“ Young People’s Positive Activities” Competitive Grant Process

Post on 03-Jan-2016

25 views 1 download

Tags:

description

“ Young People’s Positive Activities” Competitive Grant Process. Alan Michell (Head of IYPSS) Shain Akhtar (Commissioning Lead for IYPSS) Dawn Myatt & Gurjit Narwal (Commissioning Support /Resource Officer). Purpose. To give an update Resource Model based on Neighbourhood Management Areas - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Transcript of “ Young People’s Positive Activities” Competitive Grant Process

“Young People’s Positive Activities” Competitive Grant Process

Alan Michell (Head of IYPSS)

Shain Akhtar (Commissioning Lead for IYPSS)

Dawn Myatt & Gurjit Narwal (Commissioning Support /Resource Officer)

Purpose

• To give an update Resource Model based on Neighbourhood Management Areas

• Updates on Specification and Contents

• CAP’s Funding

• Review & Monitoring Process

Joint Planning & Commissioning

Understand

PlanDo

Review

National Priorities for IYPSS

• Reduce the number of 16-18 year olds who are NEET

• Increase the proportion of YP participating in positive activities (LAA target), including engagement in democratic process

• Reducing proportion of YP misusing substances

• Reduce under 18 conceptions

• Reduce first time entrant to youth justice system• Reduce number of homeless YP• Increasing the proportion of young people aged 19

achieving level 2 and 3 qualifications.

Walsall IYPSS Commissioning Priorities

• Increase the number of young people in Employment, Education and Training (EET)

• Reduce the number of young people entering the youth justice system

• Reducing proportion of young people misusing substances

• Reduce teenage pregnancy, through preventative approaches

 

Update on Funding Streams

•Previous offers can be carried forward if they have been submitted, notify by email.

•Tick box to identify the funding stream that is being applied.

•Outcomes column identified which links to service priorities and CYP.

6

•Formal partnership offers are not mandatory but are welcome. Any offer would be expected to take into account other services in their neighbourhood area to show how they work together•No change to priorities for delivery

•Funding has been allocated on Neighbourhood management areas, still allowing for cross boundary working

•Funding 2010/11 reduced due to extension on existing contracts until end September.

7

Evaluation Criteria• Evidence of effective partnerships working 20

• Clear contribution to the CYP Priorities (and consideration to the CAP’(s) priorities) : 20

• Track Record – Capacity and Capability to deliver - 20• Evidence of the involvement of young people in the

development of the bid and future delivery

• Impact/Outputs and Outcomes – 20

• Service Costs/Effectiveness and Efficiency - 20

8

Information on Programme• Universal Offer :Core Service Youth 13 to 19

Years going up to 24 years with LDD :£250,868

• Target Support:(PAYP) 8-18 years £165,096

• One off grant support/activities £25,000 using existing priorities, same application process.

9

10

Neighbourhood Management Areas Population for Core Service Youth 13-19 yrs

3729

5640

2743

33784007

3802

11

Neighbourhood Management Areas Population for PAYP 8-18 years

6086

6136

62545409

4371

9159

12

Social Deprivation Indices 1Neighbourhood Management Area

Youth Offenders

Teenage Mothers

Free School Meals

Non-achieved GCSE Grade A*-C

NEET Ethnicity Total

Streetly/

Pheasey/

Aldridge/

Walsall Wood

11.21% 8.59% 6.79% 18.54% 10.25% 8.81% 64.19

St Matthews/

Paddock/

Palfrey/Pleck

20.80% 20.33% 28.50% 22.80% 21.19% 47.86% 161.48

Darlaston/

Bentley 14.16% 14.49% 13.08% 13.18% 12.05% 11.77% 78.73

Willenhall/

Short Heath 14.31% 10.67% 11.63% 11.16% 13.32% 11.40% 72.49

Bloxwich/

Blakenall/

Birchills/

Leamore

27.65% 31.45% 31.94% 17.82% 30.46% 14.69% 154.01

Brownhills/

Pelsall/Rushall- Shelfield

11.87% 14.47% 8.06% 16.50% 12.73% 5.47% 69.10

13

Social Deprivation Indices 2Start at a mean point of 60 (6 categories) which represents the status quo of 1.00Social deprivation factor increases 0.5 for each point over 60 of the total figure on table 1,rounded up or down to the nearest whole number

Neighbourhood Management Area

Total figure 1 less

Status quo

Multiplied by 0.5 and rounded down to whole number

Social Deprivation

Weighting

Streetly/Pheasey/

Aldridge/Walsall Wood 64 – 60 = 4 +2 1.02

St Matthews/Paddock/

Palfrey/Pleck 161 – 60 = 101 +50 1.50

Darlaston/Bentley 79 – 60 = 19 +9 1.09

Willenhall/Short

Heath 72 – 60 = 12 +6 1.06

Bloxwich/Blakenall/

Birchills/Leamore 154 – 60 = 94 +47 1.47

Brownhills/Pelsall/

Rushall-Shelfield 69 – 60 = 9 +4 1.04

14

Neighbourhood Management Areas Social Deprivation Indices

1.04

1.021.50

1.47

1.06

1.09

15

ALLOCATION OF CORE YOUTH SERVICE FUNDING TO NEIGHBOURHOOD MANAGEMENT AREASFUNDING AVAILABLE 1.10.2010 TO 31.3.2011 - £250,868

Neighbourhood Management Area

13-19

Population

(A)

Deprivation Index

(B)

Population

Multiplied by Index

(A) X (B)

% Factored Population of Total

(C)

Budget Allocation (Total funding available X (C))

Streetly/Pheasey/

Aldridge/Walsall Wood 3,802 1.02 3878.04 13.54% £33,968

St Matthews/Paddock/

Palfrey/Pleck 4,007 1.50 6010.50 20.98% £52,632

Darlaston/Bentley 3,378 1.09 3682.02 12.85% £32,237

Willenhall/Short Heath 2,743 1.06 2907.58 10.15% £25,463

Bloxwich/Blakenall/

Birchills/Leamore 5,640 1.47 8290.80 28.94% £72,601

Brownhills/Pelsall/

Rushall-Shelfield 3,729 1.04 3878.16 13.54% £33,967

16

Neighbourhood Management Areas Budget Allocations for Core Service Youth

£33967

£33968

£72601

£52,632

£25463

£32237

17

ALLOCATION OF PAYP FUNDING TO NEIGHBOURHOOD MANAGEMENT AREASFUNDING AVAILABLE 1.10.2010 TO 31.3.2011 - £165,096

Neighbourhood Management Area

13-19

Population

(A)

Deprivation Index

(B)

Population

Multiplied by Index

(A) X (B)

% Factored Population of Total

(C)

Budget Allocation (Total funding available X (C))

Streetly/Pheasey/

Aldridge/Walsall Wood 6,136 1.02 6258.72 13.62% £22,486

St Matthews/Paddock/

Palfrey/Pleck 6,254 1.50 9381.00 20.41% £33,696

Darlaston/Bentley 5,409 1.09 5895.81 12.83% £21,182

Willenhall/Short Heath 4,371 1.06 4633.26 10.08% £16,642

Bloxwich/Blakenall/

Birchills/Leamore 9,159 1.47 13463.73 29.29% £48,356

Brownhills/Pelsall/

Rushall-Shelfield 6,086 1.04 6329.44 13.77% £22,734

18

Neighbourhood Management Areas Budget Allocations for PAYP

£22734

£48356

£16642

£21182£33696

£22486

19

Information on Programme

• Minimum project allocation £50,000 per annum

• Funding will be allocated based upon the needs of children & young people

20

Draft Competitive Grant Process Timeline

• Milestones• Current providers confirm staff contracts to 30/09/2010

where relevant now• Application forms issued 9th April 2010• Deadline for the return of bids is 14th May 2010• Application evaluation (including Young People) and

notification by 17th May 2010, provisional• Project panel includes young people, 3rd sector, and head

of IYPSS.

Evaluation & Review• Workshop for existing providers to introduce

the new monitoring process from 1st April 2010, starting from Quarter One

• 19th April 2010 at 1pm at Aldridge Manor House

• Once contracts are awarded providers will be expected to attend a workshop on monitor and review process.

22