R e d Y j R g [ J W e R W q R W U g Y R V e S...20 W U g v R t ^ R g R..... [..

Post on 16-Feb-2020

22 views 21 download

Transcript of R e d Y j R g [ J W e R W q R W U g Y R V e S...20 W U g v R t ^ R g R..... [..

1

:

. .

.

.

.

)Harwood& Hahn,1990 .(

.

.

.

.

."

" .

.

2

)Hess,2001 ( .

.

.

)Hess & Posselt,2002 .(

)Hess,2001 .(

.

.

) .Westheimer & Kahne,2003 .(

)Cook,1984(

)Osler & Starkey,2003.(

.

.

)Cook,1984 .()1999(

.

.

3

.

)Parker,2000 (

.

.

)Remy,1972(

)Gallo,1996

2006 .(

.

.

.

)Claire & Holden,2007.(

.

:

.

.

4

)White,2000 .(

)1999 .(

:

)Cook,1984; Harwood & Hahn,1990 .(

)VanSickle,1983 (

.

)Cross & Price,1996 (

.

.

)2006White,2000: (

1.

.

2. .

3. .

4..

.

.

.

5

.

.:

(Lockwood,1996; Johnson, Johnson & Smith, 2000;Smith, Makela & Makela,1996;White,2000)

1. .

2. .

3.

.

4..

5..

6.

.

7. .

8.

.

9..

10.

.

11..

12..

13..

14.

.

15..

` :

.

6

.

)2003(

)88 (

.

)1998 (

)80 (

.

95% .

.

)250 (

(Albe & Simonneaux, 2000)

.

(Hess & Posselt, 2002)

.

:)2006(

7

.

)Dube,2009 (

.

)Byford, Lennon & Russel, 2009(

.

)1999 (

.

)2003(

.)1998 (

.(Hess & Posselt,

2002)

.

.

:

.:

1-

8

2-

:

1-)α0.05(

.

2-)α0.05(

.

:

:

-– -

.

-

.

-

.

-

.

-

.

:

.

9

:

: :

.

""

.

: ,

.

,

.

:

.

:

"."

:

.

:)

(

2010 -2011.

:

:

- : .

- : .

- :2010 -2011 .

10

-:

.

:

:

)93 (

:

)1 (

.

. :) (

) (.

)1(

212546

242347

454893

:

:

-.

-.

11

:

-

-)(

.

-) (

.

-

)(.

- .

)2006 (

.

-)(

.

-

) (

..

-

)()21 ( .

.

)20 (

)()20 (

)50 (

)0.86 ( .

12

:

:

-

.

- :) (

) (.

-)

.(

-

.

-" "

.

-" "

) (.

-

" "(SPSS).

-.

:

:

) (.

) (:

O2XO1

O2O1

13

)O1( =.

)X( =).(

)O2( =.

:

::

-

1-2-

-

1-2-

::

.

:

) (

(ANCOVA)

.

::

"

)α0.05(

."

)(

14

)(

)2.(

)2(

) (

15.22 7.72

2.14 1.71

16.62 8.04

2.09 1.27

)2 (

.

)7.72 ( )1.71(

)8.04 ( )1.27(

) ()0.32.(

(ANCOVA).

)2 (

)15.22()2.14(

)16.62 ( )2.09(

) ()1.40.(

)α0.05(

(ANCOVA))3.(

15

)3(

(ANCOVA)

0.000 51.901 228.571 1 228.571

0.018* 5.822 25.641 1 25.641

4.404 90 396.362

92 670.473

*

)3 ( )α0.05(

) ()5.822 ( )α

0.05( .

)4 .(

)4(

0.31 15.39

0.30 16.45

16

)

()16.45(

) ()15.39 .(

0.05(

.

.

.

.

)2003 (

(Albe &

Simonneaux, 2000)

.

::

" )α

0.05(

."

)(

17

)

()5.(

)5(

) (

16.88 8.17

2.64 1.34

16.35 7.91

2.12 1.20

)5(

)( .

)8.17()1.34(

)7.91()1.20() (

)0.26.(

(ANCOVA).

)5 (

)(

)16.88()2.64(.

)16.35 ()2.12() (

)0.53.(

)α0.05(

(ANCOVA))6.(

18

)6(

(ANCOVA)

0.001 12.671 58.099 1 58.099

0.634 0.230 1.054 1 1.054

4.585 44 201.744

46 263.106

)6 ()α0.05(

) (

) ()0.230(

)α0.05( .

"

)α0.05(

"

)

.(

:

-.

-.

-.

-

.

-.

-.

19

:

:

1 -

.

2 -

.

3 -

.

4 -

.

5 -

.

6 -

.

20

)1998 .(

. .52 .

)2003 .(

.

/19)33 :(7 -36.

)2006 .(

.

331 .

)2006 .( .

/. . . /

.

)1999 .(

. . /.

)1999 .( . ./.

Albe, V. & Simonneaux, L. (2000). Teaching Socio-Scientific Issues in Classrooms.Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association forResearch in Science Teaching. New York, L.A. April.

Byford, J.; Lennon, S. & Russel, W. (2009). Teaching Controversial Issues in the SocialStudies. A Research Study of High School Teachers. Journal of EducationalStrategies. V. 82 N. 4.

Claire, H. & Holden, C. (2007). The Challenge of Teaching Controversial Issues.Trentham Books Ltd.

Cross, R. & Price, R. (1996) Science Teacher s Social Conscience and the Role ofControversial Issues in the Teaching of Science. Journal of Research in ScienceTeaching. 33 (3).

21

Dube, O. (2009) Addressing Current Controversial Issues Through the Social StudiesCurriculum: Making Social Studies Come Alive. European Journal ofEducational Studies (1).

Gallo, M. (1996) Controversial Issues in Pratice: Classroom Focus. Social Education.60 (1).

Harwood, A. & Hahne, C. (1990). Controversial Issues in the Classroom. ERIC. ED 327

45 3.

Hess, D. & Poselt, J. (2002). How High School Students Experience and Learn FromDiscussion of Controversial Public Issues”. Journal of Curriculum andSupervision. 17.4.

Hess, D. (2001) Teaching Students to Discuss Controversial Issues ERIC, ED 457106.

Johnson, D. Johnson, R. & Smith, K. (2000). Constructive Controversy: The EducativePower of Intellectual Conflict. Change 32 (1).

Lockwood, A. (1996) Controversial Issues: The Teacher s Crucial Role. SocialEducation. V. 60 N. 1.

Osler, A & Starkey, H (2003). Learning for Cosmopolitan Citizenship . TheoreticalDebates and Young people s Experiences”. Educational Review. 55.3 EJ676907.

Parker, W. (2000). Social Studies in Elementary Education. New Jersey: MerrillPrentice Hall.

Remy, R. (1972). High School Seniors Attitudes Toward their Civics and GovernmentInstruction” Social Education 36. EJ 065209.

Smith, Di.; Makela, L. & makela, H. (1996). Considering Controversial Issues in theClassroom and Beyond”. In Ohio Council for the Social Studies Review.

VanSickle, R. (1983) Practicing what We Teach: Promoting Democratic Experiencesin the Classroom in Democratic Education in Schools and Classrooms. Editedby Mary Hepburn. National Council for the Social Studies Bulletin 70.Washington, D.C. ED 238 769.

Westheimer, J. & Kahne, J. (2003). “Reconnecting Education to Democracy:Democratic Catalogue Phi Delta Kappan. 85.1.

White, C. (2000) Issues in Social Studies: Voices from the Classroom. Charles C.Thomas Pub. Ltd.