Post on 27-Dec-2015
1
AIPLA Biotech Committee Meeting
Washington D.C., October 14, 2004
Jasemine C. Chambers, Ph.D., J.D.Director Technology Center 1600
USPTO(571) 272-0500
jasemine.chambers@uspto.gov
2
Topics Today
• Staffing, Pendency, and Filings
• Appeal Conferences
• Restriction Practice Action Plan
3
TC 1600 Staffing (9/28/04)
Groups Art Units Examiners PhD MS Law School
JD Primary PSA
1610 4 56 17 11 3 10 26 7
1620 5 67 32 19 0 7 33 4
1630 8 106 64 31 0 5 40 9
1640 7 111 66 14 6 6 35 12
1650 4 70 28 16 1 9 27 6
1660 1 8 0 2 2 0 3 0
TOTAL 29 418 207 93 12 37 164 38
4
TC 1600 Update
• Pendency
FY01 FY02 FY03 FY04 Total Pendency 26.1 25.5 27.8 ?Pendency to First action 12.8 13.2 15.8 ?
5
TC 1600 Update
• Filing Data
– FY04 appears down – FY03 -7.8% (38,613)– FY02 +13.8% (41,641)– FY01 +11.9%
6
TC 1600 Update
PCT Filings
• Constitute 15% of TC 1600 Workload• FY04 (as of 9/04)
– 7,400 Chapter I’s, 4,700 Chapter II’s
• FY03 – 6,000 Chapter I’s, 4,500 Chapter II’s
7
Appeal Conferences
An appeal conference is mandatory in all cases in which an acceptable appeal brief has been filed and the examiner in charge of the application is going to proceed with the appeal and write an examiner’s answer (MPEP 1208).
8
Appeal Conferences
The participants in an appeal conference are:– The examiner– The examiner’s SPE– A conferree
• The conferee is preferably another SPE, SPRE, QAS, or TCPS. However, the conferee may also be a primary examiner having sufficient experience and knowledge to be of assistance in the consideration of the merits of the issues on appeal.
9
Appeal Conferences
Outcomes:• A Notice of Allowance may be issued.
• An Examiner’s Answer may be issued.
• A new Office Action may be issued.
10
Appeal Conferences
Outcomes:• FY04 3rd Qtr
– Exmr. Answers 229 (60.1%)– Re-openings 84 (22.0%)– Allowances 61 (16.0%)
• FY03– Exmr. Answers 426 (44.6%)– Re-openings 282 (29.5%)– Allowances 237 (24.8%)
11
The action plan includes 5 initiatives:
1. Publish Examples Of Claim Sets
2. Emphasis On Rejoinder Practice
3. Examiner Training On Restriction Practice
4. Enhanced Review Of Restriction Requirements
5. Continuous Assessment
Restriction Practice Action Plan
12
Restriction Practice Action Plan
1. Publish Examples Of Claim Sets– Provide examples that do not present a serious burden
on the Office
– Provide both applicants and examiners with guidance
We are working on this and anticipate publication within the next several months.
13
Restriction Practice Action Plan
2. Emphasis On Rejoinder Practice– Provide a new Rejoinder paragraph
– Remind applicants of their options on Rejoinder
This has been implemented.
14
Restriction Practice Action Plan
3. Examiner Training On Restriction Practice– Emphasize proper restriction practices
• Claim groupings and support/formulation of restriction requirements
– Provide Art Unit/Workgroup specific examples– Publish materials
Training to examiners delivered at end of August. We will be posting the training materials on the USPTO web site.
15
Restriction Practice Action Plan
3. Examiner Training On Restriction Practice – cont. Includes:
Basic Restriction Requirements Linking Claims Markush Practice Rejoinder Opportunities
16
Restriction Practice Action Plan
4. Enhanced Review Of Restriction Requirements– Review Art Units with high number of restrictions
and indications of inconsistent requirements
– Includes reviewing restrictions in 2nd and subsequent actions
This has been implemented.
17
Restriction Practice Action Plan
5. Continuous Assessment – Collect data from reviews and samplings
– Survey customers on impact of action plan
We are currently collecting data from reviews.
18
Thank You
Jasemine C. Chambers, Ph.D., J.D.Director Technology Center 1600
USPTO(571) 272-0500
jasemine.chambers@uspto.gov