• FLP did not conduct any active business
• THE “SNIFF” TEST:Did the parties actually do what they said they would do?
18
Family LLC
Tips to Avoid an Audit
• Don’t wait until you are in ill health• Do what you say you intend to do• Don’t contribute personal-use assets• Keep out enough to meet personal needs• Respect the form of entity (separate books, state and federal filings, etc.)• FLLC is not your personal checkbook• Distribute cash pro rata• Don’t be greedy!
19
Pros: Cons:
• Saves substantial estate taxes
• Limits owner liability
• Efficient management
• Keeps business in family
• Makes it easy to transfer fractional interests
• Distributions tax-free to extent of basis
• No real estate excise tax
Case #3Family LLC
• Requires that business formalities are followed (separate books, meetings, reports, tax returns, etc.)
• Cost of set up and administration
• Lender consent may be required
• Some audit risk, if not done correctly
20
Case #4Family LLC With Gifting Program
Apartment A, LLC
Harry50%
Sally50%
Children and SpousesUp to $12,000 each per year
Grandchildren’s TrustsUp to $12,000 per year, per beneficiary
21
Harry (42.64%)
Sally (42.64%)
Jake and Mary (2.48%)
Jennifer and David (2.48%)
Julie and Mark (2.48%)
Trusts for Grandchildren(7.44%)
Case #4Year 1 Gifts
22
Harry (20.46%)
Sally (20.46%)
Jake and Mary (9.92%)
Jennifer and David (9.92%)
Julie and Mark (9.92%)
Trusts for Grandchildren(19.84%)
Case #4Year 4 Gifts
23
More Pros: More Cons:
• Further tax savings (gift tax exclusions and discounts)
• Allows heirs to begin participation in business
• Avoids complications of co-tenancy
• Spendthrift protection
• Provides a mechanism for pooling investment assets
Case #4Family LLC With Gifting Program
• Cost of appraisal
• Pro rata distributions can impact cash flow
• Some audit risk, if not done correctly
24
Case #5Grantor Retained Annuity Trust (GRAT)
Apartment B, LLC
Harry50%
Sally50%
Value:$1,950,000
GRAT10 Years
$195,000 / yrTo H & S
Gift tax exemption used:$1,070,000
Value: $ 3,570,000
Jake33%
Jennifer33% Julie
33%
Apartment B, LLC
25
Pros: Cons:
• Retains identifiable cash flow
• Transfers significant appreciation to heirs
• Saves substantial taxes
• No audit risk, if you comply with statute
• Requires that Grantors survive the term of the trust
• Requires current use of Gift Tax exemption
• Does not facilitate transfers to grandchildren (GST exempt transfers)
• Requires trust administration
Case #5Grantor Retained Annuity Trust (GRAT)
26
Case #6Intentionally Defective Income Trust
Apartment C, LLC
Harry50%
Sally50%
Note to H & S $110,000 / yr
Apartment C, LLC
Jake33%
Jennifer33%
Julie33%
IDITSale
60%
• Harry and Sally retain 40% LLC interests• Harry and Sally contribute $117,000 in “seed money”• Harry and Sally take back a 15-year fully amortizing note
27
Pros: Cons:• Retains identifiable cash
flow
• Saves substantial taxes
• Does not require current use of Gift Tax exemption
• Transfers significant appreciation to heirs
• Facilitates transfers to grandchildren (GST exempt transfers)
• Does not require Grantors to survive term
• Requires trust administration for term of note
• Limited audit risk, if properly valued and documented
Case #6Intentionally Defective Income Trust
28
Questions?
Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt’s
Real Estate and Business Seminar Series
Thank you.
29
About the Presenters
Dennis A. Ostgard is a 1978 graduate of Harvard Law School, and leader of Schwabe, Williamson & Wyatt’s real estate and business practices in the Seattle office. His practice emphasizes commercial real estate transactions, leasing and development projects, business sales and acquisitions, and business entity selection.
Susan L. Peterson is a 1987 graduate of Harvard Law School, who focuses her practice in the areas of real estate, business transactions, and business entity formation, including commercial real estate transactions, business sales and acquisitions, business entity selection, and estate and succession planning for business owners.