Post on 23-Sep-2020
0101 : DEWITT SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19
Indicator 02: Dropout Rate Single Year Event Rate - Percent of students in grades 7-12 dropping out in a single year(Data from 2017/2018 School
Indicator 01: Graduation RateFour year Cohort Rate - Percent of students graduating in four years(Data from 2017/2018 School Year)
Indicator 03-B: AssessmentParticipation Rate: Literacy
Indicator 03-B: AssessmentParticipation Rate: Math
Indicator 03-C: AssessmentProficiency Rate: Math
Indicator 03-C: AssessmentProficiency Rate: Literacy
ASSESSMENT PARTICIPATION & PROFICIENCY RATES
GRADUATION & DROPOUT RATES
95.00%
95.00%
IndicatorLEA Rate
Target Met by LEA
LEA Differencefrom Target
State Target
State Rate
Year to Year LEA Rate Change
84.61% 85.91% 75.00% 10.91%N
1.62% 1.98% 4.76% 2.78%N
99.11% Y96.80% N/A
99.20% Y97.87% N/A
10.50% 10.50% 5.49% 5.01%N
12.95% 12.95% 15.21% N/AY
↓
↓
↓
↑
↓
↓
Progress Slippage No Change Not ApplicableYear to Year LEA Change:Indicator Met: Met Not Met Page 1 of 2248
0101 : DEWITT SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19
DISCIPLINE RATES & DISPROPORTIONALITY in DISCIPLINE
IndicatorLEA Rate
Target Met by LEA
State Target
State Rate
Indicator 04-A: Suspensions & Expulsions > than 10 days(Data from 2017/2018 school year)
Required to Complete a Self-Assessment and Review of Policies, Procedures, and Practices
Were Inappropriate Policies, Procedures, and Practices Identified by the State
Indicator 04-B: Suspensions & Expulsions for > than 10 days by Special Education Race vs. General Education all races. (Data from 2017/2018 school year)
Were Inappropriate Policies, Procedures, and Practices Identified by the State
Required to Complete a Self-Assessment and Review of Policies, Procedures, and Practices
N/A
Notes: (1) State rate and state target are based on the percent of districts whose special edcuation rate exceeds the general education rate by more than 1.36 percentage points. (2) The LEA rate is the difference between the general education rate and special education rate. Any LEA that exceed the allowable 1.36 percentage points difference must complete a review of policies, procedures, and practices.
Notes: (1) State rate and state target are based on the percent of districts identified as having innapropriate policies, procedures, and practices.(2) LEA rate is based on whether or not a LEA was identified as having possible disproportionality. Identification is the difference between the general education rate for all races and special education rate for specific races. Any LEA with a difference >4 percentage point is identified for a review of policies, procedures, and practices.
LEA Differencefrom Target
Year to Year LEA Rate Change
30.51% 29.50% N/AY
N
0.38% 0%
0101 : DEWITT SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19
LEAST RESTRICTIVE ENVIRONMENT (K-12)
IndicatorLEA Rate
Target Met by LEA
State Target
State Rate
Indicator 05-C: School Age LRE Percent of students receiving special educatiion services in other settings
Indicator 05-B: School Age LRE Percent of students inside the regular classroom less than 40% of the day
Indicator 05-A: School Age LRE Percent of students inside the regular classroom 80% or more of the day
LEAST RESTRICTIVE ENVIRONMENT (PreSchool)
Indicator 06-B: Early Childhood LRE: Separate education class, separate school or residential facility
Indicator 06-A: Early Childhood LRE: Regular Preschool Program Percent of children recieving with the majority of special education services with thier non-disabled peers
Note: Other settings includes Day Schools, Residential, and Hosptial/Home Bound but does not include students in correctional facilities or private schools.
LEA Differencefrom Target
Year to Year LEA Rate Change
54.32% 63.77% 27.56% 36.21%N
12.72% 12.00% 6.41% N/AY
2.05% 2.40% Y0.64% N/A
29.04% 35.94% N/AN/A N/A
23.74% 26.65% N/AN/A N/A
↓
↓
↓
--
--
Progress Slippage No Change Not ApplicableYear to Year LEA Change:Indicator Met: Met Not Met Page 3 of 2248
0101 : DEWITT SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19
Indicator 07-C: Preschool Outcomes Summary 2: Appropriate Behaviors
Indicator 07-C: Preschool Outcomes Summary 1: Appropriate Behaviors
Indicator 07-B: Preschool Outcomes Summary 2: Knowledge and Skills
Indicator 07-A: Preschool Outcomes Summary 2: Social Emotional
Indicator 07-A: Preschool Outcomes Summary 1: Social Emotional
Indicator 07-B: Preschool Outcomes Summary 1: Knowledge and Skills
EARLY CHILDHOOD OUTCOMES
IndicatorLEA Rate
Target Met by LEA
State Target
State Rate
Indicator 7: Early Childhood OutcomesThere are two Summary Statements which are based the change between entry and exits scores for three outcome areas: (A) Social Emotional, (B) Knowledge and Skills, and (C) Appropriate Behvaiors.
Summary Statement 1: Of those preschool children who entered the preschool program below age expectations in each Outcome, the percent who substantially increased their rate of growth by the time they turned 6 years of age or exited the program.
Summary Statement 2: The percent of preschool children who were functioning within age expectations in each Outcome by the time they turned 6 years of age or
LEA Differencefrom Target
Year to Year LEA Rate Change
87.89% 91.56% N/AN/A N/A
57.92% 68.72% N/AN/A N/A
89.49% 92.38% N/A
N/A
N/A
45.15% 61.11% N/A
N/A
N/A
90.63% 92.13% N/AN/A N/A
65.22% 78.00% N/AN/A N/A
--
--
--
--
--
--
Progress Slippage No Change Not ApplicableYear to Year LEA Change:Indicator Met: Met Not Met Page 4 of 2248
0101 : DEWITT SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19
PARENT INVOLVEMENT OUTCOMES
IndicatorLEA Rate
Target Met by LEA
State Target
State Rate
LEA Differencefrom Target
Indicator 8: Parent InvolvementPercent of surveyed parents who reported school facilitated parent involvement as a means of improving services and results for children with disabilities.
School Age (k-12) Rate
Early Childhood (3-5) Rate
Indicator 9: Disproportionality - EligibilityDisproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services that is a result of inappropriate identification (e.g. monitoring data, review of policies, practices, and procedures under 618(d), etc.).
Required to Complete a Self-Assessment and Review of Policies, Procedures, and Practices
Were Inappropriate Policies, Procedures, and Practices Identified by the State
DISPROPORTIONALITY: IDENTIFICATION & DISABILITY
Indicator 10: Disproportionality - Child with a DisabiiltyDisproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in specific disability categories that is a result of inappropriate identification (e.g. monitoring data, review of policies, practices, and procedures under 618(d), etc.).
Required to Complete a Self-Assessment and Review of Policies, Procedures, and Practices
Were Inappropriate Policies, Procedures, and Practices Identified by the State
0.00% 0.00% ≤4.00 N/A
0.00%0.00% N/A
Notes: (1) State rate and state target are based on the percent of LEAs identified as having innapropriate policies, procedures, and practices. (2) The LEA rate is based on if the risk ratio exceeded the cut score of 4; any LEA with a risk ratio greater than 4 is required to complete a review of policies, procedures, and practices.
Year to Year LEA Rate Change
Notes: (1) State rate and state target are based on the percent of LEAs identified as having innapropriate policies, procedures, and practices. (2) The LEA rate is based on if the risk ratio exceeded the cut score of 4; any LEA with a risk ratio greater than 4 is required to complete a review of policies, procedures, and practices.
93.83% 94.84% N/AN/A N/A
95.82% 96.45% N89.47% 6.98%
Y
N N/A
N N/A
Y
0101 : DEWITT SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19
Indicator 11: Child FindPercent of children with parental consent to evaluate who are evaluated within the State established timeline of 60 days.
CHILD FIND: TIMELY EVALUATION
Early Childhood (3-5) Rate
School Age (k-12) Rate
TRANSITION
Indicator 12: Early Childhood TransitionPercent of children referred by Part C prior to age 3, who arefound eligible for Part B, and who have an IEP developed and implemented by their third birthday.
Indicator 13: Secondary TransistionPercent of youth with IEPs aged 16 and above with an IEP that includes appropriate measurable postsecondary goals.
IndicatorLEA Rate
Target Met by LEA
State Target
State Rate
LEA Differencefrom Target
Year to Year LEA Rate Change
N/AN/A N/A
99.62% Y100.00% N/A
100.00% N/A N/A
↔
--
--
--80.15%
95.24% 100.00% N/AN/A N/A
100.00
100.00%
99.87%
N/A
Progress Slippage No Change Not ApplicableYear to Year LEA Change:Indicator Met: Met Not Met Page 6 of 2248
0101 : DEWITT SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19
Post-School Outcomes
IndicatorLEA Rate
Target Met by LEA
State Target
State Rate
LEA Differencefrom Target
Indicator 14: Post-School OutcomesPercent of youth who are no longer in secondary school, had IEPs in effect at the time they left school, and were:A. Enrolled in higher education within one year of leaving high school.B. Enrolled in higher education or competitively employed within one year of leaving high school.C. Enrolled in higher education or in some other postsecondary education or training program; or competitively employed or in some other employment within one year of leaving high school.
A. Enrolled in higher education within one year of leaving high school.
B. Enrolled in higher education or competitively employed within one year of leaving high school.
C. Enrolled in higher education or in some other post-secondary education or training program; or competitively employed or in some other employment within one year of leaving high school.
Year to Year LEA Rate Change
11.78% 15.80% N/AN/A N/A
25.93% 51.49% N/AN/A N/A
51.35% 63.26% N/AN/A N/A
--
--
--
Progress Slippage No Change Not ApplicableYear to Year LEA Change:Indicator Met: Met Not Met Page 7 of 2248
0101 : DEWITT SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19
Timely and Accurate Data Reporting
IndicatorLEA Rate
Target Met by LEA
State Target
State Rate
LEA Differencefrom Target
State Indicator: Timely and Accurate Data.
Early Childhood (3-5) Rate
School Age (k-12) Rate
100%
100%
100%
100%
N/A
N/A
Year to Year LEA Rate Change
0104 : STUTTGART SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19
Indicator 02: Dropout Rate Single Year Event Rate - Percent of students in grades 7-12 dropping out in a single year(Data from 2017/2018 School
Indicator 01: Graduation RateFour year Cohort Rate - Percent of students graduating in four years(Data from 2017/2018 School Year)
Indicator 03-B: AssessmentParticipation Rate: Literacy
Indicator 03-B: AssessmentParticipation Rate: Math
Indicator 03-C: AssessmentProficiency Rate: Math
Indicator 03-C: AssessmentProficiency Rate: Literacy
ASSESSMENT PARTICIPATION & PROFICIENCY RATES
GRADUATION & DROPOUT RATES
95.00%
95.00%
IndicatorLEA Rate
Target Met by LEA
LEA Differencefrom Target
State Target
State Rate
Year to Year LEA Rate Change
84.61% 85.91% 88.88% N/AY
1.62% 1.98% 1.53% N/AY
99.11% Y99.28% N/A
99.20% Y99.28% N/A
10.50% 10.50% 2.89% 7.61%N
12.95% 12.95% 6.52% 6.43%N
↑
↓
↓
↓
↓
↓
Progress Slippage No Change Not ApplicableYear to Year LEA Change:Indicator Met: Met Not Met Page 9 of 2248
0104 : STUTTGART SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19
DISCIPLINE RATES & DISPROPORTIONALITY in DISCIPLINE
IndicatorLEA Rate
Target Met by LEA
State Target
State Rate
Indicator 04-A: Suspensions & Expulsions > than 10 days(Data from 2017/2018 school year)
Required to Complete a Self-Assessment and Review of Policies, Procedures, and Practices
Were Inappropriate Policies, Procedures, and Practices Identified by the State
Indicator 04-B: Suspensions & Expulsions for > than 10 days by Special Education Race vs. General Education all races. (Data from 2017/2018 school year)
Were Inappropriate Policies, Procedures, and Practices Identified by the State
Required to Complete a Self-Assessment and Review of Policies, Procedures, and Practices
N/A
Notes: (1) State rate and state target are based on the percent of districts whose special edcuation rate exceeds the general education rate by more than 1.36 percentage points. (2) The LEA rate is the difference between the general education rate and special education rate. Any LEA that exceed the allowable 1.36 percentage points difference must complete a review of policies, procedures, and practices.
Notes: (1) State rate and state target are based on the percent of districts identified as having innapropriate policies, procedures, and practices.(2) LEA rate is based on whether or not a LEA was identified as having possible disproportionality. Identification is the difference between the general education rate for all races and special education rate for specific races. Any LEA with a difference >4 percentage point is identified for a review of policies, procedures, and practices.
LEA Differencefrom Target
Year to Year LEA Rate Change
30.51% 29.50% N/AY
N
0.38% 0%
0104 : STUTTGART SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19
LEAST RESTRICTIVE ENVIRONMENT (K-12)
IndicatorLEA Rate
Target Met by LEA
State Target
State Rate
Indicator 05-C: School Age LRE Percent of students receiving special educatiion services in other settings
Indicator 05-B: School Age LRE Percent of students inside the regular classroom less than 40% of the day
Indicator 05-A: School Age LRE Percent of students inside the regular classroom 80% or more of the day
LEAST RESTRICTIVE ENVIRONMENT (PreSchool)
Indicator 06-B: Early Childhood LRE: Separate education class, separate school or residential facility
Indicator 06-A: Early Childhood LRE: Regular Preschool Program Percent of children recieving with the majority of special education services with thier non-disabled peers
Note: Other settings includes Day Schools, Residential, and Hosptial/Home Bound but does not include students in correctional facilities or private schools.
LEA Differencefrom Target
Year to Year LEA Rate Change
54.32% 63.77% 57.64% 6.13%N
12.72% 12.00% 17.47% 4.75%N
2.05% 2.40% Y0.43% N/A
29.04% 35.94% N/AN/A N/A
23.74% 26.65% N/AN/A N/A
↑
↑
↓
--
--
Progress Slippage No Change Not ApplicableYear to Year LEA Change:Indicator Met: Met Not Met Page 11 of 2248
0104 : STUTTGART SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19
Indicator 07-C: Preschool Outcomes Summary 2: Appropriate Behaviors
Indicator 07-C: Preschool Outcomes Summary 1: Appropriate Behaviors
Indicator 07-B: Preschool Outcomes Summary 2: Knowledge and Skills
Indicator 07-A: Preschool Outcomes Summary 2: Social Emotional
Indicator 07-A: Preschool Outcomes Summary 1: Social Emotional
Indicator 07-B: Preschool Outcomes Summary 1: Knowledge and Skills
EARLY CHILDHOOD OUTCOMES
IndicatorLEA Rate
Target Met by LEA
State Target
State Rate
Indicator 7: Early Childhood OutcomesThere are two Summary Statements which are based the change between entry and exits scores for three outcome areas: (A) Social Emotional, (B) Knowledge and Skills, and (C) Appropriate Behvaiors.
Summary Statement 1: Of those preschool children who entered the preschool program below age expectations in each Outcome, the percent who substantially increased their rate of growth by the time they turned 6 years of age or exited the program.
Summary Statement 2: The percent of preschool children who were functioning within age expectations in each Outcome by the time they turned 6 years of age or
LEA Differencefrom Target
Year to Year LEA Rate Change
87.89% 91.56% N/AN/A N/A
57.92% 68.72% N/AN/A N/A
89.49% 92.38% N/A
N/A
N/A
45.15% 61.11% N/A
N/A
N/A
90.63% 92.13% N/AN/A N/A
65.22% 78.00% N/AN/A N/A
--
--
--
--
--
--
Progress Slippage No Change Not ApplicableYear to Year LEA Change:Indicator Met: Met Not Met Page 12 of 2248
0104 : STUTTGART SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19
PARENT INVOLVEMENT OUTCOMES
IndicatorLEA Rate
Target Met by LEA
State Target
State Rate
LEA Differencefrom Target
Indicator 8: Parent InvolvementPercent of surveyed parents who reported school facilitated parent involvement as a means of improving services and results for children with disabilities.
School Age (k-12) Rate
Early Childhood (3-5) Rate
Indicator 9: Disproportionality - EligibilityDisproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services that is a result of inappropriate identification (e.g. monitoring data, review of policies, practices, and procedures under 618(d), etc.).
Required to Complete a Self-Assessment and Review of Policies, Procedures, and Practices
Were Inappropriate Policies, Procedures, and Practices Identified by the State
DISPROPORTIONALITY: IDENTIFICATION & DISABILITY
Indicator 10: Disproportionality - Child with a DisabiiltyDisproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in specific disability categories that is a result of inappropriate identification (e.g. monitoring data, review of policies, practices, and procedures under 618(d), etc.).
Required to Complete a Self-Assessment and Review of Policies, Procedures, and Practices
Were Inappropriate Policies, Procedures, and Practices Identified by the State
0.00% 0.00% ≤4.00 N/A
0.00%0.00% N/A
Notes: (1) State rate and state target are based on the percent of LEAs identified as having innapropriate policies, procedures, and practices. (2) The LEA rate is based on if the risk ratio exceeded the cut score of 4; any LEA with a risk ratio greater than 4 is required to complete a review of policies, procedures, and practices.
Year to Year LEA Rate Change
Notes: (1) State rate and state target are based on the percent of LEAs identified as having innapropriate policies, procedures, and practices. (2) The LEA rate is based on if the risk ratio exceeded the cut score of 4; any LEA with a risk ratio greater than 4 is required to complete a review of policies, procedures, and practices.
93.83% 94.84% N/AN/A N/A
95.82% 96.45% N89.47% 6.98%
Y
N N/A
Y N
Y>4.00
--
↓
↔
↑
Progress Slippage No Change Not ApplicableYear to Year LEA Change:Indicator Met: Met Not Met Page 13 of 2248
0104 : STUTTGART SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19
Indicator 11: Child FindPercent of children with parental consent to evaluate who are evaluated within the State established timeline of 60 days.
CHILD FIND: TIMELY EVALUATION
Early Childhood (3-5) Rate
School Age (k-12) Rate
TRANSITION
Indicator 12: Early Childhood TransitionPercent of children referred by Part C prior to age 3, who arefound eligible for Part B, and who have an IEP developed and implemented by their third birthday.
Indicator 13: Secondary TransistionPercent of youth with IEPs aged 16 and above with an IEP that includes appropriate measurable postsecondary goals.
IndicatorLEA Rate
Target Met by LEA
State Target
State Rate
LEA Differencefrom Target
Year to Year LEA Rate Change
N/AN/A N/A
99.62% Y100.00% N/A
100.00% N/A N/A
↔
--
--
--80.15%
95.24% 100.00% N/AN/A N/A
100.00
100.00%
99.87%
N/A
Progress Slippage No Change Not ApplicableYear to Year LEA Change:Indicator Met: Met Not Met Page 14 of 2248
0104 : STUTTGART SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19
Post-School Outcomes
IndicatorLEA Rate
Target Met by LEA
State Target
State Rate
LEA Differencefrom Target
Indicator 14: Post-School OutcomesPercent of youth who are no longer in secondary school, had IEPs in effect at the time they left school, and were:A. Enrolled in higher education within one year of leaving high school.B. Enrolled in higher education or competitively employed within one year of leaving high school.C. Enrolled in higher education or in some other postsecondary education or training program; or competitively employed or in some other employment within one year of leaving high school.
A. Enrolled in higher education within one year of leaving high school.
B. Enrolled in higher education or competitively employed within one year of leaving high school.
C. Enrolled in higher education or in some other post-secondary education or training program; or competitively employed or in some other employment within one year of leaving high school.
Year to Year LEA Rate Change
11.78% 15.80% N/AN/A N/A
25.93% 51.49% N/AN/A N/A
51.35% 63.26% N/AN/A N/A
--
--
--
Progress Slippage No Change Not ApplicableYear to Year LEA Change:Indicator Met: Met Not Met Page 15 of 2248
0104 : STUTTGART SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19
Timely and Accurate Data Reporting
IndicatorLEA Rate
Target Met by LEA
State Target
State Rate
LEA Differencefrom Target
State Indicator: Timely and Accurate Data.
Early Childhood (3-5) Rate
School Age (k-12) Rate
100%
100%
100%
100%
N/A
N/A
Year to Year LEA Rate Change
100%
N/A N/A
Y
--
↔
Progress Slippage No Change Not ApplicableYear to Year LEA Change:Indicator Met: Met Not Met Page 16 of 2248
0201 : CROSSETT SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19
Indicator 02: Dropout Rate Single Year Event Rate - Percent of students in grades 7-12 dropping out in a single year(Data from 2017/2018 School
Indicator 01: Graduation RateFour year Cohort Rate - Percent of students graduating in four years(Data from 2017/2018 School Year)
Indicator 03-B: AssessmentParticipation Rate: Literacy
Indicator 03-B: AssessmentParticipation Rate: Math
Indicator 03-C: AssessmentProficiency Rate: Math
Indicator 03-C: AssessmentProficiency Rate: Literacy
ASSESSMENT PARTICIPATION & PROFICIENCY RATES
GRADUATION & DROPOUT RATES
95.00%
95.00%
IndicatorLEA Rate
Target Met by LEA
LEA Differencefrom Target
State Target
State Rate
Year to Year LEA Rate Change
84.61% 85.91% 93.33% N/AY
1.62% 1.98% 1.31% N/AY
99.11% Y100.00% N/A
99.20% Y100.00% N/A
10.50% 10.50% 1.88% 8.62%N
12.95% 12.95% 3.77% 9.18%N
↑
↓
↑
↑
↓
↓
Progress Slippage No Change Not ApplicableYear to Year LEA Change:Indicator Met: Met Not Met Page 17 of 2248
0201 : CROSSETT SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19
DISCIPLINE RATES & DISPROPORTIONALITY in DISCIPLINE
IndicatorLEA Rate
Target Met by LEA
State Target
State Rate
Indicator 04-A: Suspensions & Expulsions > than 10 days(Data from 2017/2018 school year)
Required to Complete a Self-Assessment and Review of Policies, Procedures, and Practices
Were Inappropriate Policies, Procedures, and Practices Identified by the State
Indicator 04-B: Suspensions & Expulsions for > than 10 days by Special Education Race vs. General Education all races. (Data from 2017/2018 school year)
Were Inappropriate Policies, Procedures, and Practices Identified by the State
Required to Complete a Self-Assessment and Review of Policies, Procedures, and Practices
N/A
Notes: (1) State rate and state target are based on the percent of districts whose special edcuation rate exceeds the general education rate by more than 1.36 percentage points. (2) The LEA rate is the difference between the general education rate and special education rate. Any LEA that exceed the allowable 1.36 percentage points difference must complete a review of policies, procedures, and practices.
Notes: (1) State rate and state target are based on the percent of districts identified as having innapropriate policies, procedures, and practices.(2) LEA rate is based on whether or not a LEA was identified as having possible disproportionality. Identification is the difference between the general education rate for all races and special education rate for specific races. Any LEA with a difference >4 percentage point is identified for a review of policies, procedures, and practices.
LEA Differencefrom Target
Year to Year LEA Rate Change
30.51% 29.50% N/AY
N
0.38% 0%
0201 : CROSSETT SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19
LEAST RESTRICTIVE ENVIRONMENT (K-12)
IndicatorLEA Rate
Target Met by LEA
State Target
State Rate
Indicator 05-C: School Age LRE Percent of students receiving special educatiion services in other settings
Indicator 05-B: School Age LRE Percent of students inside the regular classroom less than 40% of the day
Indicator 05-A: School Age LRE Percent of students inside the regular classroom 80% or more of the day
LEAST RESTRICTIVE ENVIRONMENT (PreSchool)
Indicator 06-B: Early Childhood LRE: Separate education class, separate school or residential facility
Indicator 06-A: Early Childhood LRE: Regular Preschool Program Percent of children recieving with the majority of special education services with thier non-disabled peers
Note: Other settings includes Day Schools, Residential, and Hosptial/Home Bound but does not include students in correctional facilities or private schools.
LEA Differencefrom Target
Year to Year LEA Rate Change
54.32% 63.77% 76.13% N/AY
12.72% 12.00% 14.77% 2.05%N
2.05% 2.40% Y0.00% N/A
29.04% 35.94% N/AN/A N/A
23.74% 26.65% N/AN/A N/A
↓
↑
↓
--
--
Progress Slippage No Change Not ApplicableYear to Year LEA Change:Indicator Met: Met Not Met Page 19 of 2248
0201 : CROSSETT SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19
Indicator 07-C: Preschool Outcomes Summary 2: Appropriate Behaviors
Indicator 07-C: Preschool Outcomes Summary 1: Appropriate Behaviors
Indicator 07-B: Preschool Outcomes Summary 2: Knowledge and Skills
Indicator 07-A: Preschool Outcomes Summary 2: Social Emotional
Indicator 07-A: Preschool Outcomes Summary 1: Social Emotional
Indicator 07-B: Preschool Outcomes Summary 1: Knowledge and Skills
EARLY CHILDHOOD OUTCOMES
IndicatorLEA Rate
Target Met by LEA
State Target
State Rate
Indicator 7: Early Childhood OutcomesThere are two Summary Statements which are based the change between entry and exits scores for three outcome areas: (A) Social Emotional, (B) Knowledge and Skills, and (C) Appropriate Behvaiors.
Summary Statement 1: Of those preschool children who entered the preschool program below age expectations in each Outcome, the percent who substantially increased their rate of growth by the time they turned 6 years of age or exited the program.
Summary Statement 2: The percent of preschool children who were functioning within age expectations in each Outcome by the time they turned 6 years of age or
LEA Differencefrom Target
Year to Year LEA Rate Change
87.89% 91.56% N/AN/A N/A
57.92% 68.72% N/AN/A N/A
89.49% 92.38% N/A
N/A
N/A
45.15% 61.11% N/A
N/A
N/A
90.63% 92.13% N/AN/A N/A
65.22% 78.00% N/AN/A N/A
--
--
--
--
--
--
Progress Slippage No Change Not ApplicableYear to Year LEA Change:Indicator Met: Met Not Met Page 20 of 2248
0201 : CROSSETT SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19
PARENT INVOLVEMENT OUTCOMES
IndicatorLEA Rate
Target Met by LEA
State Target
State Rate
LEA Differencefrom Target
Indicator 8: Parent InvolvementPercent of surveyed parents who reported school facilitated parent involvement as a means of improving services and results for children with disabilities.
School Age (k-12) Rate
Early Childhood (3-5) Rate
Indicator 9: Disproportionality - EligibilityDisproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services that is a result of inappropriate identification (e.g. monitoring data, review of policies, practices, and procedures under 618(d), etc.).
Required to Complete a Self-Assessment and Review of Policies, Procedures, and Practices
Were Inappropriate Policies, Procedures, and Practices Identified by the State
DISPROPORTIONALITY: IDENTIFICATION & DISABILITY
Indicator 10: Disproportionality - Child with a DisabiiltyDisproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in specific disability categories that is a result of inappropriate identification (e.g. monitoring data, review of policies, practices, and procedures under 618(d), etc.).
Required to Complete a Self-Assessment and Review of Policies, Procedures, and Practices
Were Inappropriate Policies, Procedures, and Practices Identified by the State
0.00% 0.00% ≤4.00 N/A
0.00%0.00% N/A
Notes: (1) State rate and state target are based on the percent of LEAs identified as having innapropriate policies, procedures, and practices. (2) The LEA rate is based on if the risk ratio exceeded the cut score of 4; any LEA with a risk ratio greater than 4 is required to complete a review of policies, procedures, and practices.
Year to Year LEA Rate Change
Notes: (1) State rate and state target are based on the percent of LEAs identified as having innapropriate policies, procedures, and practices. (2) The LEA rate is based on if the risk ratio exceeded the cut score of 4; any LEA with a risk ratio greater than 4 is required to complete a review of policies, procedures, and practices.
93.83% 94.84% N/AN/A N/A
95.82% 96.45% Y100.00% N/A
Y
N N/A
Y N
Y>4.00
--
↔
↔
↑
Progress Slippage No Change Not ApplicableYear to Year LEA Change:Indicator Met: Met Not Met Page 21 of 2248
0201 : CROSSETT SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19
Indicator 11: Child FindPercent of children with parental consent to evaluate who are evaluated within the State established timeline of 60 days.
CHILD FIND: TIMELY EVALUATION
Early Childhood (3-5) Rate
School Age (k-12) Rate
TRANSITION
Indicator 12: Early Childhood TransitionPercent of children referred by Part C prior to age 3, who arefound eligible for Part B, and who have an IEP developed and implemented by their third birthday.
Indicator 13: Secondary TransistionPercent of youth with IEPs aged 16 and above with an IEP that includes appropriate measurable postsecondary goals.
IndicatorLEA Rate
Target Met by LEA
State Target
State Rate
LEA Differencefrom Target
Year to Year LEA Rate Change
N/AN/A N/A
99.62% Y100.00% N/A
100.00% N/A N/A
↔
--
--
--80.15%
95.24% 100.00% N/AN/A N/A
100.00
100.00%
99.87%
N/A
Progress Slippage No Change Not ApplicableYear to Year LEA Change:Indicator Met: Met Not Met Page 22 of 2248
0201 : CROSSETT SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19
Post-School Outcomes
IndicatorLEA Rate
Target Met by LEA
State Target
State Rate
LEA Differencefrom Target
Indicator 14: Post-School OutcomesPercent of youth who are no longer in secondary school, had IEPs in effect at the time they left school, and were:A. Enrolled in higher education within one year of leaving high school.B. Enrolled in higher education or competitively employed within one year of leaving high school.C. Enrolled in higher education or in some other postsecondary education or training program; or competitively employed or in some other employment within one year of leaving high school.
A. Enrolled in higher education within one year of leaving high school.
B. Enrolled in higher education or competitively employed within one year of leaving high school.
C. Enrolled in higher education or in some other post-secondary education or training program; or competitively employed or in some other employment within one year of leaving high school.
Year to Year LEA Rate Change
11.78% 15.80% N8.33% 7.47%
25.93% 51.49% N33.33% 18.16%
51.35% 63.26% N33.33% 29.93%
↓
↓
↓
Progress Slippage No Change Not ApplicableYear to Year LEA Change:Indicator Met: Met Not Met Page 23 of 2248
0201 : CROSSETT SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19
Timely and Accurate Data Reporting
IndicatorLEA Rate
Target Met by LEA
State Target
State Rate
LEA Differencefrom Target
State Indicator: Timely and Accurate Data.
Early Childhood (3-5) Rate
School Age (k-12) Rate
100%
100%
100%
100%
N/A
N/A
Year to Year LEA Rate Change
100%
N/A N/A
Y
--
↔
Progress Slippage No Change Not ApplicableYear to Year LEA Change:Indicator Met: Met Not Met Page 24 of 2248
0203 : HAMBURG SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19
Indicator 02: Dropout Rate Single Year Event Rate - Percent of students in grades 7-12 dropping out in a single year(Data from 2017/2018 School
Indicator 01: Graduation RateFour year Cohort Rate - Percent of students graduating in four years(Data from 2017/2018 School Year)
Indicator 03-B: AssessmentParticipation Rate: Literacy
Indicator 03-B: AssessmentParticipation Rate: Math
Indicator 03-C: AssessmentProficiency Rate: Math
Indicator 03-C: AssessmentProficiency Rate: Literacy
ASSESSMENT PARTICIPATION & PROFICIENCY RATES
GRADUATION & DROPOUT RATES
95.00%
95.00%
IndicatorLEA Rate
Target Met by LEA
LEA Differencefrom Target
State Target
State Rate
Year to Year LEA Rate Change
84.61% 85.91% 100.00% N/AY
1.62% 1.98% 3.22% 1.24%N
99.11% Y99.09% N/A
99.20% Y99.09% N/A
10.50% 10.50% 10.09% 0.41%N
12.95% 12.95% 10.09% 2.86%N
↔
↑
↓
↓
↑
↑
Progress Slippage No Change Not ApplicableYear to Year LEA Change:Indicator Met: Met Not Met Page 25 of 2248
0203 : HAMBURG SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19
DISCIPLINE RATES & DISPROPORTIONALITY in DISCIPLINE
IndicatorLEA Rate
Target Met by LEA
State Target
State Rate
Indicator 04-A: Suspensions & Expulsions > than 10 days(Data from 2017/2018 school year)
Required to Complete a Self-Assessment and Review of Policies, Procedures, and Practices
Were Inappropriate Policies, Procedures, and Practices Identified by the State
Indicator 04-B: Suspensions & Expulsions for > than 10 days by Special Education Race vs. General Education all races. (Data from 2017/2018 school year)
Were Inappropriate Policies, Procedures, and Practices Identified by the State
Required to Complete a Self-Assessment and Review of Policies, Procedures, and Practices
N/A
Notes: (1) State rate and state target are based on the percent of districts whose special edcuation rate exceeds the general education rate by more than 1.36 percentage points. (2) The LEA rate is the difference between the general education rate and special education rate. Any LEA that exceed the allowable 1.36 percentage points difference must complete a review of policies, procedures, and practices.
Notes: (1) State rate and state target are based on the percent of districts identified as having innapropriate policies, procedures, and practices.(2) LEA rate is based on whether or not a LEA was identified as having possible disproportionality. Identification is the difference between the general education rate for all races and special education rate for specific races. Any LEA with a difference >4 percentage point is identified for a review of policies, procedures, and practices.
LEA Differencefrom Target
Year to Year LEA Rate Change
30.51% 29.50% N/AY
N
0.38% 0%
0203 : HAMBURG SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19
LEAST RESTRICTIVE ENVIRONMENT (K-12)
IndicatorLEA Rate
Target Met by LEA
State Target
State Rate
Indicator 05-C: School Age LRE Percent of students receiving special educatiion services in other settings
Indicator 05-B: School Age LRE Percent of students inside the regular classroom less than 40% of the day
Indicator 05-A: School Age LRE Percent of students inside the regular classroom 80% or more of the day
LEAST RESTRICTIVE ENVIRONMENT (PreSchool)
Indicator 06-B: Early Childhood LRE: Separate education class, separate school or residential facility
Indicator 06-A: Early Childhood LRE: Regular Preschool Program Percent of children recieving with the majority of special education services with thier non-disabled peers
Note: Other settings includes Day Schools, Residential, and Hosptial/Home Bound but does not include students in correctional facilities or private schools.
LEA Differencefrom Target
Year to Year LEA Rate Change
54.32% 63.77% 67.21% N/AY
12.72% 12.00% 4.37% N/AY
2.05% 2.40% N2.73% 0.73%
29.04% 35.94% N/AN/A N/A
23.74% 26.65% N/AN/A N/A
↓
↓
↑
--
--
Progress Slippage No Change Not ApplicableYear to Year LEA Change:Indicator Met: Met Not Met Page 27 of 2248
0203 : HAMBURG SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19
Indicator 07-C: Preschool Outcomes Summary 2: Appropriate Behaviors
Indicator 07-C: Preschool Outcomes Summary 1: Appropriate Behaviors
Indicator 07-B: Preschool Outcomes Summary 2: Knowledge and Skills
Indicator 07-A: Preschool Outcomes Summary 2: Social Emotional
Indicator 07-A: Preschool Outcomes Summary 1: Social Emotional
Indicator 07-B: Preschool Outcomes Summary 1: Knowledge and Skills
EARLY CHILDHOOD OUTCOMES
IndicatorLEA Rate
Target Met by LEA
State Target
State Rate
Indicator 7: Early Childhood OutcomesThere are two Summary Statements which are based the change between entry and exits scores for three outcome areas: (A) Social Emotional, (B) Knowledge and Skills, and (C) Appropriate Behvaiors.
Summary Statement 1: Of those preschool children who entered the preschool program below age expectations in each Outcome, the percent who substantially increased their rate of growth by the time they turned 6 years of age or exited the program.
Summary Statement 2: The percent of preschool children who were functioning within age expectations in each Outcome by the time they turned 6 years of age or
LEA Differencefrom Target
Year to Year LEA Rate Change
87.89% 91.56% N/AN/A N/A
57.92% 68.72% N/AN/A N/A
89.49% 92.38% N/A
N/A
N/A
45.15% 61.11% N/A
N/A
N/A
90.63% 92.13% N/AN/A N/A
65.22% 78.00% N/AN/A N/A
--
--
--
--
--
--
Progress Slippage No Change Not ApplicableYear to Year LEA Change:Indicator Met: Met Not Met Page 28 of 2248
0203 : HAMBURG SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19
PARENT INVOLVEMENT OUTCOMES
IndicatorLEA Rate
Target Met by LEA
State Target
State Rate
LEA Differencefrom Target
Indicator 8: Parent InvolvementPercent of surveyed parents who reported school facilitated parent involvement as a means of improving services and results for children with disabilities.
School Age (k-12) Rate
Early Childhood (3-5) Rate
Indicator 9: Disproportionality - EligibilityDisproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services that is a result of inappropriate identification (e.g. monitoring data, review of policies, practices, and procedures under 618(d), etc.).
Required to Complete a Self-Assessment and Review of Policies, Procedures, and Practices
Were Inappropriate Policies, Procedures, and Practices Identified by the State
DISPROPORTIONALITY: IDENTIFICATION & DISABILITY
Indicator 10: Disproportionality - Child with a DisabiiltyDisproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in specific disability categories that is a result of inappropriate identification (e.g. monitoring data, review of policies, practices, and procedures under 618(d), etc.).
Required to Complete a Self-Assessment and Review of Policies, Procedures, and Practices
Were Inappropriate Policies, Procedures, and Practices Identified by the State
0.00% 0.00% ≤4.00 N/A
0.00%0.00% N/A
Notes: (1) State rate and state target are based on the percent of LEAs identified as having innapropriate policies, procedures, and practices. (2) The LEA rate is based on if the risk ratio exceeded the cut score of 4; any LEA with a risk ratio greater than 4 is required to complete a review of policies, procedures, and practices.
Year to Year LEA Rate Change
Notes: (1) State rate and state target are based on the percent of LEAs identified as having innapropriate policies, procedures, and practices. (2) The LEA rate is based on if the risk ratio exceeded the cut score of 4; any LEA with a risk ratio greater than 4 is required to complete a review of policies, procedures, and practices.
93.83% 94.84% N/AN/A N/A
95.82% 96.45% N94.11% 2.34%
Y
N N/A
Y N
Y>4.00
--
↓
↔
↑
Progress Slippage No Change Not ApplicableYear to Year LEA Change:Indicator Met: Met Not Met Page 29 of 2248
0203 : HAMBURG SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19
Indicator 11: Child FindPercent of children with parental consent to evaluate who are evaluated within the State established timeline of 60 days.
CHILD FIND: TIMELY EVALUATION
Early Childhood (3-5) Rate
School Age (k-12) Rate
TRANSITION
Indicator 12: Early Childhood TransitionPercent of children referred by Part C prior to age 3, who arefound eligible for Part B, and who have an IEP developed and implemented by their third birthday.
Indicator 13: Secondary TransistionPercent of youth with IEPs aged 16 and above with an IEP that includes appropriate measurable postsecondary goals.
IndicatorLEA Rate
Target Met by LEA
State Target
State Rate
LEA Differencefrom Target
Year to Year LEA Rate Change
N/AN/A N/A
99.62% Y100.00% N/A
100.00% N/A N/A
↔
--
--
--80.15%
95.24% 100.00% N/AN/A N/A
100.00
100.00%
99.87%
N/A
Progress Slippage No Change Not ApplicableYear to Year LEA Change:Indicator Met: Met Not Met Page 30 of 2248
0203 : HAMBURG SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19
Post-School Outcomes
IndicatorLEA Rate
Target Met by LEA
State Target
State Rate
LEA Differencefrom Target
Indicator 14: Post-School OutcomesPercent of youth who are no longer in secondary school, had IEPs in effect at the time they left school, and were:A. Enrolled in higher education within one year of leaving high school.B. Enrolled in higher education or competitively employed within one year of leaving high school.C. Enrolled in higher education or in some other postsecondary education or training program; or competitively employed or in some other employment within one year of leaving high school.
A. Enrolled in higher education within one year of leaving high school.
B. Enrolled in higher education or competitively employed within one year of leaving high school.
C. Enrolled in higher education or in some other post-secondary education or training program; or competitively employed or in some other employment within one year of leaving high school.
Year to Year LEA Rate Change
11.78% 15.80% N/AN/A N/A
25.93% 51.49% N/AN/A N/A
51.35% 63.26% N/AN/A N/A
--
--
--
Progress Slippage No Change Not ApplicableYear to Year LEA Change:Indicator Met: Met Not Met Page 31 of 2248
0203 : HAMBURG SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19
Timely and Accurate Data Reporting
IndicatorLEA Rate
Target Met by LEA
State Target
State Rate
LEA Differencefrom Target
State Indicator: Timely and Accurate Data.
Early Childhood (3-5) Rate
School Age (k-12) Rate
100%
100%
100%
100%
N/A
N/A
Year to Year LEA Rate Change
100%
N/A N/A
Y
--
↔
Progress Slippage No Change Not ApplicableYear to Year LEA Change:Indicator Met: Met Not Met Page 32 of 2248
0302 : COTTER SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19
Indicator 02: Dropout Rate Single Year Event Rate - Percent of students in grades 7-12 dropping out in a single year(Data from 2017/2018 School
Indicator 01: Graduation RateFour year Cohort Rate - Percent of students graduating in four years(Data from 2017/2018 School Year)
Indicator 03-B: AssessmentParticipation Rate: Literacy
Indicator 03-B: AssessmentParticipation Rate: Math
Indicator 03-C: AssessmentProficiency Rate: Math
Indicator 03-C: AssessmentProficiency Rate: Literacy
ASSESSMENT PARTICIPATION & PROFICIENCY RATES
GRADUATION & DROPOUT RATES
95.00%
95.00%
IndicatorLEA Rate
Target Met by LEA
LEA Differencefrom Target
State Target
State Rate
Year to Year LEA Rate Change
84.61% 85.91% 87.50% N/AY
1.62% 1.98% 0.00% N/AY
99.11% Y96.96% N/A
99.20% Y96.96% N/A
10.50% 10.50% 14.06% N/AY
12.95% 12.95% 26.56% N/AY
↑
↔
↑
↑
↑
↑
Progress Slippage No Change Not ApplicableYear to Year LEA Change:Indicator Met: Met Not Met Page 33 of 2248
0302 : COTTER SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19
DISCIPLINE RATES & DISPROPORTIONALITY in DISCIPLINE
IndicatorLEA Rate
Target Met by LEA
State Target
State Rate
Indicator 04-A: Suspensions & Expulsions > than 10 days(Data from 2017/2018 school year)
Required to Complete a Self-Assessment and Review of Policies, Procedures, and Practices
Were Inappropriate Policies, Procedures, and Practices Identified by the State
Indicator 04-B: Suspensions & Expulsions for > than 10 days by Special Education Race vs. General Education all races. (Data from 2017/2018 school year)
Were Inappropriate Policies, Procedures, and Practices Identified by the State
Required to Complete a Self-Assessment and Review of Policies, Procedures, and Practices
N/A
Notes: (1) State rate and state target are based on the percent of districts whose special edcuation rate exceeds the general education rate by more than 1.36 percentage points. (2) The LEA rate is the difference between the general education rate and special education rate. Any LEA that exceed the allowable 1.36 percentage points difference must complete a review of policies, procedures, and practices.
Notes: (1) State rate and state target are based on the percent of districts identified as having innapropriate policies, procedures, and practices.(2) LEA rate is based on whether or not a LEA was identified as having possible disproportionality. Identification is the difference between the general education rate for all races and special education rate for specific races. Any LEA with a difference >4 percentage point is identified for a review of policies, procedures, and practices.
LEA Differencefrom Target
Year to Year LEA Rate Change
30.51% 29.50% N/AY
N
0.38% 0%
0302 : COTTER SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19
LEAST RESTRICTIVE ENVIRONMENT (K-12)
IndicatorLEA Rate
Target Met by LEA
State Target
State Rate
Indicator 05-C: School Age LRE Percent of students receiving special educatiion services in other settings
Indicator 05-B: School Age LRE Percent of students inside the regular classroom less than 40% of the day
Indicator 05-A: School Age LRE Percent of students inside the regular classroom 80% or more of the day
LEAST RESTRICTIVE ENVIRONMENT (PreSchool)
Indicator 06-B: Early Childhood LRE: Separate education class, separate school or residential facility
Indicator 06-A: Early Childhood LRE: Regular Preschool Program Percent of children recieving with the majority of special education services with thier non-disabled peers
Note: Other settings includes Day Schools, Residential, and Hosptial/Home Bound but does not include students in correctional facilities or private schools.
LEA Differencefrom Target
Year to Year LEA Rate Change
54.32% 63.77% 69.44% N/AY
12.72% 12.00% 3.70% N/AY
2.05% 2.40% Y0.00% N/A
29.04% 35.94% N/AN/A N/A
23.74% 26.65% N/AN/A N/A
↓
↓
↓
--
--
Progress Slippage No Change Not ApplicableYear to Year LEA Change:Indicator Met: Met Not Met Page 35 of 2248
0302 : COTTER SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19
Indicator 07-C: Preschool Outcomes Summary 2: Appropriate Behaviors
Indicator 07-C: Preschool Outcomes Summary 1: Appropriate Behaviors
Indicator 07-B: Preschool Outcomes Summary 2: Knowledge and Skills
Indicator 07-A: Preschool Outcomes Summary 2: Social Emotional
Indicator 07-A: Preschool Outcomes Summary 1: Social Emotional
Indicator 07-B: Preschool Outcomes Summary 1: Knowledge and Skills
EARLY CHILDHOOD OUTCOMES
IndicatorLEA Rate
Target Met by LEA
State Target
State Rate
Indicator 7: Early Childhood OutcomesThere are two Summary Statements which are based the change between entry and exits scores for three outcome areas: (A) Social Emotional, (B) Knowledge and Skills, and (C) Appropriate Behvaiors.
Summary Statement 1: Of those preschool children who entered the preschool program below age expectations in each Outcome, the percent who substantially increased their rate of growth by the time they turned 6 years of age or exited the program.
Summary Statement 2: The percent of preschool children who were functioning within age expectations in each Outcome by the time they turned 6 years of age or
LEA Differencefrom Target
Year to Year LEA Rate Change
87.89% 91.56% N/AN/A N/A
57.92% 68.72% N/AN/A N/A
89.49% 92.38% N/A
N/A
N/A
45.15% 61.11% N/A
N/A
N/A
90.63% 92.13% N/AN/A N/A
65.22% 78.00% N/AN/A N/A
--
--
--
--
--
--
Progress Slippage No Change Not ApplicableYear to Year LEA Change:Indicator Met: Met Not Met Page 36 of 2248
0302 : COTTER SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19
PARENT INVOLVEMENT OUTCOMES
IndicatorLEA Rate
Target Met by LEA
State Target
State Rate
LEA Differencefrom Target
Indicator 8: Parent InvolvementPercent of surveyed parents who reported school facilitated parent involvement as a means of improving services and results for children with disabilities.
School Age (k-12) Rate
Early Childhood (3-5) Rate
Indicator 9: Disproportionality - EligibilityDisproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services that is a result of inappropriate identification (e.g. monitoring data, review of policies, practices, and procedures under 618(d), etc.).
Required to Complete a Self-Assessment and Review of Policies, Procedures, and Practices
Were Inappropriate Policies, Procedures, and Practices Identified by the State
DISPROPORTIONALITY: IDENTIFICATION & DISABILITY
Indicator 10: Disproportionality - Child with a DisabiiltyDisproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in specific disability categories that is a result of inappropriate identification (e.g. monitoring data, review of policies, practices, and procedures under 618(d), etc.).
Required to Complete a Self-Assessment and Review of Policies, Procedures, and Practices
Were Inappropriate Policies, Procedures, and Practices Identified by the State
0.00% 0.00% ≤4.00 N/A
0.00%0.00% N/A
Notes: (1) State rate and state target are based on the percent of LEAs identified as having innapropriate policies, procedures, and practices. (2) The LEA rate is based on if the risk ratio exceeded the cut score of 4; any LEA with a risk ratio greater than 4 is required to complete a review of policies, procedures, and practices.
Year to Year LEA Rate Change
Notes: (1) State rate and state target are based on the percent of LEAs identified as having innapropriate policies, procedures, and practices. (2) The LEA rate is based on if the risk ratio exceeded the cut score of 4; any LEA with a risk ratio greater than 4 is required to complete a review of policies, procedures, and practices.
93.83% 94.84% N/AN/A N/A
95.82% 96.45% N92.56% 3.89%
Y
N N/A
Y N
Y>4.00
--
↓
↔
↑
Progress Slippage No Change Not ApplicableYear to Year LEA Change:Indicator Met: Met Not Met Page 37 of 2248
0302 : COTTER SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19
Indicator 11: Child FindPercent of children with parental consent to evaluate who are evaluated within the State established timeline of 60 days.
CHILD FIND: TIMELY EVALUATION
Early Childhood (3-5) Rate
School Age (k-12) Rate
TRANSITION
Indicator 12: Early Childhood TransitionPercent of children referred by Part C prior to age 3, who arefound eligible for Part B, and who have an IEP developed and implemented by their third birthday.
Indicator 13: Secondary TransistionPercent of youth with IEPs aged 16 and above with an IEP that includes appropriate measurable postsecondary goals.
IndicatorLEA Rate
Target Met by LEA
State Target
State Rate
LEA Differencefrom Target
Year to Year LEA Rate Change
N/AN/A N/A
99.62% Y100.00% N/A
100.00% N/A N/A
↔
--
--
--80.15%
95.24% 100.00% N/AN/A N/A
100.00
100.00%
99.87%
N/A
Progress Slippage No Change Not ApplicableYear to Year LEA Change:Indicator Met: Met Not Met Page 38 of 2248
0302 : COTTER SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19
Post-School Outcomes
IndicatorLEA Rate
Target Met by LEA
State Target
State Rate
LEA Differencefrom Target
Indicator 14: Post-School OutcomesPercent of youth who are no longer in secondary school, had IEPs in effect at the time they left school, and were:A. Enrolled in higher education within one year of leaving high school.B. Enrolled in higher education or competitively employed within one year of leaving high school.C. Enrolled in higher education or in some other postsecondary education or training program; or competitively employed or in some other employment within one year of leaving high school.
A. Enrolled in higher education within one year of leaving high school.
B. Enrolled in higher education or competitively employed within one year of leaving high school.
C. Enrolled in higher education or in some other post-secondary education or training program; or competitively employed or in some other employment within one year of leaving high school.
Year to Year LEA Rate Change
11.78% 15.80% N/AN/A N/A
25.93% 51.49% N/AN/A N/A
51.35% 63.26% N/AN/A N/A
--
--
--
Progress Slippage No Change Not ApplicableYear to Year LEA Change:Indicator Met: Met Not Met Page 39 of 2248
0302 : COTTER SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19
Timely and Accurate Data Reporting
IndicatorLEA Rate
Target Met by LEA
State Target
State Rate
LEA Differencefrom Target
State Indicator: Timely and Accurate Data.
Early Childhood (3-5) Rate
School Age (k-12) Rate
100%
100%
100%
100%
N/A
N/A
Year to Year LEA Rate Change
100%
N/A N/A
Y
--
↔
Progress Slippage No Change Not ApplicableYear to Year LEA Change:Indicator Met: Met Not Met Page 40 of 2248
0303 : MOUNTAIN HOME SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19
Indicator 02: Dropout Rate Single Year Event Rate - Percent of students in grades 7-12 dropping out in a single year(Data from 2017/2018 School
Indicator 01: Graduation RateFour year Cohort Rate - Percent of students graduating in four years(Data from 2017/2018 School Year)
Indicator 03-B: AssessmentParticipation Rate: Literacy
Indicator 03-B: AssessmentParticipation Rate: Math
Indicator 03-C: AssessmentProficiency Rate: Math
Indicator 03-C: AssessmentProficiency Rate: Literacy
ASSESSMENT PARTICIPATION & PROFICIENCY RATES
GRADUATION & DROPOUT RATES
95.00%
95.00%
IndicatorLEA Rate
Target Met by LEA
LEA Differencefrom Target
State Target
State Rate
Year to Year LEA Rate Change
84.61% 85.91% 76.00% 9.91%N
1.62% 1.98% 3.05% 1.07%N
99.11% Y100.00% N/A
99.20% Y100.00% N/A
10.50% 10.50% 10.44% 0.06%N
12.95% 12.95% 15.29% N/AY
↑
↑
↑
↑
↓
↑
Progress Slippage No Change Not ApplicableYear to Year LEA Change:Indicator Met: Met Not Met Page 41 of 2248
0303 : MOUNTAIN HOME SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19
DISCIPLINE RATES & DISPROPORTIONALITY in DISCIPLINE
IndicatorLEA Rate
Target Met by LEA
State Target
State Rate
Indicator 04-A: Suspensions & Expulsions > than 10 days(Data from 2017/2018 school year)
Required to Complete a Self-Assessment and Review of Policies, Procedures, and Practices
Were Inappropriate Policies, Procedures, and Practices Identified by the State
Indicator 04-B: Suspensions & Expulsions for > than 10 days by Special Education Race vs. General Education all races. (Data from 2017/2018 school year)
Were Inappropriate Policies, Procedures, and Practices Identified by the State
Required to Complete a Self-Assessment and Review of Policies, Procedures, and Practices
N/A
Notes: (1) State rate and state target are based on the percent of districts whose special edcuation rate exceeds the general education rate by more than 1.36 percentage points. (2) The LEA rate is the difference between the general education rate and special education rate. Any LEA that exceed the allowable 1.36 percentage points difference must complete a review of policies, procedures, and practices.
Notes: (1) State rate and state target are based on the percent of districts identified as having innapropriate policies, procedures, and practices.(2) LEA rate is based on whether or not a LEA was identified as having possible disproportionality. Identification is the difference between the general education rate for all races and special education rate for specific races. Any LEA with a difference >4 percentage point is identified for a review of policies, procedures, and practices.
LEA Differencefrom Target
Year to Year LEA Rate Change
30.51% 29.50% N/AY
N
0.38% 0%
0303 : MOUNTAIN HOME SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19
LEAST RESTRICTIVE ENVIRONMENT (K-12)
IndicatorLEA Rate
Target Met by LEA
State Target
State Rate
Indicator 05-C: School Age LRE Percent of students receiving special educatiion services in other settings
Indicator 05-B: School Age LRE Percent of students inside the regular classroom less than 40% of the day
Indicator 05-A: School Age LRE Percent of students inside the regular classroom 80% or more of the day
LEAST RESTRICTIVE ENVIRONMENT (PreSchool)
Indicator 06-B: Early Childhood LRE: Separate education class, separate school or residential facility
Indicator 06-A: Early Childhood LRE: Regular Preschool Program Percent of children recieving with the majority of special education services with thier non-disabled peers
Note: Other settings includes Day Schools, Residential, and Hosptial/Home Bound but does not include students in correctional facilities or private schools.
LEA Differencefrom Target
Year to Year LEA Rate Change
54.32% 63.77% 68.44% N/AY
12.72% 12.00% 16.26% 3.54%N
2.05% 2.40% Y0.72% N/A
29.04% 35.94% N/AN/A N/A
23.74% 26.65% N/AN/A N/A
↑
↔
↓
--
--
Progress Slippage No Change Not ApplicableYear to Year LEA Change:Indicator Met: Met Not Met Page 43 of 2248
0303 : MOUNTAIN HOME SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19
Indicator 07-C: Preschool Outcomes Summary 2: Appropriate Behaviors
Indicator 07-C: Preschool Outcomes Summary 1: Appropriate Behaviors
Indicator 07-B: Preschool Outcomes Summary 2: Knowledge and Skills
Indicator 07-A: Preschool Outcomes Summary 2: Social Emotional
Indicator 07-A: Preschool Outcomes Summary 1: Social Emotional
Indicator 07-B: Preschool Outcomes Summary 1: Knowledge and Skills
EARLY CHILDHOOD OUTCOMES
IndicatorLEA Rate
Target Met by LEA
State Target
State Rate
Indicator 7: Early Childhood OutcomesThere are two Summary Statements which are based the change between entry and exits scores for three outcome areas: (A) Social Emotional, (B) Knowledge and Skills, and (C) Appropriate Behvaiors.
Summary Statement 1: Of those preschool children who entered the preschool program below age expectations in each Outcome, the percent who substantially increased their rate of growth by the time they turned 6 years of age or exited the program.
Summary Statement 2: The percent of preschool children who were functioning within age expectations in each Outcome by the time they turned 6 years of age or
LEA Differencefrom Target
Year to Year LEA Rate Change
87.89% 91.56% N/AN/A N/A
57.92% 68.72% N/AN/A N/A
89.49% 92.38% N/A
N/A
N/A
45.15% 61.11% N/A
N/A
N/A
90.63% 92.13% N/AN/A N/A
65.22% 78.00% N/AN/A N/A
--
--
--
--
--
--
Progress Slippage No Change Not ApplicableYear to Year LEA Change:Indicator Met: Met Not Met Page 44 of 2248
0303 : MOUNTAIN HOME SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19
PARENT INVOLVEMENT OUTCOMES
IndicatorLEA Rate
Target Met by LEA
State Target
State Rate
LEA Differencefrom Target
Indicator 8: Parent InvolvementPercent of surveyed parents who reported school facilitated parent involvement as a means of improving services and results for children with disabilities.
School Age (k-12) Rate
Early Childhood (3-5) Rate
Indicator 9: Disproportionality - EligibilityDisproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services that is a result of inappropriate identification (e.g. monitoring data, review of policies, practices, and procedures under 618(d), etc.).
Required to Complete a Self-Assessment and Review of Policies, Procedures, and Practices
Were Inappropriate Policies, Procedures, and Practices Identified by the State
DISPROPORTIONALITY: IDENTIFICATION & DISABILITY
Indicator 10: Disproportionality - Child with a DisabiiltyDisproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in specific disability categories that is a result of inappropriate identification (e.g. monitoring data, review of policies, practices, and procedures under 618(d), etc.).
Required to Complete a Self-Assessment and Review of Policies, Procedures, and Practices
Were Inappropriate Policies, Procedures, and Practices Identified by the State
0.00% 0.00% ≤4.00 N/A
0.00%0.00% N/A
Notes: (1) State rate and state target are based on the percent of LEAs identified as having innapropriate policies, procedures, and practices. (2) The LEA rate is based on if the risk ratio exceeded the cut score of 4; any LEA with a risk ratio greater than 4 is required to complete a review of policies, procedures, and practices.
Year to Year LEA Rate Change
Notes: (1) State rate and state target are based on the percent of LEAs identified as having innapropriate policies, procedures, and practices. (2) The LEA rate is based on if the risk ratio exceeded the cut score of 4; any LEA with a risk ratio greater than 4 is required to complete a review of policies, procedures, and practices.
93.83% 94.84% N/AN/A N/A
95.82% 96.45% N94.65% 1.80%
Y
N N/A
N N/A
Y
0303 : MOUNTAIN HOME SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19
Indicator 11: Child FindPercent of children with parental consent to evaluate who are evaluated within the State established timeline of 60 days.
CHILD FIND: TIMELY EVALUATION
Early Childhood (3-5) Rate
School Age (k-12) Rate
TRANSITION
Indicator 12: Early Childhood TransitionPercent of children referred by Part C prior to age 3, who arefound eligible for Part B, and who have an IEP developed and implemented by their third birthday.
Indicator 13: Secondary TransistionPercent of youth with IEPs aged 16 and above with an IEP that includes appropriate measurable postsecondary goals.
IndicatorLEA Rate
Target Met by LEA
State Target
State Rate
LEA Differencefrom Target
Year to Year LEA Rate Change
N/AN/A N/A
99.62% Y100.00% N/A
100.00% N/A N/A
↔
--
--
--80.15%
95.24% 100.00% N/AN/A N/A
100.00
100.00%
99.87%
N/A
Progress Slippage No Change Not ApplicableYear to Year LEA Change:Indicator Met: Met Not Met Page 46 of 2248
0303 : MOUNTAIN HOME SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19
Post-School Outcomes
IndicatorLEA Rate
Target Met by LEA
State Target
State Rate
LEA Differencefrom Target
Indicator 14: Post-School OutcomesPercent of youth who are no longer in secondary school, had IEPs in effect at the time they left school, and were:A. Enrolled in higher education within one year of leaving high school.B. Enrolled in higher education or competitively employed within one year of leaving high school.C. Enrolled in higher education or in some other postsecondary education or training program; or competitively employed or in some other employment within one year of leaving high school.
A. Enrolled in higher education within one year of leaving high school.
B. Enrolled in higher education or competitively employed within one year of leaving high school.
C. Enrolled in higher education or in some other post-secondary education or training program; or competitively employed or in some other employment within one year of leaving high school.
Year to Year LEA Rate Change
11.78% 15.80% N/AN/A N/A
25.93% 51.49% N/AN/A N/A
51.35% 63.26% N/AN/A N/A
--
--
--
Progress Slippage No Change Not ApplicableYear to Year LEA Change:Indicator Met: Met Not Met Page 47 of 2248
0303 : MOUNTAIN HOME SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19
Timely and Accurate Data Reporting
IndicatorLEA Rate
Target Met by LEA
State Target
State Rate
LEA Differencefrom Target
State Indicator: Timely and Accurate Data.
Early Childhood (3-5) Rate
School Age (k-12) Rate
100%
100%
100%
100%
N/A
N/A
Year to Year LEA Rate Change
100%
N/A N/A
Y
--
↔
Progress Slippage No Change Not ApplicableYear to Year LEA Change:Indicator Met: Met Not Met Page 48 of 2248
0304 : NORFORK SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19
Indicator 02: Dropout Rate Single Year Event Rate - Percent of students in grades 7-12 dropping out in a single year(Data from 2017/2018 School
Indicator 01: Graduation RateFour year Cohort Rate - Percent of students graduating in four years(Data from 2017/2018 School Year)
Indicator 03-B: AssessmentParticipation Rate: Literacy
Indicator 03-B: AssessmentParticipation Rate: Math
Indicator 03-C: AssessmentProficiency Rate: Math
Indicator 03-C: AssessmentProficiency Rate: Literacy
ASSESSMENT PARTICIPATION & PROFICIENCY RATES
GRADUATION & DROPOUT RATES
95.00%
95.00%
IndicatorLEA Rate
Target Met by LEA
LEA Differencefrom Target
State Target
State Rate
Year to Year LEA Rate Change
84.61% 85.91% 88.88% N/AY
1.62% 1.98% 0.00% N/AY
99.11% Y100.00% N/A
99.20% Y100.00% N/A
10.50% 10.50% 30.76% N/AY
12.95% 12.95% 33.33% N/AY
↑
↓
↑
↑
↓
↓
Progress Slippage No Change Not ApplicableYear to Year LEA Change:Indicator Met: Met Not Met Page 49 of 2248
0304 : NORFORK SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19
DISCIPLINE RATES & DISPROPORTIONALITY in DISCIPLINE
IndicatorLEA Rate
Target Met by LEA
State Target
State Rate
Indicator 04-A: Suspensions & Expulsions > than 10 days(Data from 2017/2018 school year)
Required to Complete a Self-Assessment and Review of Policies, Procedures, and Practices
Were Inappropriate Policies, Procedures, and Practices Identified by the State
Indicator 04-B: Suspensions & Expulsions for > than 10 days by Special Education Race vs. General Education all races. (Data from 2017/2018 school year)
Were Inappropriate Policies, Procedures, and Practices Identified by the State
Required to Complete a Self-Assessment and Review of Policies, Procedures, and Practices
N/A
Notes: (1) State rate and state target are based on the percent of districts whose special edcuation rate exceeds the general education rate by more than 1.36 percentage points. (2) The LEA rate is the difference between the general education rate and special education rate. Any LEA that exceed the allowable 1.36 percentage points difference must complete a review of policies, procedures, and practices.
Notes: (1) State rate and state target are based on the percent of districts identified as having innapropriate policies, procedures, and practices.(2) LEA rate is based on whether or not a LEA was identified as having possible disproportionality. Identification is the difference between the general education rate for all races and special education rate for specific races. Any LEA with a difference >4 percentage point is identified for a review of policies, procedures, and practices.
LEA Differencefrom Target
Year to Year LEA Rate Change
30.51% 29.50% N/AY
N
0.38% 0%
0304 : NORFORK SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19
LEAST RESTRICTIVE ENVIRONMENT (K-12)
IndicatorLEA Rate
Target Met by LEA
State Target
State Rate
Indicator 05-C: School Age LRE Percent of students receiving special educatiion services in other settings
Indicator 05-B: School Age LRE Percent of students inside the regular classroom less than 40% of the day
Indicator 05-A: School Age LRE Percent of students inside the regular classroom 80% or more of the day
LEAST RESTRICTIVE ENVIRONMENT (PreSchool)
Indicator 06-B: Early Childhood LRE: Separate education class, separate school or residential facility
Indicator 06-A: Early Childhood LRE: Regular Preschool Program Percent of children recieving with the majority of special education services with thier non-disabled peers
Note: Other settings includes Day Schools, Residential, and Hosptial/Home Bound but does not include students in correctional facilities or private schools.
LEA Differencefrom Target
Year to Year LEA Rate Change
54.32% 63.77% 56.06% 7.71%N
12.72% 12.00% 18.18% 5.46%N
2.05% 2.40% Y0.00% N/A
29.04% 35.94% N/AN/A N/A
23.74% 26.65% N/AN/A N/A
↑
↓
↔
--
--
Progress Slippage No Change Not ApplicableYear to Year LEA Change:Indicator Met: Met Not Met Page 51 of 2248
0304 : NORFORK SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19
Indicator 07-C: Preschool Outcomes Summary 2: Appropriate Behaviors
Indicator 07-C: Preschool Outcomes Summary 1: Appropriate Behaviors
Indicator 07-B: Preschool Outcomes Summary 2: Knowledge and Skills
Indicator 07-A: Preschool Outcomes Summary 2: Social Emotional
Indicator 07-A: Preschool Outcomes Summary 1: Social Emotional
Indicator 07-B: Preschool Outcomes Summary 1: Knowledge and Skills
EARLY CHILDHOOD OUTCOMES
IndicatorLEA Rate
Target Met by LEA
State Target
State Rate
Indicator 7: Early Childhood OutcomesThere are two Summary Statements which are based the change between entry and exits scores for three outcome areas: (A) Social Emotional, (B) Knowledge and Skills, and (C) Appropriate Behvaiors.
Summary Statement 1: Of those preschool children who entered the preschool program below age expectations in each Outcome, the percent who substantially increased their rate of growth by the time they turned 6 years of age or exited the program.
Summary Statement 2: The percent of preschool children who were functioning within age expectations in each Outcome by the time they turned 6 years of age or
LEA Differencefrom Target
Year to Year LEA Rate Change
87.89% 91.56% N/AN/A N/A
57.92% 68.72% N/AN/A N/A
89.49% 92.38% N/A
N/A
N/A
45.15% 61.11% N/A
N/A
N/A
90.63% 92.13% N/AN/A N/A
65.22% 78.00% N/AN/A N/A
--
--
--
--
--
--
Progress Slippage No Change Not ApplicableYear to Year LEA Change:Indicator Met: Met Not Met Page 52 of 2248
0304 : NORFORK SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19
PARENT INVOLVEMENT OUTCOMES
IndicatorLEA Rate
Target Met by LEA
State Target
State Rate
LEA Differencefrom Target
Indicator 8: Parent InvolvementPercent of surveyed parents who reported school facilitated parent involvement as a means of improving services and results for children with disabilities.
School Age (k-12) Rate
Early Childhood (3-5) Rate
Indicator 9: Disproportionality - EligibilityDisproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in special education and related services that is a result of inappropriate identification (e.g. monitoring data, review of policies, practices, and procedures under 618(d), etc.).
Required to Complete a Self-Assessment and Review of Policies, Procedures, and Practices
Were Inappropriate Policies, Procedures, and Practices Identified by the State
DISPROPORTIONALITY: IDENTIFICATION & DISABILITY
Indicator 10: Disproportionality - Child with a DisabiiltyDisproportionate representation of racial and ethnic groups in specific disability categories that is a result of inappropriate identification (e.g. monitoring data, review of policies, practices, and procedures under 618(d), etc.).
Required to Complete a Self-Assessment and Review of Policies, Procedures, and Practices
Were Inappropriate Policies, Procedures, and Practices Identified by the State
0.00% 0.00% ≤4.00 N/A
0.00%0.00% N/A
Notes: (1) State rate and state target are based on the percent of LEAs identified as having innapropriate policies, procedures, and practices. (2) The LEA rate is based on if the risk ratio exceeded the cut score of 4; any LEA with a risk ratio greater than 4 is required to complete a review of policies, procedures, and practices.
Year to Year LEA Rate Change
Notes: (1) State rate and state target are based on the percent of LEAs identified as having innapropriate policies, procedures, and practices. (2) The LEA rate is based on if the risk ratio exceeded the cut score of 4; any LEA with a risk ratio greater than 4 is required to complete a review of policies, procedures, and practices.
93.83% 94.84% N/AN/A N/A
95.82% 96.45% N89.74% 6.71%
Y
N N/A
N N/A
Y
0304 : NORFORK SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19
Indicator 11: Child FindPercent of children with parental consent to evaluate who are evaluated within the State established timeline of 60 days.
CHILD FIND: TIMELY EVALUATION
Early Childhood (3-5) Rate
School Age (k-12) Rate
TRANSITION
Indicator 12: Early Childhood TransitionPercent of children referred by Part C prior to age 3, who arefound eligible for Part B, and who have an IEP developed and implemented by their third birthday.
Indicator 13: Secondary TransistionPercent of youth with IEPs aged 16 and above with an IEP that includes appropriate measurable postsecondary goals.
IndicatorLEA Rate
Target Met by LEA
State Target
State Rate
LEA Differencefrom Target
Year to Year LEA Rate Change
N/AN/A N/A
99.62% Y100.00% N/A
100.00% 100.00% N/A
↔
--
--
↑80.15%
95.24% 100.00% N/AN/A N/A
100.00
100.00%
99.87%
Y
Progress Slippage No Change Not ApplicableYear to Year LEA Change:Indicator Met: Met Not Met Page 54 of 2248
0304 : NORFORK SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19
Post-School Outcomes
IndicatorLEA Rate
Target Met by LEA
State Target
State Rate
LEA Differencefrom Target
Indicator 14: Post-School OutcomesPercent of youth who are no longer in secondary school, had IEPs in effect at the time they left school, and were:A. Enrolled in higher education within one year of leaving high school.B. Enrolled in higher education or competitively employed within one year of leaving high school.C. Enrolled in higher education or in some other postsecondary education or training program; or competitively employed or in some other employment within one year of leaving high school.
A. Enrolled in higher education within one year of leaving high school.
B. Enrolled in higher education or competitively employed within one year of leaving high school.
C. Enrolled in higher education or in some other post-secondary education or training program; or competitively employed or in some other employment within one year of leaving high school.
Year to Year LEA Rate Change
11.78% 15.80% Y33.33% N/A
25.93% 51.49% Y66.66% N/A
51.35% 63.26% Y66.66% N/A
↑
↑
↑
Progress Slippage No Change Not ApplicableYear to Year LEA Change:Indicator Met: Met Not Met Page 55 of 2248
0304 : NORFORK SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19
Timely and Accurate Data Reporting
IndicatorLEA Rate
Target Met by LEA
State Target
State Rate
LEA Differencefrom Target
State Indicator: Timely and Accurate Data.
Early Childhood (3-5) Rate
School Age (k-12) Rate
100%
100%
100%
100%
N/A
N/A
Year to Year LEA Rate Change
100%
N/A N/A
Y
--
↔
Progress Slippage No Change Not ApplicableYear to Year LEA Change:Indicator Met: Met Not Met Page 56 of 2248
0401 : BENTONVILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19
Indicator 02: Dropout Rate Single Year Event Rate - Percent of students in grades 7-12 dropping out in a single year(Data from 2017/2018 School
Indicator 01: Graduation RateFour year Cohort Rate - Percent of students graduating in four years(Data from 2017/2018 School Year)
Indicator 03-B: AssessmentParticipation Rate: Literacy
Indicator 03-B: AssessmentParticipation Rate: Math
Indicator 03-C: AssessmentProficiency Rate: Math
Indicator 03-C: AssessmentProficiency Rate: Literacy
ASSESSMENT PARTICIPATION & PROFICIENCY RATES
GRADUATION & DROPOUT RATES
95.00%
95.00%
IndicatorLEA Rate
Target Met by LEA
LEA Differencefrom Target
State Target
State Rate
Year to Year LEA Rate Change
84.61% 85.91% 86.55% N/AY
1.62% 1.98% 1.17% N/AY
99.11% Y99.25% N/A
99.20% Y99.25% N/A
10.50% 10.50% 24.93% N/AY
12.95% 12.95% 27.05% N/AY
↑
↓
↑
↑
↑
↑
Progress Slippage No Change Not ApplicableYear to Year LEA Change:Indicator Met: Met Not Met Page 57 of 2248
0401 : BENTONVILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19
DISCIPLINE RATES & DISPROPORTIONALITY in DISCIPLINE
IndicatorLEA Rate
Target Met by LEA
State Target
State Rate
Indicator 04-A: Suspensions & Expulsions > than 10 days(Data from 2017/2018 school year)
Required to Complete a Self-Assessment and Review of Policies, Procedures, and Practices
Were Inappropriate Policies, Procedures, and Practices Identified by the State
Indicator 04-B: Suspensions & Expulsions for > than 10 days by Special Education Race vs. General Education all races. (Data from 2017/2018 school year)
Were Inappropriate Policies, Procedures, and Practices Identified by the State
Required to Complete a Self-Assessment and Review of Policies, Procedures, and Practices
N/A
Notes: (1) State rate and state target are based on the percent of districts whose special edcuation rate exceeds the general education rate by more than 1.36 percentage points. (2) The LEA rate is the difference between the general education rate and special education rate. Any LEA that exceed the allowable 1.36 percentage points difference must complete a review of policies, procedures, and practices.
Notes: (1) State rate and state target are based on the percent of districts identified as having innapropriate policies, procedures, and practices.(2) LEA rate is based on whether or not a LEA was identified as having possible disproportionality. Identification is the difference between the general education rate for all races and special education rate for specific races. Any LEA with a difference >4 percentage point is identified for a review of policies, procedures, and practices.
LEA Differencefrom Target
Year to Year LEA Rate Change
30.51% 29.50% N/AY
N
0.38% 0%
0401 : BENTONVILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19
LEAST RESTRICTIVE ENVIRONMENT (K-12)
IndicatorLEA Rate
Target Met by LEA
State Target
State Rate
Indicator 05-C: School Age LRE Percent of students receiving special educatiion services in other settings
Indicator 05-B: School Age LRE Percent of students inside the regular classroom less than 40% of the day
Indicator 05-A: School Age LRE Percent of students inside the regular classroom 80% or more of the day
LEAST RESTRICTIVE ENVIRONMENT (PreSchool)
Indicator 06-B: Early Childhood LRE: Separate education class, separate school or residential facility
Indicator 06-A: Early Childhood LRE: Regular Preschool Program Percent of children recieving with the majority of special education services with thier non-disabled peers
Note: Other settings includes Day Schools, Residential, and Hosptial/Home Bound but does not include students in correctional facilities or private schools.
LEA Differencefrom Target
Year to Year LEA Rate Change
54.32% 63.77% 53.06% 10.71%N
12.72% 12.00% 11.06% N/AY
2.05% 2.40% N2.65% 0.65%
29.04% 35.94% N/AN/A N/A
23.74% 26.65% N/AN/A N/A
↑
↑
↓
--
--
Progress Slippage No Change Not ApplicableYear to Year LEA Change:Indicator Met: Met Not Met Page 59 of 2248
0401 : BENTONVILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19
Indicator 07-C: Preschool Outcomes Summary 2: Appropriate Behaviors
Indicator 07-C: Preschool Outcomes Summary 1: Appropriate Behaviors
Indicator 07-B: Preschool Outcomes Summary 2: Knowledge and Skills
Indicator 07-A: Preschool Outcomes Summary 2: Social Emotional
Indicator 07-A: Preschool Outcomes Summary 1: Social Emotional
Indicator 07-B: Preschool Outcomes Summary 1: Knowledge and Skills
EARLY CHILDHOOD OUTCOMES
IndicatorLEA Rate
Target Met by LEA
State Target
State Rate
Indicator 7: Early Childhood OutcomesThere are two Summary Statements which are based the change between entry and exits scores for three outcome areas: (A) Social Emotional, (B) Knowledge and Skills, and (C) Appropriate Behvaiors.
Summary Statement 1: Of those preschool children who entered the preschool program below age expectations in each Outcome, the percent who substantially increased their rate of growth by the time they turned 6 years of age or exited the program.
Summary Statement 2: The percent of preschool children who were functioning within age expectations in each Outcome by the time they turned 6 years of age or
LEA Differencefrom Target
Year to Year LEA Rate Change
87.89% 91.56% N/AN/A N/A
57.92% 68.72% N/AN/A N/A
89.49% 92.38% N/A
N/A
N/A
45.15% 61.11% N/A
N/A
N/A
90.63% 92.13% N/AN/A N/A
65.22% 78.00% N/AN/A N/A
--
--
--
--
--
--
Progress Slippage No Change Not ApplicableYear to Year LEA Change:Indicator Met: Met Not Met Page 60 of 2248
0401 : BENTONVILLE SCHOOL DISTRICT Annual Performance Report2018 - 19
PARENT INVOL